疼痛患者心理障碍评估的项目反应理论分析与应用
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
目的:本研究以疼痛患者为研究对象,揭示传统测验理论、单维项目反应理论与多维项目反应理论评估其心理障碍的异同,探讨项目反应理论在临床心理评估中应用的可能性,分析影响疼痛患者心理障碍程度的因素,为构建疼痛管理系统,指导临床实践提供依据。
     方法:本研究通过多中心合作,抽取北京、西安、重庆、兰州等地10家医疗机构就诊的具有疼痛症状的患者进行问卷调查。采用医院焦虑抑郁量表(HAD)、患病行为问卷(IBQ)评估患者的心理障碍,应用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)、疼痛强度简易描述量表(VRS)和简化的麦-吉疼痛问卷(SF-MPQ)评估患者的疼痛程度,并对患者的性别、居住环境、所患疾病种类等一般因素进行了调查。应用因素分析等方法探讨了HAD、IBQ的结构,应用内部一致性系数评估了信度,进而利用单维IRT模型(GRM和2PL)和多维IRT模型(Bi-factor模型)对其条目和测验的信息量等进行了分析,并对不同的分析方法进行了对比。同时,也初步评估了三种疼痛程度测量工具的实用性。在此基础上,我们进一步应用相关分析及多元方差分析,探讨了疼痛程度及其他一般因素对于患者心理障碍程度的影响,为临床诊疗过程提供参考。
     结果:
     1. HAD和IBQ各维度的单维性都不太理想,对比CTT、单维IRT和Bi-factor模型的分析结果,我们发现Bi-factor模型更适合这两个量表的结构和条目特征,心理测量学指标也更理想;
     2.应用Bi-factor模型进行分析,患者心理症状之间的关系更为清晰,而且症状的独特特点也得以体现;
     3.对于患者疼痛程度的评估VAS量表应用性更好,而SF-MPQ则在患者疼痛性质等方面可以提供更全面的信息;
     4.与男性疼痛患者相比,女性疼痛患者情绪的抑制状态更为明显;
     5.与居住在城市的疼痛患者相比,居住在乡镇或县城的疼痛患者情绪的主动状态更为明显,而且不恰当的患病行为更为明显;
     6.在疼痛患者当中,居住在城市的女性癌症患者和居住在乡镇或县城的女性急性疼痛患者心理障碍程度更为严重,诊疗过程中需要耐心沟通。
     结论:IRT可以应用于临床心理症状的评估;多维特征明显的临床量表采用多维模型分析效果更好;疼痛患者的心理障碍程度与疼痛程度密切相关;性别、居住环境和疾病种类在一定程度上影响患者的心理障碍程度。但由于时间和精力有限,本研究仅对疼痛管理综合系统进行了初步构建,对其它临床心理评估的适用性还需进一步的论证。
Purpose In order to provide practical evidence for the benefits of usingItem response theory (IRT) to analyze clinical psychological measures, ClassicalTesting Theory (CTT), unidimensional IRT and multidimensional IRT modelswere used to analyze pain related psychological factors, and the differencesbetween these methods were compared. Additionally, the influences of painseverity and other demographic factors to severity of psychological disorder forpatients with pain were analyzed systematically. All this work was conducted toprovide primary reference for comprising of pain management system, and toprovide guidance for clinical practice.
     Methods Ten medical departments were enrolled in this study, locating inBeijing, Xi’an, Chongqing, and Lanzhou cities. Questionnaires were deliveredto outpatients with pain symptoms. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale(HAD) and Illness Behavior Questionnaire (IBQ) were used to measure patients’ psychological disorders. Visual analogue scale (VAS), verbal rating scale (VRS)and Short-form of McGill pain questionnaire (SF-MPQ) were used to evaluatethe severity of pain in patients. Also other information of patients wasdocumented, including sex, living in the city or in the country, and classificationof their illnesses. Data was analyzed using the combination of different methods,including factor analysis, coefficients of internal consistency, graded responsemodel (GRM), two-parametric logistic model (2PL), bi-factor model and so on.Different criteria were also used to compare the different methods, includingconstruct validity, consistency, item and test information etc. At the same time,3methods of evaluating the severity of pain were also compared. Based on theseresults, correlation analysis and multivariate analysis of variance wereconducted to assess the influences of pain severity and other demographicfactors having on severity of psychological disorders.
     Results We got the following results in this study.
     1. The unidimensionality of subscales of HAD and IBQ were not so well.Among the3methods, bi-factor analysis was more appropriate for theconstructs of these two scales and items’ contents. And psychological criteria ofbi-factor analysis were better.
     2. Bi-factor analysis made the correlations between different psychologicalsymptoms clearer, and specific characteristics were more obvious.
     3. VAS was better when evaluating the severity of pain. And SF-MPQcould provide more detailed information of the characteristics of pain.
     4. Compared with male pain patients, females were more passive (specificcharacteristics of depression).
     5. Compared with pain patients living in the cities, patients living in thecountry were more active (specific characteristics of anxiety), and had more obvious inappropriate illness behaviors.
     6. Among the pain patients, female cancer patients living in the cities andfemale patients with acute pain living in the country had more severepsychological disorders. And doctors should treat them more patiently.
     Conclusion In this study we could know that IRT could be applied in theanalysis of clinical psychological evaluations. And multidimensional modelscould get better results for scales with multidimensional characteristics.Obviously, psychological disorders of pain patients were correlated significantlywith their pain severity. Besides, sex, living in the city or the country, andclassification of illnesses could also exert influences on their psychologicalfactors. As a primary exploration for constructing a comprehensive evaluatingsystem of pain, this study could provide some suggestions for clinical practice.However, limited in the time and resources, we still have many shortcomingsneeding to be improved.
引文
1Von Korff, M., Crane, P., Lane, M. et al.(2005) Chronic spinal pain andphysical-mental comorbidity in the United States: results from the nationalcomorbidity survey replication. Pain113(3),331-339.
    2Eriksen J,Jensen MK,SjogrenP et al.Epidemiology of chronic nonmalignantpain in Denmark.Pain,2003,106:221-228.
    3Blyth FM, March LM, Brnabic AM, et al. Chronic pain in Australia:aprevalence study.Pain2001,89:127-134
    4北京市朝阳区慢性疼痛疾病流行病学调查报告。郑天源侯进才卢锦玲中国疼痛医学杂志2010,16,(6):339-340
    5Gatchel. A biopsychosocial overview of pretreatment screening of patientswith pain. Clinical Journal of Pain,2004,17:192-199.
    6Waddell,G.(1987)A New Clinical Model for the Treatment of Low-BackPain., Spine12(7),632-644
    7Joseph L Riley III,Michael E. Robinson,Emily A Wise,DonaldPrice(1999).A meta-analytic review of pain perception across the menstrualcycle.Pain1999Jun;81(3):225-35.
    8Robinson, M.E.&Riley, J.L.(1999). The role of emotion in pain. In R.J.Gatchel and D.C. Turk (Eds.), Psychosocial Factors in Pain: CriticalPerspectives. New York: Guilford.
    9Zhang JH, Huang YG: The immune system: A new look at pain. Chin Med J(Engl)119:930-938,2006
    10Finger, S.(1994). Origins of neuroscience. New York: Oxford UniversityPress pp.148-164.
    11Livingston, W.K.(1998). Pain and suffering. Washington: IASP Press
    12Melzack, R.,&Wall, P.D.(1965). Pain mechanisms: A new theory.Science,150,971-979.
    13Melzack, R.,&Casey, K.L.(1968). Sensory, motivational and centralcontrol determinants of pain: A new conceptual model. In D. Kenshalo (Ed.),The skin senses (pp.423-443). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas
    14Melzack, R.(2001). Pain and the neuromatrix in the brain. Journal of DentalEducation,65,1378-1382.
    15Melzack, R.(2005). Evolution of the neuromatrix theory of pain. PainPractice,5,85-94.
    16C. Richard Chapman, Robert P. Tuckett,and Chan Woo Song.Pain and Stressin a Systems Perspective: Reciprocal Neural,Endocrine, and ImmuneInteractions The Journal of Pain, Vol9, No2(February),2008: pp122-145
    17Wolfe, F., Smythe, H.A., Yunnus, M.B., et al.(1990). The American Collegeof Rheumatology1990criteria for the classification of fibromyalgia.Report of the multicenter criteria committee. Arthritis Rheumatism,33,160-172.
    18Boersma, K.,&Linton, S.J.(2006). Psychological processes underlyingthe development of a chronic pain problem: A prospective study of therelationship between profiles of psychological variables in thefear-avoidance model in disability. Clinical Journal of Pain,22:160-166.
    19Feuerstein, M.,&Beattie, P.(1995). Biobehavioral factors affecting painand disability in low back pain: Mechanisms and assessment. PhysicalTherapy,75,267-269.
    20Vlaeyen, J.W.,&Linton, S.J.(2000). Fear-avoidance and its consequencesin chronic musculoskeletal pain: A state of the art. Pain,85,317-32.
    21Vlaeyen, J.W.S.,&Crombez, G.(1999). Fear of movement/(re)injury,avoidance and pain disability in chronic low back pain patients. ManualTherapy,4,187-195.
    22Turk, D.C., Robinson, J.P.,&Burwinkle, T.(2004). Prevalence of fear ofpain and activity in fibromyalgia syndrome patients. Journal of Pain,5,483-490.
    23Vlaeyen, J.W.S., Kole-Snijders, A.M., Boeren, R.G.B.,&van Eek H.(1995).Fear of movement/reinjury in chronic low back pain and its relation tobehavioral performance. Pain,62,363-372.
    24Vlaeyen, J.W.S., Kole-Sniders, A., Rooteveel, A., Ruesink. R.,&Heuts, P.(1995). The role of fear of movement/(re)injury in pain disability. Journal ofOccupational Rehabilitation,5,235-252.
    25Crombez, G., Vlaeyen, J.W.,&Heuts, P.H.(1999). Pain-related fear ismore disabling than pain itself: Evidence on the role of pain-related fear inchronic back pain disability. Pain,80,329-339.
    26McCracken, L.M., Gross, R.T.,&Eccleston, C.(2002). Multimethodassessment of treatment process in chronic low back pain: Comparison ofreported pain-related anxiety with directly measured physical capacity.Behaviour Research and Therapy,40,585-594.
    27Banks, S.M.,&Kerns, R.D.(1996). Explaining high rates of depression inchronic pain: A diathesis-stress framework. Psychological Bulletin,119,95-110.
    28Dersh, J., Gatchel, R.J., Mayer, T.G., Polatin, P.B. and Temple, O.W.(2006).Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in patients with chronic disablingoccupational spinal disorders. Spine,31:1156-1162.
    29Atkinson, J.H., Slater, M.A., Patterson, T.L., Gant, I.,&Garfin, S.R.(1991).Prevalence, onset, and risk of psychiatric disorders in men with chronic lowback pain: A controlled study. Pain,45,111-121.
    30Magni, G., Moreschi, C., Rigatti Luchini, S.,&Merskey, H.(1994).Prospective study on the relationship between depressive symptoms andchronic musculoskeletal pain. Pain,56,289-297.
    31Rudy, T.E., Lieber, S.J., Boston, J.R., Gourley, L.M.,&Baysal, E.(2003).Psychosocial predictors of physical performance in disabled individuals withchronic pain. Clinical Journal of Pain,19,18-30
    32Brown, G.K.(1990). A causal analysis of chronic pain and depression.Journal of Abnormal Psychology,99,127-137.
    33Katon, W., Egan, K.,&Miller, D.(1985). Chronic pain: Lifetime psychiatricdiagnoses and family history. American Journal of Psychiatry,142,1156-1160.
    34Katz, J, McDermott, M.P., Cooper, E.M., Walther, R.R., Sweeney, E.W.,&Dworkin, R.H.(2005). Psychosocial risk factors for postherpetic neuralgia:A prospective study of patients with herpes zoster. Journal of Pain,6,782-790.
    35Jarvik JG, Hollingworth W, Heagerty PJ, Haynor DR, Boyco EJ,&Deyo,R.A.(2005). Three-year incidence of lowback pain in an initiallyasymptomatic cohort. Clinical and imaging risk factors. Spine,30,1541-1548.
    36Von Korff, M.,&Simon, G.(1996). The relationship between pain anddepression. British Journal of Psychiatry,168(suppl30),101-108.
    37Turk, D.C., Okifuji, A.,&Scharff, L.(1995). Chronic pain and depression:Role of perceived impact and perceived control in different age cohorts. Pain,61,93-101.
    38Robinson, M.E.&Riley, J.L.(1999). The role of emotion in pain. In R.J.Gatchel and D.C. Turk (Eds.), Psychosocial Factors in Pain: CriticalPerspectives. New York: Guilford.
    39Wright, B.(1980). Foreword. In G. Rasch, Probabilistic models for someintelligence and attainment tests (Expand ed.). Chicago, IL: University ofChicago Press.
    40Heinen, T.(1996). Latent class and discrete latent trait models: Similaritiesand differences. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
    41Takane, Y.,&de Leeuw, J.(1987). On the relationship between itemresponse theory and factor analysis of discretized variables. Psychometrika,52,393-408.
    42Andrich, D.(1978). A rating formulation for ordered response categories.Psychometrika,43,561-573.
    43Masters, G. N.(1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring.Psychometrika,47,149-174.
    44Muraki, E.(1992). A generalized partial credit model: Application of an EMalgorithm. Applied Psychological Measurement,16,159-176.
    45Samejima, F.(1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern ofgraded scores. Psychometrika Monograph Supplement,34(4, Pt.2),100.
    46Samejima, F.(1997). The graded response model. In W. J. van der Linden&R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp.85-100). New York, NY: Springer.
    47Reckase, M. D.(2009). Multidimensional item response theory. New York,NY: Springer
    48van der Linden, W. J.,&Hambleton, R. K.(Eds.).(1997). Handbook ofmodern item response theory. New York, NY: Springer.
    49Tenenbaum, G., Furst, D.,&Weingarten, G.(1985). A statistical reevaluationof the STAI anxiety questionnaire. Journal of Clinical Psychology,41,239-244.
    50Bouman, T. K.,&Kok, A. R.(1987). Homogeneity of Beck’s depressioninventory (BDI): Applying Rasch analysis in conceptual exploration. ActaPsychiatrica Scandinavica,76,568-573.
    51Chang, C.(1996). Finding two dimensions in MMPI-2depression.Structural Equation Modeling,3,41-49.
    52Cole, J. C., Rabin, A. S., Smith, T. L.,&Kaufman, A. S.(2004).Development and validation of a Rasch-derived CES-D short form.Psychological Assessment,16,360-372.
    53Reise, S. P.,&Waller, N. G.(1990). Fitting the two-parameter model topersonality data. Applied Psychological Measurement,14,45-58.
    54Aggen, S. H., Neale, M. C.,&Kendler, K. S.(2005). DSM criteria for majordepression: Evaluating symptom patterns using latent-trait item responsemodels. Psychological Medicine,35,475-487.
    55Cooper, A.,&Gomez, R.(2008). The development of a short form of theSensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire.Journal of Individual Differences,29,90-104.
    56Ferrando, P. J.(1994). Fitting item response models to the EPI-A Impulsivitysubscale. Educational and Psychological Measurement,54,118-127.
    57Gray-Little, B., Williams, V. S. L.,&Hancock, T. D.(1997). An itemresponse theory analysis of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem scale. Personalityand Social Psychology Bulletin,23,443-451.
    58Zumbo, B. D., Pope, G. A., Watson, J. E.,&Hubley, A. M.(1997). Anempirical test of Roskam’s conjecture about the interpretation of an ICCparameter in personality inventories. Educational and PsychologicalMeasurement,57,963-969.
    59Butcher, J. N., Graham, J. R., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Tellegen, A., Dahlstrom, W.G.,&Kaemmer, B.(2001). MMPI-2: Manual for administration, scoring,and interpretation (Rev. ed.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    60Reise, S. P.,&Waller, N. G.(2003). How many IRT parameters does it taketo model psychopathology items? Psychological Methods,8,164-184.
    61Reise, S. P.,&Waller, N. G.(2010). Measuring psychopathology withnonstandard item response theory models: Fitting the four-parameter modelto the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. In S. E. Embretson(Ed.), Measuring psychological constructs: Advances in model-basedapproaches (pp.147-173). Washington, DC: American PsychologicalAssociation.
    62Gardner, W., Kelleher, K. J.,&Pajer, K. A.(2002). Multidimensionaladaptive testing for mental health problems in primary care. Medical Care,40,812-823.
    63Gibbons, R. D., Weiss, D. J., Kupfer, D. J.,Frank, E., Fagiolini,A.,Grochocinski, V. J.,... Immekus, J. C.(2008). Using computerizedadaptive testing to reduce the burden of mental healthassessment.Psychiatric Services,59,361-368.
    64Wang, W., Chen, P.,&Cheng, Y.(2004). Improving measurement precisionof test batteries using multidimensional item response models. PsychologicalMethods,9,116-136.
    65Yao, L.,&Boughton, K. A.(2007). A multidimensional item responsemodeling approach for improving subscale proficiency estimation andclassification. Applied Psychological Measurement,31,83-105.
    66DeMars, C. E.(2006). Application of the bi-factor multidimensional itemresponse theory model to testlet-based tests. Journal of EducationalMeasurement,43,145-168.
    67Gibbons, R. D., Bock, R. D., Hedeker, D., Weiss, D. J., Segawa, E.,Bhaumik, D. K., Stover, A.(2007). Full-information item bifactor analysisof graded response data. Applied Psychological Measurement,31,4-19.
    68Chen, F. F., West, S. G.,&Sousa, K. H.(2006). A comparison of bifactorand second-order models of quality of life. Multivariate BehavioralResearch,41,189-225.
    69Smits, D. J. M.,&De Boeck, P.(2003). A componential IRT model for guilt.Multivariate Behavioral Research,38,161-188.
    70Mislevy, R. J., Levy, R., Kroopnick, M.,&Rutstein, D.(2008). Evidentiaryfoundations of mixture item response theory mod-els. In G. R. Hancock&K.M. Samuelsen (Eds.), Advances in latent variable mixture models (pp.149-175). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
    71Meijer, R. R.,&Baneke, J. J.(2004). Analyzing psychopathology items: Acase for nonparametric item response theory modeling. PsychologicalMethods,9,354-368.
    72Roberson-Nay, R., Strong, D. R., Nay, W. T., Beidel, D. C.,&Turner, S. M.(2007). Development of an abbreviated Social Phobia and Anxiety Inventory(SPAI) using item response theory: The SPAI-23. Psychological Assessment,19,133-145.
    73Santor, D. A., Ramsay, J. O.,&Zuroff, D. C.(1994). Nonparametric itemanalyses of the Beck Depression Inventory: Evaluating gender item bias andresponse option weights. Psychological Assessment,6,255-270.
    74Stark, S., Chernyshenko, O. S., Drasgow, F.,&Williams, B. A.(2006).Examining assumptions about item responding in personality assessment:Should ideal point methods be considered for scale development and scoring?Journal of Applied Psychology,91,25-39.
    75Marshall, G. N., Orlando, M., Jaycox, L. H., Foy, D. W.,&Belzberg, H.(2002). Development and validation of a modified version of thePeritraumatic Dissociative Experiences Questionnaire. PsychologicalAssessment,14,123-134.
    76Frazier, T. W., Naugle, R. I.,&Haggerty, K. A.(2006). Psy-chometricadequacy and comparability of the short and full forms of the PersonalityAssessment Inventory. Psychological Assessment,18,324-333.
    77Young, M. A., Halper, I. S., Clark, D. C.,&Scheftner, W. A.(1992). Anitem-response theory evaluation of the Beck Hopelessness Scale. CognitiveTherapy and Research,16,579-587.
    78Langenbucher, J. W., Labouvie, E., Martin, C. S., Sanjuan, P. M., Bavly, L.,Kirisci, L.,&Chung, T.(2004). An application of item response theoryanalysis to alcohol, cannabis, and cocaine criteria in DSM-IV. Journal ofAbnormal Psychology,113,72-80.
    79Aggen, S. H., Neale, M. C.,&Kendler, K. S.(2005). DSM criteria for majordepression: Evaluating symptom patterns using latent-trait item responsemodels. Psychological Medicine,35,475-487.
    80Feske, U., Kirisci, L., Tarter, R. E.,&Pilkonis, P. A.(2007). An applicationof item response theory to the DSM-III-R criteria for borderline personalitydisorder. Journal of Personality Disorders,21,418-433.
    81Lord, F. M.(1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testingproblems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    82Cooper, A.,&Gomez, R.(2008). The development of a short form of theSensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire.Journal of Individual Differences,29,90-104.
    83Duncan-Jones, P., Grayson, D. A.,&Moran, P. A.(1986). The util-ity oflatent trait models in psychiatric epidemiology. Psychological Medicine,16,391-405
    84Grayson, D. A.(1986). Latent trait analysis of the Eysenck PersonalityQuestionnaire. Journal of Psychiatric Research,20,217-235.
    85Kim, Y.,&Pilkonis, P. A.(1999). Selecting the most informative items inthe IIP scales for personality disorders: An application of item responsetheory. Journal of Personality Disorders,13,157-174.
    86Kessler, R. C., Andrews, G., Colpe, L. J., Hiripi, E., Mroczek, D. K.,Normand, S. T.,... Zaslavsky, A. M.(2002). Short screening scales tomonitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychologicaldistress. Psychological Medicine,32,959-976.
    87Walter, O. B., Becker, J., Bjorner, J. B., Fliege, H., Klapp, B. F.,&Rose, M.(2007). Development and evaluation of a computer adaptive test for anxiety(anxiety-CAT). Quality of Life Research: An International Journal ofQuality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation,16,143-155.
    88Walter, O. B., Becker, J., Bjorner, J. B., Fliege, H., Klapp, B. F.,&Rose, M.(2007). Development and evaluation of a computer adaptive test for anxiety(anxiety-CAT). Quality of Life Research: An International Journal ofQuality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation,16,143-155.
    89Kamakura, W. A.,&Balasubramanian, S. K.(1989). Tailored interviewing:An application of item response theory for personality measurement. Journalof Personality Assessment,53,502-519.
    90Reise, S. P.,&Henson, J. M.(2000). Computerization and adaptiveadministration of the NEO PI-R. Assessment,7,347-364.
    91Simms, L. J.,&Clark, L. A.(2005). Validation of a computerized adaptiveversion of the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality (SNAP).Psychological Assessment,17,28-43.
    92Revicki, D. A.,&Sloan, J.(2007). Practical and philosophical issuessurrounding a national item bank: If we build it will they come? Quality ofLife Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects ofTreatment, Care and Rehabilitation,16,167-174.
    93Cella, D., Yount, S., Rothrock, N., Gershon, R., Cook, K., Reeve, B.,...PROMIS Cooperative Group.(2007). The patient-reported outcomesmeasurement information system (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH roadmapcooperative group during its first two years. Medical Care,45, S3-S11.
    94Reise, S. P.,&Haviland, M. G.(2005). Item response theory and themeasurement of clinical change. Journal of Personality Assessment,84,228-238.
    95Cooke, D. J., Michie, C., Hart, S. D.,&Hare, R. D.(1999). Evaluating thescreening version of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist–Revised (PCL:SV):An item response theory analysis. Psychological Assessment,11,3-13.
    96Teresi, J. A., Cross, P. S.,&Golden, R. R.(1989). Some applications oflatent trait analysis to the measurement of ADL. Journals of Gerontology,44,S196-S204.
    97Gibbons, R. D., Clarke, D. C., VonAmmon Cavanaugh, S.,&Davis, J. M.(1985). Application of modern psychometric theory in psychiatric research.Journal of Psychiatric Research,19,43-55.
    98Carmody, T. J., Rush, A. J., Bernstein, I. H., Brannan, S., Husain, M. M.,&Trivedi, M. H.(2006). Making clinicians lives easier: Guidance on use ofthe QIDS self-report in place of the MADRS. Journal of Affective Disorders,95,115-118.
    99Martin, M., Kosinski, M., Bjorner, J. B., Ware, J. E., Jr., MacLean, R.,&Li,T.(2007). Item response theory methods can improve the measurement ofphysical function by combining the modified health assessmentquestionnaire and the SF-36Physical Function scale. Quality of LifeResearch: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment,Care and Rehabilitation,16,647-660
    100McGrew, K. S.,&Woodcock, R. W.(2001). Woodcock–Johnson IIItechnical manual. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
    101Morey, L. C.(1991). Personality Assessment Inventory: Pro-fessionalmanual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
    102La Femina, F., Senese, V. P., Grossi, D.,&Venuti, P.(2009). A battery forthe assessment of visuo-spatial abilities involved in drawing tasks. ClinicalNeuropsychologist,23,691-714.
    103Pedraza, O., Graff-Radford, N. R., Smith, G. E., Ivnik, R. J., Willis, F. B.,Petersen, R. C.,&Lucas, J.(2009). Differential item functioning of theBoston Naming Test in cognitively normal African American and Caucasianolder adults. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society,15,758-768.
    104Schultz-Larsen, K., Kreiner, S.,&Lomholt, R. K.(2007). Mini-mentalstatus examination: Mixed Rasch model item analysis derived two differentcognitive dimensions of the MMSE. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,60,268-279.
    105Educational Testing Service.(2010). About the GRE general test. Retrievedfrom http://www.ets.org/gre/general/about
    106Mulaik, S. A.(2010). Foundations of factor analysis (2nd ed.). Boca Raton,FL: Chapman&Hall.
    107Smith, G. T.,&Combs, J.(2010). Issues of construct validity inpsychological diagnoses. In R. F. Krueger&E. Simonsen (Eds.),Contemporary directions in psychopathology: Scientific foundations of theDSM-V and ICD-11(pp.205-222). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
    108de Ayala, R. J.(2009). The theory and practice of item response theory. NewYork, NY: Guilford Press.
    109Levy, R.(2009). The rise of Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation forpsychometric modeling. Journal of Probability and Statistics,2009,1-18.doi:10.1155/2009/537139
    110DiBello, L. V., Roussos, L. A.,&Stout, W.(2007). Review of cognitivelydiagnostic assessment and a summary of psycho-metric models. In C. R.Rao&S. Sinharay (Eds.), Handbook of statistics26: Psychometrics (pp.979-1030). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier North-Holland.
    111Dumenci, L.,&Achenbach, T. M.(2008). Effects of estimation methods onmaking trait-level inferences from ordered categorical items for assessingpsychopathology. Psychological Assessment,20,55-62.
    112Caldwell, A. B.(2006). Maximal measurement or meaningful measurement:The interpretive challenges of the MMPI-2Restructured Clinical (RC)scales. Journal of Personality Assessment,87,193-201.
    113Fava, G. A., Ruini, C.,&Rafanelli, C.(2004). Psychometric theory is anobstacle to the progress of clinical research. Psychotherapy andPsychosomatics,73,145-148.
    114Gordon, R. M.(2006). False assumptions about psychopathology, hysteriaand the MMPI-2Restructured Clinical scales. Psychological Reports,98,870-872.
    115汪向东,王希林,马弘.心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版)[M],心理卫生杂志出版社,1999,223-226
    116胜利,蒋宝琦,方耀奇,沈渔邨,《患病行为问卷》的信度、效度初步测试,中国心理卫生杂志,2001,1(15),9-12.
    117汪向东,王希林,马弘.心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版)[M],心理卫生杂志出版社,1999,371-375
    118杨业兵;两级评分自陈式量表项目反应理论分析的方法与模型选择[D],第四军医大学,2011.
    119Simms LJ, Gros DF, Watson D, O’Hara MW. Parsing the General andSpecific Components of Depression and Anxiety with Bifactor Modeling.Depression and Anxiety,2008,25,E34-E46
    120Main CJ, Waddell G. Psychometric construction and validity of the pilowskyillness behaviour questionnaire in British patients with chronic low backpain. Pain,1(28),1987,13-25.
    121Pilowsky I. Dimensions of illness behaviour as measured by the illnessbehaviour questionnaire: A replication study. Journal of PsychosomaticResearch,1(37),1993,53-62.
    122Engel G. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine.Science,1977,196,129-136.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700