摘要
项目管理的研究自二次世界大战期间兴起以来,经过几十年的发展,已经发展成为一门自成体系的管理学科。但为什么还要引入项目治理呢?首先,与项目管理技术蓬勃发展相比,涉及到项目本质等核心问题的项目理论的研究却相对滞后。其次,对于工程项目,项目越来越大型化、复杂化,其组织实施的日益专业化、市场化,更需要项目理论做宏观上的指导。而项目组织也具备了类似企业组织的特点,这样一来,把企业中一些比较成熟理论引入到项目理论的研究中来也是自然的选择。最后,在中国这样一个处于转制时期的国家来说,公司治理是一个比较突出的问题,而在工程建设领域,由于产权不清、信息不对称和不完全契约引起的治理问题也同样反映到工程项目上。通过以上三点分析本文认为,把公司治理理论引入到工程项目理论的研究来不仅是必要的,也是可行的。
对于如何把治理理论引入到工程项目组织中,构建工程项目治理的框架,本文的思路如下:
(1)对传统的工程项目的实施过程进行抽象,形成一个工程项目运作实施的框架模型。在这个模型的基础上,对工程项目组织的本质进行初步探讨。
(2)与公司治理产生的原因相比较,项目组织中也存在同样导致治理问题产生的因素,从而引出工程项目治理。
(3)区分工程项目治理与工程项目管理,确定工程项目治理的边界。进而与公司治理相对比,分析工程项目治理的目标、层次和治理的主体等。
与公司治理理论相似,本文把工程项目治理也分为内部治理和外部治理两个层次,内部治理的主体是建设单位,设计、施工、材料设备承包商,建设监理等。存在利益冲突、信息不对称和不完全契约是内部治理问题产生的主要原因,治理形式以正式制度为主,包括项目法人责任制、招投标制、建设监理制和合同管理等。
外部治理的主体主要是指除上述直接利益相关者之外的间接利益相关者,如政府部门、金融机构、项目使用者和社区居民等。外部治理产生的主要原因是项目所有权内涵的扩大,他们通过债权或其他利益关系对项目行使治理权,而且对项目的成功会带来影响。外部治理的形式为正式制度与非正式制度的结合。
Project management had been studied during the second war, after that , it has been developed for over sixty years and now a suit of a management system has been built up. But why do we need to introduce project governance? First, contrasted with the rapid developing project management technology, the project theory involving the nature of project is developing slowly. Second, as for a engineering project, it becomes more and more complex and it becomes specialization and market increasingly, so it calling for the project theory to conduct it macroscopically. And also the project organization has possesses the similar nature of corporation, so it is naturely to introduce the governance theory to the study of project theory. The third, as for China, during which has changing social system, corporation governance is a extrusive problem. In the same way, the governance problem caused by ambiguous property right and incomplete contract has appeared in the engineering project. Through the three reasons, the author regard that it is not only necessary but also feasible to introduce the governance.
How to build up the engineering project governance? The paper gives the follow steps:
(1) We abstract the traditional engineering project process and build a framework model, on this model, the nature of engineering project is explored.
(2) Contracting reasons cause corporation governance, the same elements cause governance also exist in the engineering project.
(3) Distinguish the engineering project governance and engineering project management to build the border of the paper. Moving forward, the paper analysis the goal the main body and administrative levels of engineering project governance.
Similar with corporation governance, engineering project governance is divided two administrative levels: interior governance and outer governance. The main body of the interior governance are the owner, contractor, designer supplier of the engineering project, agency problem and incomplete contract are the main reason which cause the interior governance, the forms of governance include
The main body of outer governance include government、bank、users and community which exclude the main body of the interior governance. The reason causes outer governance is the property of the project is enlarged. The stakeholders exert their governance right by creditor's right or influence of the stakeholders. The forms of governance include formal institution informal institution
引文
[1] 朱俊文、刘共清,尹贻林.项目管理发展综述[J].技术经济与管理研究,2003(1)
[2] 黄有亮、成虎.工程项目管理理论与实践新进展综述[J].江苏建筑,2003年增刊
[3] J.Rodney Turner, On the nature of the project as a temporary organization, International Journal of Project Management 2003; 21(1-8)
[4] Jonas soderiund ,Building theories of projects management : past research ,question for future, International Journal of Project Management 2004; 22(183-191)
[5] J.Rodney Turner, Communication and Co-operation on Projects Between the Project Owner As Principal and the Project Manager as Agent, European Management Journal ,June 2004
[6] Lynn Crawford, Julien Pollack, Hard and soft projects: a framework for analysis, International Journal of Project Management 2004; 22(645-653)
[7] 李慧.中、西方公司治理理论综述[J].经济纵横,2005,(1)
[8] 吴敬琏.现代公司与企业改革[M].天津:天津人民出版社,1994.
[9] 张维迎.所有制、治理结构与委托代理关系[J].经济研究,1996,(9)
[10] 青木昌彦、钱颖一.转轨经济中的公司治理结构[M].北京:中国经济出版社,1995
[11] 林毅夫,蔡昉.李周现代企业制度的内涵与国有企业改革方向[J].经济研究,1997,(3)
[12] 费方域,控制内部人控制——国企改革中的治理机制研究[J],经济研究,1996,(6)
[13] 李维安.公司治理[M].南开大学出版社.2001,(2)
[14] Bowley,M.(1996) The British Building Industry, Cambridge Fournal of Economics, 21,127-45
[15] Winch, G,M. The construction firm and the construction project: a transaction cost approach. Construction Management and Economics (1989) 7, 331—45.
[16] Winch, G,M. Project Management in Construction: Towards a Transaction Cost Approach, Le Groupe Bagnolet Working Paper No.1, University College London;1995.
[17] Winch, G,M. Governing the project process: a conceptual framework, Construction Management and Economics (2001) 19, 799—808.
[18] Turner JR, Keegan AE. Mechanisms of governance in the project-based organization: a transaction cost perspective. European Management Journal 2001;19(3), 254—67.
[19] Keith Lambert. Project Governance [J].World Project Management Week.27 March 2003.
[20] 教传生.项目管理的治理结构在大庆油田有限责任公司中的应用研究.东南大学硕士论文,2003
[21] 杨飞雪、汪海舰、尹贻林.项目治理结构初探[J].中国软科学,2004,(3)
[22] 严玲、尹贻林、范道津.公共项目治理理论概念模型的建立.中国软科学.2004
[23] 徐勇.治理转型与竞争——合作主义[J].开放时代,2001(7)
[24] 奥利弗·哈特.公司治理:理论与启示[J].经济学动态.译者:朱俊、汪冰、顾恒中,1996(6)
[25] 费方域.公司治理的理论前提及其意义[J].上海经济研究,1996,(6)
[26] Kenneth J. Arrow: The Economics of Agency" in Principles and Agents: The Structure of Business", Boston, 1985, P2
[27] 曹廷求.公司治理理论面临的三大挑战[J].山西财经大学学报,2003,(10)
[28] 杨瑞龙.企业共同治理的经济学分析[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2001
[29] 郭斌.企业治理演进的理论逻辑与经验启示[J].西南交通大学学报 (社会科学版),2003,(11)
[30] 玛格丽特·M·布莱尔.所有权与控制——21 世纪的公司治理结构探索[M],中国社会科学出版社,1999(8),张荣刚译
[31] 杨瑞龙、周业安.企业的利益相关者理论及其应用[M].经济科学出版社,2000(8)
[32] 刘仁怀、叶向阳.公司治理:理论演进与实践发展的分析框架[J].经济体制改革,2003,(4)
[33] 过聚荣.公司治理的目标与模式:关于近期公司治理理论的简要评述[J].当代财经,2003(4)
[34] 仲伟周.腐败:公共权力委托代理与监管视角.西安交通大学博士后论文,2000,(1)
[35] 张维迎.企业理论与中国企业改革 (M),北京大学出版社,1999
[36] 李洋、王辉.利益相关者理论的动态发展与启示.现代财经,2004,(7)
[37] Freeman, R. R: The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions, business Ethics Quarterly, 1994.(4)
[38] Clarkson M.B., 1995, A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance ,Academy of Management Review,20,92-117
[39] Rowley T.J., 1997, Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review, 22,897-910
[40] Charkham, J. (1994) Keeping Good Company A Study of Corporate Governance in Five Countries, Oxford: Clarendon Press
[41] Wheeler, D. and Sillanpaa, M. (1997) The Stakeholder Corporation, London: Pitman Publishing, 1997
[42] Carroll, A.B. (1996) Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management, Southwestern College Publishing, Cincinatti, Ohio.
[43] 王健.交易成本经济学治理结构理论的新进展[J].教学与研究,2001,(5)
[44] 王晓州.建设项目委托代理关系的经济学分析及激励与约束机制设计[J].中国软科学,2004,(6)
[45] 任玉珑、吴国生.工程项目参与主体的行为的经济学分析[J].重庆大学学报, 2004,(4)
[46] 投资项目利益相关者管理研究 朱东恺 中国工程咨询2004,(2)
[47] 王孟钧、邓铁军.建筑市场管理的自组织理论及其实现[J].湖南大学学报,2001,(8)
[48] 权军、朱宏亮.运用系统科学方法建立加入 WTO 后建设法规体系的框架.建筑,2002,(6)
[49] 吴淑琨.公司治理和公司管理的系统化思考[J].南京大学学报(社会科学版),2001,(3)
[50] Chan. Daniel W.M., Kumaraswamy.M.M.. A Comparative Study of Causes of Time Overruns In Hong Kong Construction Projects [J]. International Journal of project Management. 1997, 15(1): 55-63.
[51] Morris P W G, Hough G H. The pre-condition of success and failure in major projects [J]. Major Project Association, 1986, 3
[52] C S Lim, M Zain Mohamed. Criteria of Project Success: an Exploratory re-examination [J]. International Journal of Project Management. 1999, Vol.17:243~248
[53] 张锋.对商业建筑项目成功标准的调查与研究.云南大学硕士学位论文,2004,(5)
[54] Munns A K, Bjeirmi B F. The Role of Project Management in Achieving Project Success[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 1996, vol.14, No.2: 81-87
[55] 张野.石化建设项目利益相关者间冲突研究.大连理工大学硕士学位论文,2003,(9)
[56] 杨经福.投资项目利益相关者分析.河海大学硕士学位论文,2002,(3)
[57] 奥利弗·哈特.公司治理:理沦与启示[J],经济学动态,1996,(6)
[58] 吴淑琨.公司治理模式探讨[J].经济学动态,1999,(1)
[59] 杨其静.从完全合同理论到不完全合同理论[J].教学与研究,2003,(7)
[60] 许红军.工程建设监理委托—代理问题研究.河北工业大学硕士论文,2002,(1)
[61] 王华、尹贻林.基于委托—代理的工程项目治理结构及其优化[J].中国软科学,2004(11)
[62] 高显义.中国建筑业契约与信用机制研究.同济大学博士论文.2004,(3)
[63] 栾维功.水利项目建设管理体制与建设管理单位治理结构[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2001
[64] 国家计委《关于建设项目实行业主责任制的暂行规定》(计建设[1992]2006号)
[65] 国家计委《关于实行建设项目法人责任制的暂行规定》(计建设[1996]673号)
[66] 刘伊生.建设项目管理[M].清华大学出版社、北京交通大学出版社,2004,(9)
[67] 叶隆.国有建筑企业改革与建筑业发展.安徽大学硕士论文,2004,(5)
[68] 许天戟、宋京豫.建筑伙伴的机理与实施研究[J].基建优化,2002,(2)
[69] 江伟.工程项目管理中信息不对称的对策研究.华北电力大学硕士论文,2003,(12)
[70] Jonathan Hosie. Egan's view on contracts[J]. Engineering Management Journal, 2001.2.
[71] F. D .Lazar. Project partnering: Improving the likelihood of win-win outcomes [J]. Journal Of management in Engineering,2000.3.
[72] 胡季英、关柯.我国建设工程合同管理存在的问题及对策探讨[J].建设监理,2003,(4)
[73] 候化坤.国际工程合同管理与索赔.西安建筑科技大学硕士学位论文,2004,(6)
[74] 黄海艳.发展项目的公众参与研究.河海大学博士学位论文.2004,(5)
[75] 蓝海涛.转型期我国政府项目管理制度分析[J].宏观经济管理,2005,(7)
[76] 《关于投资体制改革的决定》(国发 [2004] 20号)
[77] http://tzs.ndrc.gov.cn/tzgz中华人民共和国国家发展和改革委员会固定资产投资司
[78] 史树林.论 WTO 条件下政府职能的转变与创新.中央财经大学学报.2003,(12).
[79] 崔秉哲.世行和亚行贷款业务概论.河南人民出版社.1995,(3)P87
[80] 周盛世.工程承包中银行出具履约保函的若干问题探讨[J].建筑经济,2001,(6)
[81] 曹长庆.关于建立我国工程保险制度的研究.天津大学硕士论文,2002,(2)
[82] 田杰芳.工程建设参与各方的风险管理及保险.北方交通大学硕士学位论文,1999,(12)
[83] 方桐清.建筑工程保险机制的研究.西安建筑科技大学硕士学位论文,2004,(6)
[84] 罗祥、戴秋光.工程保险索赔的一般程序.水利水电技术[J], 2003, (10)
[85] 南方周末2005年4月17日
[86] http://news.sina.com.cn/c/2005-O7-20/21196485797s.shtml 新华网
[87] http://www.cctv.com/news/financial/inland/20050115/100695.shtml
[88] http://www.sdfdc.com/new_news/admin/newsfile/2004102791314.html
[89] 《北京市政府投资建设项目委托代建合同 (示范文本)》