摘要
陈洪绶是生活于明清之交的一位杰出画家,其独特的画风所呈现出的深郁凝重而又灵动的绘画面貌,对后世产生了极大的影响,其“高古奇骇”的人物造型,“渊雅静穆”的高古气息,数百年来一直是人们学习和研究的对象。陈洪绶一生绘有大量历史题材的作品,并通过对这些题材进行的不同处理,来寄托画家不同的情感,《苏李泣别图》正是这样的作品。
本文通过对历史上苏李题材艺术的考察梳理,分析不同时期不同思想的艺术家对苏李的不同态度,借以了解陈洪绶对这一故事的态度和他热衷于此一题材的原因。文中通过对陈洪绶分别绘制于1635年和1646年的两幅《苏李泣别图》进行重点考察研究后认为,陈的《苏李泣别图》是时代的产物,是画家借历史故事来映射当时的时政,抒怀明志,表达对中心爱国之士的颂扬和对误国叛国之徒的唾弃。但是陈洪绶的《苏李泣别图》绘制的已不再是传统样式中的苏武和李陵的形象,而是经过对苏李形象的主观改造,使之成为可以传达画家思想情感的符号。并且由于时代的差异、思想的变迁,画家对同一题材同样形象地描绘作了不同的艺术处理,表达出完全不同的情感。将人物主观化的造型与线条组织的形式美巧妙结合,达到具象结构与主观造型的完美统一,传达出画家的强烈情感,这是老莲的《苏李泣别图》给我们的印象。通过对两幅《苏李泣别图》的研究,不仅使我们了解了画家从中年到晚年的心路历程,也使我们更深刻地认识了画家对绘画本质的主动把握,和画家为表达胸臆书写情怀而对绘画诸要素进行的主观选择。
Chen Hong-shou was an outstanging paiter who lived in the changing that ming dynasty into Qing.His drawings that appearanted unique dignified and nimble style has had the enormous influence to the later generation.His pictures has always been regarded as subjects of study and reseach because of their ancient and singular character modeling and elegant solemn and quietflavour for several hundred years. Chen Hong-shou hasthe massive historical thme work all his life,and though different processing which carries on to these themes,reposes the painter different emotion, cis precisely such work.
This article try to analysis different manner of different artist to the story of Su-Li in different age through observision and study the arts of Su-Li in order to understanding Chen Hong-shou’s manner to this story and the reason he hankers for this theme.In the article,after the inspection center on the two pictures which separately were drawn in 1635 and 1646.We belive that the pictures of were the product of that age,and expressed the painter’s inner voice of the central patriotic gentleman’s praise and to injures the country person’s of treason spurning through his commention on the historical story.But Chen Hong-shou’s the pictures of no longer were drawn up in traditional image styly of Su-wu and Li-ling,but became the emotion mark which could transmit the painter’s thought passing though to Su-Li image subjective transformantion .And as a result of the time different,the thought vicissitude,the painter described similarly vividly to the identical theme has made different artistic processing, expressed the completely different emotion. The character internalization modelling and the line organization's beauty of form ingenious union, achieved the embodiment structure and the subjective modelling perfect unification, transmits painter's intense emotion, this is Chen Hong-shou’s the pictures of give our impression.Though the research to two drawings,we not only understand the painter idear course from the middle age to the old age ,but aiso know the profoundly initiative assurance to the drawing essence and the painter’s subjective choice for the expression feelings writing mood which carried on to the drawing various essential factors.
引文
①周大璞等主编《古文观止注译》,湖北人民出版社,1984:234-237。
①庾信(北周),《庾信诗赋选》,古典文学出版社,1958:124。
①李维琨.《中国巨匠美术丛书·陈洪绶》,北京文物出版社,1998:32。
②黄涌泉.《陈洪绶年谱》,人民美术出版社,1960:82
①《中国历代画家大观·明》,上海美术出版社,1998:470。
②张潮山,《虞初新志》,上海人民美术出版社,1932:245。
①周亮工,《读画录》。
②陈洪绶著,吴敢辑校《画论》,《陈洪绶集》浙江古籍出版社,1994:22-23。
①陈洪绶著,吴敢辑校《画论》,《陈洪绶集》浙江古籍出版社,1994:22-23。
[1]时洁芳.《中国花鸟画通鉴12.拂云承露》上海书画出版社,72-73
[2]薛永年主编,邵彦编著.《中国绘画的历史与审美鉴赏》.中国人民大学出版社,2007:341-345.
[3]高居翰.《气势撼人·十七世纪中国绘画中的自然与风格》.上海书画出版社,2003:69-94
[4]许文美.《论陈洪绶版画〈张深之正北西厢秘本〉中的仕女形象》.《朵云68·陈洪绶研究》.上海书画出版社,2008:117-119
[5]高居翰.《山外山·晚明绘画》.上海书画出版社,2003
[6]黄涌泉.《陈洪绶年谱》.上海人民美术出版社,1960
[7]卢辅圣.《历史的象限》.上海书画出版社,2003
[8]黄涌泉.《陈洪绶(修订本)》.上海人民美术出版社,1988
[9]王静灵.《试论陈洪绶<隐居十六观》图册的形制》.《朵云68集·陈洪绶研究》.上海书画出版社,2008
[10]陈传席.《中国山水画史》,天津美术出版社,2001年版
[11]陈传席.《陈洪绶》,河北美术出版社,
[12]陈洪绶.《明陈洪绶水浒叶子》,上海人民美术出版社,1979年版
[13]《宣和画谱》卷十八,湖北美术出版社,1999:366
[14]樊美君.《中国传统美学的当代阐释》,北京大学出版社,2006
[15]李泽厚.《美的历程》,天津社会科学院出版社,2000年版。
[16]《敦煌壁画临本选集》,上海美术出版社,1989年版。
[17]杜哲森.《中国绘画断代史·元代绘化》,中国出版社,人民美术出版社。
[18]陈宝良.《晚明生员的弃巾之风及其山人化》,《史学集刊》2001年,第二期。
[19]史建期,徐文杰.《中国白描》,上海远东出版社,2009年版。
[1]洪再新.《中国美术史》,中国美术学院出版社,2000年版
[2]徐建融.《元明清绘画研究十论》,复旦大学出版社
[3]宋力.《中国花鸟画统鉴6·霜前雁后》,上海书画出版社,2008年版
[4]李泽厚.《美学三书》,天津社会科学院出版社,2003年版
[5]刘恒.《中国书法史·清代卷》,江苏教育出版社
[6]杜永菊,孟庆荣.《中国历史知识全书·中国古代绘画》
[7]张兵.《虽作头陀不解禅——清初遗民诗人归庄与佛教》,西北大学报,2003年40卷4期。
[8]孔定芳.《论明遗民的出处》,新加坡国立大学硕士论文。
[9]王国维.《古雅之美在美学上之位置》转《清华艺术将堂》,中央编译出版社。
[10]黄宾虹.《黄宾虹文集》书信编,上海书画出版社,1999年版
[11]朱光潜.《朱光潜美学文学论文选集》,湖南人民出版社,1980年版