基于共生理论的企业集群组织研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
在企业集群的理论研究中,从现有的文献资料看,不论是国外还是国内,都是在宏观经济领域和中观产业领域层面对企业集群进行研究,论文运用共生理论,率先从微观领域系统地分析和研究企业集群,指出集群企业的共生有助于降低集群企业的市场交易成本和内部管理控制成本,从而提高了集群的整体竞争能力;论文提出了共生关系下的集群企业衍生模式、集群企业对共生对象的选择机制、集群发展过程的调节机制。论文的分析及结论对集群、企业、政府都有积极的借鉴意义。
     论文的内容安排是:
     第一章介绍论文研究的背景,讨论企业集群的内涵与外延;提出对企业集群的定义;介绍论文研究的内容、方法与创新之处。
     第二章较为全面地介绍国内外有关企业集群的研究文献,从外部经济说、交易费用说、创新说、竞争优势说四个方面进行归纳和总结,并对国内有关企业集群的研究进行专门综述,这一章还介绍企业演化理论及相关学说,重点介绍共生理论的概念和基本原理。
     第三章运用共生理论分析集群企业在企业生态系统中的竞争与合作关系,界定集群企业的竞争、寄生、偏利共生和互惠共生概念和特点,通过企业最优成长模型推导出企业共生关系的数学模型,对集群企业共生现象进行简要分析。
     第四章分析集群企业共生关系的一些条件,充分讨论企业共生的必要条件、充分条件、均衡条件、稳定条件和一般条件;对集群企业共生组织从点共生到间歇共生、到连续共生、再到一体化共生的演进方式及特征进行分析,并对集群企业共生程度与其他共生特性的相关性进行分析。
     第五章从企业间关系入手分析集群网络组织结构及特性,以经济学原理对集群组织进行分析,从组织形式、专业化产业类型、基本结构、成员企业间关系四个方面给出企业集群的分类。
     第六章以共生理论观点对企业集群产生、成长的演化路径进行分析,对企业集群的培育期、成长期、成熟期、衰退期或蜕变期等生命周期现象进行剖析,分析了技术界面的选择机制对集群发展的影响。
     第七章,在构建企业集群的价值链的基础上,对集群共生对象的选择机制、集群共生能量的调节机制、集群及共生企业与环境的影响和作用一一进行了详尽的分析。
     第八章,通过183余家集群企业的调查数据,对共生关系下的企业集群及成员企业进行实证分析。
     第九章,对论文的分析进行总结,提出对地方政府发展区域经济的建议,并对企业集群领域的进一步研究作简单展望。
     论文的创新之处在于:
     首先,论文运用共生理论分析社会科学领域的企业集群现象,不仅在企业集
    
    浙江大学博士学位论文
    群的研究领域尚属首次,就是在共生理论的应用研究方面也不多见,本论文的研
    究将共生理论引入到管理学视野,做出了有益的尝试。
     其次,论文率先从微观层面对企业集群展开系统研究。从现有的文献资料来
    看,不论是国外还是国内,对企业集群的研究都是在宏观经济领域和中观产业领
    域层面展开,迄今尚未有从微观层面对企业集群进行研究,本论文率先从微观领
    域系统地研究企业集群,论文的分析和结论对企业集群和集群中的企业都具有现
    实意义。
     第三,论文率先将企业集群作为一个组织整体进行研究,运用共生理论分析
    企业集群的组织结构和特性,对企业集群的发展型态、运行机制进行了较为系统
    的研究,提出了基于共生关系的集群企业衍生模式及运行机制,对政府和企业都
    具有积极的借鉴意义。
Document materials up until now show, no matter abroad or domestic, the research that is about enterprise clusters centralized in the fields of macro-economy and industry economy. The dissertation takes the lead in analyses and studying the enterprise clusters systematically from the micro field, Point out that the intergrowth contributes to reduce marketing cost of the enterprise and inside management control cost, thus improved the whole competitive power of enterprise clusters. The dissertation has proposed the mode that enterprise has emerged under the intergrowth relation, the choice mechanism to the intergrowth target of enterprise, the regulation mechanism to the enterprise clusters evolution. All there are positive reference meanings to the clusters, enterprises, governments in the analysis and conclusion of the dissertation.
    The content of the dissertation does the following arrangement:
    In chapter one, the dissertation introduces the background studied, discuss the intension of the enterprise clusters and extend, put forward the definition of the enterprise clusters, introduce the places of the content studied, method and innovation.
    In chapter two, introduce the research document about the enterprise clusters both at home and abroad, collect the research documents, sum up and summarize from four respects of advantage of external economy, trade expenses, innovation, competition. The study on domestic relevant enterprises clusters has carried on the survey. The dissertation introduce the organization evolution theory and relevant theory, introduce the concept of the intergrowth theory and basic principle especially.
    In chapter three, use business ecology and intergrowth theory to analyze the competition and cooperation in the enterprise ecosystem of the enterprise clusters, define the concept and characteristic of the intergrowth form of the enterprise, point out the ideal intergrowth form, and derive the mathematics model of the relation of enterprise intergrowth.
    In chapter four, analyze and discuss the condition of the relation of enterprise intergrowth, probe into the principle that the enterprise forms the homobium, analyze the correlations between the intergrowth degree of enterprise clusters and other characteristics. The gradual progress way and characteristic organized to the enterprise clusters intergrowth are analyzed.
    In chapter five, analyze the institutional framework of the network and characteristic, and explain this phenomenon with the economics principle, classify for the enterprise clusters according to four standards.
    
    
    
    In chapter six, analyze the evolution route where the enterprise clusters produces, grow up with the intergrowth theory, analyze the life period of enterprise clusters, analyze the impact on enterprise clusters development of the in technology chooses mechanism.
    In chapter seven, on the basis of structuring the value chain of enterprise clusters, have carried on exhaustive analysis to the choice mechanism of the intergrowth target, the regulation mechanism of intergrowth energy, and influence and function between the environment and the enterprise clusters, intergrowth enterprise.
    In chapter eight, pass the investigation data of five cities and 183 enterprises in Zhejiang, carry on the analysis of real example of the enterprise clusters.
    In chapter nine, the analysis to the dissertation is summarized, the suggestion for developing the regional economy is proposed to the local government on the basis of the summaries. The study on enterprise clusters field looks into the distance briefly, too.
    Lie in the place of innovation of this dissertation:
    First of all, the dissertation uses the intergrowth theory to analyse that the phenomena of enterprise clusters in the domain of the social sciences, not only still belong to the first time in the field of research of the enterprise, even if but also rare in application study of the intergrowth theory. The research of this thesis leads the intergrowth theory into the management domain, has made the help
引文
1. Alchian A.A. and Demsetz H. 1972. Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization. American Economic Review, (12):777-795
    2. Aldrich H.E. and Pfeffer J. 1976. Environments of Organizations. Annual Review of Sociology. Palo. CA. Annual Review, (2):79-92
    3. Arnin A. and Robins K. 1991. The Reemergence of Regional Economies? The Mythical Geography of Flexible Accumulation. Environment and Planning D. Society and Space, (8):7-34
    4.Anhur Andersen等:未来组织设计.王小波等译.北京:新华出版社,2000
    5. Asheim T. 1994. Interactive Innovation system and SME Policy. Paper presented on the IGU Commission on the Organization of Industrial Space residential conference. Sevillia. Spain. August.
    6. Bacattini G. 1990. The Marshallian Industrial District as a Socio-economic Notion. In F.Pyke, G.Bacattini and W. Sengenberger (eds.). Industrial Districts and Inter-Firm Co-operation in Italy. Geneva. IILS.
    7. Bacattini G 1991. The Industrial District as a Creative Melieu. In Benko G. and Dunford M.(eds). Industrial Change and Regional Development. London. Belhaven, 102-114
    8. Barney J. 1991. Firm Resource and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, (17):99-122
    9. Batista R. and Swann P.1998. Do Firms in Clusters Innovate More? Research Policy, (27):525-540
    10. Bessant J. snd Francis D.1998. Using Learning Networks to Help Improve Manufacturing Competitiveness. Technovation, 19(6-7):373-381
    11. Birkinshaw J. 2000. Upgrading of Industry Clusters and Foreign Investment. International Studies of Management and Organization,30(2):93-113
    12. Birkinshaw J. and Francis D. 1999. Using Learning Networks to Help Improve Manufacturing Competitiveness. Technovation, 19(6-7):373-381
    13. Bramanti A. and Maggioni M.A. 1997. The Dynamics of Milieux, The Network Analysis Approach. In Remigio R.. Alberto B. and Richard G(eds). The Dynamics of Innovative Region. the GREMI approach. Brookfield. Ashgate
    14. Capello R. 1999. Spatial Transfer of Knowledge in Hi-Tech Milieux, Learning Versus Collective Learning Progresses. Regional Studies, 33(4):353-365
    15. Carney M. 1998. The Competitiveness of Networked Production: the role of trust and asset specificity. Journal of Management Studies, 35(4):457-479
    16. Carrincazeaux C., Lung Y and Rallet A. 2001. Proximity and Localization of
    
    Corporate R&D Activities. Research Policy, (30):777-789
    17. Cattorna J.L. and Waiters D.W. 1996. Managing the Supply Chain-a Strategic Perspective. Macmillan Press Ltd
    18. Chari S. 2000. The Agrarian Origins of the Knitwear Industrial Cluster in Triuppur, India. World Development, 28(3)579-599
    19. Christopherson S. and Storper M. 1986. The City as Studio, the Worm as Back Lot, The Impact of Vertical Disintegration on the Location of the Motion Picture Industry. Environment and Planning D. Society and Space ,(4):305-320
    20. Cohen W.M. 1990. Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, (35): 128-152
    21. Conner K.R.1991. A Historical Comparison of Resource-based Theory and Five Schools Thought within Industrial Organization Economics:Do We Have a New Theory of the Firm ? Journal of Management, (17): 124-154
    22. Cooke P. 2000. Structural Competitiveness and Learning Regions. Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies,(3):265-260
    23. Cooke P. Uranga M.G.and Etxebarria G. 1997. Regional Innovation Systems:Institutional and Organizational Dimensions. Research Policy, (26):475-491
    24. D'Aveni,R. 1994.Hypercom petition. New York. NY: Free Press, 1994
    25. DeBernardy M. 1999. Reactive and Proactive Local Territory, Co-operation and Community in Grenoble. Regional Studies,33(4):343-352
    26. DeBresson C. and Amesse F.1991. Networks of Innovators, A Review and Introduction to the Issue. Research Policy,(20):363-379
    27. Enright M.J. 2000. Regional Clusters and Multinational Enterprise: Independence, Dependence, or Interdependence? International Studies of Management & Organization, 30(2): 114-138
    28. Feldman M.P. 1994. The Geography of Innovation. London. Kluwer Academic Publishers
    29. Florida R. and Kenney M. 1990. Silicon Valley and Route 128 Won't Save Us. California Management Review (33):68-88
    30. Freeman C. 1991. Networks of Innovators, A Synthesis of Research Issues. Research Policy, (20):499-514
    31. Gary Hamel and Prahalad C.K. 1990. Core Competence of the Corporation. Harvard Business Review, (5):79-91
    32. Gordon I.R. and McCann E 2000. Industrial Clusters: Complexes, Agglomeration and/or Social Networks? Urban Studies,37(3):513-532
    33. Granovettor M. 1985. Economic Action and Social Structure: The Proplem of Embededness. American Journal of Sociology,(91 ):481-510
    34. Grant R.M. 1991. The Resource-baged Theory of Competitive Advantage:Implication for Strategy Formulation. California Management Review,33(3): 114-135
    
    
    35. Gulyani S. 2001. Effects of Poor Transportation on Lean Production and Industrial Clustering, Evidence from the Indian Auto Industry. World Development, 29(7): 1157-1177
    36. Hannan M.T. and Freeman J.H. 1982. The Population Ecology of Organizations. American Review (3): 929-964
    37. Harrison B. 1992. Industrial District: Old Wine in New Bottles? Regional Studies, 26(4):469-483
    38. Harrison B. etc.1994. Why Large Corporation Will Continue to Dominate the Global Economy. New York. The Guilford Press
    39. Hau L. Lee 1995. Corey Billingtion, The Evolution of Supply-Chain-Management Models and Practice at Hewlett-Packard. Interface, 25(5):42-63
    40. Havengen B. 1996. The Value Chain Component in a Decision Support System, A Case Example. IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management, 43(4):418-428
    41. Hayter R. 1997. The Dynamics of Industrial Location, The Factory, the Firm and the Production System. England. John Wiley and Sons Ltd
    42. Henrik Brandes etc. 1997.Outsourcing—Success or Failure? Findings from five studies.European Joumal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 3(2):63-75
    43. Hodgson GM. 1988. Economics and Institutions. Cambridge. MA:Polity Press.
    44. Hwang J. and Hoo S. 2000. Characteristics and development of industrial districts, The case of software clusters in Seoul. Paper presented at the residential conference on Knowledge. Industry and Environment. IGU Commission on the Organization of Industrial Space. Dongguan. China, 8-11 August
    45. Ivarsson I. 1999. Competitive Industry Clusters and Inward TNC Investments: the case of Sweden. Regional Studies,33(1):37-49
    46. Izushi H. 1997. Conflict between Two Industrial Networks: Technological Adaptation and Inter-firm Relationships in the Creamics Industry in Seto, Japan. Regional Studies, 31 (2): 117-129
    47. Izushi H. 1999. Can a Development Agency Foster Cooperation among Local Firms? The case of the Welsh Development Agency's supplier association programme. Regional Studies,33(8):730-750
    48. Janice Black, Kimberly Boal 1995. Strategic Resources: Traits, Configurations and Paths to Sustainable Competitive Advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 1994(15): 131-148
    49. Jefferey F.1999. Rayport, John J. Sviokla, Exploiting the Virtual Value Chain. Harvard Business Review. Sep-Dec, 75-99
    50. Jeffery L. 1998. Sampler, Redefining Industry Structure for the Information Age, Strategic Management Journal, (19) :343-355
    51. Keeble D. and Wilkinson F. 1999. Collective Learning and Knowledge Development in the evolution of Rebional Cluster of High Technology SMEs in Europe. Regional Studies, 33(4):295-303
    
    
    52. Keeble D. Lawson C. Moore B. and Wilkinson F. 1999. Collective Learning Processes, Networking and Institutional Thickness in the Cambridge Region. Regional Studies, 33(4):319-332
    53. Krugman P.1991. Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, (99):483-499
    54. Krugman P. 1998. What's New about the New Economic Geography? Oxford Review of Economic Policy,(14): 1 - 17
    55. Lane P.J. and Lubatkin M. 1998. Relative Absorptive Capacity and Inter-organizational Learning Capacity. Regional Studies, (19): 461-477
    56. Larson A.1992. Network Dyads in Entrepreneurial Settings: A study of the governance of exchange relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(1):76-104
    57. Lawson C. and Lorenz E.1999. Collective Learning, Tacit Knowledge and Regional Innovative Capacity. Regional Studies, 33(4): 305-317
    58. Levy D.Dunning J.H.1993. International Production and Sourcing." Trends and Issues. STI Review, (13):13-59
    59. Lim I. And Nesadurai H.1997. Managing the Malaysian Industrial Economy: the policy and reform process for industrialization. ISEAS and Nomura Research Institute: 185-215
    60. Lissoni F. 2001. Knowledge Codification and the Geography of Innovation: the case of Brescia mechanical cluster. Research Policy,(30): 1479-1500
    61. Longhi C. 1999. Networks, Collective Learning and Technology Development in Innovative High Technology Regions, the Case of Sophia-Antipolis. Regional Studies, 33(4):333
    62. Lundvall B.A. 1992. National Systems of Innovation, Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London. Printer Publishers
    63. Maillat D. 1991. The Innovation Process and the Role of the Milieu. In Bergrnan E.M. etc.(eds.): Regions Reconsidered: Economic Networks, Innovation and Local Development in Industrialized Countries(Mansell. New York)103-117
    64. Malecki E.J. 1994. Enterpreneurships in Regional and Local Development. International Regional Science Review, (16): 119-153
    65. Malecki E.J. 1995. Flexibility and Industrial districts. Environment and Planning,(27): 11-14
    66. Markusen, A. 1990. Regional Network and the Resurgence of Silicon Valley. California, Boston: Allen and Unwin
    67. Markusen, A. 1991. The Origins and Dynamics of Production Networks in Silicon Valley. Research Policy,(20):423-437
    68. Markusen, A. 1994. Studying Regional by Studying Firms. Professional Geographer, 46(4):477-490
    69. Markusen, A. 1996. Sticky Places in Slippery Space, a typology of industrial
    
    districts. Economic Geography, (3): 293-313
    70. Meyer-Stamer J. 1998. Path Dependence in Regional Development: Persistence and Change in Three Industrial Clusters in Santa Catarina, Brazil World Development, 26(8):1495-1511
    71. Miles R.E.1992. Causes of Failure in Network Organizations. California Management Review, Summer
    72. Morgan K.1997. The Learning Region: Institutions, Innovation and Regional Renewal. Regional Studies,(31):491-503
    73. Nelson R. 1993. National Innovation Systems, A Comparative Analysis. New York and Oxford, Oxford University Press
    74. Niosi J. and Bas T.G. 2001.The Competencies of Regions: Canada's Clusters in Biotechnology. Small Business Economies, (17):31-42
    75. Oliver Christine 1990. Determinats of Interorganizational Relationships, Integration and Future Directions. Academy of Management Review, (15):241-265
    76. Osborn R. and Hagedoorn J. 1997. The Institutionalization and Evolutionary Dynamics of Interorganizational Alliances and Networks. Academy of Management Journal,40(2):261-278
    77. Pack H. 1994. Endogenous Growth Theory: Intellectual Appeal and Empirical Shortcoming. Journal of Economic Perspective, (8):55-72
    78. Padmore T. and Gibson H. 1998. Modelling Systems of Innovation: Ⅱ.A Framework for Industrial Cluster Analysis in Regions. Research Policy,(26):625-641
    79. Pang X. 1995. Linkage, Agglomeration Economies and Rural Industrialization, New industrial Districts in China? Paper presented at the 1995 residential conference of the IGU Commission on the Organization of Industrial Space, Seoul, Korea, August
    80. Park S.O. and Markusen A. 1995. Generalizing New Industrial Districts, a Theoretical Agenda and an Application from a Non - Western Economy. Environment and Planning, (27), 84-104
    81. Petearf M.A. 1993. The Cornerstones of Competitive Advantage: A Resource-based View. Strategic Management Journal, (14): 179-191
    82. Pfeffer J. and Salancik G.R. 1978: The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper & Row
    83. Pinch S. and Henry N. 1999. Paul Krugman's Geographical Economics, Industrial Clustering and the British Motor Sport Industry. Regional Studies,33(9):815-827.
    84. Piore M. and Sabel C. 1984. The Second Industrial Divide, Possibilities for Prosperity. New York, Basic Books
    85. Porter M.E. 1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York, The Free Press
    
    
    86. Porter M.E. 1991. Towards a Dynamic Theory of Strategy. Strategic Management Journal. (12):95-117
    87. Porter M.E. 1996. What is strategy? Harvard Business Review, (6)
    88. Porter M.E. 1998. Clusters and the New Economics of Competition. Harvard Business Review, 76(6):77-90
    89. Porter M.E. 2000. Location, Competition and Economic Development, Local Clusters in a Global Economy. Economic Development Quarterly, (1): 15-35
    90. Ram Charan 1991. How Networks Reshape Organizations, For Resuits. Harvard Business Review, September-October
    91. Richard H. Hall 1991. Organizations, Structhers, Processes and Outcomes. Prentice Hall, Inc., New Jersey
    92. Richard Norman 1993. From Value Chain to Value Constellation, Designing Interactive strategy. Harvard Business Review, Jul-Aug, 65-71
    93. Ring ES. and Van de Ven A.H. 1992. Structuring Cooperrative Relationship between Organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 13(7):483-498
    94. Ron Sanchez 1998. Preparing for an Uncertain Future-Managing Organizations for Strategic Flexibility. International Studies of Management & Organization, 27(2):71-94
    95. Saxenian A. 1994. Regional Advantage, Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128, Harvard University Press, Cambridge
    96. Saxenian A. 1990. Regional Networks and the Resurgence of Silicon Valley. California Management Review, Fall, 89-112
    97. Schmitz H. 1999. Form Ascribed to Earned Trust in Exporting Clusters. Journal of International Economics, (48): 139-150
    98. Scott A.J. 1988. New Industrial Space. London: Pion
    99. Scott A.J. 1992. The Role of Large Producers in Industrial Districts: a case study of high technology systems houses in southern California. Regional Study, (26): 265-275
    100. Scott A.J. 1993. Technopoles, High-Technology Industry and Regional Development in South California. Berkeley, UC Press
    101. Sternberg R. 1998. Innovation Linkage and the Region: Theoretical assumption vs. empirical evidence. Paper presented to the residential conference of the IGU Commission on the Organization of Industrial Space, Goteborg, August
    102. Storper M. 1989. The Transition to Flexible Specialization in Industry, External Economies, the Division of Labor and the Crossing of Industrial Divides. Cambridge Journal of Economics, (13), 273-305
    103. Storper M. 1995. Regional Technology Coalitions: an Essential Dimension of National Technology Polict. Research Policy, (24):895-911
    104. Storper M. 1997. The Regional World, Territorial Development in a Global Economy. New York, Guilford Press
    
    
    105. Storper M. and Harrison B. 1991. Flexibility, Hierarchy and Regional Development: the changing structure of industrial production systems and their forms of governance in the 1990s. Research Policy, (20):407-422
    106. Storper M. and Scott A.J.(eds) 1992. Pathways to Industrialization and Regional Development. London: Routledge
    107. Svikola J.J. and Jeffery F.R. 1995. Exploting the Virtual Value Chain. Harvard Business Review, 11-12,75-85
    108. Swann P. and Prevezer M. 1996. A Comparison of the Dynamics of Industrial Clustering in Computing and Biotechnology. Research Policy,(25): 1139-1157
    109. Takeuchi A. 1994. Location Dynamics of Industry in Tokyo Meteropolitan Region. Report of Research, Nippon Institute of Technology, (21):283-292
    110. Tong X and Wang J. 2000. Global-local networking of PC manufacturing in Dongguan, China. Paper presented at the 2000 residential conference of the IGU Commission on the Organization of Industrial Space, Dongguan, China, August 8-11
    111. Vernon R. 1966. International Investment and International Trade in the Profit Life Cycle. Quarterly Journal of Economics, (80): 190-207
    112. Vivek Ranadvice:实时的魅力——成功企业对实现实时信息技术的反映和应用.史晓洵等译.北京:清华大学出版社,2000
    113. Von Hippel E. 1987. The Sources of Innovation. New York,Oxford University Press
    114. Von Hippel E. 1994. Sticky Information and the Locus of Problem Solving. Management Science,(4):429-439
    115. Wang J. 1998. In Search of Innovativeness: The Case of Zhong'guancun. In Malecki E. and P. Oina(eds.) Making Connections: Technological Learning and regional economic change,205-220
    116. Wang J. and Brandbury J.1986. The Changing Industrial Geography of the Chinese Special Economic Zones. Economic Geography, 62(4):307-320
    117. Wever E., Stam E.1999. Clusters of High Technology SMEs, The Dutch Case. Regional Studies, 33(4),391-400
    118. Williamson, O.E. 1979. Transaction Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relationships. Journal of Law and Economics, (22):233-262
    119. Williamson, O.E. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press, 1985
    120.爱迪斯(美):企业业生命周期.第一版.北京:中国社会科学出版,1997
    121.安虎森:空间接近与不确定性的降低.南开经济研究,2001(3):51-56
    122.安虎森:新产业区理论与区域经济发展.北方论丛,1998(2):61-65
    123.拜瑞·丁·内勒巴夫,亚当·M·布兰登伯格(美).合作竞争——一种结合了竞争与合作的革命性思维.合肥:安徽人民出版社,2000
    124.波特(美).现代竞争分析.载廖理,汪韧,陈璐.探求智慧之旅——哈佛、麻省理工
    
    著名经济学家访谈录.北京:北京大学出版社,2000
    125.蔡宁,吴结兵.企业集群的竞争优势:资源的结构性整合.中国工业经济,2002(7):45-50
    126.蔡宁,杨闩柱.基于企业集群的工业园区发展研究.中国农村经济,2003(1):53-59
    127.蔡淑琴,龚业明.基于供应链的企业管理战略.科研管理,1999(5):86-90
    128.陈菊红.虚拟企业:跨世纪企业的崭新组织模式.管理工程学报,2000(2):62-64
    129.陈守明.小企业网络——一种新型的企业组织形式.管理现代化,2000(1):30-31
    130.陈郁编.企业制度与市场组织:交易费用经济学文选.上海:上海人民出版社,1996
    131.陈振汉,厉以宁.工业区位理论.北京:人民出版社,1982
    132.程兆谦,徐金发.企业外部成长方式的选择:一个路径决策模型.中国软科学,2000(12):89-92
    133.池仁勇.意大利中小企业集群形成的条件与特征.外国经济与管理,2001(8):27-31
    134.迟晓英,宣国良.价值链研究发展综述.外国经济与管理,2000(1):25-30
    135.迟晓英,宣国良.正确理解供应链与价值链的关系.工业工和与管理.2000(1):29-32
    136.符正平.论波特竞争优势理论的新发展.学术研究,1999(7):36-40
    137.仇保兴.小企业集群研究.上海:复旦大学出版社,1999
    138.仇保兴.仇保兴市长谈如何构筑基于集群创业的支持系统.杭州政报,2001(10):38-41
    139.仇保兴.发展小企业集群要避免的陷阱——过度竞争所致的柠檬市场.北京大学学报(哲社版).1999(1):25-29
    140.邓明然,叶建木.民营企业中的集群现象及启示.科技进步与对策,2001(8):91-92
    141.樊圣君,张旭亮,张振宇.论区域集群的独特社会资本优势扩对区域和国家持续竞争优势的意义.经济评论,2001(4):64-67
    142.方民生.波特的簇群理论与浙江产业组织.浙江经济,2001(7):29-30
    143.冯宗宪.经济空间场理论与应用.西安:陕西人民出版社,2000
    144.盖文启,朱华晟.产业的柔性集聚及其区域竞争力.经济理论与经济管理,2001(10).25-30
    145.盖文启.创新网络——区域经济发展新新思维.北京:北京大学出版社,2002
    146.韩福荣,徐艳梅.企业仿生学.北京:企业管理出版社,2001
    147.胡成功.生态位理论与我国知识经济发展方略.中国软科学,2000(6):120-124
    148.黄泰岩,牛飞亮.西方企业网络理论与企业家的成长.中国工业经济,1999(2):75-78
    149.黄野.虚拟公司.广州:广东经济出版社,1999
    150.黄勇.浙江块状经济现象分析.中国工业经济,1999(5):58-60
    151.贾根良.网络组织:超越市场与企业两分法.经济社会体制比较,1998(4).13-19
    152.杰西卡·利普耐克等(美).虚拟团队管理——21世纪组织发展新趋势.北京:经济管理出版社,2002
    
    
    153.解树江.虚拟企业——理论分析、运行机制与发展战略.北京经济管理出版社,2002
    154.金祥荣,柯荣柱.对专业市场的一种交易费用经济学解释.经济研究,1997(4):74-79
    155.金祥荣,张金山,郑勇军等著.组织创新与区域经济发展.杭州:杭州大学出版社,1998
    156.景芝英,徐雪梅.试论聚集经济的本质.财经问题研究,1998(11):11-13
    157.科斯(美).企业的经济性质.上海财经大学出版社,2000
    158.肯尼斯·普瑞斯.以合作求竞争.沈阳:辽宁教育出版社,1998
    159.蓝海林,蒋峦,谢卫红.中小企业集群战略研究.中国软科学,2002(11):53-57
    160.李维安.网络组织——更具有适应能力的新型组织模式.南开管理评论,2000(3):4-7
    161.李小健.新产业区经济活动全球化的地理研究.地理科学进展,1997(3).16-23
    162.李新春.企业战略网络的生成发展与市场转型.经济研究,1998(4):70-78
    163.李元旭.资产专用性与纵向一体化.经济科学,2000(5):64-69
    164.刘清华,吴晓波.中小企业集群的知识转移分析.技术经济与管理研究,2002(4):88
    165.刘友金.论集群式创新的组织模式.中国软科学,2002(2):71-75
    166.陆立军等著.科技型中小企业与区域竞争力.北京:中国经济出版社,2002
    167.马士华,林勇.陈志祥.供应链管理.北京:机械工业出版社,2000
    168.马世骏.现代生态学透视.北京:科学出版社,1990
    169.马歇尔(英).经济学原理(1922版).北京:商务印书馆,1997
    170.马永生.供应链管理.经济管理,1999(8):24
    171.迈克尔·波特(美).竞争优势.北京:华夏出版社,1997
    172.迈克尔·波特(美).竞争战略.北京:华夏出版社,1997
    173.慕继丰,冯宗宪.企业簇与企业竞争力.宁夏大学学报.社会科学版,2002(7):89-91,97
    174.朴杉沃(韩).李小健译.发展中国家的新产业区:问题与策略地理译报,1994.13(4):3-8
    175.钱平凡.组织转型.杭州:浙江人民出版社,1999
    176.芮明杰,钱平凡.分析的交易费用理论认识与评价.上海理论研究,1998(6):42-46
    177.芮明杰,袁安照.现代公司理论与运行.济南:山东人民出版社,1998
    178.申恩平.提升我国块状经济竞争力的思考.经济问题,2002(11):24-26
    179.石忆邵,朱红燕.市场集群、企业集群与城镇网络——兼论长江三角洲都市经济圈联动发展模式.城市规划汇刊,2000(2):35-37
    180.石忆邵.市场群落理论及其在中国的实践.城市规划汇刊,2001(1):18-22
    181.孙天琦.合作竞争型准市场组织的发展与产业组织结构演进.中国工业经济研究,2001(3):71-75
    182.孙巍.生产资源配置效率——生产前沿理论及其应用.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2000
    
    
    183.唐隆华,宋劲松.西方经济学中的企业规模理论.当代经济研究,2000(3):52-58
    184.万泽滢.价值链与供应链在价值系统中的整合.浙江社会科学,2001(3):58-60
    185.汪少华,汪佳蕾.浙江省企业集群成长的创新模式.中国农村经济,2002(8):38-62
    186.王丹.虚拟制造体系相关概念和理论诠释.经济研究参考,2001(58):8-12
    187.王缉慈,童昕.特色产业区规划要引入生态工业思想.浙江经济,2001(12):32-33
    188.王缉慈,王可.区域创新环境和企业根植性—兼论我国高新技术企业开发区的发展.地理研究,1999(4):357-361
    189.王缉慈.创新的空间——企业集群与区域发展.北京:北京大学出版社,2001
    190.王缉慈.关于企业规模科学性的思考.中国工业经济,1997(7):27-30
    191.王缉慈.简评关于新产业区的国际学术讨论.地理科学进展,1998.6(3):29-35
    192.王缉慈.区域创新环境及其网络理论.中国高新技术产业导报,1996年10月24日起连载
    193.王缉慈.网络环境:产业组织创新的的崭新形式——兼评我国企业上规模的认识误区.战略与管理,1997(3).109-114
    194.王建刚,赵进.产业集聚现象分析.管理世界,2001(6):192-196
    195.王珺.论簇群阶段性演进.学术研究,2002(7):5-9
    196.王珺.中小企业专业化发展与网络.学术研究,1999(9):16-20
    197.韦伯(德).工业区位论》(1929版).北京:商务印书馆.1997
    198.魏后凯.对产业集群与竞争力关系的考察.经济管理,2003(6):4-11
    199.魏江,叶波.文化视野内的小企业集群技术学习研究.科学学研究,2001(4):68-72
    200.魏江,申军.传统产业集群创新系统的结构和运行模式——以温州低压电器业集群为例.科学学与科学技术管理,2003(1):14-17
    201.魏守华,石碧华.论企业集群的竞争优势.中国工业经济,2002(1):59-65
    202.项保华.战略管理——艺术与实务.北京:华夏出版社,2001
    203.萧灼基.金融共生理论与城市商业银行改革序言.北京:商务印书馆.2002
    204.萧灼基.共生理论序言.北京:科学技术术出版社,1998
    205.徐金发,程大涛.虚拟企业的模型构建及价值链分析数量经济技术经济研究,2003(2):81-65
    206.徐金发,程大涛.中小企业集群化发展的竞争优势分析及其启示.科技进步与对策,2003(9):80-81
    207.徐康宁.开放经济中的产业集群与竞争力.中国工业经济,2001(11):22-27
    208.杨忠直.企业生态学引论.北京:科学出版社,2003:69-76
    209.杨忠直.合资项目经济评价新论.系统工程学报,1996.11(4)
    210.叶波.面向整体技术能力演进的企业集群技术学习机制研究.浙江大学硕士学位论文.2002
    211.叶建亮.知识溢出与企业集群.经济科学,2001(3):23-30
    212.袁纯清.共生理论——兼论小型经济.北京:科学技术术出版社,1998
    213.袁纯清.金融共生理论与城市商业银行改革.北京:商务印书馆.2002
    214.约翰·哈格尔三世等(美).网络价值.北京:经济科学出版社,2000
    215.约瑟夫·熊彼特(美).经济发展理论.北京:商务印书馆.1997
    
    
    216.詹姆斯·迈天(美).生存之路.北京:清华大学出版社,1997
    217.詹姆斯·穆尔(美).一个新的企业形态的兴起.载陶德言编著.知识经济浪潮.北京:中国城市出版社,1998
    218.詹姆斯·穆尔(美).竞争的衰亡——商业生态系统时代的领导与战略.北京:北京出版社,1999
    219.张金锁,康凯.区域经济学.天津:天津大学出版社,1997
    220.张仁寿.专业化产业区:组织特征和优化路径.浙江经济,2001(7):31
    221.赵春明.虚拟企业.杭州:浙江人民出版社,1999
    222.郑勇军.产业区域化与大产业区的培育.浙江经济,2001(7):32-33
    223.周文.产业空间集聚机制理论的发展.经济科学,1999(6):96-101
    224.朱华晟,盖文启.产业的柔性集聚及其区域竞争力实证分析.经济理论与经济管理,2001(11).70-74

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700