东营凹陷沙四段滩坝砂体沉积特征及储层预测
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
滩坝砂体是陆相断陷湖盆缓坡带油气勘探的重要对象,对碎屑岩滩坝沉积体系的地质认识,传统上主要局限于湖盆边坡地带和水下古隆起等正向构造带。东营凹陷在中国东部箕状断陷盆地中最具代表性,从其缓坡带勘探实际来看,已发现沙四段滩坝砂储层分布范围并非严格受古鼻状构造控制,传统的古水下隆起控砂模式不能很好地解释该区滩坝砂体展布特征。由于滩坝砂体以砂泥薄互层为特征,单层厚度薄,横向变化大,分布规律复杂,储集砂体的地质识别与描述以及地球物理预测难度均较大。因此研究滩坝砂体沉积特征、展布规律及预测方法不但具有理论意义,而且对深化类似区带油气勘探也具有重要实际意义。
     综合利用钻井岩心、地震、测井等资料,对东营凹陷沙四上亚段滩坝砂体沉积特征、成因机制进行了系统性研究,认为沙四上亚段可分为1个三级层序和3个体系域,滩坝砂体主要形成于三级层序的低位域;根据滩坝砂的形态、结构、产状及分布特征,可划分为坝砂和滩砂亚相。古地貌、古物源、古水动力、古基准面共同控制了滩坝砂体的形成和分布;其中,古地貌控制滩坝砂的发育分布范围,古物源控制滩坝砂的发育程度,古水动力控制滩坝砂的相带展布,古基准面控制滩坝砂的叠置样式。
     在滩坝砂体薄储层预测方面,提出了基于滩坝砂体成因层序特点的地质-地球物理综合预测方法。首先,通过层序地层研究,明确滩坝砂体发育层位;其次,通过古地貌-古环境匹配研究确定滩坝砂体发育区带;再运用综合地球物理技术,根据滩坝砂体的地质-地震响应特征,选择针对性的储层预测方法和地震属性参数组合,通过井震结合精细描述滩坝砂体。应用该方法,对东营凹陷沙四段滩坝砂体的预测取得了良好效果。实践证明,地质分析与地球物理技术的综合应用是预测描述薄互层储层的有效途径。
The beach-bar is main exploration target in the shelving of nonmarine downfaulted basin. Traditionally, the depositional system of clasolite beach-bar is thought localizing in slope of lake-basin and palaeohigh underwater. Dongying sag is a typifier of half basin in China east. By exploration practice, it is found out that the distribution of beach-bar of Es4 is not only controlled under nosing structure, and it is disagreement with traditional idea. Hence it is very important the study of forming and distribution of beach-bar. Being aimed at difficulties of beach-bar of Es4 in Dongying sag, the comprehensive research is done by present sedimentology, high definition sequence stratigraphy and geophysical technology. The sedimentary characteristics and identification mark and distribution of beach-bar in Dongying sag are clearly and definitely. On base of the geologic model, the relationship of geologic framework and seismic response is built up by forward modeling. The comprehensive predict method of beach-bar is built up and practiced in exploration, and the good effect is acquired.
     Using the data of drilling core, seismic and logging, the sediment features and origin mechanisms of beach bar sand-body. in Dongying sag are researched systemically, the writer thinks that there are one third sequence and three system fields, the beach bar sand-body mainly forms in low order fields of third system fields. The beach bar sand-body is classified into beach dam sands and bank sands. Palaeogeomorphology, Palaeosource, Palaeohydropower and Palaeobasal-level controls forming and distribution of beach bar sand-body. Palaeogeomorphology controls the distribution and Palaeosource controls the development level and Palaeohydropower controls facies belt distribution and Palaeobasal-level controls overriding styles.
     A case study of E2s4 in Dongying depression, it is put forward that the comprehensive prediction method of geology- geophysics based on the genesis features of beach bar sand-body. Firstly, by researching stratigraphic sequence the distribution areas of beach bar sand-body are known; secondly, analyzing response characters of geology-seism, effective reservoir prediction methods and seismic attribution parameters are chosen; finally, favorite facies belts are understood by multi-attribution analyzing of target stratum and the beach bar sand-body is described by linking well and seism. Using of this method, well effects are gained in predicting beach bar sand-body of E2s4 of Dongying depression. It indicates that the comprehensive uses of geology analyzing and geophysics skills is effective to predict and descript the reservoirs of beach bar sand-body.
引文
[1]姜在兴.沉积学[M] .北京:石油工业出版社.2003:442
    [2]赵徵林,朱筱敏主编.沉积岩石学(第三版)[M].北京:石油工业出版社.2001.
    [3]王秉海,钱凯.胜利油区地质研究与勘探实践(第1版)[M] .东营:石油大学出版社.1992.
    [4]操应长,姜在兴.利用测井资料识别层序地层界面的几种方法[J].石油大学学报(自然科学版) .2003.27(2):23-26
    [5]杨守业,李从先.长江下游下蜀黄土化学风化的地球化学研究[J].地球化学.2001.30(4):402-406
    [4]杨守业,李从先.长江与黄河沉积物元素组成及地质背景[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质.1999.19(2):19-26
    [5]陆友明.孤东地区下第三系层序格架及沉积体系研究[D].中国地质大学.2000.
    [6]张小浩.南泥湾油田延长组沉积相与储层特征[D].西北大学.2001.
    [7]尹克敏.东营凹陷南斜坡第三系沉积特征及含油气预测[D].石油大学. 2002.
    [8]冯有良.东营凹陷下第三系层序地层格架与低位砂岩复合体成藏模式[D].中国地质大学.2000.
    [9]纪友亮,张世奇.层序地层学原理及层序成因机制模式[M].北京:地质出版社.1998.
    [10]操应长,姜在兴.陆相断陷湖盆层序地层单元的划分及界面识别标志[M].石油大学学报.1996.20(4):1-5
    [11]朱筱敏,信荃麟.断陷湖盆滩坝储集体沉积特征及沉积模式[J].沉积学报.1994.12(2):12-16
    [12] Richard G. Hoy and Kenneth D. Ridgway. Sedimentology and sequence stratigraphy of fan-delta and river-delta deposystems, Pennsylvanian Minturn Formation, Colorado. AAPG bulletin,2003,87(7): 1169-1191
    [13]康安,王贵文.古水深曲线在测井资料层序地层分析中的应用[J].沉积学报,2000,18(1):63-67
    [14]李丕龙,姜在兴.东营凹陷储集体与油气分布[M].北京:石油工业出版社. 2000.
    [15]杨守业,李从先,张家强.苏北滨海平原冰后期古地理演化与沉积物物源研究[J].古地理学报.2000.2(2):65-72
    [16]王爱萍,杨守业,李从先.南京地区下蜀土元素地球化学特征及物源判别[J].同济大学学报.2001.29(6):657-661
    [17]操应长,断陷湖盆层序地层学[M] .地质出版社,2005.
    [18]操应长,姜在兴,夏斌等.利用测井资料识别层序地层界面的几种方法[J] .石油大学学报(自然科学版) .2003.27(2):23-28
    [19]操应长,姜在兴,夏斌.声波时差测井资料识别层序地层单元界面的方法、原理及实例[J].沉积学报.2003.21(2):318-323
    [20]邓宏文.美国层序地层研究中的新学派——高分辨率层序地层学[J].石油与天然气地质.1995.16(2):89-97
    [21]邓宏文,王洪亮.层序地层基准面的识别、对比技术及应用[J].石油与天然气地质.1996.17(3):177-184
    [22]王洪亮,邓宏文.地层基准面原理在湖相储层预测中的应用[J].石油与天然气地质.1997.18(2):96-102
    [23]王宁,郑和荣.东营凹陷岩性油气藏勘探中的层序地层学研究应用[A].复杂油气藏勘探技术国际学术研讨会论文集[C].北京:石油大学出版社.1998
    [24]何玉平,刘招君,杜江峰.高分辨率层序地层学基准面旋回识别[J].世界地质,2003.22(1):21-25
    [25] Cross AT , Lessenger MA. Sediment Volume Partitioning : Rationale for Stratigraphic Model Evaluation and High resolution Stratigraphic Correlation[R] .Accepted for Publication Norwegian Petroleum–Forening Conference Volume,1996.1-24
    [26]郑荣才,尹世民,彭军.基准面旋回结构与叠加样式的沉积动力学分析[J].沉积学报.2000.18(3):369-375
    [27]郑荣才,彭军,吴朝容.陆相盆地基准面旋回的级次划分和研究意义[J].沉积学报.2001.19(2):249-255
    [28]肖玉茹,何峰煜.高分辨率地层学在储层预测中的应用[J].石油实验地质.2003.25(2):169-173
    [29]于红枫,王英民,李雪.东营凹陷八面河地区沙河街组第四段高分辨率层序地层[J],成都理工大学学报(自然科学版) .2005.32(5):486-491
    [30]彭彩珍,李治平,贾闽惠.低渗透油藏毛管压力曲线特征分析及应用[J],西南石油学院学报.2002.24(2):21-24
    [31]何更生.油层物理[M].北京:石油工业出版社.1994.
    [32]陈丽华,姜在兴.储层试验测试技术[M] .石油大学出版社.1994.
    [33]鲁洪江,邢正岩,王永诗.压汞和退汞资料在储层评价中的综合应用探讨[J],油气采收率技术.1997.4(2):47-54
    [34]万玲、孙岩、魏国齐.确定储集层物性参数下限的一种新方法及其应用——以鄂尔多斯盆地中部气田为例[J].沉积学报.1999.17(3):454-457
    [35] Van Wagoner J C. An overview of the fundamentals of sequence stratigraphy and key definition. In: Wilgus C K,ed. Sea-level changes: An Integrated Approuch. SEPM. Spec. Publ. , 1988,42: 39-45
    [36] Van Wagoner J C. et al. . Siliciclastic sequence stratigraphy in well logs,cores,and outcrops. AAPG methods in exploration series 7. 1990.
    [37]顾家裕.层序地层学及其在油气勘探开发中的应用论文集[C].北京:石油工业出版社.1997.
    [38]姜在兴.层序地层学原理及应用[M].北京:石油工业出版社.1996.
    [39]姜在兴,操应长.砂体层序地层及沉积学研究[M].北京:地质出版社.2000
    [40]池英柳.可容空间概念在陆相断陷盆地层序分析中的应用[J].沉积学报.1996,16(4):7-11
    [41]池英柳.陆相断陷盆地层序成因初探[J].石油学报.1996.17(3):19-26
    [42]郭建华.陆相断陷湖盆T-R旋回沉积层序与研究实例[J].沉积学报.1998.16(1):8-14
    [43]操应长,姜在兴.高分辨率层序地层学在陆相断块油气田开发中的应用[A].层序地层学论文集[C].石油工业出版社.1997.
    [44] Neil F. Hurley. Recognition of Faults, unconformities, and Sequence Boundaries Using Cumulative Dip Plots[J]. AAPG Bulletin,V.78,No.8, 1994, P.1173-1185