广西苦苣苔科观赏植物资源调查与引种研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
苦苣苔科Gesneriaceae在全世界约有150属3 700种,我国分布有58属470余种,绝大部分种类具有较高的观赏价值。美国、加拿大等西方国家已育成大量园艺品种,然而目前我国的苦苣苔资源基本仍处于野生状态,园艺化研究较少,部分资源受各种因素影响遭到严重破坏,且国内尚未开展对苦苣苔科观赏植物种质资源的系统研究。中国从西南到华南的山地是中国苦苣苔科植物现代分布和分化的重点区域,广西正处于这个区域中心,所拥有的属数居全国之首,物种的丰富度和多样性程度都很高,对该地区进行苦苣苔科植物观赏资源的系统性研究具有十分重要的意义。针对于此,本研究于2004年开始,先后8次对广西野生苦苣苔观赏植物种质资源进行了详细的调查,初步摸清了其分布情况,在此基础上,首次将野生苦苣苔科植物观赏资源的研究从野外调查和生物学研究范畴拓展到引种栽培、生理特性和繁殖技术、观赏性状评价、亲缘关系鉴定和杂交育种等园艺方面,初步形成了一个完整的体系,为进一步的苦苣苔科观赏植物的产业化开发奠定了基础。主要研究结果如下:
     1.通过对广西苦苣苔科植物分布重点区域的详细调查,共调查到33个属的132种该科植物,其中74个为广西特有种;发现了唇柱苣苔属Chirita 2新种,细筒苣苔属Lagarosolen 1新种,石蝴蝶属Petrocosmea 1新种,小花苣苔属Chiritopsis 1新变种以及短筒苣苔属Boeica、石蝴蝶属、小花苣苔属和唇柱苣苔属广西新记录各1个。在充分调查和引种的基础上,通过对2个近缘属——唇柱苣苔属和小花苣苔属的综合评价以及11个属74个种的层次分析评价,首次建立了该科植物观赏资源的评价体系,认为以唇柱苣苔属、小花苣苔属、朱红苣苔属Calcareoboea、细筒苣苔属、旋蒴苣苔属Boea、长檐苣苔属Dolicholoma、石蝴蝶属、石山苣苔属Petrocodon以及芒毛苣苔属Aeschynanthus等9个属的36个种及2变种,具有很高的观赏价值和开发潜力,其中唇柱苣苔属大部分种适应能力强,花大色艳,在评价体系中名列前茅,共有27种1个变种值得优先开发。按照生境类型将野外苦苣苔科植物划分为9类,即:阴湿半附生岩生型、洞穴型、耐旱喜光型、阴生干燥型、高海拔型、低海拔高温干燥型、阴湿喜阴附生型、耐旱附生型和林下地生型,这对成功引种该科植物具有重要的指导意义。在调查的过程中了解到大部分的苦苣苔科植物分布狭窄,居群数量少,自然更新能力弱,急需采取相应的保护措施。
     2.在详细调查的基础上,建立了一套引种驯化技术体系,其中引种成功的有唇柱苣苔属、小花苣苔属、朱红苣苔属、细筒苣苔属、吊石苣苔属Lysionotus和半蒴苣苔属Hemiboea等11个属,67个种。对引种成功的35种唇柱苣苔属植物的光合作用特性研究表明,唇柱苣苔属植物的光饱和点和补偿点按照其原始生长环境不同而区别明显,大部分唇柱苣苔属植物光补偿点、光饱和点和表观量子效率都较一般耐阴植物低,显示出对阴生环境的高度适应性,其中光补偿点最低的为洞穴植物软叶唇柱苣苔C. mollifolia,仅为0.57μmol·m-2·s-1,光饱和点最高的的线叶唇柱苣苔C. linearifolia也仅为16.73μmol·m-2·s-1,低于一般常见的耐阴园林植物;叶绿素a、b含量和比值试验结果显示,除少数几个种外,大部分的唇柱苣苔属和其他苦苣苔科植物的叶绿素a/b比值都在2.3左右,表现出了阴生植物的特点,因此在引种驯化过程中尤其要注意保持适当的遮阴。同时这些特点都使得该类植物具有了作为室内观赏盆花的极大潜力。
     3.以牛耳朵C. eburnea、黄花牛耳朵C. lutea、紫纹唇柱苣苔C. pseudoeburnea和桂林唇柱苣苔C. gueilienensis等为代表的唇柱苣苔属植物以及滇桂喜鹊苣苔Ornithoboea wildeana、吊石苣苔L. pauciflorus的种子在25~30℃时有较高的萌发率;浸种时间以16 h最佳;赤霉素对种子萌发影响不大;光照能促进种子的萌发,赤霉素处理能部分替代种子萌发对光的需求。以唇柱苣苔属为主要材料,叶插繁殖方式的研究结果表明具有肥厚肉质叶的莲座型种叶插繁殖成活率均可达100%,但繁殖系数低,更适于家庭繁殖使用;在组织培养中,不同种的不同外植体取材和最佳灭菌时间均不同,须按照实际情况进行试验和选择。均以采用2次0.1%Hgcl2灭菌为宜,幼叶和幼嫩花梗的灭菌时间均为3 min和5~7min;封闭性组织如苞片内和花蕾内组织,灭菌时间为3 min和5 min左右能得到较理想的结果;在外植体启动培养基的激素配比上,使用MS培养基,唇柱苣苔属植物多适合于NAA0.1mg·L-1+6-BA 0.1mg·L-1的激素配比,而小花苣苔属更适合于NAA0.1 mg·L-1+6-BA0.2 mg·L-1的激素配比。对7种唇柱苣苔和1种小花苣苔进行了试管苗出瓶移栽方法的研究,以蛭石40%,珍珠岩40%与草炭20%的混合基质配比,多菌灵800倍液处理基质,出瓶时间为春秋两季能获得最高的成活率;通过对不同配比的栽培基质与3种唇柱苣苔属植物生长因子之间的相互影响关系研究,认为对不同产地环境条件下的种其适应的基质配比不一,其中牛耳朵和尖萼唇柱苣苔C. pungentisepala适合于草炭60%,珍珠岩20%和蛭石20%的混合基质,桂林唇柱苣苔适合于草炭80%和珍珠岩20%的混合基质。在此基础上,建立了一套以唇柱苣苔属种为主体的引种驯化和温室盆栽技术体系,包括幼苗、成苗和开花期的栽培管理技术、环境控制、病虫害防治措施等,同时建成了国内搜集唇柱苣苔属植物比较齐全的种质资源圃。
     4.对56个唇柱苣苔属植物的材料进行了AFLP标记和聚类分析,试验表明,根据亲缘关系的远近,在遗传距离为0.56处分为2大类,在遗传距离0.585处,可将余下的30份材料分为2大类。对唇柱苣苔属牛耳朵、蚂蝗七C. fimbrisepala、永福唇柱苣苔C. yungfuensis和尖萼唇柱苣苔的新鲜花粉和不同液氮冻存时间花粉的萌发试验表明液氮冻存是该属植物有效的花粉保存方式,冻存前后花粉萌发率均可达70%以上;在对亲缘关系进行分析的基础上,对所搜集的唇柱苣苔属植物进行了初步的杂交育种,并获得了杂种F1后代,并对亲本重要观赏性状在子代上的表现和控制性状的基因的显隐性关系进行了分析。试验结果显示,即使亲缘关系较远的唇柱苣苔属内种,其种间杂交没有明显的生殖隔离的现象,这为培育新品种提供了保证。
     总之,通过引种栽培,对野生苦苣苔科植物,尤其是唇柱苣苔属内观赏资源的引种驯化、盆花栽培提供理论依据,为将来开发商品盆花以及产业化栽培打下基础,AFLP分析结果为种间亲缘关系的确定和杂交亲本的选择和育种提供了参考,杂交亲和性试验显示了唇柱苣苔属植物育种的巨大潜能。
There are about 150 gunes, 3 700 species in Gesneriaceae in the world, of which approximately 58 genus and 470 species distribute in China, and most of them are famous ornamental perennials with beautiful flowers and leaves, and can be cultivated as pot flowers and garden plants in warm regions. A lot of perfect horticultural varieties have been relased in many western developed countries, for example American, Canada, etc. But up to now almost all Chinese ornamental precious germplasm resources are still leaved in wild without sufficient researches on the breeding and horticultural culture. Some resources were seriously destroyed because of various factors. And the same time, researches of the ornamental resources of Gesneriaceae have been developed few so far. The mountainous areas from southwest to south in China are the very important areas of modern distributions and differentiation of Gesneriaceae plants. Guangxi is lying in the centre of these areas. The genus of which it owns of Gesneriaceae is the most in China. The diversities and richness of species in Gesneriaceae are very high degree in Guangxi. It is very great significance of systematic researches for ornamental resources of Gesneriaceae in Guangxi. 8 investigations on the wild Gesneriaceae were made in Guangxi successively from 2004. Based on the wild investigations in Guangxi, the researches were extended from the characteristic of botany in Gesneriaceae to the cultivation of introductions and domestication, reproduction technologies, relationship analysis of some species in Chirita, test of cross-breeding, etc. It has basically been established a relatively system for further industrialized operation. The results are included as follows:
     1. Through detail investigation of important distributions of Gesneriaceae plants in Guangxi, 33 genus and 132 species were found, of these 74 endemic species. 2 new species in Chirita, 1 new species in Lagarosolen, 1 new species in Petrocosmea, 1 variety in Chiritopsis, and one each new records of Boeica, Petrocosmea, Chiritopsis and Chirita. Based on full investigations and introduction of those plants, the comprehensive ornamental characteristics of 2 relatives’genus, Chirita and Chiritopsis, were evaluated. Further, 11 genus and 74 species were valuated by AHP. The evaluation system of ornamental resources of Gesneriaceae plants was firstly established. The results show that some genus, for example Chirita, Chiritopsis, Calcareoboea, Lagarosolen, Boea, Dolicholoma, Petrocosmea, Petrocodon,and Aeschynanthus, etc, and 36 species and 2 varieties, have a high ornamental value and potential for development. The performances of most species in Chirita are so perfect in the evaluation system. There are 27 species and 1 variety of development should be priority. In the course of that investigation, the distributions of most of Gesneriaceae plants are very narrow, populations of the number are small, and natural regeneration capacities are very weak. Some urgent protective measures should adopt as early as possibly.
     2. Based on the full investigation of Gesneriaceae plants in Guangxi, a set of technical system was found for introduction and domestication. 67 species in 11 genus, for example Chirita, Chiritopsis, Calcareoboea, Lagarosolen, Lysionotus, and Hemiboea, etc. were successfully introduced. The research results of photosynthesis of 35 species in Chirita showed that there was a clear distinction of the light compensation point (LCP) and light saturation point (LSP) according to the original habitats of different species. Compare with general shade-tolerance plants, the Compare with general shade-tolerance plants, the LCP, LSP and apparent quantum yield (φ) are lower that them. This results show the high degree adaptability in this kinds of plants to shade-environments. The LCP of C. mollifolia is the lowest, is only 0.57μmol·m-2·s-1, and the highest LSP in 35 species, of C. linearfolia is only 16.73μmol·m-2·s-1. The results of chlorophyll a, b content and their ratio show that almost all species in Chirita and other genus are highly resistant to the shade environments, because the ratio of the chlorophyll a and b in major portion of species in tested plants is about 2.3 besides few species. So, appropriate over-shade is very important in the procedure of introduction and domestication. At the same time this characteristic shows that the great potential is well qualified as development of indoor potted.
     3. The results of biological and botany physiology characters research showed that, genus Chirita for the C. eburnea, C. lutea, C. pseudoeburnea and C. gueilienensis ect, as well as Ornithoboea wildeanathe, best of soaking time of those species seeds is 16 hours, but the best of soaking time of Lysionotus pauciflorus seeds is only 8 hours. For all species, the temperature for seed germination is 25~30℃. Ranging between 0 and 200 mg·L-1, high concentration of GA is beneficial to germination for all species, and light can improve germination rate. In addition, GA can replace the effect of light during germinating. Take Chirita species as major materials, the breeding ways were studied. The results show that the survival rate of leaf cutting can reach 100% in those species with fleshy rosulate leaves. But the reproducing coefficient is low. This shortcoming makes it to be a general reproducing way only adapt to family. On study of tissue culture and regeneration, different species require to select different explants and disinfect time. The peddicel and enclosing tissue are the best suitable explant for initial culture, and are using two times of 0.1% Hgcl2 as best suitable sterilization way while the most optimal hormone rate in MS medium of sprouting to Chirita is NAA0.1 mg?L-1+6-BA0.1 mg?L-1, but the best to Chiritopsis is NAA0.1 mg?L-1+6-BA0.2 mg?L-1. Based on studying of transplantation ways for tissue culture container seedlings of 7 species in Chirita and 1 species in Chiritopsis, the results showed that the transplantations mixed medium which the proportion of peatmoss, vermiculite, perlite was 60%, 20% and 20% was the best, the best disinfect way was to use 800×Carbendazim to disinfect mix medium, and an opportune time is spring and autumn. The effect between different proportion of vermiculite, perlite, and peatmoss in mixed medium and different growth factors was showed that different species require selecting different proportion. It should select appropriate rate of substrate for perfect growth in different species. The mixed medium of peatmoss, vermiculite and perlite, which the proportion are 60%, 20% and 20% were proved suitable for C. eburnea and C. pungentisepala, which the proportion are 80%, 0% and 20%. A set of introduction, domestication and greenhouse potted technology system was founded on according to Chirita, including the propagation, environment control, prevention and cure of the plant diseases and insect pests.
     4. In order to establish the relationship of different species of Chirita, and to provide the evidence for the future crossbreeding in molecule, clustering of UPGMA analysis and AFLP analysis were done in 56 species of Chirita. The genetic relationship among these are some different of the materials of Chirita. The results showed that the 56 materials tested can be divided into 2 categories according to the Nei’s genetic distance 0.56, 2 categories were divided in the Nei’s genetic distance 0.585 again. The way of conservation in Liquid Nitrogen of pollen of Chirita is proved to be an excellent method based on the comparison of pollen germination experiments of fresh pollen and conserved in liquid nitrogen with different time for C. eburnea, C. fimbrisepala, C. yungfuensis and C. pungentisepala. After 16 weeks in liquid nitrogen, the germination rate of pollen of 4 Chirita species is still over 70%. Based on the analysis of relationship of different species in Chirita, some species were selected for crossbreeding, and the crossbreeds were successfully got. The results showed that it could be hybridized between different species in same genus, Chirita, and reproduced hybrid (F1) even if their relationship is distant in same genus. It will give an enough provide to cultivate more new varieties.
     To sum up, by cultivation of some ornamental genetic resource of Gesneriaceae from Guangxi, especially in Chirita, it offered theoretical basis on application of introduction, the domestication and commercial cultivation in the future of the wild Gesneriaceae, especially in Chirita. The test of crossbreeding and the analysis of AFLP may be favorable of confirming the relationship, selecting appropriate parents and the molecular makers assisted selections. The test of cross-compatibility displayed the huge potential ability in Chirita.
引文
1. A.麦肯齐,A. S. 鲍尔,S. R. 弗迪. 生态学[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2002:65-68.
    2. 白伟岚,任建武.八种植物耐阴性比较研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报,1999,21(3):46-52.
    3. 白音,包英华,王文权,等.国产石斛属植物亲缘关系的AFLP分析[J].园艺学报,2007,34(6):1569-1574.
    4. 采利尼克尔. 木本植物耐阴性的生理学原理,王世绩译[M]. 北京:科学出版社,1986.
    5. 蔡祥海,邓德山,马云保, 等. 牛耳朵化学成分的研究[J]. 中草药,2006,36(4):510-544.
    6. 曹丽敏,曹明,唐咸来,等.广西苦苣苔科四种植物的染色体数目报道[J].广西植物,2003,23(4):331-333.
    7. 曹明,李世晋,曹利民,等.中国苦苣苔科三特有属花粉形态研究[J].广西植物,2008,27(5):669-672.
    8. 曹明,林春蕊,唐赛春, 等. 广西苦苣苔科植物花粉形态[J].广西植物,2003,23(2):139-142.
    9. 曹志洪.栽培基质的研制和产业化前景[C].中国科学院南京土壤研究所国际学术研讨会论文集,设施农业相关技术(中国,苏州),1998,248-254.
    10. 陈俊愉,邓朝佐.用百分制评选三种金花茶优株试验[J].北京林业大学学报,1986,3:35-43.
    11. 陈俊愉,王四清,王香春.花卉育种中的几个关键环节[J].园艺学报,1995,22(4): 372-376
    12. 陈民生 耿忠义 赵京岚.温度对玉米种子萌发特性的影响[J].山东农业大学学报(自然科学版),2007,28(2):196-202.
    13. 陈平,梁其彪. 西石山地区的山地土壤类型和利用[J].广西农业科学,1991,3:123-126.
    14. 陈启亮,李清国,田瑞,等. AFLP标记及其在园艺植物遗传育种中的应用[J].长江大学学报:自然科学版,2005,2(2):19-24.
    15. 陈银华,蒋健箴. 光照强度对辣椒光合特性与生长发育的影响[J].上海农业学报,1998,14(3):46—50.
    16. 陈振德,黄俊杰,蔡葵,等.混合基质的理化特性机器对甘蓝幼苗生长的影响[J]. 土壤肥料,1996,2:14-18.
    17. 陈作雄. 论广西土壤的垂直地带性分布规律[J]. 广西师范学院学报(自然科学版),2003,20(1):66-72.
    18. 陈作雄. 论广西气候的垂直地带性分布规律[J]. 广西师范学院学报(自然科学版),2007,24(3):54-60.
    19. 代正福. 贵州亚热带地区的野生苦苣苔科观赏植物种质资源[J].热带农业科学,2005,25(1):18-23.
    20. 戴思兰. 园林植物遗传学[M]. 北京:中国林业出版社,2005;26-41,161-210.
    21. 丁印龙,杨盛昌. 遮荫对13种盆栽棕榈植物生长的影响[J].亚热带植物科学,2002,31(B09):51-56.
    22. 杜慧芳,程智慧,杨海花,等.大蒜无土栽培有机和混合基质配方筛选[J].西北农业学报,2007,16(1):184-188.
    23. 樊超,冯楠楠,张超. 金山、金焰绣线菊耐阴性的研究[J].安徽农学通报,2007,13(15):71-72.
    24. 范彦,周寿荣.川西地区三种野生草坪地被植物耐阴性的研究[J]. 中国草地,1999,5:48-52.
    25. 方鼎,覃德海.广西苦苣苔科一新属——文采苣苔属(英文)[J].植物分类学报,2004,42(6):533-536.
    26. 方鼎,覃德海,曾玲.广西苦苣苔科植物新资料[J].植物分类学报,1993,31(5): 463-471.
    27. 方鼎,覃德海,韦毅刚.广西苦苣苔科新植物(续三)[J].植物分类学报,1999,37(6):591-596.
    28. 付家瑞.种子生理[M].北京:科学出版社,1985.70-74.
    29. 甘德欣,谭勇,龙岳林,等.紫薇和紫荆及樱花的光合特性研究[J].湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2006,32(5):505-507.
    30. 高江云,陈进,夏永梅.国产姜科植物观赏特性评价及优良种类筛选[J].园艺学报, 2002,29(2):158-162.
    31. 韩洁,胡楠,李玉阁,等.菊花品种资源遗传多样性的AFLP分析[J].园艺学报,2007,34(4):1041-1046.
    32. 何启林.国外盆栽花卉的生产情况[Z]. 国家林业局信息中心,中国农业网,2005.
    33. 郝玉华. 组培苗驯化移栽基质研究[J].江苏农业科学,2005,5:79-81.
    34. 何顺志.贵州金盏苣苔属(苦苣苔科)一新种——万山金盏苣苔[J].植物分类学报,2006,44 (4): 454–456.
    35. 胡启明. 种子植物科属地理[M]. 北京:科学出版社,1990.
    36. 胡志辉,周大宏,潘爱华. 树莓试管苗炼苗基质配方的选择研究[J]. 江汉大学学报:自然科学版,2004,32(2):80-81.
    37. 黄嘉宏,李江南,李自安,等.近45a广西降水和气温的气候特征.热带地理, 2006,26(1):23-28.
    38. 黄俊,郭世荣,吴震,等.6个不结球白菜品种光合作用特性的研究[J].西北植物学报 ,2006,26(6):1183-1189.
    39. 黄伟,张俊花,任华中. 番茄耐低温弱光性研究进展[J]. 河北北方学院学报(自然科学版),2005,21(2):46-51.
    40. 蒋健箴,王志源,朱雨杰,等.弱光对甜椒不同品种光合特性的影响[J].园艺学报,1999,26(5):314—318.
    41. 蒋文伟,刘彤, 温国胜,等.城市观赏树种桂花的光合特性初步研究[J]. 浙江林业科技,2003,23(5):18-21.
    42. 荆延德,张志国. 栽培基质常用理化性质“一条龙”测定法[J].北方园艺,2002,3:18-19.
    43. 荆延德,张志国,赵石萍. 案头牡丹农艺指标与基质配方理化指标关系的研究[J].土壤通报,2006,37(3):539-542.
    44. 荆延德,张志国. 主成分分析和聚类分析在花卉栽培基质配方选择中的应用[J].土壤通报,2004,35(5):588-591.
    45. 况雪源,苏志,涂方旭. 广西气候区划分[J]. 广西科学,2007,14(3):278-283.
    46. 兰安军,张百平,熊康宁,等.黔西南脆弱喀斯特生态环境空间格局分析[J].地理研究,2003,22(6):733-741.
    47. 兰茂(明). 滇南本草,三卷[M]. 上海:上海书店出版社,1994.
    48. 冷平生,胡悦. 5种园林树木的光合和蒸腾特性的研究[J].北京农学院学报,2000,15(4):13-18.
    49. 李光照. 广西植物的新记录[J]. 广西植物,2001,21(2):99-102.
    50. 李贵民,赵红霞,孟凡珍,等.安祖花无土栽培研究进展[J]. 山东农业大学学报:自然科学版,2005,36(2):322-324.
    51. 李家美. 唇柱苣苔属及其近缘类群(苦苣苔科)的系统发育研究(博士论文)[D]. 北京:中国科学院植物研究所,中国科学院研究生院,2007.
    52. 李鹏民,高辉远,邹琦,等. 5种国兰(Cymbidium)的光合特性[J].园艺学报,2005,32(1):151-154.
    53. 李淑芹. 重瓣大岩桐(Sinningia speciosa)组织培养及工厂化育苗技术的研究(硕士论文)[D]. 东北林业大学,2003.
    54. 李文华,张忠良,鲁周民,等. 不同枇杷品种光合作用特性研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报,2005,33(11):29-33.
    55. 李秀存,易燕明,李耀先. 广西土壤水分分布规律[J]. 广西气象,1993,14(1):44-46.
    56. 李雪萍,袁 芳.大岩桐叶片扦插繁育技术的研究[J]. 江苏林业科技,2006,33(6):16-17.
    57. 李英慧,田广澍,李艳. 北方大岩桐组培试管苗瓶外移栽实验[J]. 辽宁师范大学学报(自然科学版),1999,22(3):245-247.
    58. 李渊博,徐晗,石雷,等. 紫茎泽兰对五种苦苣苔科植物化感作用的初步研究[J]. 生物多样性,2007,15(5):486-491.
    59. 李振宇,李渊博,邢全. 广西唇柱苣苔属(苦苣苔科)一新变种—光华唇柱苣苔[J]. 植物分类学报,2006,44(6):649–650
    60. 李振宇,王印政. 中国苦苣苔科植物[M].郑州:河南科学技术出版社,2004:1-702.
    61. 李振宇. 广西半蒴苣苔属(苦苣苔科)一新变种——翅茎半蒴苣苔[J]. 植物分类学报,2004,42(3):261-262.
    62. 李振宇. 苦苣苔亚科的地理分布[J].植物分类学报,1996:34(4):341-360.
    63. 梁桂友. 三种苦苣苔科植物组织培养与快速繁殖的研究(硕士论文)[D].北京:北京林业大学,2007.
    64. 梁桂友,温放,李湛东.尖萼唇柱苣苔的组织培养和快速繁殖[J].植物生理学通讯,2007,43(2):321.
    65. 林琼 肖娟.3种凤仙花属植物种子萌发特性比较研究[J].湖南农业科学,2007,4:36-40.
    66. 林绍生,李华芬,陈义增. 应用模糊数学评价观叶植物的观赏性[J]. 亚热带植物通讯, 2000,29(2):43-47.
    67. 林树燕,张庆峰,陈其旭.10种园林植物的耐阴性[J].东北林业大学学报,2007,35(7):32-34.
    68. 刘登民,闫秀亭.牡丹无土栽培试验初报[J].山东林业科技,1998,(5):11—13.
    69. 刘莲芬,钱关泽,张金保.牡丹无土栽培研究进展[J].聊城大学学报:自然科学版,2004,17(1):44-46.
    70. 刘庆超,潘会堂,王奎玲.新几内亚凤仙光合作用特性研究[J].莱阳农学院学报,2004,21(1):60-62.
    71. 刘青林,刘西俊,王淑燕.中国花卉育种的进展[C].中国植物园:论文集, 1994,1:73-77.
    72. 刘晓红,戴思兰.菊花无土栽培基质试验分析初探[J].河北科技师范学院学报,2004,18(1):23-26.
    73. 刘晓龙,郭新弧. 安徽小花苣苔属一新种[J].植物研究,1989,9(3):51-54.
    74. 刘演,韦毅刚. 中国广西唇柱苣苔属(苦苣苔科)一新种——黄花牛耳朵[J].植物分类学报,2004,22(5):391-393.
    75. 刘演,韦毅刚,唐赛春.中国广西苦苣苔科一新种—灵川小花苣苔[J].植物分类学报,2006,44(3):340-344.
    76. 刘演. 广西苦苣苔科濒危植物的现状[A];中国植物学会七十周年年会论文摘要汇编(1933-2003)[C]. 成都:2003:484-485.
    77. 刘玉莲 殷学波樱花品种园艺学性状的综合评价[J].江苏农学院学报,1996,17(2):39-43.
    78. 卢纹岱. SPSS for Windows 统计分析(第2版)[M]. 北京:电子工业出版社,2005:146-205,230-291,311-395.
    79. 鲁元学,孙先凤,周其兴,等.云南十种苦苣苔科植物的染色体数目报道[J].云南植物研究,2002,24(3):377-382.
    80. 鲁元学,李锡文. 云南吊石苣苔属一新种[J].云南植物研究,2002,24(1):23-24.
    81. 吕方明. 绿色宠物—非洲紫罗兰[M].台北:绿色宠物生物科技股份有限公司,2006:1-156.
    82. 孟浩,王丽萍,王鑫,等.辣椒耐低温弱光的研究进展[J].北方园艺,2007,5:55-57.
    83. 彭东辉,张启翔,黄俊婷. 中国野牡丹科观赏植物种质资源及其在福建省的分布初步调查[J].中国园林,2007,23(11):82-88.
    84. 钱义咏.云南唇柱苣苔属一新种[J].植物分类学报,1996,34(2):216-218.
    85. 秦廷豪,邹宗兰,饶晓鸿,等.重瓣大岩桐的快速繁殖及其产业化技术程序[J].植物生理学通讯,2002,38(4):313-316.
    86. 秦廷豪. 大花蕙兰组培苗假植炼苗及基质配方[J].亚热带农业研究,2007,3(4):297-299.
    87. 秦新生,邢福武.海南岛十字苣苔属一新记录种[J].植物研究,2006,26(2):133-135.
    88. 任海,彭少麟,张奠湘,等. 报春苣苔的生态生物学特征[J].生态学报,2003,23(5):1012-1017.
    89. 沈显生. 植物学拉丁文[M]. 合肥:中国科技大学出版社,2005:1-160.
    90. 石进朝. 涝峪苔草叶绿素含量与耐阴性研究[J].中国农学通报,2007,23(3):240-243.
    91. 石胜友,成明吴,梁国鲁.变叶海棠遗传多样性的AFLP分析.园艺学报,2006,33(2):381-384
    92. 石胜友,成明昊,胡玉林,等. 用AFLP分析小金海棠的起源[J]. 园艺学报,2008,35(2):281-284.
    93. 苏雪痕. 园林植物耐阴性及其配置[J]. 北京林学院学报,1981,3(2):63-70.
    94. 孙东磊,申建梅,万树青,等. 金钟藤的危害与利用[J]. 中国野生植物资源,2006,25(1):32-34.
    95. 孙会忠,贺学礼.3种绢蒿属植物种子萌发特性的比较[J].西北农林科技大学学报,2007,35(2):198-202.
    96. 汤正辉,陈维伦,石雷, 等. 刺齿唇柱苣苔的离体快速繁殖[J]. 植物生理学通讯,2004,40(2):211.
    97. 汤正辉,石雷,陈维伦,等.台闽苣苔的组织培养和快速繁殖[J].植物生理学通讯,2005,41(4):497.
    98. 汤正辉,石雷,陈维伦,等. 异裂苣苔的组织培养和快速繁殖[J].植物生理学通讯,2005,41(5):643.
    99. 汤正辉, 石雷,陈维伦,等. 半蒴苣苔的组织培养和快速繁殖[J].植物生理学通讯,2005,41(3):333.
    100. 田晔林,李俊清,王文和,等.北京地区唇形科野生观赏植物资源及其观赏特性评价[J].北京农学院学报,2007,22(3):41-43.
    101. 王昌永.花叶蔓长春花光合生理特性的研究[J]. 安徽农学通报,2007,13(13):39-45.
    102. 王开发,王宪曾.孢粉学概论[J]. 北京:北京大学出版社,1983:21-48.
    103. 王丽勉. 惹人喜爱的扭果花属植物[N]. 中国花卉园艺,2004,4:24-25.
    104. 王满元,杨岚,屠呦呦.红药化学成分的研究[J]. 中国中药杂志,2006,31(4):307-308.
    105. 王满元,杨岚,屠呦呦.红药苯乙醇苷类化学成分的研究[J]. 中国中药杂志,2005,30(24):1921-1923.
    106. 王美平.弱光对苗期黄瓜形态和生理生化特性的影响[J].上海农业学报,2003:28-34.
    107. 王沙生,高荣孚,吴贯明. 植物生理学[M]2 版.北京:中国林业出版社,1991:136.
    108. 王素静,唐辉,沈博,等.无土栽培基质现状及展望[J].云南化工,2007,34(6):54-59.
    109. 王文采. 苦苣苔科五新属[J].植物研究,1981,1(3):21-51.
    110. 王文采. 中国苦苣苔科的研究(四)[J].植物研究,1982,2(4): 37–64.
    111. 王文采. 中国苦苣苔科植物的研究(六)[J]云南植物研究,1984,6(1):11-14.
    112. 王文采. 中国苦苣苔科植物的研究(七)[J].广西植物,1986,6:6-11.
    113. 王文采. 中国苦苣苔科植物的研究(十)[J].广西植物,1992,12:296-300.
    114. 王文采,中国科学院中国植物志编辑委员会. 中国植物志(第六十九卷)[M]. 北京:科学出版社.1990:125-581.
    115. 王文采,李振宇. 越南苦苣苔科一新属[J]. 植物分类学报,1992,30(4):356-361.
    116. 汪松,解焱,中国物种红色名录.第一卷[M].北京:中国高等教育出版社,2005: 405-406.
    117. 王苏斌,郑海涛,邵谦谦. SPSS统计分析[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2003:149-228.
    118. 王涛,祝军,李光晨,等.苹果砧木亲缘关系AFLP分析[J].中国农业科学,2001,34(3):256-259.
    119. 汪小全,李振宇.rDNA片段的序列分析在苦苣苔亚科系统学研究中的应用[J].植物分类学报,1998,36(2):97-105.
    120. 王雁.14种地被植物光能利用特性及耐阴性比较[J]. 浙江林学院学报,2005,22(1):6-11.
    121. 王印政,傅德志,彭华. 一个孑遗类群———尖舌苣苔族(Klugieae)物种的居群绝灭速率及其指示意义[J].生物多样性,1999,7(3):214-219.
    122. 王印政.异叶苣苔属地上茎的生长式样及其系统发育意义[J]. 植物分类学报,2000,38(3):231-235.
    123. 王印政,顾志建. 直瓣苣苔属、筒花苣苔属和吊石苣苔属4个种的核形态学研究[J].植物分类学报,1999,37(2):137-142.
    124. 王印政 云南异叶苣苔属(苦苣苔科)二新种[J].植物分类学报,1995,33(3):297-301.
    125. 王印政,李恒.云南贡山异叶苣苔属(苦苣苔科)一新种[J]. 植物分类学报,2000,38(2):189-191.
    126. 魏胜利,王文全,秦淑英,等.桔梗、射干的耐阴性研究[J].河北农业大学学报 ,2004,27(1):52-57.
    127. 韦毅刚.广西苦苣苔科一新属——方鼎苣苔属[J].植物分类学报,2004,42(6):528-532.
    128. 韦毅刚,文和群,钟树华.广西苦苣苔科植物新资料[J].植物分类学报,2000,38(3):297-301.
    129. 韦毅刚,钟树华,文和群.广西苦苣苔科植物区系和生态特点研究[J].云南植物研究,2004,26(2):173-182.
    130. 温放,李湛东.广西苦苣苔科植物资源及产业化前景[J]. 广西园艺,2005,16(4):56-59.
    131. 温放,张启翔.5种唇柱苣苔属植物叶插繁殖方式研究[J]. 北方园艺,2007,12:103-105.
    132. 温放,李湛东,张启翔.南方喀斯特地区苦苣苔科观赏植物在北京的引种栽培[J]. 北方园艺,2006,5:136-137.
    133. 温放,张启翔,任翔翔. 黄花牛耳朵的离体培养和快速繁殖[J]. 植物生理学通讯,2008,44(2):301-302.
    134. 文和群,钟树华. 广西苦苣苔科观赏植物资源[J]. 广西植物,1998,18(3):209-212.
    135. 武菊英 滕文军 王庆海.耐旱多年生观赏草春季观赏性评价[J].华北农学报,2006,21(1):129-132.
    136. 翁忙玲 程慧林 姜卫兵.弱光对园艺植物光合特性及生长发育影响研究进展[J].内蒙古农业大学学报:自然科学版,2007,28(3):279-282.
    137. 吴其濬撰(清). 植物名实图考[M]. 北京:商务印书錧出版社,1957:1-892.
    138. 吴梅,聂捷夫,娄义龙,等.野扇花与几种耐阴性植物光合作用的比较[J]. 贵州农业科学,2006,34(4):100-101.
    139. 伍世平,王君健,于志熙. 11 种地被植物的耐荫性研究[J]. 武汉植物学研究,1994,12(4):360-364.
    140. 吴晓蕾,杨利平,李敬蕊. 野生花卉蚂蝗七离体叶片培养和不定芽再生研究,2007中国观赏园艺研究进展[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2007:276-277.
    141. 吴征镒,孙航,周浙昆,等.中国植物区系中的特有性及其起源和分化[J].云南植物研究,2005,27(6):577-604.
    142. 吴征镒,路安民,汤承彦,等. 中国被子植物科属综论[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2003:1015-1021.
    143. 吴征镒,中国植被编辑委员会.中国植被[M]. 北京:科学出版社,1980:829-848
    144. 席以珍.后蕊苣苔属的花粉形态[J].植物研究. 1987,4(7):17-26.
    145. 谢嘉霖,刘荣华,叶启芳,等.无土栽培基质电导率和pH值测定条件的研究[J]. 安徽农业科学,2006,34(3):415-416.
    146. 邢全,石雷,刘立安,等. 中国苦苣苔科多肉观赏植物[N]. 中国花卉盆景,2005:2-4.
    147. 徐冰,金水虎,丁炳扬. 耐阴蕨类植物的筛选和园林应用[J].浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2006,32 (3):329-333.
    148. 徐宏英,陈会仙,岳建英,等.非洲紫罗兰有机型无土栽培研究[J].北方园艺,2004,4:76-77.
    149. 续九如,黄智慧.林业试验设计[M]. 北京:中国林业出版社,1995:71-80.
    150. 徐康,杨霞光,杜建仪,等. 不同基质对仙客来生长开花的影响[J].浙江林业科技,1998,l8(5):10-13.
    151. 徐良,韦毅刚.中国广西蛛毛苣苔属(苦苣苔科)一新种——桂林蛛毛苣[J].植物分类学报,2004,42(4):390-382.
    152. 徐文芬,何顺志.贵州唇形科、苦苣苔科药用植物资源的调查研究[J].贵州科学,2005,23(4):48-53.
    153. 许兆然.泰国蛛毛苣苔属一新种[J].植物分类学报,1994,32(4):359一361.
    154. 阎丽春,覃海宁.那坡县种子植物区系的特有现象[J].武汉植物学研究,2001,19(3):199-208.
    155. 闫双喜 刘保国 李永华,等.河南鸡公山自然保护区野生观花植物资源的研究[J].河南科学,2007,25(4):582-585.
    156. 严志坚,李振宇.中国苦苣苔科唇柱苣苔属花粉形态研究及其系统学意义[J].贵州科学,2003,21(3):1-8.
    157. 严志坚,李振宇.中国苦苣苔科长蒴苣苔属花粉形态研究[J].贵州科学,2003,21(4):5-9.
    158. 严志坚,李振宇. 宽叶吊石苣苔的胚胎学研究及其系统学意义[J].杭州师范学院学报(自然科学版),2003,2(2):23-26.
    159. 杨梅,刘建辉,李世栋,等.基质配方和施肥量对厚皮甜瓜幼苗生长及生理特性的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报,2007,35(4):168-174
    160. 应俊生,张玉龙.中国种子植物特有属[M]. 北京:科学出版社,1994:302-376.
    161. 余道平,彭启新,李策宏. 峨眉四照花的种子萌发特性[J].植物资源与环境学报,2007,16(3):79-80.
    162. 俞继英,周芳勇,林建军.仙客来栽培基质配方的研究[J].林业科技开发 ,2005,19(4):53-55.
    163. 郁书君,李贞植,俞奉植.杜鹃无土栽培基质配方的研究[J].园艺学报,2004,31(2):210-214.
    164. 曾小平,赵平,蔡锡安,等.25种南亚热带植物耐阴性的初步研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2006,28(4):88-95.
    165. 张德威,牟咏花.几种无土栽培基质的理化性质[J]. 浙江农业科学,1993,5(3):166-171.
    166. 张忠义,陈树国,王妙玲,等. 洛阳牡丹品种种质资源定量评估方法研究[J]. 河南农业大学学报,1996,30(2):133-138.
    167. 赵锋,胡鸢雷,祝建波,等. 厚叶旋蒴苣苔BcWRKY2基因5’端调控区的克隆及功能元件分析[J].石河子大学学报 ,2007,25(1):1-4.
    168. 赵恢武,刘晗,于海源, 等. 耐旱植物厚叶旋蒴苣苔BDN1脱水素基因的克隆及表达特性分析[J].科学通报,2000,45(15):1648-1654.
    169. 赵溪竹,姜海凤,毛子军. 长白落叶松、日本落叶松和兴安落叶松幼苗光合作用特性比较研究[J].植物研究,2007,27(3):361-366.
    170. 张海波 刘彭 刘立鸿.新疆短命植物小拟南芥(Arabidopsis pumila)种子萌发特性及其生态适应性[J].生态学报,2007,27(10):4310-4316.
    171. 张俊祥,李枝林,范成明,等.云南野生兰属主要种间亲缘关系的AFLP分析[J].园艺学报,2006,33(5):1141-1144.
    172. 张林青,周青,肖程岭.园林植物耐阴性研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学,2006,34(19):4851-4853.
    173. 张宁 沈红香 高遐虹,等.苹果属部分观赏品种与中国野生种的亲缘关系[J].园艺学报,2007,34(5):1227-1234.
    174. 张文辉,祖元刚,刘国彬.十种濒危植物的种群生态学特征及致危因素分析[J].生态学报,2002,22(9):1512—1520
    175. 张西露. 我国无土栽培的现状与展望[J].农技服务,2006,12:4-5.
    176. 张亚利. 梅花花粉超低温保存研究及其花粉库建立(博士论文)[D]. 北京:北京林业大学园林学院,北京林业大学研究生院,2007.
    177. 张源盛,余昌明,韦丽娜,等.无土栽培基质对菊花生长发育及产量的影响[J].浙江农业学报,1998,10(3):158—160.
    178. 张玉进,张兴国,刘佩瑛.魔芋花粉的低温和超低温保存[J]. 园艺学报,2000,27(2):139-140.
    179. 郑炳松,郑勇平. 仙客来叶片光合特性及其与环境因子的关系[J].浙江林学院学报,2001,18(4):366-370.
    180. 郑先云 郭亚平 马恩波.AFLP分子标记技术的发展[J].生命的化学,2003,23(1):65-67.
    181. 周立东,余竞光,郭伽, 等. 蚂蝗七根的化学成分研究[J]. 中国中药杂志,2001,26(2):114-117.
    182. 周世良,FUNAMOTO Tsuneo,文军. 六道木属六道木组种间关系的AFLP 分析和黄花六道木中国分布新记录的认定[J]. 云南植物研究, 2004, 26(4):405-412.
    183. 邹喻苹,葛颂,王晓东,等.系统与进化植物学中的分子标记[M].北京:科学出版社,2001:108-121,161-165.
    184. 朱华,王洪,李保贵. 十字苣苔属一新记录种[J].云南植物研究,1996,18(2):144.
    185. 朱科钤,蒋洁,胡永光. 温室蔬菜光合作用特性的试验研究[J].农机化研究,2005,3:202-204.
    186. 朱细俭,黄少峰. 金钟藤的初步调查研究[J]. 广东林堪设计,2003,3:33-34.
    187. A. J.underwoo: Experiments in ecology--their logical design and interpretation using analysis of variance[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1997:504-535.
    188. Aggarwal RK, Brar DS , Nandi S , et al.: Phylogenetic relationships among Oryza species revealed by AFLP markers [J] .Theor Appl Genet. 1999, 98:1320-1328.
    189. Anon: Tracking down the proper growing media[J]. Greenhouse Manager. 1983,2(7):55-69.
    190. Baskin C C, Baskin J .: Seeds Ecology,Biogeography and Evolution of Dormancy and Germination[M]. SanDiego: Academic Press,1998: 215-534.
    191. Bassman J B,Zwier JC. Gas: Exchange characteristics of Populus trichocarpa, Populus deltoides and Populus trichocarpa ×P. Deltoides clone[J]. Tree Physiol. 1991,8:145-149.
    192. Boggan J.K.: Fragrant flowers in Gesneriaceae[N]. Seattle: The Gloxinia, 1996,48:132-137.
    193. Burtt,B. L: Classification above the genus,as exemplified by Gesneriaceae, with parallels from other groupsPlant Systematics and Evolution 1[M], Supplement,1977:97-109.
    194. Chun-Neng Wang, Michael Moller, Quentin C. B. Cronk: Population Genetic Structure of Titanotrichum oldhamii (Gesneriaceae), a Subtropical Bulbiliferous Plant with Mixed Sexual and Asexual Reproduction[J].Annals of Botany. 2004,93(2): 201-209.
    195. El Gizawy, A. M. , Comaa, H. M.: Effect of diferentshading levels on tomato plants, I. Growth, flowering and chemical composition[J].Acta Horticulture. 1992, 323:341-347.
    196. Elizabeth A. Zimmer, Eric H. Roalson, Laurence E. Skog, et al.: Phylogenetic relationships in the Gesnerioideae (Gesneriaceae) based on nrDNA ITS and cpDNA trnL-F and trnE-T spacer region sequences[J]. Am. J. Botany. 2002 89: 296-311.
    197. Erdtman, G.: Pollen and spore morphology 1 plant Taxonomy.Vol.2[M]. Copenhagen: Ejnar Munksgaarl, 1957.
    198. Flemaire: Physical chemical and biological properties of growing media[J]. ActaHort. 1995, 396:273-284.
    199. Fonteno W C: Know your media—the air, water and contaller connection[J]. GrowerTalks. 1988, 51(11): 110-111.
    200. Gutterman Y: Seed germination in desert plants[M]. Berlin: Springer-Vedag, 1993.
    201. L Harper, P H Lovell, and K G Moore:The shapesand sizes of seeds[M]. North Wales, Great Britain: Annu Rev Ecol Syst, 1970, 1:327-356.
    202. Harbaugl1 B K. :Root medium components and fertilizer efects on pH[J]. PPGA News. 1994, 25(11): 2-4.
    203. Harold E Moore, Jr: African Violets, Gloxinias, and Their relatives--A Guide to the cultivated Gesneriads[M]. New York, NY:The Machillan Company,1957,1-323.
    204. Hoflacher H, Bauer H.: Light acclimateion in leaves of the juvenile and adult life phases of ivy(Hedera helix)[J]. Physiol Plant. 1982,56:177-182.
    205. Jackson M L.: Soil chemical analysis[M]. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs., 1970:50-55.
    206. James F. Smith: Phylogenetic resolution within the tribe Episcieae (Gesneriaceae): congruence of ITS and NDHF sequences from parsimony and maximum-likelihood analyses[J]. Am. J. Botany. 2000, 87: 883-897.
    207. James F. Smith: Systematics of Columnea Section Pentadenia and Section Stygnanthe (Gesneriaceae)[M]. Michigan: North University Building,1994:1-89.
    208. Jansen D H.: Variation in seed size within a crop of a Costa Rican Mucana and relllla[J]. Amer J Bot. 1977, 64: 347-349.
    209. Jason Carr, Mingliang Xu, John W. Dudley, et al.: AFLP analysis of genetic variability in New Guinea Impatiens[J]. Theor Appl Genet. 2003, 106:1509–1516.
    210. Jia-Mei Li, Yin-Zheng Wang: Phylogenetic Reconstruction Among Species of Chiritopsis and Chirita Sect. Gibbosaccus (Gesneriaceae) Based on nrDNA ITS and cpDNA trnL-F Sequences[J]. Systematic Botany. 2007, 32(4): 888–898.
    211. K. Kukulczanka, G. Suszynska: Regenerative properties of Saintpaulia ionantha Wendl. leaves cultured in vitro[J].Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae.1972, 12:503-510.
    212. K. W. Hughes, S. L. Bell, J. D. Caponetti: Anther-derived haploids of the African violet[J].Can J Bot. 1975,53:1442-1444.
    213. Koopman WJM, Zevenbergen M, Berg RGvan den: Species relationships in Lactuca sl (Lactuceae , Asteraceae) inferred from AFLP fingerprints [J]. Amer J Bot. 2001. 88:1881-1887.
    214. Kouki Hikosaka: Effect of leaf age,nitrogen nurtrition and photon flux density on the organization of photosynthetic apparatus in leaves of a vine (Ipomoea tricotore cav)grown horizontally to avoid mutual shading of leaves.Planta[J],1996,198(1):144-150.
    215. Lichtenthaler H K, Buschmann C, Doll M, et al.: Photosynthetic activity, chloroplast ultra-structure, and leaf characteristics of high-light and low-light plants and of sun and shade leaves[J]. Photosynth Res. 1981, 2:115-141.
    216. M. Appelgren, O. M.Heide: Regeneration in Streptocarpus leaf Discs and its regulation by temperature and growth substances[J]. Physiol Plant. 1972,27: 417-423.
    217. M Moller, QCB Cronk: Origin and relationships of Saintpaulia (Gesneriaceae) based on ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences[J].Am. J. Botany. 1997, 84: 956 -997.
    218. Mace ES , Gebhardt CG, Lester RN , AFLP analysis of genetic relationships in the tribe Datureae (Solanaceae) [J ]. Theor Appl Genet. 1999, 99: 634-641.
    219. Mathieu Perret, Alain Chautems, Rodolphe Spichiger,et al.: Nectar Sugar Composition inRelation to Pollination Syndromes in Sinningieae (Gesneriaceae)[J]. Annals of Botany. 2001,87(2):267-274.
    220. N. D. Start, B. G. Cumming: In Vitro Propagation of Saintpaulia ionantha Wendl[J]. HortScience. 1976,11(3):204-206.
    221. Nasrddin, A. Smitley D. R. Relationship of Frankliniella occidentalis(Thysanoptera: Thripidae) population density and feeding injury to the frequency of insecticide applications to gloxinia[J]. Journal of Economic Entomology. 1991,84(6):1812-1817.
    222. Nelson P V.: Greenhouse operation and management(6/E)[M]. North Carolina: North Carolina State University, Department of Horticultural Science,2003:87—89.
    223. P. C. Bilkey, B.H. McCown: A.C. Hildebrandt. Micropropagation of African Violet from Petiole Cross Sections[J].HortScience. 1978,13(1):37-38.
    224. P. C. Bilkey, E.C. Cocking: Increased Plant Vigor by in Vitro Propagation of Saintpaulia ionantha Wendl. From Sub-epidermal Tissue[J].HortScience. 1981, 16(5): 643-644.
    225. P. M. Harney, A. Knap.A: Technique For the In Vitro Propagation of African Violets Using Petioles[J].Can J Plant Sci.1979,59(1):263-266.
    226. D. E. Peck, B. G. Cumming: In Vitro Vegetative Propagation of Cape primrose Using the Corolla of the Flower [J].HortScience. 1984,19(3):399-400.
    227. O. M. Hilliard: A revision of Chirita Sect. Liebigia (Gesneriaceae)[J]. Edinburgh Journal of Botany. 2004,60(3):361-387.
    228. Peggie Schuly: Gloxinias-and How to Grow them[M]. New York,NY: M. Barrows and Company,Inc,1965,1-128.
    229. R. C..Cooke: Tissue Culture Propagation of African Violets[J].HortScience. 1977,12(6):549.
    230. R. E. Norris, R.H. Smith, P. Tuner: Phenotypic. Differences in Haploid African Violets[J].Tissue Culture Association. 1982,18(5):443-446.
    231. R.H. Smith, R.E. Norris: In Vitro Propagation of African Violet Chimeras[J].HortScience. 1983, 18(4):436-437.
    232. Sachiko A, Izumi W.:Seed dormancy/germination traits of seven Persicaria species and their implication in soil seed-bank strategy[J]. Ecol Res. 2000, 15: 33-46.
    233. Schaal B A.: Reproductive capacity and seed size in Lupinus texensis[J]. Amer J Bot. 1980,67:703-709.
    234. Silvana Marten-Rodriguez: In Search of Flowers and Pollinators:a Ten-Day Trip in Jamaica[J]. The Gloxinian. 2005,55(3)48-53.
    235. Silvertown J W.:Seed size, life span and germination date as coadapted features of plant life history[J]. Amer Nat. 1981,18:860-864.
    236. Saaty T L.: The Analytic Hierachy Process[M]. New York,NY: McGraw Hill, Ino., 1980.
    237. Stefan Vogel,Werner Huber,Anton Weber: Perfume Flowers in Gesneriaceae and their pollination by Euglossine Bees[J].2005,The Gloxinia. 55(2):46-53.
    238. T. Winkelamann, J. Grunewaldt: Genotypic variability for protoplast regeneration in Saintpaulia ionantha (H.Wendl.)[J].Plant Cell Reports. 1995,14:704-707.
    239. The Gesneriad Society, Inc.: How to know and grow Gesneriads[M]. Seattle: The Gesneriad Society, 2007:4-55.
    240. Thompsin J N.: Variation among individual seed weights in Lonatium grayi under controlled conditions:Magnitude and partitioning of the variance[J]. Ecology. 1984, 654:626-631.
    241. Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M et al.: AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting[J]. Nucleic Acids Research,1995,23(21):4407-4414.
    242. W. Handro: Effects of Some Growth Regulators on in vitro Flowering of Streptocarpus nobilis[J]. Plant Cell Reports. 1983, 2:133-136.
    243. WANG Lei, GAO Qiu,WANG Yin-Zheng, et al.: Isolation and sequence analysis of two CYC-like genes, SiCYC1A and SiCYC1B, from zygomorphic and actinomorphic cultivars of Saintpaulia ionantha (Gesneriaceae)[J].Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica. 2006,44(4):353-361.
    244. Wang, W.T., Pan, K.Y., Li, Z.Y.: Lagarosolen In: Z.Y. wu & P.H. Raven (eds.) Flora of China[M]. Beijing: Science Press, Beijing and Botanical Garden Press, St. Lois, Missouri, 1998,18:310.
    245. WANG Yin-Zheng, Li Zhen-Yu, PAN Kai-Yu,et al.: Floral Organogenesis of Titanotrichum oldhamii (Gesneriaceae)[J].Acta Botanica Sinica. 2002,44(8)895-901.
    246. WANG Yin-Zheng, Li Zhen-Yu, PAN Kai-Yu, et al.: Pattern and Significance of Seedling Development in Titanotrichum oldhamii (Gesneriaceae)[J]. Acta Botanica Sinica. 2002,44(8):903-907.
    247. Wei Yi-Gang: A new species of Lagarosolen WT Wang (Gesneriaceae) from Guangxi province, China[J]. KEW BULLETIN.2007, 61:273-275.
    248. Wen-Hong Chen,Yu-min Shui: Ancylostemon hekouensis (Gesneriaceae), a new species from Yunnan, China[J].Ann.Bot.Fennici. 2006,43:448-450.
    249. Wood D.: A revision of Chirita (Gesneriaceae)[J]. Edinburgh: Notes from the Royal Botanical Garden, 1974,33:123-205.
    250. Xiaowei Ni, Yelin Huang, Lin Wu, et al.: Genetic diversity of the endangered Chinese endemic herb Primulina tabacum (Gesneriaceae) revealed by amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP)[J]. Genetica. 2006,127:177-183.
    251. Y.G. Wei: Petrocodon ferrugineus (Gesneriaceae), a New Species from Guangxi, China[J]. NOVON. 2007,17:135-137.
    252. Yoichiro Hoshino, Masaru Nakano, Masahiro Mii.: Plant regeneration from cell suspension-derived protoplasts of Saintpaulia ionantha Wendl.[J].Plant Cell Report. 1995,14:341-344.
    253. ZABEAU M., VOS P.: Selective restriction fragment amplification: a general method for DNA fingerprinting[P]. European patent Application, 1995,: Publication Number Ep 0534858 A 1
    254. 森 源 治 郎 : Studies on the growth and flowering of bulbous plants of Amaryllidaceae~growth and flowering of Lycoris plants grown in the field[J].J Japan Soc Hort SCi,1997,(45):389.