摘要
以欧美与我国PM_(2.5)手工监测技术标准为基础,从采样空白设置、合格判定限值、处理方法等多方面,对欧美与我国手工监测采样空白进行对比阐述。欧美与我国均设置了相关采样空白作为手工监测质控手段,但欧美具有详细且量化的各项空白合格限值,我国尚未作出明确规定。同时,对四个典型城市PM_(2.5)手工采样现场空白扣除前后进行初步比较。通过对欧美采样空白设置及限值阐述,以期为完善我国PM_(2.5)手工采样质量控制技术完善提供借鉴。
引文
[1]HJ3095-2012,环境空气质量标准[S].
[2]prEN 12341;2012(draft)Ambient air-Standard gravimetric measurement method for the determination of the PM_(10)or PM_(2.5)mass concentration of suspended particulate matter[S].
[3]US EPA,Quality assurance project plan for the Federal PM_(2.5)performance evaluation program[R].
[4]US EPA,Field standard operating procedures for the federal PM_(2.5)performance evaluation program[R].
[5]HJ618-2011环境空气PM_(10)和PM_(2.5)的测定重量法[S].
[6]HJ 656-2013,环境空气颗粒物(PM_(2.5))手工监测方法(重量法)技术规范[S].
[7]Friedrich Lagler,Claudio Belis,Annette borowiak.A quality assurance and control program for PM_(2.5)and PM_(10)measurements in European air quality monitoring networks[R].Publications office of the European Union,2011.
[8]US EPA,Quality assurance guidance document 2.12:monitoring PM_(2.5)in ambient air using designated reference or Class I equivalent methods[R].