呼和浩特市五个居民区绿地木本植物空间结构比较与评价
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本文以呼和浩特市芳汀花园(F)、桥华紫华园(Q)、名仕园(M)、东乐花园(D)和内蒙古农业大学东区居住区(N)5个居民区绿地为主要研究对象,从绿地树种组成、水平结构、垂直结构、树种组成结构四个层面,对城市居民区绿地的空间结构进行系统研究。结果表明:
     (1)树种组成上,研究区内共有维管束植物22科,43属,80种。其中,裸子植物有3科6属12种,被子植物有19科37属68种;乔木53种,灌木27种;乡土树种有13科22属30种,外来树种有18科32属50种。特点是既有向蔷薇科、豆科、松科、木犀科等一些大科集中的倾向,同时又向少种科和单种科分散;灌木树种、乡土树种偏少,并且落叶、阔叶树种占有绝对优势。
     (2)水平结构上,研究区的植株密度在435~1508株/hm2之间,较为合理;聚集指数R值在1.2435~1.5731之间,表明植株都是均匀分布;覆盖度在0.3814~0.6279之间,芳汀花园、东乐花园和农大东区的覆盖度稍大,群落稍显杂乱,应注意及时修剪。
     (3)垂直结构上,研究区的乔灌草比例不尽合理,灌木数量明显偏低;林层比在0.3629~0.5345之间,桥华紫华园、芳汀花园、名仕园、东乐花园和农大东区的群落错落有致的效果依次降低。
     (4)树种组成结构上,研究区的常绿落叶比为1:3.6~1:9,比例偏低;R值为2.6977~4.8208,H值为1.9208~2.8024,J值为0.8342~0.9696,M值为0.0657~0.2126。结果表明,芳汀花园的树种丰富度、多样性、均匀度最好,农大东区和名仕园的则较低。芳汀花园的树种单调度指数最低,名仕园和农大东区的树种单调度则较高。对R、H、J和M的相关分析得出:H与R、H与J、J与R呈正相关,H与M、M与J、M与R呈负相关。
     (5)空间结构的综合评价采用隶属函数法和指标排序叠加法,结果表明:名仕园和桥华紫华园的水平结构优于另外3个研究区。名仕园、桥华紫华园和芳汀花园的垂直结构优于另外2个研究区。树种组成结构从弱到强依次为:名仕园<农大东区<东乐花园<桥华紫华园<芳汀花园。综合起来看,空间结构从弱到强依次为:农大东区<东乐花园和名仕园<桥华紫华园和芳汀花园。
The purpose of the thesis was to study the Spatial Structure of woody plants in the Tree Species Composition, the Horizontal Structure, the Vertical Structure and the Tree Species Composition Structure, Taking the residential green areas of Fang Ting(F),Qiao Hua(Q),Ming Shi-yuan(M),Dong Le(D) and the east area of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University(N) as the main research objects.The main results are as follows:
     1. The Tree Species Composition of the study green areas: There were 80 Plants species,which belonged to 43 genera and 22 families of vascular plants in the study green areas. There were 12 Plants Species,which belonged to 6 genera and 3 families of Gymnosperm, and 68 Plants Species,which belonged to 37 genera and 19 families of Angiosperms.There were 53 arbor species,27 shrub species according to 2 life types. There were 30 Plants Species,which belonged to 22 genera and 13 families of Native plants, and 50 Plants Species,which belonged to 32 genera and 18 families of Exotic species.The characteristics tendency of species focused on big subjects of the Rosaceae, Leguminosae, Pinaceae, Oleaceae, and scattered small branches and single species branches.shrub species and native trees were few, and deciduous and broad-leaved species had absolute advantage.
     2.The Horizontal Structure of the study green areas: Plant densities were in 435 ~ 1508 trees/hm2 and more reasonable.The values of Aggregation index R were between 1.2435 ~ 1.5731, indicating that plants were uniformly distributed.Coverage degrees were in 0.3814 ~ 0.6279, coverage degrees of F, D and N were larger, plant communities were slightly messy, and should pay attention to pruning plants timely.
     3. The Vertical Structure of the study green areas: The rates of Arbor, Shrub and Grass were unreasonable,and the number of shrubs were few Significantly.The values of stand level rate were in 0.3629~0.5345,the order of plants Spatial effect were Q﹥F﹥M﹥D﹥N.
     4.Tree Species Composition Structure of the study green areas: The rates of Evergreen and Deciduous were 1:3.6~1:9, and the proportions were low. R values were 2.6977~4.8208, H values were 1.9208~2.8024, J values were 0.8342~0.9696, M values were 0.0657~0.2126. The results show that tree species richness, diversity, and evenness of F were best and them of N and M were more relative poor. Tree species monotony of F was lowest and them of M and N were higher. Correlation analysis showed that there was a positive correlation between H and R, H and J and J and R, and a negative correlation between H and M, M and J and M and R.
     5.Comprehensive Evaluation method of the spatial structure used the methods of Membership function and Superposition method to sort indicators, the results show that: The Horizontal Structure of M and Q were better than the other three study areas, the Horizontal Structure of M,Q and F were better than the other two study areas, the order of Tree Species Composition Structure was M﹤N﹤D﹤Q﹤F. The order from weak to strong of patial structure was N﹤D﹤M﹤Q and F.
引文
1马世骏,王如松.社会-经济-自然复合生态系统[J].生态学报,1984,4(1):1-9.
    2赵晶.上海城市土地利用与景观格局的空间演变研究[D].华东师范大学博士学位论文,2004.
    3陈自新.城市园林绿化与城市可持续发展[J].中国园林,1998,14(5):4-5.
    4唐万鹏,陈义群,许亚洲,等.长江中下游滩地植物群落特征及多样性指数的相关性分析[J].湖北林业科技,2003,(4):1-7.
    5奉树成,陈敏,陈钢.大树引入城市与改善城市生态环境[J].中国园林,1999,15(2):41-43.
    6姜允芳,石铁矛,胡学宁.城市生态绿地系统规划[J].沈阳建筑工程学院学报,1999,15(1):4-8.
    7邬建国.景观生态学—格局、过程、尺度与等级[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2000.
    8 Quattrochi D A,Pelletier R E.Remote sensing for analysis of landseapes:An introduetion.In Turner M G,Gardner R H,ed.Quantitative Methods in Landseape Eeology[M].NewYork: Springer-Verlag,1991.
    9高原容重(杨增志等译).城市绿地规划[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1983.
    10李敏.城市绿地系统与人居环境规划[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1997.
    11祝宁,李敏,王成,等.哈尔滨市绿地系统结构初步分析[J].东北林业大学学报,2002,30(3):127-130.
    12王天明,王晓春,国庆喜,等.哈尔滨市绿地景观格局与过程的连通性和完整性[J].应用与环境生物学报,2004,10(4):402-407.
    13周廷刚,郭达志.基于GIS的城市绿地景观空间结构研究--以宁波市为例[J].生态学报,2003,23(5):901-907.
    14胡勇,赵媛.南京城市绿地景观格局之初步分析[J].中国园林,2004,(11):34-36.
    15孔繁花,赵善伦,张伟.济南市绿地系统景观空间结构分析[J].山东省农业管理干部学院学报,2002,18(2):108-109.
    16车生泉.上海城市绿地景观异质性分析[J].上海环境科学,2001,20(11):511-514.
    17车生泉,宋永昌.上海城市公园绿地景观格局分析[J].上海交通大学学报(农业科学版),2002,20(4):322-1327.
    18高峻,杨名静,陶康华.上海城市绿地景观格局的分析研究[J].中国园林,2000,16(1):67-70.
    19车生泉.城市绿地景观结构分析与生态规划--以上海市为例[M].南京:东南大学出版社,2003.
    20 Armando A,Apan Steven R,Raine Mark S.Paterson.Mapping and analysis of changes in the Riparian landseape strueture of the Loekyer Valley catchment,Queensland,Australia[J].land-scape and Urban Planning,2002,(59):43-57.
    21 Shoichiro Asakawa,Keisuke Yoshida,Kazuo Yabe.Perceptions of urban stream corridors within the greenway system of Sapporo Japan[J].Landscape and Urban Planning,2004,(68):167-182.
    22 Lucy B,Chris D T.The distribution of plant species in urban vegetatio fragments[J].Landscape Ecol,1999,(14):493-507.
    23 Forman R.T.T.Godron M.Landscape Ecology[M].New York:John Wiley &Sons,1986.
    24 Forman R.T.T.Ecologically sustainable landscapes:the role of spatial configuration In: IS Zonneveld and R.T.T.Forman(eds),Changing Landseape:An Ecological Perspective Springer-velag[M],NewYork,1990:261-277.
    25 CJJ/T85-2002,J185一2002.中华人民共和国建设部.中华人民共和国行业标准.城市绿地分类标准[M].
    26刘滨谊,姜允芳.中国城市绿地系统规划评价指标体系的研究[J].城市规划汇刊,2002,(2):27-29.
    27刘云国,刘加利,张慧智,等.城市绿地规划指标体系研究--以岳阳市为例[J].湖南大学学报(自然科学版),2004,31(1):71-74.
    28严晓,王希华,刘丽正,等.城市绿地系统生态效益评价指标体系初报[J].浙江林业科技,2003,23(2):68-72.
    29 Turner M G..Landscap ecology:the effect of pattern on process[J].Annual Review of Ecology Systematies,1989,(20):171-197.
    30 Forman R.T.T..Some general principles of landscape and regional ecology[J].Landseape Ecology,1995,(10):133-142.
    31 LI H,Reynolds J F..A simulation experiment to quantify spatial heterogeneity in Categorical maps[J].Ecology,1994,(75):2446-2455.
    32魏斌,王景旭,张涛.城市绿地生态效果评价方法的改进[J].城市环境与城市生态,1997,10(4):54-55.
    33李贞,王丽荣,管东生.广州城市绿地系统景观异质性分析[J].应用生态学报,2000,1l(1):127-130.
    34易军.城市园林植物群落生态结构研究与景观优化构建[J].南京林业大学硕士学位论文.2005.
    35翁殊斐,陈锡沐.广州市公园植物景观特色与品种配置相关性研究[J].亚热带植物科学.2004,33(1):42-45.
    36陈爽,詹志勇.南京城市森林结构特征与管理对策[J].林业科学.2004,40(6):158-164.
    37王磊,孙书存,高贤明.岷江上游人工油松林群落空间结构:物种丰富度和盖度[J].林业科学.2004,40(6):8-12.
    38朱文泉,何兴元,陈玮,等.城市森林结构的量化研究--以沈阳树木园森林群落为例[J].应用生态学报,2003,1(12):2090-2094.
    39吴泽民,黄成林,白林波,等.合肥城市森林结构分析研究[J].林业科学.2002,38(4):7-13.
    40杨学军.上海城市园林植物群落的物种丰富度调查.中国园林[J].2000(3):67-69.
    41王永.城市绿化树种组成结构数量指标初探[J].河南林业科技,1997(3):35-37.
    42陈廷贵,张金屯.十五个物种多样性指数的比较研究[J].河南科学.1999,(17):55-57.
    43邵燕,汤庚国.苏州市城市生态绿地植物群落空间结构评价指标体系研究[J].蓝天园林,2007,40(3):7-9.
    44韩轶,李吉跃.城市森林综合评价体系与案例研究[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2005.
    45王庆日.城市绿地的价值及其评估研究[D].浙江大学博士学位论文,2003.
    46肖荣波,周志翔,王鹏程,等.3S技术在城市绿地生态研究中的应用[J].生态学杂志,2004,23(6):71-76.
    47肖笃宁,布仁仓,李秀珍.生态空间理论与景观异质性[J].生态学报,1997,17(5):453-461.
    48辞海编辑委员会.辞海[M].上海辞书出版社,1980.
    49赵红霞.聊城市城市绿地空间结构及功能研究[D].南京林业大学博士学位论文,2007.
    50郎金顶.北京市建成区绿地植物多样性结构和功能评价[D].北京林业大学硕士学位论文,2007.
    51李智琦.武汉市城市绿地植物多样性研究[D].华中农业大学硕士学位论文,2005.
    52吴丽娟.北京城市绿地景观格局与生物多样性保护研究[D].北京林业大学博士学位论文,2006.
    53孙卫邦.乡土植物与现代城市园林景观建设[J].中国园林,2003(7):63-65.
    54田胜尼,刘登义,彭少麟.植物外来种的入侵及防治对策[J].安徽农学通报,2003,9(6):89-92.
    55孙卫邦,向其柏.谈生物入侵与外来观赏植物的引种利用[J].中国园林,2004,(9):54-56.
    56彭少麟,向言词.植物外来种入侵及其对生态系统的影响[J].生态学报,1999,19(4):560-568.
    57李博,徐炳声,陈家宽.从上海外来杂草区系剖析植物入侵的一般特征[J].生物多样性,2001,9(4) :446-457.
    58马克平,黄建辉,于顺利,等.北京东灵山地区植物群落多样性研究丰富度、均匀度和物种多样性指数[J].生态学报,1995,15(3):268-277.
    59贺金生,江明喜.长江三峡地区退化生态系统植物群落物种多样性特征[J].生态学报,1998,18(4):399-407.
    60贺金生,陈伟烈.中国中亚热带东部常绿阔叶林主要类型的群落多样性特征[J].植物生态学报,1998,22(4):303-311.
    61 Stohlgren T,Bullk A,Otsuki Y, et. al. Comparison of range-land vegetation sampling techniques in the Central Grasslands[J].Range Manage,1998,51(2):164-172.
    62彭少麟,周厚诚,陈天杏,等.广东森林群落的组成结构数量特征[J].植物生态学报,1989,13(l):10-17.
    63刘灿然,马克平.北京东灵山地区植物群落多样性的研究---样本大小对多样性测度的影响[J].生态学报,1999,17(6):584-592.
    64朱华,王洪,李保贵.滇南热带雨林物种多样性的取样面积探讨[J].生物多样性,1998,6(4):241-247.
    65熊四清,朱忠保,胡蝶梦.八大公山木本植物物种多样性研究--总体的物种多样性估计[J].湖南林业科技,1997:24(4):l-5.
    66韩轶,宋慧,董志勤.呼和浩特市园林绿地景观发展思考与对策(上,下)[OL].呼和浩特市园林科研所网站http://www.hhhtyl.org/sy/sym.htm,2006,11(13).
    67王成.城镇不同类型绿地生态功能的对比分析[J].东北林业大学学报,2002,30(3):111-114.
    68李吉跃,翟洪波.木本植物水力结构与抗旱性[J].应用生态学报,2000,11(2):301-305.
    69李吉跃,朱妍.干早胁迫对北京城市绿化树种耗水特性的影响[J].北京林业大学学报,2006,(增1):32-37.
    70王颖,余瑞卿,李湛东,等.城市片林中常见树种的蒸腾耗水特性研究综述[J].内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版)[J],2005,26(3):115-119.
    71王彩华,宋连天.模糊论方法学[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1988.
    72荩垆,实用模糊数学[M].北京:科学技术文献出版社,1989.
    73阎晓容,郑希伟.几种宿根花卉的耐研究[J],河北林业科技,1992,(1):51-54.
    74张林艳,叶万辉.群落可侵入性及其影响因素[J].植物生态学报,2002,26(1):109-114.
    75苏志尧,陈北光,古炎坤,等.广州白云山几种森林群落的物种丰富度和多样性[J].华南农业大学学报,2001,22(3):5-8.
    76中国科学院生物多样性委员会.生物多样性研究的原理与方法[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,1994.
    77张林静,岳明,赵桂仿,等.新疆阜康地区植物群落物种多样性及其测度指标的比较[J].西北植物学报,2002,22(2):142-150.