基于层次分析法的豫北地区雨水花园植物综合评价
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Comprehenive Evaluation of Rain Garden Plants in North Area of He’nan Province Based on AHP
  • 作者:梁彦兰 ; 陈晓霞 ; 王昭娜
  • 英文作者:Liang Yanlan;Chen Xiaoxia;Wang Zhaona;College of Civil Engineering and Architecture,Anyang Institute of Technology;
  • 关键词:层次分析法 ; 雨水花园 ; 植物选择 ; 评价
  • 英文关键词:analytic hierarchy process;;rain garden;;plant selection;;evaluation
  • 中文刊名:STTB
  • 英文刊名:Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation
  • 机构:安阳工学院土木与建筑工程学院;
  • 出版日期:2019-02-15
  • 出版单位:水土保持通报
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.39;No.228
  • 基金:河南省高等学校哲学社会科学优秀学者专项“生态视角下的中小城市绿地减灾研究”(2015-YXXZ-19);; 安阳市科技攻关项目“基于BIM技术的安阳市建设海绵城市的思路与实施”(2016087)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:STTB201901019
  • 页数:5
  • CN:01
  • ISSN:61-1094/X
  • 分类号:126-130
摘要
[目的]研究豫北地区雨水花园植物的筛选,为雨水花园和海绵城市的建设提供理论支撑。[方法]对国家级海绵城市鹤壁市和河南省省级海绵城市安阳市境内的典型雨水花园植物进行研究,采用AHP层次分析法对29种雨水花园植物进行综合评价,从3个准则层和9个指标层构建植物评价体系。[结果]指标层中的抗旱性、抗湿性、绿化美化特性、去污降污能力4个指标对于雨水花园植物的选择具有重要影响。千屈菜、红蓼、东方狼尾草、鸢尾、细叶芒、花叶芒6种植物综合评价等级为1级;再力花、常夏石竹、八宝景天、美人蕉、金鸡菊、马鞭草、大丽花7种植物综合评价等级为4级;香彩雀、紫叶狼尾草、蜀葵等16种植物综合评价等级为2—3级。[结论]综合评价值为1级的植物是豫北地区建设雨水花园的首选植物;综合评价等级为4级的植物是雨水花园慎重选择的植物材料;综合评价等级为2—3级的植物,选择合适的区域如蓄水区、缓冲区、边缘区进行雨水花园植物的种植。
        [Objective]To study the selection of rain garden plant in North He’nan Province,in order to provide theoretical support for the construction of rainwater garden and sponge city.[Methods]We investigated the 29 typical rain garden plants in the sponge city of Hebi and An’yang City in He’nan Province.Rain garden plants were comprehensively evaluated by analytic hierarchy process(AHP),and the evaluation system was constructed from three criterion layers and 9 index levels.[Results]Drought resistance,humidity resistance,greening and beautifying characteristics, decontamination and pollution reduction ability showed important influences on the selection of plants in rain garden.Lythrum salicaria,Polygonum orientale,Pennisetum orientale,Iris tectorum,Miscanthus sinensis "Gracillimus",Miscanthus sinensis "Variegatu"were evaluated as level 1.Thalia dealbata,Dianthus plumarius,Hylotelephium erythrostictum,Canna indica,Coreopsis drummondii,Verbena officinalis,Dahlia pinnata were evaluated as level 4.The rest of sixteen plants were evaluated as level 2—3.[Conclusion]Plants with a comprehensive evaluation level 1 are the optimal choice for the construction of rainwater gardens in Yubei District.Plants with a comprehensive evaluation level 4 need to be carefully selected for rainwater gardens.Integrated evaluation of plants with level 2—3 are suitable to be planted in areas such as water storage areas,buffer zones,and marginal areas.
引文
[1]福州市城乡建设委员会.海绵城市——-低影响开发雨水系统构建[EB/OL].(2015-01-08)[2017-11-17]http:∥www.fzjw.gov.cn/cms/siteresource/.
    [2]安阳市海绵城市建设项目设计导则:低影响开发雨水系统构建(试行)[S].安阳市住房和城乡建设局,2016.
    [3]Steiner L M,Robert D W.Rain Gardens:Sustainable Landscaping for a Beautiful Yard&a Healthy World[M].Canada:Voyageur Press Inc,2012.
    [4]Woelfle-Erskine C.Capturing the Rain for Your Own Water-efficient Garden[M].Sweden:Timber Press,2012.
    [5]Kraus H,Spafford A.Rain Gardening in the South:Ecologically Designed Gardens for Drought,Deluge and Everything in Between[M].USA:John F Blair Publisher,2013.
    [6]万映伶,王美仙.国内外雨水花园研究综述[J].建筑与文化,2015(7):127-129.
    [7]蔡妤,董丽.基于AHP的北京地区雨水花园植物选择研究[M]∥张启翔.中国观赏园艺研究进展,北京:中国林业出版社,2016.
    [8]熊肸,陈榕,姜帅,等.张家界市园林地被植物景观质量评价与应用研究[J].水土保持通报,2018,38(5):307-312.
    [9]刘翠英,贺学林,张雄.毛乌素沙地可用于园林绿化的植物资源及开发利用[J].水土保持通报,2006,26(4):91-95.
    [10]郜春丽,翁殊斐,赵宝玉.基于AHP法的滨水绿道植物景观评价体系构建[J].西北林学院学报,2013,28(3):206-209.
    [11]刘斯荣,刘春丽.雨水花园中植物的选择与设计[J].湖北工业大学学报,2016,31(3):113-116.
    [12]李效文,贾黎明,郝小飞,等.森林景观SBE评价方法[J].中国城市林业,2007,5(3):33-36.
    [13]陈翠玉,杨善云,严莉,等.基于AHP的柳州市居住区植物景观评价体系构建[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2014,34(6):134-140.
    [14]宁惠娟,邵峰,孙茜茜,等.基于AHP法的杭州花港观鱼公园植物景观评价[J].浙江农业学报,2011,23(4):717-724.
    [15]王佳,王思思,车伍,等.雨水花园植物的选择与设计[J].北方园艺,2012(19):77-81.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700