摘要
从现代审计的发展过程来看,风险评价系统是风险审计的灵魂。在对风险审计的研究文献中,更多的是对这种方法模式的技术和功效进行评价分析,只是强调风险评估理念,并未就影响其核心的“风险评价”进行深入研究,而怎样促使审计主体合理评估,才是风险审计评价系统能否有效推行的关键,也是审计以“客户满意”为基础的审计绩效发展的重点。
审计综合评价研究的核心问题就是对审计评价的研究缺乏基本的理论和一般方法,现有的研究缺乏系统性,许多审计评价理论研究成果,不但没有系统性、适应性、广泛性,甚至缺乏最基本的概念基础,与实际应用的距离较大。
立足于审计服务思想,用系统工程管理的观点,研究审计服务“瓶颈”问题的形成、制度结构、及其审计评价系统的运筹与控制,对于提高我国审计服务业的管理水平,实现与国际接轨,对中国审计的发展和全新社会保障体系的平台构建,从根本上解除国家或社会对审计承担的无限责任,解除审计对审计服务承担的无限责任,具有十分重要的理论和实践意义。
本文通过详细、深入和全面的研究论证,在审计服务运筹与控制的基础性研究方面、审计评价系统控制优化的组织结构研究方面、审计动态运筹与控制研究方面以及审计评价系统体系与反馈控制研究方面均有创新与突破,给出了审计评价系统研究的基本理论和一般方法,为审计综合评价系统与评价建模搭建提供决策支持。
本文以理论研究为主,采用定性与定量相结合、理论与实证相结合的研究方法。综合运用了包括结构动态设计理论,运筹学,数理统计,决策理论,现代预测理论,信息论等在内的基本理论；并有效采用了结构动态设计理论、数学分析、系统工程、模糊熵的理论、运筹学、模糊数学、马尔科夫及多目标规划等多种技术方法。在实证研究中,本文综合运用了多种数学方法,并应用C语言进行应用编程。
本文解决了审计风险结构的优化规律描述与当前审计服务约束条件下的研究思路问题,找到了长期以来审计主体风险抑制问题的症结,构建了审计体制的结构优化配置的黄金分割模型,并用系统工程学方法研究了审计二元关系模式主体的建模与控制问题,最后构建了基于“客户满意度”的审计绩效模糊综合评价模型(量化),为进一步优化审计发展的运筹与控制,提供了量化依据。
本文的研究成果,将极大地推进审计评价系统的建立,实现审计体制转型、机制革命和从“传统计划审计到审计服务满意”的现代审计转制过程,使其不仅能起到“经验指导”作用,而且还具有“理论牵引”作用,并将对整个审计服务发展、审计评价系统与研究起到基础性的推动作用。
The risk assessment has become the soul of risk audit from the view of development process of modern audit. The research literatures of risk audit have been focusing on the evaluation and analysis to the technology and efficacy of the method, and only stressing the concept of risk evaluation, but not lucubrating to the "risk assessment" that affects the core. However, how to promote the rational assessment of audit main body is the key that determines the effective implementation of risk audit, as well as is the developmental emphasis of audit performance that takes the "customer satisfaction" as the basis.
The core issue studied by audit comprehensive evaluation is the lack of basic theory and general methods in the study for audit evaluation for the present researches are devoid of system. Many theoretical research results of audit evaluation are short of system, adaptability, breadth, and even the most basic concept foundation, thus having great distance to the practical application.
Basing on the idea of audit service, utilizing the view of system engineering, studying the form and system structure of "bottleneck" problems in the audit service, as well as planning and controlling the audit system have great theoretical and practical significance to enhance the management level of China audit service, to gear to international standard, to build a platform for the development of China audit and new social security system, to release fundamentally from unlimited liabilities of audit undertaken by the country or society, and to relieve the unlimited liabilities of audit service borne by the audit.
Through delicate, embemed and thourgh research and proof, this dissertation innovated in the basic research on audit service operation and control, in the organizational structure of audit review optimization, in the audit dynamic operation and control and the evaluation and feedback of audit behavior. This dissertation Provided Decision-Making Support for the founding of audit evaluation and feedback system.
This dissertation mainly based on theory study through qualitative and quantitative methods. It integratedly use dynamic design theory, operation, Mathematical statistics, Decision theory, modern forecasting theory and information theory; otherwise this dissertation used a lot of technology, such as structure dynamic design theory, Mathematical Analysis, systematic engineering, Fuzzy Entropy, Markov Process and Multiobjective Programming. In empirical research, this dissertation used a lot of mathematic methods and programmed using C language.
This dissertation solved the fundamental research thinking of audit risk structure optimization regular pattern description and currently audit service restriction. It discovered the crucial reason which restrained the audit body risk and founded the golden section model of audit system structure optimization allocation and then researched the modeling and control problem of systematic audit duality relation body using engineering method and founded a audit performance fuzzy evaluation model based on customer satisfaction, which provided quantitative basis for the further development of audit operation and control.
The research results of this selected subject will greatly advance the establishment of audit evaluation system, realize the transition and mechanism revolution of the audit system, as well as the transfer process of modern audit from the "traditional planned audit to audit service satisfaction", and enable the audit to play the role of "Experience Guidance" and "Theory Traction", as well as play a fundamental promoting role to the development and research of the entire audit service.
引文
[]]国家审计署2003年第5号令.审计机关审计事项评价准则,2003(12)
[2]国家审计署2004年第6号令.审计机关审计项目质量控制办法,2004(2)
[3]中国内部审计协会.内部审计16号准则,2005(5)
[4]Eilifsen, A., Knechel, W. R. and Wallage, P.. Application of the Business Risk Audit Model:A Field Study, Accounting Horizons.2001 (9):193-207
[5]Knechel, W. R, Behavioral Research in Auditing and Its Impact on Audit Education. Issues in Accounting Education,2000 (1) Knechel,W.R. Auditing:Assurance&Risk.2nd edition, South-Western College Publishing.2001:8-9
[6]Michael K.Power. Auditing and the Production of Legitimacy. Accounting, Organizations and Society 2003 (28):379-394
[7]黄世忠,陈建明.美国财务舞弊症结探究.会计研究,2002(]0)：16-18
[8]石爱中.独立审计准则研究.经济科学出版社,2002：67-86
[9]胡春元.风险基础审计.(大连)东北财经大学出版社,2001：67
[10]刘峰,许菲.风险导向型审计法律风险审计质量.会计研究,2002(2)：5
[1]]王修歧、刘兵.制度基础审计与风险基础审计的比较研究.审计研究,1997(1)：37-40
[12]陈志强.风险导向审计理论结构中的一个缺陷.审计研究,1998(5)：48-49
[13]张龙平,聂曼曼.试论新审计风险模型的理论进步与运用.审计研究,2005(4)
[14]陈毓圭.对风险导向审计方法的由来及其发展的认识.会计研究,2004(2)：58-63
[15]谢荣,吴建友.现代风险导向审计理论研究与实务发展.会计研究,2004(4)：57-59
[16]杨志国,常志安.关于上市公司审计风险成因的调查研究.审计研究,2004(4)：27-32
[17]Ashton, R. H.1974. An Experimental Study of Internal Control Judgments. Journal ofAccounting Research.12 (1) Ashton, R. H.1976. Cognitive Changes Induced by Accounting Changes: Experimental Ev ence on the Functional Fixation Hypothesis. Journal of Accounting Research.14 (Supplement)
[18]Ashton, R. H.1974. An Experimental Study of Internal Control Judgments. Journal ofAccounting Research.12 (1)
[19]Libby. R.1975. Accounting Ratios and the Prediction of Failure:Some Be havioral Evidence. Journal of Accounting Research 13 (1)
[20]Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman.1974. Judgm ent under Uncertainty:Heuristics and Biases. Science
[21]Swieringa, R. J., and M. Gibbins, L_Larsson and J. L. Sweeney.1976. Experiments in the Heuristics of Human Information Processing. Journal of Accounting Research 14 (Supplement)
[22]Gibbins, M.1977. Classificatory Smoothing of Income with Extraordinary Items:Research Implications. The Accounting Review 52 (2)
[23]Joyce, E. J., and G. C. Biddle.1981. An choring and Adjustmentin Probabilistic Inference in Auditing. Joumal of Accounting Research 19 (1)
[24]Kin ey, W. R., Jr., W. C. Uecker.1982. Mitigating the Consequences of Anchoring in Auditor Judgments. The Accounting Review 57 (1)
[25]Biggs, S. F., andT. J. Mock.1983. An Investigation ofAuditors Decision Processes in the Evaluation of Internal Co ntrols and Audit Scope Decision. Journal of Accounting Research 21 (1)
[26]Bulter, S. A.1986. An choring in the Judgmental Evaluation of AuditSamples. TheAccounting Review 61 (1)
[27]W right. A.1988. The comparative Performance of M BAs Vs Undergraduate Accounting Ma jors in Public Accounting. The Accounting Review 63 (1)
[28]Abdolmoharnmadi. M., and A. Wright.1987. An Examination of the Effects of Experience and Task Complexity on Audit Judgment. The Accounting Renew 62 (1)
[29]Libby, R.1985. Availability and the Generation of Hypo theses in An alytical Review. Journal of Accounting Research 23 (1)
[30]Bedard, J. C., and S. F. Biggs.1991. Pattern Recognition, Hypotheses Generation, and Auditor Performance in an Analytical Task. The Accounting Review 66 (3)
[31]Bonnet, S. E., an d B. L. Lewis.1990. Determinants of Auditor Expertise. Journal of Accounting Research (28)
[32]Libby, R., an d H. T. Tan.1993. Modeling the determinants of audit expertise. Working paper, Cornell University.
[33]Ashton, A. H.1991. An EmpiricalAn alysisofExpertise, Experience, an d Error Frequency Knowledge in Auditing. The Accounting Review 66 (2)
[34]Nelson. M. W.1993. The Effects of Error Frequency an d Accoun ting Kn owledge on Error Diagnosis in AnaIytical Review. The Accounting Review 68 (4)
[35]Tubbs. R. M.. 1992. TheEffect ofExperience ontheAuditor's Organization an d Amoun t of Knowledge. The Accoun ting Review 67 (4)
[36]Nelson, M. W., R. Libby, S. E. Bon er.1995. Kn owledge Strutture and the Estimation of Co nditional Pmbabilities in Audit Planning. The Accounting Review 70 (1)
[37]李若山.审计案例一国外审计诉讼案例.辽宁人民出版社,1998：89-102
[38]葛家澎,黄世忠.安然事件的反思—对安然公司会计审计问题的剖析.会计研究,2002(2)
139]胡春元.风险基础审计.东北财经大学出版社(大连),2000：69-80,113
[40]黎仁华,马宝善.犯罪行为控制论.中国检察出版社,2002
[41]王光远.关于审计学科建设的新问题.审计研究,2000(1)
[42]李勇.谈我国独立审计准则制定与实施的有关问题.财务与会计,2002(4)
[43]徐政旦,谢荣等.审计研究前沿.上海财经大学出版社,2002(10)：212-237[44] Nichols&Smith, Predicting Audit Qualification With Financial and Market Variables, The Accounting Review, Vol.52.1983:108-126
[45]Simunic&Stein, An Examination of Audit Reporting for Accounting Principles Changes, Journal of Applied Business Research, Vol.16, No.3,1987: 87-103
[46]Teoh&Wong, Perserved Auditor Quality and the Earnings Response Coefficient, Accounting Review, Vol.68,1993:346-368
[47]Becker, DeFond and Jiambalvo, The Effect of Audit Quality on Earnings Management, Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol 15, No 1,1998:63-75
[48]DeFond, M. and J. Jiambalvo, Factors Related to Auditor-Client Disagreements Over Income-Increasing Accounting Methods ", Contemporary Accounting Research.1993 (9):415-431.
[49]Aharony, J., C-W. Jevons and T.J.Wong, Financial packaging of IPO firms in China, Journal of Accounting Research.1998 (24):103-126.
[50]Vander Banwhede, Marleen Willekens, Ann GaeremynckAudit Firm Size, Public Ownership, and the Firms'Discretionary Accruals Management, The International Journal Of Accounting.2003 (38):1-22
[51]Haw, I., D. Qi., W. WU. and W. Zhang. Earnings management of listed firms in response to security regulations in China, s emerging capital market. Working paper,1998
[52]Aharony, Lee and Wong, Financial Packaging of IPO. Firms in China, Journal of Financial Economics.2000 (20):293-315
[53]Michael. Firth, An Analysis of Audit Fees and Their Determinants in New Zealand, Auditing:A Journal of Practice and Theory.1985 (11):23-37
[54]Dharan, B. G. and Lev, B., The Valuation Consequence of Accounting Changes; A multi-Year Examination, Appears in Journal of Accounting, Auditing, and Finance.1993 (8):475-94
[55]Lawrence A.Ponemon, The Objective of Accountants'Litigation Support Judgments, The Accounting Review.1995 (7):249-275
[56]陈汉文.审计学研究.厦门大学出版社.2003(10)：34。
[57]张立民.论审计质量的影响因素及其改善,中国注册会计师,2000年(2) 8-12
[58]张龙平,张敦力.试论审计质量特征与审计质量控制思想,审计研究,1997(5)：26-27
[59]武俊.论审计质量分层与管理.审计研究,2004(3)：26-30
[60]冯均科.注册会计师审计质量控制理论研究.北京中国财政财经出版社,2002(1)：262-164
[61]王英姿.注册会计师审计质量评价与控制研究.上海财经大学出版社,2002(1)
[62]叶少琴.中国上市公司注册会计师审计质量研究.北京中国财政财经出版社,2004(1)
[63]Bamber, E. M.1993. Opportunities in Behavioral Accoun ting Research. Be havioral Research in Accoun ting 5.
[64]林俊家、宫军.审计环境论.审计研究,1999(4)：1-6
[65]Emby, C. R., A Davidson, The Effects of EngagementFactors on Auditor Independence:Canadian Evidence, Jour-nal of International Accounting, Auditing&Taxation,1988
[66]Libby, R., an d H. T. Tan.1993. Modeling the determinants of audit expertise. Working paper, Cornell University.
[67]Kennedy, J.1993. Debiasing Audit Judgment with Accountability:A Fram ework and Some Experimental Results. Journal of Accounting Research 31 (2) Kenedy, J.1995. Debiasing the Curse of Knowledge in Audit Judgment. The Accounting Review 70 (2)
[68]Brunswik E. The conceptual framework of psychology, Chicago, University of Chicago Press,1952
[69]冯·诺依曼,摩根斯坦恩.博弈论和经济行为.中国经济出版社,1994：56-72
[70]Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman.1974. Judgm ent under Uncertainty:Heuristics and Biases. Science.
[71]潘德冰.社会场论导论.华东师范大学出版社,1992：57-72,93-95,158-167
[72]Fama, E., " Agency Problem and the Theory of the Firm", Journal of PoliticalEconomy,88:1980:288-307.
[73]Becker. Crime and punishment:An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy 76,1968:169-217
[74]Jensen. M., and Meckling, W. Theory of the firm:managerial behavior, agency costs and capital structure. Journal of Financial Economics,1976, 3:305-360
[75]张维迎.产权安排与企业内部的权力斗争.经济研究,2000年(6)：40-50
[76]Milgrom, P., " Employment Contracts, Influcence Activities, and Efficient Organization Design", Journal of Political Economy,1988:42-60.
[77]刘峰,许菲.风险导向型审计：审计质量——兼论“五大”在我国审计市场的行为.会计研究,2002(2)：21-27
[78]盛乐,包迪鸿.人力资本的产权化效应.浙江学刊杂志,2002(1)：171
[79]Jacqueline Senker and Wendy Faukkner. "Networks, racit knowledge and innlvarion", in Rod Coombs et al. (eds.), Technological Collaboration: Dynamics of Cooperation in Industrial Innovation. Cheltenham:Edward Elgar Publishing Limited,1996
[80]Cordero, R"Changing human resources to make flextble manufacturng system (FMS)successful, " the journal of High technology Management research,1997, 8 (2):263-275
[81]Michael, A · Sheppeck:Leadership, Values, and Accountability. In M ·M·Chemers &, R. Ayman (Eds.), Leadership Theory and Research:Perspectives and Directions:San Diego, CA:academic Press,2000:109-136
[82]Thomas A.Stewart, "Brainpower:Hutellectual Capital Js Becoming America's Most Valuable Asset," 1991 (3):40-56
[83]Thomas A. Stewart, "Your Company's Most Valuable Asset:Intellectual Capital," 1994 (10):34-42
[84]Kamoche, K. " Strategic human resource management within a resource-capability view of the firm, " journal of Management Studies,1996, 33 (2):213-233
[85]Miller, W. "Building the ultimate resource, " Management Review,1999 January:42-45
[86]Robert L. Mathis&John H. Jackson:Human Resource Management,9thed, South-Western College Publishing,1999
[87]Delaney J T, Huselid M A. The impact of human resource manage ment practices on perceptions of organizational performance. Acade my of Manage ment Journal,1996 (39):949-969
[88]Pfeffer J. Producing sustainable competitive advantage through the effective manage ment of people. Acade my of Management Executive,1995 (9) 55-69
[89]Huselid. The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover Productivity, and Corporate Financial Performance, Academy of Management Journal,1995 (38):635-672
[90]Ferris G R, Arthur M M, Berkson H M, Kaplan D M, Harrell-Cook G, Frink D D. Toward a social context the ory of the human resource management-organization effective relationship. Human Resource Manage ment Review,1998 (8):235-267
[91]王永龙.当代西方的战略人力资源管理.经济管理,2003(4)：50-54
[92]温小郑,张涛,吴成茂.邮政行业劳动力组织结构调整研究.陕西人民教育出版社,2003(8)：115-182
[93]Jennings N R, Sycara K, Wooldridge M J. A roadmap of agent research and development. Journal of Autonomous Agent and Multi-Agent System,1998 (1): 275-306
[94]Wooldridge M J, Jennings N R. Intelligent agent:theory and practice. Knowledge Engineering Review.1995,10 (2):115-152
[95]Yang Kun, Liu Da-you. Agents:properties and classification. Computer Science.1999,26 (9):30-34
[96]Wooldridge M J. Agent-Based software engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.1997,144 (1):26-34
[97]Haddadi A. Reasoning about cooperation in agent system:a pragmatic theory [Ph.D. Thesis]. Manchester, UK:University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology (UMIST),1995
[98]Rao A S, Georgeff M P. BDI agent:from theory to practice. In:Georgeff M P ed. Proceedings of the 1st Internation(?)Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS-95). San Francisco. ACM Press. 1995:312-319
[99]Ross, S. The Econom ic Theory of Agen:the Pr jncipal'sProblem Am erican Econom ic Review.1973 (2):134-139
[100]Mirrless, J. The Optim al Sttucture of lncentive and Authority w ith in an Organization. Bell Journal of Econom ic.1976 (1):105-131
[101]Stiglitz, J. E. Incentive and R sk sharing in sharecropping. Review of Econom in Studies 1974 (4):219-256
[102]史金平.现代企业的委托代理.经济师.2000年(7)：19-20
[103]Leland, H. E. Agency costs, risk management, and capital structure. Journal of Finance.1998,53 (4):1213-1243
[104]Anderson, M. H. and Prezas, A. P. The interaction of investment and financing decisions under moral hazard. International Review of Economics and Finance.1998 (4):379-392
[105]Agrawal, A. and Mandelker, G. N. Managerial incentives and corporate investement and financing decisions. Journal of Finance.1987 (4):823-837
[106]Hellmann. T. and Stiglitz, J. Credit and equity rationing in markets with adverse selection. European Economic Review.2000 (44):281-304
[107]Nygaard A. and Myrtveit, I.Moral hazard, competition and contract design:empirical evidence from managerial, franchised and entrepreneurial businesses in Norway. Applied Economics.2000 (32):349-356
[108]张维迎.公有制经济中的委托人—代理人关系：理论的政策含义.经济研究,1995 (4)： 21-26
[109]谢茂拾.论重构国企改制工作的委托代理运作系统.广东商学院学报,2000(1)：28-34
[110]Hart,0., and Moore, J., "Property Rights and the Nature of the Firm", Journal of Political Economy Vol.1998 (6),1990 (10):1119-1158
[111]Arrow. K. The economics of agency. Principal and Agents:The Structure of Business, Boston:Harvard Business School Press,1985,37-51
[112]Tobin. J. Liquidity preference as behavior toward srisk. Review of Economic Studies.1958,26 (1):65-86
1113]陈收,吴芸.委托代理关系下组合投资与资本结构优化决策.系统工程理论与实践,2000(7)：21-26
[114]Hart,0. and Holm strom, B. The Theory of Contracts. Advances in Economic Theory: Fifth World Congress. New York:Cambridge University Press.1987
[115]陈收,刘卫国,汪寿阳,邓小铁.融资约束条件下投资组合有效边界研究.预测,2000,(1)：38-40
[116]徐新,邱菀华.委托代理问题中信息对称情况下自然状态对最优契约的影响研究.系统工程理论与实践,2000(11)：62-66
[117]张维迎.博弈论与信息经济学.上海人民出版社,1996年
[1]8]詹姆斯·莫里斯.非对称信息下的激励理论.上海商务印书馆,1997年
[119]Holm strom B. Moral hazard and observability. The Bell Journal of Economics,1979 (1):74-91
[120]唐绍祥.基于马尔可夫过程的有限平均动态委托代理模型.数量经济技术经济研究,2001(10)：47-50
[121]张青.基于“发展导向的企业绩效评价研究.中国管理科学,2001(2)：58
[122]戴维. 奥斯本等.改革政府——企业精神如何改革着公营部门(中译本).上海译文出版社,1996年：121
[123]周志忍.当代国外行政改革比较研究.北京国家行政学院出版社,1999：59
[124]赵俊涅,韩玉启.基于“客户满意“导向的审计绩效研究.生产力研究.2008(8)： 153
[125]Jones, D.; Logistics Quality Management--The Key to Customer Satisfaction; Selected Areas in Communications, IEEE Journal on, Volume: 4, Issue:7, Oct 1986:10621-067
[126]Anderson, J., Rungtusanatham. M., Schroeder, R., Devaraj, S., A path analytic model of a theory of quality manngement underlying the Deming management method:preliminary empirical findings. Decision Scieces 1995.26 (5):637-658
[127]Boulding, William, Ajay Kalra, etal. A dynamo ic process model of service quality:from expectation to behavior intention. Journal of Marketing Research,1987,24:305-314.
[128]Fornell and Birger Wernerfelt. Differentiation as a Basis for Explaining Customer Satisfaction Across Industries. Journal of Economic Psychology 1987; Vol.44 (4):681-696
[129]刘宇.顾客满意度及其测评方法研究.数量经济技术经济研究,2001年(1)：87-90
[130]刘宇,葛新权.顾客满意度指数及其构造.数量经济技术经济研究,2001(10)： 70-73
[131]胡宁生主编.中国政府形象战略(下册).中共中央党校出版社,1998：1023-1028
[132]韩晓梅.西方内部审计十大发展趋势.上海会计,2002(7)
[133]于玉林.试论面向新世纪的内部审计制度.审计研究,2000(6)
[134]余玉苗,黄兵海.我国上市公司战略审计初探.财会月刊,2004(5)
[135]Martin Shubik.社会科学中的博弈论.Game Theory in the Social Sciences,麻省理工学院出版社,1982年
[136](美)亨格(Hunger, D. J.),(美)惠伦(Wheelen, T. L.)著,电子工业出版社,2008(1)
[137]Gordon Donaldson,1985: "Managing Corporate Wealth", New York: Praeger
[138]何卫东.上市公司自愿性信息披露研究.深圳证券交易所研究报告,2003年