外源茉莉酸甲酯对茶树抗虫作用的诱导及其机理
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本文以茶树Camellia sinensis(L.)O.Ktze.—茶尺蠖Ectropis obliqua Prout—单白绵绒茧蜂Apanteles sp.三层营养关系为研究对象,通过研究应用外源茉莉酸甲酯(methyl jasmonate,MJA)处理茶树后,对茶树叶片组织中脂氧合酶、多酚氧化酶和蛋白酶抑制素活性,对茶尺蠖幼虫中肠蛋白酶活性和生长的影响,比较经外源MJA处理的茶梢、正常茶梢、虫害茶梢挥发物的组成和比例、茶尺蠖和单白绵绒茧蜂对不同挥发物的行为选择反应以及单白绵绒茧蜂在茶园中对茶尺蠖幼虫的寄生率的影响,探讨外源茉莉酸甲酯诱导茶树产生的直接抗虫性和间接抗虫性,以及抗性的生理生化机理。
     (1) 外源MJA处理茶树对茶尺蠖幼虫生长的影响
     通过应用外源MJA喷雾法和暴露法处理茶树后,测定了茶尺蠖幼虫取食经外源MJA处理的茶树叶片后体重和取食量的变化。结果表明,茶尺蠖1龄幼虫取食经MJA(200μl/株)喷雾法或暴露法处理的茶树叶片5天后,幼虫体重增加量和取食叶面积分别比对照低21.59%和21.69%、17.21%和20.05%;茶尺蠖1龄幼虫取食经MJA喷雾法或暴露法处理的茶树叶片4天后,50、100、200和400μl/株四种剂量处理中幼虫体重的增加量均分别比对照的低,差异极显著,但未观察到被致死的个体。并且,各处理中幼虫体重与对照的差异随MJA剂量增高而增大,但200和400μl/株两种剂量处理之间差异不显著。这表明幼虫取食受MJA处理的叶片,茶尺蠖幼虫生长受到抑制,但浓度达到一定水平后,抑制作用不再明显增加。
     (2) 外源MJA处理茶树对单白绵绒茧蜂寄生率的影响
     通过在茶园应用外源MJA喷雾法和暴露法处理茶树后,测定了诱导产生挥发物对茶尺蠖幼虫天敌单白绵绒茧蜂寄生率的影响。结果表明,MJA处理茶树2天后,喷雾法或暴露法处理茶树树冠下的茶尺蠖幼虫被单白绵绒茧蜂寄生率,2002年分别比对照处理茶树树冠下的高13.97%和13.38%、2003年则分别比对照的高11.21%和10.28%,差异均极显著。喷雾法与暴露法处理之间绒茧蜂的寄生率差异不显著。表明外源MJA诱导茶树挥发物对单白绵绒茧蜂成虫具有引诱作用。
     (3) 外源MJA处理茶树对茶树叶片组织中酶的影响
     通过应用外源MJA喷雾法和暴露法处理茶树后,测定了茶树叶片组织中脂氧合酶、多酚氧化酶和蛋白酶抑制素的活性。结果表明,MJA处理茶树2、5和7天后,喷雾法和暴露
Using the tritrophic relationships of the tea plant Camellia sinensis, the geometrid Ectropis obliqua and the parasitoid Apanteles sp. as a model system, we studied the application of exogenous methyl jasmonate (MJA) to the plant on the lipoxygenase (LOX), polyphenol oxidase (PPO) and proteinase inhibitor (PI) activity in the leaves of tea plants, the growth and midgut proteinase activity of geometrid larvae, parasitism of the caterpillars by the wasp, releases of volatiles from the tea shoots, and host-selection behavior of the geometrid and the parasitoid. Our objectives were to investigate the exogenous MJA-inducible direct and indirect resistance of tea plants to insects as well as the physiological and biochemical mechanisms of the induced resistance. (1) Effect of exogenous MJA treatment of tea plants on the growth of geometrid larvaeEffect of exogenous MJA treatment of tea plants on the body weight of and leaf area consumed by the geometrid larvae were studied. When 1st instar geometrid larvae fed for five days on leaves of tea plants treated by either MJA-spraying or MJA-exposure at a dosage of 200 μl/plant, body weight and leaf area consumption were decreased by 21.59%, 21.69% and 17.21%, 20.05% respectively, than those of the larvae feeding on control tea plants. When 1st instar geometrid larvae fed for four days on leaves of tea plants treated by either MJA-spraying or MJA-exposure at a dosage of 50, 100, 200 or 400 ul/plant, increase in body weight of geometrid larvae in each of the four dosages was lower than that in the control, but no deaths of larvae were observed. Moreover, the difference in body weight of larvae between the treatments and control increased as the dosage of MJA increased, but there was no significant difference between the treatments of 200 and 400 ul/plant. These results indicate that when geometrid larvae fed on leaves of tea plants after MJA treatment, their growth was reduced, and the level of reduction increased as the concentrations of MJA increased up to a plateau, where no further decrease could be observed.
    (2) Effect of exogenous MJA treatment of tea plants on the parasitism of Apanteles sp.Effect of exogenous MJA treatment of tea plants on the percentage of the geometrid larvae parasitized by Apanteles sp. was studied under field condition. The results showed that, when the tea plants were treated with MJA for two days, the percentage of geometrid caterpillars parasitized under the canopy of the tea plant in the two treatments, i.e., MJA-spraying and MJA-exposure, was increased by 13.97% and 13.38% respectively in 2002, and by 11.21% and 10.28% respectively in 2003, than those of the control tea plants. The differences between MJA-treated tea plants and controls were highly significant; however, the differences between the two methods of MJA treatments were not significant. Volatiles of tea plants following exogenous MJA treatments exhibited a significant increase of attractiveness to the female adults of Apanteles sp.(3) Effect of exogenous MJA treatment of tea plants on enzyme activity in the tea leavesEffect of exogenous MJA treatment of tea plants on LOX, PPO and PI activity in the tea leaves was studied. MJA significantly induced LOX, PPO and PI activity in the leaves of tea plants. Two, five and seven days after MJA treatment of the tea plants, either by MJA-spraying and MJA-exposure, LOX activities in the leaves of tea plants were increased by 32.5-63.5% and 44.3-61.7% respectively, than those of the control tea plants. LOX activities at 2 days after MJA-spraying treatment were 11.8% lower than mat after MJA-exposure treatment; but the differences of LOX activities at 5 and 7 days between MJA-spraying and MJA-exposure treatments were not significant. Two, five and seven days after MJA-treatment of tea plants, either by MJA-spraying or MJA-exposure, PPO activities in the leaves were increased by 20.28-23.39% and 18.00-18.59% respectively, than those of the control tea plants; but the differences between the two treatment methods were not significant. Two, five and seven days after MJA-treatment of tea plants, either by MJA-spraying or MJA-exposure, PI activities in the leaves were increased by 19.13-24.78 % and 37.64-42.38 % respectively, than those of the control tea plants; and PI activities after MJA-spraying treatment were higher than those after MJA-exposure treatment(4) Effect of exogenous MJA treatment of tea plants on midgut proteinase activity of thegeometrid larvaeEffect of exogenous MJAtreatment of tea plants on midgut proteinase activity of the geometrid larvae was studied. When geometrid larvae fed on leaves of tea plants at 5 days after
    either MJA-spraying or MJA-exposure treatment, the activities of the high alkaline trypsin-like enzyme and chymotrypsin-like enzyme in their midgut were 15.6 %, 24.1 % and 40.3%, 44.6% lower, than those of the control tea plants respectively. The differences of two enzymes activities between MJA-spraying and MJA-exposure treatments were not significant. However, the activities of the low alkaline trypsin-like enzyme in their midgut were unaffected, leading to imbalance between different types of enzyme activity in the midgut of the larvae. Consequently, the metabolism velocity for proteins in the leaves of tea plants fed by the larvae was reduced and in turn, larval growth was retarded. (5) Collection and identification of volatiles emitted from tea shootsThe volatiles emitted from intact tea shoots, larvae-infested tea shoots, tea shoots treated by MJA-exposure and tea shoots treated by MJA-spraying were collected by Tenax TA and identified by GC-MS. Results showed the followings:The volatiles emitted from intact tea shoots were composed of 21 compounds. The relative abundance of the compounds from higher to lower was as follows: The following six compounds showed the highest relative abundance (relative abundance >1), namely Acetic acid, 2-ethylhexyl ester, 2-ethyl-l-Hexanol, (Z)-3-Hexen-l-ol,acetate, Phenol, Butanioc acid, pentyl ester, Decanoic acid,ethy ester. The following six compounds showed lower relative abundance C 1> relative abundance >0.1), namely Benzoic acid,2-methypropyl ester, Nonanal, formate, (Z)-3-Hexen-l-ol, Naphthalene, P -Ionone, Acetophenone. And the following nine compounds showed only trace relative abundance (relative abundance ^0.1), namely (E)-3,7-dimethyl-l,3,6 -Octatriene, Styrene,(E)-2-Hexenal, (+/-)-3,7-dimethyl-l,6-Octadien-3-ol, (E)-3,7-dimethyl-2, 6-Octadien-l-ol, Formic acid,ethyl ester, 3-Penten-2-ol, 2-ethylhexyl, 2-ethylhexanoate, 1,4-Methanoazulene,decahydro-4,8,8-trimethyl.The volatiles emitted from tea shoots treated by MJA-exposure were composed of 24 compounds. Among these, nine compounds showed higher relative abundance, ten compounds showed lower relative abundance and five compounds showed only trace relative abundance. The following three compounds, which were lacking the intact tea shoots, were detected in tea shoots treated by MJA-exposure: Benzaldeyde, 2-methyl-3-Heptanone, 5-methyl-3-Hepten-2-one, Styrene, which was lacked in tea shoots treated by MJA-spraying, and 2-Methyl-3-Heptanone, which was lacked in larvae infested tea shoots, were also detected
    in tea shoots treated by MJA-exposure. The following ten compounds showed higher relative abundance in tea shoots treated by MJA-exposure tea shoots than in intact tea shoots: (E)-3,7-dimethyl-l,3,6-Octatriene, (Z>3-Hexen-l-ol,acetate, (Z)-3-Hexen-l-ol, formate, 2-ethyl -1-Hexanol, Nonanal, 3-Penten-2-ol, Benzoic acid, 2-methypropyl ester, 1,4-Methanoazulene, decahydro-4,8,8-trimethyl, 2-ethylhexyl,2-ethylhexanoate, Naphthalene. The relative abundance of Acetic acid, 2-ethylhexyl ester was lower in tea shoots treated by MJA-exposure than in intact tea shoots. The total relative abundance in tea shoots trated by MJA-exposure was higher than that in intact tea shoots.The volatiles emitted from tea shoots treated by MJA-spraying were composed of 23 compounds. Among these, there were eight compounds with higher relative abundance, eight compounds with lower relative abundance and seven compounds with only trace relative abundance. The following three compounds, which were lacking in intact tea shoots, were detected in tea shoots treated by MJA-spraying: Benzaldeyde, 2-methyl-3-Heptanone, 5-methyl-3-Hepten-2-one, Styrene was lacking in tea shoots treated by MJA-spraying, and 2-Methyl-3-Heptanone was lacking in larvae infested tea shoots. The following ten compounds showed high relative abundance in tea shoots treated by MJA-spraying than in intact tea shoots: (E)-3,7-dimethyl-l,3,6-Octatriene, (Z)-3-Hexen-l-ol,acetate, (Z>3-Hexen-l-ol, formate, 2-ethyl-1-Hexanol, Nonanal, 3-Penten-2-ol, Acetic acid, 2-ethylhexyl ester, 1,4-Methanoazulene, decahydro-4,8,8-trimethyl, 2-ethylhexyl,2-ethylhexanoate, Naphthalene. The relative abundance of benzoic acid, 2-methypropyl ester was lower in tea shoots treated by MJA-spraying than in intact tea shoots. The total relative abundance of volatiles emitted from tea shoots treated by MJA-spraying was higher than that from intact tea shoots.The volatiles emitted from larvae infested tea shoots were composed of 23 compounds. Among them, there were seven compounds with higher relative abundance, ten compounds with lower relative abundance and six compounds with only trace relative abundance. The following two compounds, which were lacking in intact tea shoots, were detected from tea shoots treated by MJA-spraying: Benzaldeyde, 5-methyl-3-Hepten-2-one The following nine compounds showed higher relative abundance in larvae infested tea shoots than in intact tea shoots: (E)-3,7-dimethyl-l,3,6-Octatriene, (Z)-3-Hexen-l-ol,acetate, (Z>3-Hexen-l-ol, formate, 2-ethyl-1-Hexanol, 3-Penten-2-ol, l,4-Methanoazulene,decahydro-4,8,8-trimethyl, Nonanal, 2-
引文
[1] Acevedo C, Sanchez E, Young M E, Simpson R, 2003. Predication correlation of vapor pressure for methyl jasmonate. Journal of Food Engineering, 59: 431-433.
    [2] Aerts R J, Schafer A, Hesse M, Baumann T W, Slusarenko A, 1996. Signalling molecules and the systhesis of alkaloids in Catharnthus roseus seedlings. Phychemistry, 42(2): 417-422.
    [3] Agrawal A A, 2000. Mechanisms, ecological consequences and agricultural implications of tri-trophic interactions. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 3: 329-335.
    [4] Agrawal G K, Rakwal R, Jwa N S, 2002. Cloning and characterization of a jasmonate inducible rice (Oryza sativa L.) peroxidase gene, OsPOX, against global signaling molecules and certain inhibitors of kinase-signsling cascades). Plant Science, 162: 49-58.
    [5] Arimura G I, Tashiro K, Kuhara S, Nishioka T, Ozawa R, and Takabayashi J, 2000. Gene Responses in bean leaves induced by herbivory and by herbivore-induced volatiles. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 277: 305-310.
    [6] Avdiushko S.A; Brown G C; Dalman D L, Hildebrand D F, 1997. Methyl jasmonate exposure induces insect resistance in cabbage and tobacco. Environmental Entomology, 26(3): 642-654. Baldwin I T, 1989. Mechanism of damaged-induced alkaloids in wild tobacco. Joural of chemical ecology, 15: 1 661-1 680.
    [7] Baldwin I T, 1999. Inducible nicotine production in native nicotiana as an example of adaptive phenotypic plasticity. Joural of chemical ecology, 25: 3-30.
    [8] Baldwin I T, 2001. An ecologically motivated analysis of plant-herbivore interactions in native tobacco. Plant Physiology, 127(4): 1 449-1 458.
    [9] Baldwin I T, Kessler A, Halitschke R, 2002. Volatile signaling in plant-plant-herbivore interactions: what is real? Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 5: 1-4.
    [10] Baldwin I T, Schmelz E A, Ohnmeiss T E, 1994. Wound-induced changes in root and shoot jasmonic acid pools correlate with induced nicotine synthesis in Nicotiana sylvestris Spegazzini and Comes. Joural of chemical ecology, 20: 2 139-2 157.
    [11] Baldwin I T, Zhang Z P, Diab N, Ohnmesis T E, McCloud E S, Lynds G Y, Schmelz E A, 1997. Quantification, correlations and manipulations of wound-induced changes in jasmonic
     acid and nicotine in Nicotiana sylvestris. Planta, 201: 397-404.
    [12] Beale M H, Ward J L, 1998. Jasmonates: key players in the plant defence. Natural Product Reports, 15: 533-548.
    [13] Bernasconi M L, Turlings T C J, Ambrosetti L, Bassetti P, Dorn S, 1998. Herbivore-induced emissions of maize volatiles repel the corn leaf aphid, Rhopalosiphum maidis. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 87: 133-142.
    [14] Biondi S, Scaramagli S, Oksman C K M, Poli F, 2002. Secondary metabolism in root and callus cultures of Hyoscyamus muticus L.: the relationship between morphological organization and response to methyl jasmonate. Plant Science, 163: 563-569.
    [15] Birch M. A, Haynes, K. F, 1982. Insect pheromones. Edward Arnold.
    [16] Boland W, Hopke J, Donath J, Nuske J, Bublitz F, 1995. Jasmonic acid and coronatin induce odor production in plants. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl, 34(15): 1 600-1 602.
    [17] Bolter C J, Jongsma M A, 1995. Colorado potato beetles (Leptinotarsa decemlineata) adapt to proteinase inhibitors induced in potato leaves by methyl jasmonates. Journal of Insect Physiology, 1995,41(12): 1 071-1 078.
    [18] Bolter, C.J, 1993. Methyl-jasmonates induces papain inhibitors in tomato leaves. Plant Physiology, 103(4):1347-1353.
    [19] Bowles D, 1990. Signals in the wounded plant. Nature, 343(25): 314-315.
    [20] Brikett M A, Campbell C A M, Chamberlain K, Guerrieri E, Hick A J, Martin J L, Matthes M, Napier J A, Pettersson J, Pickett J A, Poppy G M, Pow,E M, Pye B J, Smart L E, Wadhams G H, Wadhams L J, Woodcock C M, 2000. New roles for cis-jasmone as an insect semiochemical and in plant defense. Proceeding of the National of Academy of Sciences of the Unated States of Amermica, 97(16): 9 329- 9 334.
    [21] Broadway R M, 1995. Are insects resistant to plant proteinase inhibitors? Journal of Insect Physiology, 41(2): 107-116.
    [22] Campbell F C, Houseman J G, 1987. A preliminary characterization of alkaline digestive protease in the posterior midgut of the face fly Musca auturnalis De Geer Can. Journal Zoology, 65: 635-639.
    [23] Carvalho W L, Oliveira M G A, Barros E G, Moreira M A, 1999. Lipoxygenases affect protease inhibitor levels in soybean seeds. Plant Physiological Biochemistry, 37(6): 497-501.
    [24] Ceci L R, Spoto N, Virgilio M Gallerani R, 1995. The gene coding for the mustard trypsin inhibitor-2 is discontinuous and wound-inducible. Federation of European Biochemical Societies Letters, 364: 179-181.
    [25] Chen Z M, Xu N, Han B Y, 1999. Role of volatile allelochemicals on host location of tea pests and host foraging of natural enemies in tea ecosystem. In: First Asia-Pacific conference on chemical ecology. Shanghai, China, nov. 1-4, 2004. Foreign Language Press, p. 161.
    [26] Cheong J J, Choi Y D, 2003. Methyl jasmonate as a vital substance in plants. Trends in Genetics 19(7): 409-413.
    [27] Cipllini D F J, Redman A A, 1999. Age-dependent effects of jasmonic acid treatment and wind exposure on foliar oxidase activity and insect resistance in tomato. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 25(2): 271-281.
    [28] Constabel C P, Ryan C A, 1998. A survey of wound- and methyl jasmonate-induced leaf polyphonol oxidase in crop plants. Phytochemistry, 47(4): 507-511.
    [29] Creelman R A, 1995. Jasmonic acid distribution and action in plants: Regulation during development and response to biotic and abiotic stress. Proceeding of the National of Academy of Sciences of the Unated States of Amermica, 92: 4 114-4 119.
    [30] Creelman R A, Mullet J E, 1997. Biosynthsis and action of jasmonates in plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology Plant Molecular Biology, 48: 355-381.
    [31] D'Auzac J. 1995. A new volatile hormone, methyl jasmonate. Plantations Recherche, development. Physiology, 2(2): 17-30
    [32] Daly K C, Durtschi M L, Smith B H, 2001. Olfactory-based discrimination learning in the moth, Manduca Sexta. Journal of Insect Physiology, 47: 375-384.
    [33] Dicke M, Bruin J, 2001. Chemical information transfer between plants: back to the future. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 29: 981-994.
    [34] Dicke M, Dijkman H, 2001. Within-plant circulation of systemic elicitor of induced defence and release from roots of elicitor that affects neighbouring plants. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 29: 1 075- 1 087.
    [35] Dicke M, Gols R, Ludeking D, Posthumus M A, 1999. Jasmonic acid and herbivory differentially induce carnivore-attracting plant volatiles in lima bean plants. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 25(8): 907-1 922.
    [36] Doan A T, Ervin G, Felton G, 2004. Temporal effects on jasmonate induction of anti-herbivore defense on Physalis angulata: seasonal and ontogenetic gradients. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 32: 117-126.
    [37] Eisenreich W, Menhard B, Hyands P J, Zenk M H, 1996. Studies on the biosynthesis of taxol: The taxane carbon skeleton is not of mevalonoid origin. Proceeding of the National of Academy of Sciences of the Unated States of Amermica, 93: 6 431-6 436.
    [38] Endt D V, Kijne J W, Memelink J, 2002. Transcription factors controlling plant secondary metabolism: what regulates the regulators? Phytochemistry, 61:107-114.
    [39] Engelberth J, Schmelz E A, Alborn H T, Cardoza Y J, Huang J, Tumlinson J H, 2003. Simultaneous quantification of jasmonic acid and salicylic in plants by vapor-phase extraction and gas chromatography-chemical ionization-mass spectrometry. Analytical Biochemistry, 312: 242-250.
    [40] Farag M A, Pare P W, 2002. C_6-Green leaf volatiles trigger local and systemic VOC emissions in tomato. Phytochemistry, 61: 545-554.
    [41] Fanner E E, 1997. New fatty acid based signals: A lesson from the plant world. Science, 276: 912-913.
    [42] Fanner E E, 2001. Surface-to-air signals. Nature, 411:854-856.
    [43] Fanner E E, Almeras E, Krishnamurthy V, 2003. Jasmonates and related oxylipins in plant responses to pathogenesis and herbivory. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 6:372-378.
    [44] Farmer E E, Ryan C A, 1990. Interplant communication: Airborne methyl-jasmonate induces synthesis of proteinase inhibitors in plant leaves. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the Unated States ofAmermica, 87: 7 713-7 716.
    [45] Farmer E E, Ryan C A, 1992. Octadecanoid precursors of jasmonic acid activate the synthesis of wound-inducible proteinase inhibitors. Plant Cell, 4: 129-134.
    [46] Felton G W, Donato K, Broadway R M, Duffey S S, 1992. Impact of oxidized plant phnolics on the nutrional quality of dietary protein to a noctuid Spodoptera exigua. Journal of Insect Physiology, 38: 277-285.
    [47] Felton G W, Korth K L, Bi J L, Wesley S V, Huhman D V, Mathews M C, Murphy J B, Lamb C, Dixon R A, 1999. Inverse relationship between systemic resistance of plants to microorganisms and to insect herbivory. Current Biology, 9:317-320.
    [48] Felton G W, Korth K, 2000. Trad-offs between pathogen and herbivore resistance. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 3: 309-314.
    [49] Garcia P E, Mercado E C, Lozoya G L, 2004. Gene expression and enzyme activity of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) ascorbate oxidase during elicitor and wounding stress. Plant Science, 166: 237-243.
    [50] Genoud T, Metraux J P, 1999. Crosstalk in plant cell signaling: structure and function of the genetic network. Trends in Plant Science, 4(2): 503-507.
    [51] Gilabert M P, Carmona F G, 2002. Chromatographic analysis of lipoxygenase products. Analytica Chimica Acta, 465: 319-335.
    [52] Gols R, Posthumus M A, Dicke M, 1999. Jasmonic acid induces the production of gerbera volatiles that attract the biological control agent Phytoseiulus persimilis. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 93: 77-86.
    [53] Gonzalez A G A, Tiznado H M E, Zavaleta G R, Martinez T M A, 2004. Methyl jasmonate treatments reduce chilling injury and activate the defense response of guava fruits. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communication, 313: 694-701.
    [54] Gundlach H, Muller M J, Kutchan T M, Zenk M, 1992. Jasmonic acid is a signsl transducer in elicitor-induced plant cell cultures. Proceeding of the National of Academy of Sciences of the Unated States of Amermica, 89: 2 389- 2 393.
    [55] Guo H W, Ecker J R, 2004. The ethylene signaling pathway: new insights. Trends in Plant Science, 4(7): 40-49.
    [56] Hailes H C, Isaac B, Javaid M H, 2001. Synthesis of methyl epijasmonate and c/s-3-(2-oxopropyl) -2- (pent-2Z-enyl)-cyclopentan-1-one. Tetrahedron, 57: 10 329-103 333.
    [57] Harari AR, Ben-Yalir D, Rosen D, 1994. Mechanism of aggregation behaior in Maladera matrida Argaman (Coleoptera: scarbeidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology, 20: 361-371.
    [58] Heath R L, McDonald G, Christeller J T, Lee M, Bateman K, West J, van Heeswijck R, Anderson M A, 1997. Proteinase inhibitors from Nicotiana alata enhance plant resistance to insect pests. Journal Insect Physiology, 43(9): 833-842.
    [59] Heil M, 2002. Ecological costs of induced resistance. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 5: 1-6.
    [60] Heil M, Koch T, Hilpert A, Fiala B, Boland W, Linsenmair KE, 2001. Extrafloral nectar production of the ant-associated plant, Macaranga tanarius, is an induced, indirect, defensive response elicited by jasmonic acid. Proceeding of the National of Academy of Sciences of the Unated States of Amermica, 98(3): 1 083-1 088.
    [61] Hopke J, Donath J, Blechert S, Boland W, 1994. Herbivore-induced volatiles: the emission of acyclic homoterpenes from leaves of Phaseolus lunatus and Zea mays can be triggered by a β-glucosidase and jasmonic acid. Federation of European Biochemical Societies Letters, 352: 146-150.
    [62] Horiuchi J I, Arimura G I, Ozawa R, Shimoda T, Takabayashi J, Nishioka T, 2001. Exogenous ACC enhances volatiles production mediated by jasmonic in lima bean leaves. Federation of European Biochemical Societies Letters, 509: 332-336.
    [63] Howe G A, Schilmiller A L, 2002. Oxylipin metabolism in response to stress. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 5; 230-236.
    [64] Howe G, 2001. Cyclopentenone signals for plant defense: Remodeling the jasmonic acid response. Proceeding of the National of Academy of Sciences of the Unated States of Amermica, 98(22): 12 317-12 319.
    [65] Jongsma M A, Bakker P L, Peters J, Bosch D, Stiekema W, 1995. Adaptation of Spondoptera exigua larvae to plant proteinase inhibitors by induction of gut proteinase activity insensitive to inhibitors. Proceeding of the National of Academy of Sciences of the Unated States of Amermica, 92: 8 041-8 045.
    [66] Keinanen M, Oldham N J, Baldwin I T, 2001. Rapid HPLC screening of jasmonate-induced increase in tobacco alkaoids, phenolics and diterpene glycosides in Nicotiana attenuata. Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry, 49: 3 553-3 558.
    [67] Kennedy G G, 2003. Tomato, pests, parasitoids and predators: tritrophic interactions involving the Genus Lycopersicon. Annual Review Entomology, 48: 51-72.
    [68] Kessler A, Baldwin I T, 2001. Defensive function of herbivore-induced plant volatile emissions in nature. Science, 291: 2 141-2 144.
    [69] Kessler A, Baldwin IT, 2002. Plant responses to insect herbivory: The emerging molecular analysis. Annual Review of Plant Physiology Plant Molecular Biology, 53: 299-328.
    [70] Kobayashi A, Kawamura M, Yamamoto Y, Shimizu K, Kubota K, Yamanishi T, 1988. Methyl epijasmonate in the essential oil of tea. Agricultural and Biological Chemistry, 52(9): 2 299-2 303.
    [71] Koda, Y, 1994. Involvement of jasmonic acid and related compounds in the tuberrization of Jerusalem artickoke plants (Helianthus tuberosus). Journal of Crop Science, 63(2): 333-338.
    [72] Koiwa H, Bressan R A, Hasegawa P M, 1997. Regulation of protease inhibitors and plant defense. Trends in Plant Science. 2(10): 379-384.
    [73] Krause N, Ebert S, 2001. Synthesis of (±)-methyl epijasmonate and (+)-methyl dihydropijasmonate by diasteroselective protonation. Joural Organic Chemistry, 3 837-3 841.
    [74] Kreft S, Ravnikar M, Mesko P, Pungercar J, Umek A, Kregar I, Strukelj B, 1997. Jasmonic acid inducible aspartic proteinase inhibitors from potato. Physiochemistry, 44(6): 1 001-1 006.
    [75] Lawrence P K, Koundal K R, 2002. Plant protease inhibitors in control of phytophagous insects. Plant Biotechnology, 5(1): 1-20.
    [76] Leon J, Sanchez S J J, 1999. Molecular biology of jasmonic acid biosynthesis in plants. Plant Physiological Biochemistry, 37(5): 373-380.
    [77] Li X C, Schuler M A, Berenbaum M R, 2002. Jasmonate and salicylate induce expression of herbivore cytochrome P450 genes. Nature, 419: 712-715.
    [78] Liden J C, Phisalaphong M, 2000. Oligosaccharides potentiate methyl jasmonate-induced production of paclitaxel in Taxus Canadensis. Plant Science, 158: 41-51.
    [79] Liechti R, Farmer E E, 2002. The jasmonate pathway. Science, 296: 1 649-1 650.
    [80] Loughrin J H, Potter D A, Hamilton K T R, 1995. Volatiles compounds induced by herbivory act as aggregation kairomones for the Japanese beetle (Popilla japonica Newman). Journal of Chemical Ecology, 21: 1 457-1 467.
    [81] Lu Y B, Liu S S, Liu Y Q, Furlong M J, Zalucki M P, 2004. Contrary effects of jasmonate treatment of two closely related plant species on attaction of and oviposition by a specilist herbivore. Ecology letters, (7): 337-345.
    [82] Maleck K, Dietrich R A, 1999. Defense on multiple fronts: how do plants cope with diverse enemies? Trends in Plant Science, 4(6): 215-219.
    [83] McCloud E S, Baldwin I T, 1997. Herbivory and catepillar regurgitants amplify the wound induced increases in jasmonic acid but not nicotine in Nicotiana sylvestris. Planta Heidelberg. 203(4): 430-435.
    [84] McConn M, Creelman R A, Bell E, Muullet J E, Browse J, 1997. Jasmonate is essential for insect defense in Arabidopsis. Proceeding of the National of Academy of Sciences of the Unated States of Amermica. 94(10): 5 473-5 477.
    [85] Meiners T, Hilker M, 2000. Induction of plant synomones by oviposition of a phytophagous insect. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 26(1): 221-232.
    [86] Mochizuki A, 1998. Characteristics of digestive proteases in the gut of some insect orders. Appl. Entomol. Zool., 33(3): 401-407.
    [87] Ohnmeiss T E, Baldwin I T, 2000. Optimal defense theory predicts the ontogeny of an induced nicotine defense. Ecology, 81(1): 1 765-1 783.
    [88] Pare P W, Tumlinson J H, 1996. Plant volatile signals in response to herbivore feeding. Florida Entomologist, 79(2): 93-103.
    [89] Pare P W, Tumlinson J H, 1997. De novo biosynthesis of volatiles induce by insect herbivory in cotton plants. Plant Physiology, 114: 1 161-1 167.
    [90] Paul N D, Hatcher P E, Taylor J E, 2000. Coping with multiple enemies: an intergration of molecular and ecological perspectives. Trends in Plant Science, 5(5): 220-226.
    [91] Pena I H, 1994. Aspirin prevents wound-induced gene expression tomato leaves by blocking jasmonic acid biosynthesis. Planta 191: 123-128
    [92] Pernas M, Monge R S, Salcedo G, 1999. Biotic and abiotic stress can induce cystatin expression in chestnut. Federation of European Biochemical Societies Letters, 467: 206-210.
    [93] Pettersson J, 1970. A aphid sex attractant. Biological studies. Entomology Scand, 1: 63-73.
    [94] Pieterse C M J, Ton J, Van Loon L C, 2001. Cross-talk between plant defence signaling pathways: boost or burden? AgBiotechNet, 3: 1-8.
    [95] Pieterse C M J, Van Pelt J A, Ton J, Parchmann S, Mueller M J, Buchala A J, Meteraux J P, Van Loon L C, 2000. Rhizobacteria-mediated induced systemic resistance (ISR) in Arabidopsis requires sensitivity to jasmonate and ethylene but is not accompanied by an increase in their production. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 57: 123-134.
    [96] Pohlon E., Baldwin I T, 2001. Artificial diets "capture" the dynamics of jasmonate-induced defenses in plants. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 100: 127-130.
    [97] Preston C A, Laue G, Baldwin I T, 2001. Methyl jasmonate is blowing in the wind, but can it act as a plant-plant airborne signal? Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 29: 1 007-1 023.
    [98] Rangel M, Machado O LT, Cunha M, Jacinto T, 2002. Accumulation of chloroplast-targeted lipoxygenase in passion fruit leaves in response to methyl jasmonte. Phytochemistry, 60: 619-625.
    [99] Reinbothe S, 1994.The regulation of plant gene expression of jasmonates in response to environmental cues and pathogens .Plant Cell, 6(9): 1 197-1 207.
    [100] Reymond P, Farmer E E, 1998. Jasmonate and salicylate as global signals for defense gene expression. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 1:404-411.
    [101] Roda A L, Oldham N J, Svatos A, Baldwin IT, 2003. Allometric analysis of the induced flavonls on the surface of wild tobacco (Nicotiana attenuata). Phytochemistry, 62: 527-536.
    [102] Rodriguez S, Compagnon V, Crouch N P, Pierre B S, Luca V, 2003. Jasmonate-induced epoxidation of tabersonine by a cytochrome P-450 in hairy root cultures of Catharanthus roseus. Phytochemistry, 64:401-409.
    [103] Ryan C A, 2000. The systemin signaling pathway: differential activation of plant defensive genes. Biochemica et Biophysica Acta - Protein Structure and Molecular Enzymology, 1477: 112-121.
    [104] Sabelis M W, Janssen A, Kant M R, 2001. Enhanced: The enemy of my enemy is my ally. Science, 291: 2 104 -2 113.
    [105] Saona C R, Brandner S J C, Pare P W, Henneberry T J, 2001. Exogenous methyl jasmonate induces volatile emission in cotton plants. Joural of chemical ecology, 27(4): 679-695.
    [106] Scherman T D, Vaughin K C, Duke S O, 1991. A limited survey of the phylogenetic distribution of polyphenol oxidase. Phytochemistry, 30: 2 499-2 506.
    [107] Schmelz E A, Grebenok R J, Galbraith D W, Bowers WS, 1999. Insect-induced synthesis of phytoecdysteroids in spinach, Spinacia oleracea. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 25(8): 1 739-1 757.
    [108] Schmelz E A, Grebenok R J, Galbraith D W, Bowers, 1998. damage-induced accumulation of phytoecdysteroids in spinach: A Rapid root response involving the octadecanoic acid pathway. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 24(2): 339-360.
    [109] Sekiya J, Numa S, and Kajiwara T, 1976. Biosynthesis of leaf alcohol formation of
     3Z-henxenal from linolenic acid in chloroplasts of Thea sinensis leaves. Agricutural Bioogical Chemistry, 40(1): 185-190.
    [110] Sembdner G, Parthier B, 1993. The biochemistry and the physiological and molecular action of jasmonates. Annual Review of Plant Physiology Plant Molecular Biology, 44: 569-589.
    [111] Seo H S, Sung J T, Cheong J J, Lee Y H, Lee Y W, Hwang I, Lee J S, ChoiY D, 2001. Jasmonic acid carboxyl methyltransferase: a key enzyme for jasmonate-regulated plant responses. Proceeding of the National of Academy of Sciences of the Unated States of Amermica, 98(8): 4 788-4 793.
    [112] Siqueira J C, Fernandes K V S, Machado O L T, Cunha M, Gomes V M, Moura D, Jacinto T, 2002. 87 kDa tomato cystatin exhibits properties of a defense protein and forms protein crystals in prosystemin overexpressing transgenic plants. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 40: 247-254.
    [113] Slesak E, Slesak M, Gabrys B, 2001. Effect of methyl jasmonate on hydroxamic acid content, protease activity, and bird cherry-oat aphid Rhopalosiphum pad i(L.) probing behavior. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 27(12): 2 529-5 543.
    [114] Sokal R R, Rohlf F J, 1995. Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. Third Edition. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company. 20-31.
    [115] Stout M J, Workman K V, Bostock R M, Duffey S S, 1998. Stimulation and attenuation of induced resistance by elicitors and inhibitors of chemical induction in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) foliage. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 86: 267-279.
    [116] Stratmann J W, 2003. Long distance run in the wound response-jasmonic acid is pulling ahead. Trends in Plant Science, 8(6): 247-250.
    [117] Surrey K, 1964. Spectrophotometric method for determination of lipoxidase activity. Plant Physiology, 39: 65-70.
    [118] Thaler J S, Stout M J, Karban R, Duffey S S, 2001. Jasmonate-mediated induced plant resistance affects a community of herbivores. Ecological Entomology, 26: 312-324.
    [119] Thaler J S, 1999. Jasmonate-inducible plant defences cause increased parasitism of herbivores. Nature, 399: 686-688.
    [120] Thaler J S, 2002. Effect of jasmonate-induced plant responses on the natural enemies of lerbivores. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 71: 141-150.
    [121] Thaler J S, Fidantsef L, Bostock R M, 2002. Antagonism between jasmonate-and salicylate - mediated plant resistance: effects of concentration and timing of elicition on defense- related proteins,herbivore,and pathogen performance in tomato. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 28(6): 1 131-1 159.
    [122] Thaler J S, Fidantsef L, Duffey S S, Bostock R M, 1999. Trade-offs in plant defense against pathogens and herbivores: a field demonstration of chemical elicitors of induced resistance. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 25(7): 1 597-1 609.
    [123] Tscharntke T, Thiessen S, Dolch R, Boland W, 2001. Herbivory, induced resistance, and interplant signal transfer in Alnus gltinosa. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 29: 1 025-1 047.
    [124] Van Dam N M, Baldwin IT, 1998. Costs of jasmonate-induced responses in plants competing for limited resources. Ecology Letters, 1: 30-33.
    [125] Van Dam N M, Hadwich K, Baldwin IT, 1999. Induced responese in Nicotiana attenuata affect behavior and growth of the specialist herbivore Manduca sexta. Oecologia, 122: 371-379.
    [126] Van Dam N M, Horn M, Mares M, Baldwin IT, 2001. Ontogeny constrains systemic rotease inhibitor response in Nicotiana attenata. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 27(3): 547-569.
    [127] Van Poecke R M P, Dicke M, 2002. Induced parasitoid attraction by Arabidopsis thaliana: involvement of the octadecanoid and the salicylic acid pathway. Journal of Experimental Botany, 53 (375): 1 793-1 799.
    [128] Veronesi C, Pouenat M L, Rickauer M, Esquerre T M T, 1999. Regulation of tobacco lipoxygenase by methyl jasmonate and fatty acids. Sciences de la vie /Life Sciences, 322: 491-497.
    [129] Walker T S, Bais H P, Vivanco J M, 2002. Jasmonic acid-induced hypericin production in cell suspension cultures of Hypericum perforatum L. (St. John's wort). Phytochemistry, 60: 289-293.
    [130] Walling L L, 2000. The myriad plant responses to herbivores. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 19: 195 -216.
    [131] Ward J, Gaskin P, Beale M H, Sessions R, Koda Y, Wastemack C, 1997. Molecular modeling, synthesis and biological activity of methyl 3-methyljasmonate and related derivatives. Tetrahedron, 53(24): 8 181-8 194.
    [132] Wasternack C, Parthier B, 1997. Jasmonate-signaled plant gene expression. Trends in Plant Science, 2 (8): 302-307.
    [133] Weber H, 2002. Fatty acid-derived signals in plants. Trends in Plant Science, 7(5): 217-224.
    [134] Wu J, Hard N F, 2000. Purification and characterization of a cystatin from the leaves of methyl jasmonate treated tomato plants. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C, 127: 209-220.
    [135] Xu N, Chen Z M, 1995. Induction of volatile parasitoid attracting synomone in tea plants by feeding of tea geometrd (Ectropis oblique Wehrli) larvae and behavioral response of Aplantes sp. to different odors. Proceedings of'95 International Tea-Quality-Human Health Symposium. Nov. 7-10. Shanghai.. China, 381-385.
    [136] Zhao C H, Miller J G, Pan K H, 1998. Responses of tea tussock moth, Euproctis speudoconspersa, to its pheromones, (R)-10, 14-dimethylpentadecyl isobutyrate, and to the senantiomer of its pheromone. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 24(8): 1 347-1 368.
    [137] Ziegler J, Keinanen M, Baldwin I T, 2001. Herbivore-induced allene oxide synthese transcripts and jasmonic acid in Nicotiana attenuata. Phytochemistry, 58: 729-738.
    Engelberth J, Alborn H J, Schmelz E C, Tumlinson J H, 2004. Airborne signals prime plants against insect herbivore attack. Proceeding of the National of Academy of Sciences of the Unated States of Amermica, 101(6): 1 781-1 795.
    [138] 浜村澈三,1997.药剂抵抗性茶园生物防治研究.茶业试验场报告,第21号:121-198.
    [139] 本间知夫,吉田克志,1998.茶叶伤害诱导性活性.野菜.茶叶试验场研究报告.13:87-95.
    [140] 陈棣华,洪北边,汪命龙,1989.茶尺蠖核型多角体病毒研究.生物防治通报,5(4):168-172.
    [141] 陈棣华,栗陶生,1990.茶尺蠖病原真菌分离鉴定及其特性.茶叶科学,10(1):29-33.
    [142] 陈棣华,孙继山,1992.茶尺蠖核多角体病毒的精细结构与发生.电子显微学报, 11(5):373-374.
    [143] 陈棣华,孙维山,1986.茶尺蠖核型多角体病毒对三种有益昆虫的安全性试验.中国茶叶,4:38-39.
    [144] 陈雪芬,孙淑珍,1993.除虫脲对茶尺蠖的药效研究.中国茶叶,15(2):26-27.
    [145] 陈雪芬,肖强,姚惠明,1997a.25%辛.甲.氰乳油防治茶尺蠖防效好.植保技术与推广,3:12.
    [146] 陈雪芬,熊兴平,2003.茶尺蠖防治技术研究进展及展望.中国茶叶,3:15-17.
    [147] 陈宗懋,1992.世界茶树保护研究进展.茶叶文摘,6:1-7.
    [148] 陈宗懋,2000a.茶树释放的挥发性互利素是一种间接抗虫机制.海峡两岸茶叶科学学术研讨会论文集.143-147.
    [149] 陈宗懋,陈雪芬,1989.世界茶树病虫区系分析.茶叶科学,9(1):13-22.
    [150] 陈宗懋,陈雪芬,1999.茶业可持续发展中的植保问题.茶叶科学,19(1):1-6.
    [151] 程观泰,胡暑光,方承明,1996.FS—农药增效灵与杀虫剂合用防治茶尺蠖田间试验.蚕桑茶叶通讯,4:23.
    [152] 戴轩,1990.茶毛虫细菌性软化病对茶黑毒蛾及茶尺蠖的感染试验.生物防治通报,6(3):139-140.
    [153] 戴轩,1992.我国茶树害虫生物防治.生物防治通报,8(1):41-43.
    [154] 戴轩,1997a.贵州茶树昆虫区系及第六区划初步研究.茶叶通报,19(4):22-24.
    [155] 戴轩,199Tb.杀虫蝉防治假眼小绿叶蝉及茶尺蠖的药效试验.茶叶,23(2):36-37.
    [156] 戴轩,1997c.茶园节肢动物群落结构与功能关系的研究.贵州茶叶,(3):27-28.
    [157] 戴轩,1997d.贵州东部地区茶园蜘蛛种类调查研究(续).昆虫无敌,19(1):41-44.
    [158] 董文霞,崔林,韩宝瑜,2004.我国茶树昆虫研究进展.中国茶叶,2:10-11.
    [159] 戈峰,陈小飞,王常平,2002.茶毛虫性信息素对茶毛虫防治效果的研究.茶叶科学,22(2):115-118.
    [160] 郭友佳,戴亮,任清等,1994.用吸附.热脱捕集进样法研究茉莉花香释放过程中化学成分.色谱12(2):110-113.
    [161] 韩宝瑜,1997.茶园昆虫群落时空格局及多样性稳定性.茶叶科学,17(1):27-32.
    [162] 韩宝瑜,2000.茶园昆虫群落稳定性机制.茶叶科学,20(1):1-4.
    [163] 韩宝瑜,陈宗懋,1999.蚜茧蜂对不同味源的选择性.茶叶科学,19(1):29-34.
    [164] 韩宝瑜,陈宗懋,2000a.七星瓢虫和异色瓢虫4变种成虫对茶蚜蜜露的搜索行为和 蜜露的组分分析.生态学报,20(3):495-501.
    [165] 韩宝瑜,陈宗懋,2000b.异色瓢虫4变种成虫对茶和茶蚜气味行为反应.应用生态学报,11(3):413-416.
    [166] 韩宝瑜,陈宗懋,2001c.茶蚜在茶树不同部位上刺探行为的差异.植物保护学报,28(1):7-11.
    [167] 韩宝瑜,陈宗懋,张钟宁,2001b.不同生境异色瓢虫对茶梢互利素和蚜虫利它素EAG和行为反应.生态学报,21(12):2 131-2 135.
    [168] 韩宝瑜,黄从富,张钟宁,2001d.合肥郊区春季菜园和茶园昆虫群落的组成及差异.昆虫知识,38(5):361-363.
    [169] 韩宝瑜,江昌俊,李卓民,2001a.间作、密植和单行茶园节肢动物群落的多样性稳定性.生态学报,21(4):132-137.
    [170] 韩宝瑜,周成松,2004.茶梢和茶花主要挥发物对门氏食蚜蝇和大草蛉引诱效应.应用生态学报,15(4):623-626.
    [171] 何咏雷,邱中良,邱鸿贵,1996.我国不同地区棉褐带卷蛾的性行为的观察.华东昆虫学报,5(2):57-61.
    [172] 洪北边,殷坤山,1988.茶尺蠖核型多角体病毒制剂的配制及室内和田间防治试验.中国茶叶,1:13-15.
    [173] 洪北边,殷坤山,1991.茶尺蠖核型多角体病毒制剂的防治效果.茶叶科学,11(1):39-44.
    [174] 侯建文,赵烨烽,1988.茶尺蠖的天敌及其控制作用.茶叶,1:15-18.
    [175] 侯建中,1997b.几种化学药剂对韦伯虫座孢菌节孢子萌芽影响的研究.中国茶叶,4:32-33.
    [176] 胡萃,叶恭银,林高明,1990.茶尺蠖NPV对茶尺蠖幼虫取食及生长发育的影响.浙江农业大学学报,16(2):113-118.
    [177] 胡萃,朱俊,江冬友,1993a.茶尺蠖核型多角体病毒的生产工艺流程.茶叶,19(2):23-26.
    [178] 胡萃,朱俊庆,1993b.茶尺蠖幼虫期寄生天敌群落结构及其演变的分析.茶叶科学,13(2):87-91.
    [179] 胡萃,朱俊庆,叶恭银,洪健,1994.茶尺蠖.上海:上海科学出版社,1-3.
    [180] 蒋友成,1986.茶尺蠖幼虫田间分布型及其在实践上的应用.茶叶,4:18-23.
    [181] 阚李斌,吴佩忠,2001.多虫克防治茶尺蠖、假眼小绿叶蝉试验.农药,10:34.
    [182] 孔庆瑚,何玲,陈云英,1990.茶尺蠖核型多角体病毒性试验.科技通报,6(1):32-35.
    [183] 李明,袁德奎,1997.生物农药Bt-781对茶尺蠖的防效评价.贵州农业科学,25(4):26-29.
    [184] 李彦章,石正丽,陈棣华,1994.灰茶尺蛾核型多角体病毒某些生化特性的研究.中国病毒学,9(3):265-271.
    [185] 李正西,陈常铭,唐明远,1993.长角广腹细蜂的搜索利它素.昆虫学报,36(1):45-50.
    [186] 梁布锋,刘明富,1997.从感染幼虫中分离纯基因型的油桐尺蠖核型多角体病毒.植物保护学报,24(2):187-188.
    [187] 刘带根,付金根,孔俊,1996.茶尺蠖的发生规律及防治措施.江西农业科技,2:34-36.
    [188] 刘国华,阚小妹,2001.0.38%苦参碱乳油防治茶尺蠖、菜青虫田间药效试验.植物保护,5:20-22.
    [189] 刘金根,1998.茶尺蠖在皖南茶区的发生及综合防治.蚕桑茶叶通讯,1:7-9.
    [190] 刘军,兰萍章,1988.用细胞遗传学方法检测茶尺蠖核型多角体病毒的安全性.生物防治通报,4(1):38-44.
    [191] 刘双娣,1999.赛丹防治茶尺蠖的药效试验.广西植保,4:6.
    [192] 刘贤进,余向阳,王冬兰,张存政,王跃,2003.转基因棉对棉铃虫幼虫生长及中肠蛋白酶活性的影响.植物保护学报,30(3):232-236.
    [193] 刘勇,陈巨莲,倪汉祥,胡萃,2001.茉莉酸诱导小麦幼苗对麦蚜取食行为的影响.植物保护学报,28(4):325-330.
    [194] 楼云芬,1992.时间序列分析优选法预报茶尺蠖二代成虫高峰日.中国茶叶,14(5):18-19.
    [195] 楼云芬,1993.茶尺蠖发育历期的温度效应.茶叶科学,13(2):127-133.
    [196] 吕文明,1993.茶尺蠖成虫消长动态及其预测.中国茶叶,4:26-28.
    [197] 吕文明,楼云芬,1986.茶尺蠖防治标准的研究.茶叶科学研究报告,13-23.
    [198] 吕文明,楼云芬,胡宏基,1990.不同品种茶树对茶尺蠖的抗性.中国茶叶,4:24-25.
    [199] 吕要斌,刘树生,2004.外源茉莉酸诱导植物反应对菜蛾绒茧蜂寄生选择行为的影 响.昆虫学报,47(2):206-212.
    [200] 罗亨文,王云刚,张汉鹄,1997.云南茶树昆虫区系特点及主要害虫发生与防治.茶叶,23(3):33-35.
    [201] 倪老虎,1998.敌灭灵防治茶尺蠖和茶黑毒蛾的示范试验.茶叶,2:15-16.
    [202] 欧阳晓,江汉华,陈常铭,1997.茶毒蛾黑卵蜂识主利它素的研究.中国生物防治,13(4):145-150.
    [203] 潘亚飞,赵敬钊,1996.斜纹猫蛛对茶尺蠖幼虫捕食作用的初步研究.蛛形学报,5(2):149-153.
    [204] 彭少春,汪明,张勇,陈德洋,李登林,1999.敌杀星乳油防治茶尺蠖的效果.安徽农学通报,2:17.
    [205] 全国植保总站,1996.中国茶树病虫测报方法.合肥:安徽科学技术出版社,82-88.
    [206] 商业部茶叶畜产局,商业部杭州茶叶加工研究所,1989.茶叶品质理化分析.上海:上海科学出版社,469-470.
    [207] 佘宇平,陶涛,1996.滇西南茶园蜘蛛名录.蛛形学报,5(2):154-158.
    [208] 孙全基,李良成,费文良,2001.茶园喷施1.2%中垦牌苦参素防治茶尺蠖试验初报.茶业通报,3(22):20-21.
    [209] 谭济才,1995.湖南省茶园蜡蝉种类调查研究初报.茶叶科学,15(1):33-37.
    [210] 谭济才,张觉晚,肖能文,2003.湖南省茶树害虫名称.湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版),29(4):296-307.
    [211] 王琛柱,项秀芬,张树芳,钦俊德,1995.大豆胰蛋白酶抑制剂对棉玲虫幼虫消化生理和生长发育的影响.昆虫学报,38(3):272-277.
    [212] 王妮妍,蒋德安,2002.茉莉酸及其甲酯与植物诱导抗病性.植物生理学通讯,38(3):279-284.
    [213] 王勇,张汉鹄,邹运鼎,1991.彩纸对茶尺蠖幼虫诱集效率的研究.植物保护学报,18(2):177-180.
    [214] 吴晓晶,胡萃,1987.茶尺蠖核型多角体病毒的大量增殖研究.浙江农业大学学报,13(2):150-157.
    [215] 夏英三,1999.茶尺蠖的生活习性与防治措施.福建茶叶,4:12.
    [216] 谢先镒,1995.茶尺蠖的发生与防治.蚕桑茶叶通讯,3:13-14.
    [217] 谢振伦,1996.白痣姹刺蛾病毒病的分离鉴定.广东茶叶,4:26-28.
    [218] 谢振伦,戴素贤,赖时华,1994.雷州半岛无公害茶园昆虫群落的演替.茶叶科学,14(2):141-147.
    [219] 熊兴平,殷坤山,陈雪芬,1998.茶树害虫综合治理计算机决策系统.茶叶科学论文集,上海科学技术出版社,97-103.
    [220] 徐涛,周强,陈威,2003.茉莉酸信号传导途径参与了水稻的虫害诱导防御过程.科学通报,48(13):1442-1446.
    [221] 许宁,陈宗懋,游小清,1999.引诱茶尺蠖天敌寄生蜂的茶树挥发物的分离与鉴定.昆虫学报,42(2):126-131.
    [222] 许宁,游小清,陈宗懋,1998.三级营养关系中茶树间接防御茶尺蠖危害的生化机制.茶叶科学,18(1):1-7.
    [223] 许宁,1996.挥发物性物质在茶树-茶尺蠖-绒茧蜂三重营养关系中的化学通讯作用.浙江农业大学博士学位论文.
    [224] 杨辅安,汪命龙,韩和平.1998.几种菊酯类农药防治茶尺蠖的药效比较.中国茶叶,3:23.
    [225] 叶恭银,胡萃,朱俊庆,1994.茶尺蠖核型多角体病毒对宿主种群的控制作用.植物保护学报,21(3):231-237.
    [226] 叶恭银,胡萃,朱俊庆,商建农,1995.茶尺蠖核型多角体病毒对宿主幼虫食物摄取与利用的影响.浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版),21(1):34-37.
    [227] 叶恭银,朱俊庆,1992.高温条件下茶尺蠖核型多角体病毒对茶尺蠖繁殖的影响.中国病毒学.7(3):283-288.
    [228] 叶琪铭,叶水娟,陈礼林,1988.余杭茶尺蠖真菌流行病的初步观察.茶叶,(4):31.
    [229] 殷坤山,1984.剪、采、耕对茶树害虫的控制作用,茶叶,10(2):51-55.
    [230] 殷坤山,陈华才,肖强,唐美君,2000.茶尺蠖核型多角体病毒制剂的试制与推广应用.中国病毒学,51:27-29.
    [231] 殷坤山,洪北边,1988.茶尺蠖核型多角体病毒的土法生产.中国茶叶,3:4-6.
    [232] 殷坤山,洪北边,1989.15种农药对茶尺蠖单白绵绒茧蜂的杀伤力比较.中国茶叶,1:12-13.
    [233] 殷坤山,洪北边,1990b.茶尺蠖性信息素腺体部位的研究.中国茶叶,12(5):8-9.
    [234] 殷坤山,洪北边,洪子华,1990a.茶尺蠖性信息素的研究.中国茶叶,3:20.
    [235] 殷坤山,洪北边,胡宏基,1987.五种害虫在茶丛中的分布规律及其应用设想.中国 茶叶,5:14-17.
    [236] 殷坤山,尚稚珍,1993.茶尺蠖性信息素生物学综合研究.自然科学进展,国家重点实验室通讯,3(4):332-338.
    [237] 殷坤山,熊兴平,1994.茶尺蠖幼虫期龄期差异对子代发生期的影响.中国茶叶,16(1):32-33.
    [238] 殷坤山,熊兴平,单夏锋,1995.茶尺蠖发育历期和有效积温的研究.植物保护,1:45-47.
    [239] 殷坤山,熊兴平,唐美君,1994.茶尺蠖幼虫龄期差异对子代发生期的影响.中国茶叶,1:32-33.
    [240] 殷坤山,熊兴平,唐美君,1996.茶尺蠖综合治理决策系统与示范.中国植保保护研究进展.498-500.
    [241] 张传溪,胡萃,吴祥甫,1999.茶尺蠖核型多角体病毒多角体蛋白基因核苷酸序列及其在Baculoviridae中的地位(英文),中国生物化学与分子生物学报,3:20-23.
    [242] 张汉鹄,1989.茶尺蠖发育起点温度与有效积温研究.安徽农业科学,1:62-66.
    [243] 张汉鹄,2001.我国茶树尺蛾区系考查.茶叶科学,21(2):157-160.
    [244] 张汉鹄,韩宝瑜,1997.我国茶树蓑蛾区系与发生.茶叶科学,17(2):171-176.
    [245] 张汉鹄,韩宝瑜,1999.中国茶树昆虫区系及发生.茶叶科学,19(2):81-86.
    [246] 张觉晚,黄厚仁,伏吉安,1996.兰岭茶厂茶园病虫及天敌资源调查.茶叶通讯,4:24-26.
    [247] 张觉晚,王沅江,1994a.湘西茶树害虫及天敌资源调查.茶叶,20(1):22-25.
    [248] 张觉晚,王沅江,1994b.湖南常德地区茶树害虫及天敌资源调查.茶业通报,4:29-31.
    [249] 赵冬香,陈宗懋,程家安,2002.茶树—假眼小绿叶蝉—白斑猎蛛间化学通讯物的分离与活性鉴定.茶叶科学,22(2):109-114.
    [250] 赵怀宇,陈棣华,1986.茶尺蠖核型多角体病毒的血清学研究.病毒学杂志,1(3):52-59.
    [251] 中国农业科学院茶叶研究所,主编,1986.中国茶树栽培学.上海:上海科学技术出版社,1-9.
    [252] 山根久和,1998.酸.Nippon Nogeikagaku Kaishi,72(5):665-668.