管理科学部重要期刊知识交流效率评价——基于Super-SBM与SFA模型的实证研究
|
摘要
[目的/意义]知识交流效率衡量学术期刊投入与产出的比较,对于考察学术期刊在知识交流中的地位和作用具有重要参考价值,为跨学科学术期刊评价提供了一种新的研究思路。[方法/过程]采用非参数形式Super-SBM与参数形式SFA方法,测算国家自然科学基金委员会管理科学部认定的30种重要期刊知识交流效率。[结果/结论]两种方法计算结果均发现2009-2013年间30种重要期刊知识交流效率整体水平较低。两种方法计算得到的知识交流效率不具有显著差异,二者在比较期刊知识交流效率值高低和依据效率得分进行期刊排序上具有通用性。
[Purpose/Significance] Knowledge exchange efficiency is to measure the comparison of input and output of academic journals,which has important reference value to explore the position and role of the academic journals in knowledge exchange and provides a new research idea for evaluating interdisciplinary academic journal. [Method/Process]The paper measured knowledge exchange efficiency of 30 species of important journals of department of management sciences of national natural science fund committee by the non-parametric Super-SBM and parametric SFA method. [Result/Conclusion] The results showed that during the period of 2009-2013,the overall level of the knowledge exchange efficiency of 30 species of important journals was rather low. There was no significant difference of knowledge exchange efficiency among journals by the Super-SBM and SFA. Two different methods were universal in the versatility on the level and rank in terms of the knowledge exchange efficiency.
[Purpose/Significance] Knowledge exchange efficiency is to measure the comparison of input and output of academic journals,which has important reference value to explore the position and role of the academic journals in knowledge exchange and provides a new research idea for evaluating interdisciplinary academic journal. [Method/Process]The paper measured knowledge exchange efficiency of 30 species of important journals of department of management sciences of national natural science fund committee by the non-parametric Super-SBM and parametric SFA method. [Result/Conclusion] The results showed that during the period of 2009-2013,the overall level of the knowledge exchange efficiency of 30 species of important journals was rather low. There was no significant difference of knowledge exchange efficiency among journals by the Super-SBM and SFA. Two different methods were universal in the versatility on the level and rank in terms of the knowledge exchange efficiency.
引文
[1]Halkos G E,Tzeremes N G.Measuring economic journals'citation efficiency:a data envelopment analysis approach[J].Scientometrics,2011,88(3):979-1001.
[2]Petridis K,Malesios C,Arabatzis G,et al.Efficiency analysis of forestry journals:Suggestions for improving journals'quality[J].Journal of Informetrics,2013,7(7):505-521.
[3]万莉,程慧平.基于DEA方法的学术期刊引证效率研究[J].情报学报,2013,32(12):1295-1302.
[4]张垒.档案学期刊知识交流效率评析[J].档案管理,2014,(6):56-58.
[5]Lee H,Shin J.Measuring journal performance for multidisciplinary research:An efficiency perspective[J].Journal of Informetrics,2014,8(1):77-88.
[6]Tüselmann H,Sinkovics R R,Pishchulov G.Towards a consolidation of worldwide journal rankings–A classification using random forests and aggregate rating via data envelopment analysis[J].Omega,2015,51:11-23.
[7]Rosenthal E C,Weiss H J.A data envelopment analysis approach for ranking journals[J].Omega,2016.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2016.09.006.
[8]Xiang-yang S,Li Z,Qi-gang L.An Approach for Evaluating Journals of Universities or Colleges Based upon Multi-layer Efficiency DEA[J].Physics Procedia,2012,25:678-686.
[9]李琳,黄海军,汪寿阳.基于DEA\AR博弈交叉效率方法的学术期刊评价研究[J].管理科学学报,2016,19(4):118-126.
[10]吴美琴,李常洪,宋雅文,等.基于窗口分析与松弛变量测度的期刊引证效率评价——18种图情期刊效率差异分析[J].情报理论与实践,2017,40(2):122-127.
[11]Ortega F J,Gavilan J M.The measurement of production efficiency in scientific journals through stochastic frontier analysis models:Application to quantitative economics journals[J].Journal of Informetrics,2013,7(4):959-965.
[12]张垒.科技期刊知识交流效率评价及影响因素研究[J].中国科技期刊研究,2014,25(11):1408-1413.
[13]张垒.期刊知识交流效率及影响因素分析——基于DEA_Tobit两阶段法[J].科学学研究,2015,(4):516-521.
[14]王惠,王树乔.图书情报类期刊知识交流效率评价及影响因素研究[J].情报科学,2017,35(3):134-138.
[15]Mc Williams A,Siegel D,Van Fleet D D.Scholarly journals as producers of knowledge:Theory and empirical evidence based on data envelopment analysis[J].Organizational Research Methods,2005,8(2):185-201.
[16]程慧平.基于DEA和SFA方法的信息服务业技术效率研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2013,34(4):28-34.
[17]管理科学重要学术期刊表[EB/OL].http://www.nsfcms.org/index.php?r=site/journal List,2017-04-03.
[18]邱均平,李应萍.我国图书情报学期刊的学术影响力分析[J].图书馆,2010,(1):64-66.
[19]苏新宁.人文社会科学期刊评价指标体系研究[J].图书馆论坛,2006,26(6):59-65.
[20]苏新宁.构建人文社会科学学术期刊评价体系[J].东岳论丛,2008,(1):35-42.
[21]雷玉桃,黄丽萍.中国工业用水效率及其影响因素的区域差异研究——基于SFA的省际面板数据[J].中国软科学,2015,(4):155-164.
[22]Tone K.A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2002,143(1):32-41.
[23]储节旺,储伊力.我国省域公共图书馆效率测评及影响因素分析——基于Super-SBM与Tobit模型的实证研究[J].图书情报工作,2015,59(22):33-38.
[2]Petridis K,Malesios C,Arabatzis G,et al.Efficiency analysis of forestry journals:Suggestions for improving journals'quality[J].Journal of Informetrics,2013,7(7):505-521.
[3]万莉,程慧平.基于DEA方法的学术期刊引证效率研究[J].情报学报,2013,32(12):1295-1302.
[4]张垒.档案学期刊知识交流效率评析[J].档案管理,2014,(6):56-58.
[5]Lee H,Shin J.Measuring journal performance for multidisciplinary research:An efficiency perspective[J].Journal of Informetrics,2014,8(1):77-88.
[6]Tüselmann H,Sinkovics R R,Pishchulov G.Towards a consolidation of worldwide journal rankings–A classification using random forests and aggregate rating via data envelopment analysis[J].Omega,2015,51:11-23.
[7]Rosenthal E C,Weiss H J.A data envelopment analysis approach for ranking journals[J].Omega,2016.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2016.09.006.
[8]Xiang-yang S,Li Z,Qi-gang L.An Approach for Evaluating Journals of Universities or Colleges Based upon Multi-layer Efficiency DEA[J].Physics Procedia,2012,25:678-686.
[9]李琳,黄海军,汪寿阳.基于DEA\AR博弈交叉效率方法的学术期刊评价研究[J].管理科学学报,2016,19(4):118-126.
[10]吴美琴,李常洪,宋雅文,等.基于窗口分析与松弛变量测度的期刊引证效率评价——18种图情期刊效率差异分析[J].情报理论与实践,2017,40(2):122-127.
[11]Ortega F J,Gavilan J M.The measurement of production efficiency in scientific journals through stochastic frontier analysis models:Application to quantitative economics journals[J].Journal of Informetrics,2013,7(4):959-965.
[12]张垒.科技期刊知识交流效率评价及影响因素研究[J].中国科技期刊研究,2014,25(11):1408-1413.
[13]张垒.期刊知识交流效率及影响因素分析——基于DEA_Tobit两阶段法[J].科学学研究,2015,(4):516-521.
[14]王惠,王树乔.图书情报类期刊知识交流效率评价及影响因素研究[J].情报科学,2017,35(3):134-138.
[15]Mc Williams A,Siegel D,Van Fleet D D.Scholarly journals as producers of knowledge:Theory and empirical evidence based on data envelopment analysis[J].Organizational Research Methods,2005,8(2):185-201.
[16]程慧平.基于DEA和SFA方法的信息服务业技术效率研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2013,34(4):28-34.
[17]管理科学重要学术期刊表[EB/OL].http://www.nsfcms.org/index.php?r=site/journal List,2017-04-03.
[18]邱均平,李应萍.我国图书情报学期刊的学术影响力分析[J].图书馆,2010,(1):64-66.
[19]苏新宁.人文社会科学期刊评价指标体系研究[J].图书馆论坛,2006,26(6):59-65.
[20]苏新宁.构建人文社会科学学术期刊评价体系[J].东岳论丛,2008,(1):35-42.
[21]雷玉桃,黄丽萍.中国工业用水效率及其影响因素的区域差异研究——基于SFA的省际面板数据[J].中国软科学,2015,(4):155-164.
[22]Tone K.A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2002,143(1):32-41.
[23]储节旺,储伊力.我国省域公共图书馆效率测评及影响因素分析——基于Super-SBM与Tobit模型的实证研究[J].图书情报工作,2015,59(22):33-38.