外源海藻糖提高黄瓜抗逆性的研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本论文以黄瓜幼苗作为实验材料,测试黄瓜在干旱、盐碱和低温环境胁迫条件下的若干生理指标,比较不同浓度海藻糖处理后对提高黄瓜幼苗抗逆性的作用效果。研究结果表明:
     1.用PEG6000模拟干旱条件,海藻糖处理后可提高干旱胁迫下黄瓜幼苗叶片的相对含水量和叶绿素的含量,降低电导率和MDA的含量,提高POD、CAT和SOD酶的活性。说明海藻糖可缓解干旱对黄瓜幼苗生长的胁迫。差异显著性测定后比较海藻糖各处理的效果,浓度为10mmol·L~(-1)的处理效果好于低浓度的处理。
     2.在180 mmol·L~(-1)的NaCI胁迫下,分别添加5、10、20 mmol·L~(-1)海藻糖的处理都可提高黄瓜幼苗的叶片相对含水量和叶片叶绿素含量,降低细胞质膜通透性和MDA含量,提高POD和CAT酶的活性。这些数据说明添加海藻糖可减轻盐分胁迫对黄瓜的伤害。差异显著性测定表明,在5、10、20 mmol·L~(-1)的海藻糖处理浓度中,10 mmol·L~(-1)的处理效果最好。
     3.在4℃低温胁迫条件下,海藻糖处理后测定黄瓜芽苗根和三叶期幼苗叶片的有关生理指标,结果表明海藻糖处理可降低两种材料的细胞质膜通透性和MDA含量,提高POD和CAT酶的活性,提高幼苗叶片的叶绿素含量。说明用外源海藻糖处理黄瓜幼苗可减轻低温胁迫对幼苗的伤害,而且在黄瓜幼苗的两个不同生长时期得到了一致的结果。差异显著性测定表明,与对照相比,10 mmol·L~(-1)海藻糖处理对于黄瓜冷害胁迫的抗性具有显著效果。
     本研究测定结果表明了一定浓度的海藻糖溶液预处理黄瓜幼苗可提高其在低温、高盐以及干旱胁迫下的抗逆性。关于提高黄瓜幼苗对于抗旱性以及耐冷性的海藻糖最适浓度,我们正在设计实验,旨在通过进一步的研究得出较为明确的结论。关于海藻糖提高黄瓜抗逆性的生理机制以及生产应用技术将成为今后研究的重要课题。
The paper tested several main physiological indexes of cumuber under separately abiotic stress including drought injury, salt injury, and chilling injury, to study that trehalose solution of adapive concentration had the ability of improving the stress resistance of cumuber. The results are followed.
     The firstly, under drought injury with PEG6000, trehalose solution of adapive concentration improved relative water content and chlorophyll content of cucumber leaves, and increased the activitives of peroxidase (POD) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) of cucumber leaves and reduced cell membrane relative permeability and MDA content. These showed that the trehalose solution of adapive concentration had the ability of reducing the drought injury of cumuber. Among several different treatments, the effect of 10mmol.L~(-1) treholase solution was better.
     The secondly, under salt injury of 180 mmol.L~(-1) NaCI, these treatments including 5, 10, 20mmol.L~(-1) trehalose solutions improved relative water content and chlorophyll content of cucumber leaves, and increased the activitives of peroxidase (POD) and catalase (CAT) of cucumber leaves and reduced cell membrane relative permeability and MDA content. These dataes showed that trehalose solution of adapive concentration reduced salt injury. Distinct tests showed that among the three solutions, 10 mmol.L~(-1) was the best.
     The last, under chilling injury of 4℃, the treatment of 10 mmol.L~(-1) improved relative water content and chlorophyll content, and increased the activitives of peroxidase (POD) and catalase (CAT) and reduced cell membrane relative permeability and MDA content. Further more, the result of cumuber seedlings was the same as that of cumuber gemma. These showed that the trehalose solution of 10 mmol.L~(-1) improved the chilling resistance of cumuber.
     These studies showed that the trehalose solution of adapive concentration improved the chilling resistance,drought resistance and salt resistance of cumuber. The next experiments will be done about the most adapive solution that trehalose solution improve stress resistance of cumuber, and the physiological mechanism of stress resistance.
引文
[1].王宝山.植物生理学[M].北京,科学出版社,2004
    [2].冯翠莲.转基因烟草的遗传稳定性分析及其抗逆性测定[D].华南热带农业大学硕士生论文,2004
    [3].陈洁,林栖凤.植物耐盐生理及耐盐机理研究进展[J].海南大学学报自然科学版2203,21(2):177-182
    [4]. MAURHC,KADOR T, GUERN J,eto f. Phosphorylationr egulatesth ewaterc hannel activity of the seed specificaquaporin r一TIP[J],1995,14:3028一3035
    [5].王忠华,李旭晨,夏英武.作物抗早的作用机制及其基因工程改良研究进展[J].生物技术通报,2002,(1):16-19
    [6].江香梅,黄敏仁,王明麻.植物抗盐碱、耐干早基因工程研究进展[C1].南京林业大学学报,2001,25(5):57262
    [7].顾振瑜,胡景江,文建雷等.元宝枫对干早适应性的研究[J].西北林学院学报,1999, 14(2):1- 6
    [8].徐坤,郑国生.水分胁迫对生姜光合作用基保护酶活性的影响.园艺学报,2000,1:47 -51
    [9].刘爱琴,冯丽珍.干早胁迫对杉树无性系光合特征的影响.福建林学院学报,1998, 18(3 ):238-241
    [10].李保国等.果树光合作用研究进展.河北林学院学报,1990,5(3):254-258
    [11].彭方仁等.板栗密植园树冠结构特征与光能分布规律研究.南京林业大学学报, 1997,21(2):254-261
    [12].关义新,戴俊英,林艳.水分胁迫下植物叶片光合的气孔和非气孔限制[J].植物生理学通讯,1995,31(4):293-297
    [13].姚雅琴,王沛洪,胡东维.水分胁迫下小麦叶肉细胞的超微结构变化与抗早性的关系[J].西北植物学报,1993,13(1):16-20
    [14].沈征言,朱海山.高温对菜豆生育影响及菜豆不同基因型的耐热性差异[J].中国农业科学, 1993,26(3):50一55
    [15]. Claudia Pastene. Effect of high temperature on photo synthesis in beansⅡC02 Assimilation and metabolite Contents. Plant Physiol,1996,112:1253一1260
    [16].梁颖,胡雪琴.6-BA对水分胁迫下水稻幼苗生理特性的影响.耕作与栽培,2002,4:28-29
    [17].胡景江,左仲武等.外源活性氧清除剂对油松幼苗抗旱性效应.西北林学院学报,2005,20(4):18-20
    [18].李芸瑛,梁广坚等.外源甜菜碱对黄瓜幼苗抗冷性的影响.植物生理学通讯,2004,40(6):673-676
    [19].马千全,邹琦.根施甜菜碱对水分胁迫下小麦幼苗水分状况和抗氧化能力的改善作用.作物学报,2004,30(4):321-328
    [20].郭启芳,马千全.外源甜菜碱提高小麦幼苗抗盐性的研究.西北植物学报,2004,24(9):1680-1686
    [21]. Schiraldi C, Di Lernia I, De Rosa M. Trehalose production : exploiting novel Approaches[J].Trends Biotechnol , 2002 ,20(10): 421~4251
    [22]. De Smet K A, Weston A, Brown I N, et al. Three pathways for Trehalose biosynthesis in mycobacteria. Microbiology , 2002,146: 199~2081
    [23].黄成垠,戴秀玉.海藻糖对医用诊断工具酶活性保护作用研究[J].微生物学通报,1997,24,6:341-343
    [24].葛宇.海藻糖对重组人铜锌SOD酶的保护作用[J].中国生物制品学杂志,2003,16(1): 42-45
    [25].李建伟.海藻糖对Pseudoaltermonas sp SM9913适冷蛋白酶的稳定性保护研究[J].山东大学学报,2003,38(40): 116-119
    [26].李莉.海藻糖在植物抗逆性方面的研究进展[J].生物学通报, 2003,38(6):6-7
    [27].任媛媛,刘景芳.海藻糖代谢途径相关基因及生物工程[J].微生物学报,2003,43(6):821-824
    [28]. Oscer Goddijn,Sjef Smeekien. Sensing trehalose biosythesis in plants ,The plants Journal,1998,14(2):143-146
    [29]. Vogel G,Aeschbacher R A, Muller J,et al. Trehalose-6-phosphate phosohatases from Arabiclopsis thaliana identification by functional complementation of the yeast tps2 mutant, 1998,13:673-678
    [30].赵恢武.干旱诱导启动子驱动的海藻糖262磷酸合酶基因的载体构建及转基因烟草的耐旱性[J].植物学报, 2000,42(6) : 616—619
    [31].林丽璞,徐惠君,叶兴国等.小麦转TPS基因植株的获得及其初步功能的鉴定[J].麦类作物学报,2007,27(3):369-373
    [32].丁顺华,李艳艳,王宝山.外源海藻糖对小麦幼苗耐盐性的影响[J].西北植物学报,2005,25(3):513-516
    [33].汤绍虎,周启贵.海藻糖在渗透胁迫下对油菜种子萌发和幼苗生理的影响[J].植物生理科学,2006,22(6):205-209
    [34].张玉华,凌沛学,籍保平.海藻糖的研究现状及其应用前景[J].食品与药品,2005,7(3):8-13
    [35]. GODDIJIN O J M, VAN DUN K. Trehalose metabolism in plants[J]. Trends in Plant Science, 1999, 4(8):315-319
    [36].马小卫,郭春会,罗梦.核壳、盐和水分胁迫对长柄扁桃种子萌发的影响[J].西北林学院学报,2006,21(4):69-72
    [37].赵世杰,许长城,邹琦等.植物组织中丙二醛测定方法的改进[J].植物生理学通讯,1994,30(3):207-210
    [38].丁顺华.外源海藻糖对小麦幼苗耐盐性的影响[J].西北植物学报,2005,25(3):513-518
    [39]张志良,翟伟菁。植物生理学实验指导[M],3版.北京:高等教育社,2003
    [40].杨剑平,徐红梅,王文平等.水杨酸和渗透胁迫对玉米幼苗生理特性的影响[J].北京农学院学报,2003,18(1):7-9
    [41].杜荣骞.生物统计学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1999
    [42].马小卫,郭春会,罗梦.核壳、盐和水分胁迫对长柄扁桃种子萌发的影响[J].西北林学院学报,2006,21(4):69-72
    [43].种培芳,杨江山.水杨酸对水分胁迫下甜瓜幼苗生理特性的影响[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2006,41(3):44-47
    [44].房玉林,惠竹梅,陈洁等.水分胁迫对葡萄光合特性的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2006,24(2):135-138
    [45]. WANG S G. Research about trehalose enhancing salt resistance ability of wheat seedlings[J]. Journal South west Agriculture University,1992,14(2):182-185
    [46]. HERNANDEZ J A,AI MANSA M S.Short-term effects of salt stress on antioxidant system and leaf water relations of pea leave[J]. Physiologia Plantarum, 2002, ll5: 251-257
    [47].杨剑平,徐红梅,王文平等.水杨酸和渗透胁迫对玉米幼苗生理特性的影响[J].北京农学院学报,2003,18[1]:7-9
    [48].段辉国,袁澍,黄作喜等.亚精胺预处理对渗透胁迫下小麦幼苗抗氧化能力的影响[J].作物学报,2006,32[7]:1057-1062
    [49]. HERNANDEZ J A,AI MANSA M S.Short—term effects of salt stress on antioxidant system and leaf water relations of pea leave [J]. Physiologia Plantarum,2002,ll5:251—257
    [50]. Goddijin Oscar J M, van Dun K. Trehalose metabolism in plants[J]. Trends in Plant Science, 1999,4(8):315-319
    [51].关洪斌,王晓兰,智艳阳.海藻糖对大豆植物抗性的影响[J].贵州农业科学,2007(1):13-15
    [52].赵世杰,史国安,董新纯.植物生理学实验指导[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,2002:84-143
    [53].吴旭红.中药种衣剂对大豆幼苗抗低温胁迫能力影响研究初报[J].大豆通报,2005(4):11-13
    [54].马德华,孙其信.温度逆境对不同品种黄瓜幼苗膜保护系统的影响[J].西北植物学报,2001,21(4):656-661
    [55].张圣平,顾兴芳,王烨等.低温胁迫对以野生黄瓜[棘瓜]为砧木的黄瓜嫁接苗生理生化指标的影响[J].西北植物学报,2005,25(7):1426-1432
    [56].陈少裕.膜脂过氧化对植物细胞的伤害[J].植物生理学通讯,1991(2):84-90
    [57].曾红学,王俊.盐害生理与植物抗盐性.生物学通报,2004(9):1-2