住院骨折患者的流行病学调查分析
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
目的 骨折是一种常见的、突发性的损伤,对患者本人及其家庭、社会都造成极大的痛苦和负担。骨折不仅影响患者的生存质量,造成潜在的寿命损失,同时还会使社会劳动力在一定程度上有所损失,造成国家和个人的资源浪费。为此,探讨骨折发生的流行病学特征和相关危险因素,确定高危人群,制定有针对性的骨折预防措施,从而减少骨折的发病率及致残率,减轻骨折给人们带来的痛苦和经济负担,对提高患者乃至整个人群的生存质量,具有现实意义。
     方法 本文通过回顾调查及现况调查的方法,对1994年1月至2002年12月天津市天津医院、河西骨科医院这两所医院收治的2730例骨折患者的住院病历资料进行了骨折流行病学调查,以了解天津地区骨折发生的流行病学特征。在描述性分析的基础上,采用了对数线性模型和对应分析等统计学方法对资料进行全面、深入的分析。又在天津医院等4所医院随机抽取了在2002年12月至2003年3月住院患者中的140例骨折患者和148例非骨折患者作为对照,进行病例对照研究,应用logistic回归模型进行单因素及多因素分析,以揭示骨折的危险因素,为加强社区卫生保健及健康教育提供依据,从而指导社区卫生服务工作。
     结果 在骨折的流行病学特征的分析中,本研究显示:调查患者平均年龄为41.70±18.50岁,其中15~59岁年龄段的发病人数最多(76.5%),0~14岁年龄组与60岁以上年龄组发病人数较少。骨折患者职业分布中工人所占比例最大,占45.8%,其余依次为干部、学生。应用圆形分布法可看出,骨折住院病人的住院时间有集中趋势,即5月上旬(5月5日)~11月下旬(11月20日)。骨折半数以上在路途中发生(54.0%),其次是在工作单位和家中。本次调查多为单发性骨折,占74.1%。骨折部位以胫腓骨为最多,占16.0%,其余依次为股骨颈、髌骨、踝骨。骨折多由于自身原因引起,骨折伤害直接原因以交通事故、骑车或行走时跌伤、高处坠落较多,分别占30.5%,26.8%,26.0%。患者大部分为急诊入院,占88%,其次为一般门诊,危重患者所占比例较少,为2.1%;而出院情况大部分为好转,占57.5%。在本研究中,单发性骨折住院
    
    日明显短于多发性骨折。平均住院日排在前五位的骨折依次为:椎骨骨折、股
    骨干骨折、腔肿骨骨折、股骨粗隆间骨折、股骨颈骨折。多发性骨折的住院费
    用明显高于单发性骨折,椎骨骨折住院费用最高。
     本文采用对数线性模型对骨折病人的年龄、性别和骨折发生时间进行综合
    分析的结果显示:年龄、性别和月份对骨折的发生有交互效应。男性在10~49
    岁年龄组骨折发生情况多于女性:50~59岁年龄组在IO月份骨折发生人数低
    于平均水平:男性在3、4、巳9这四个月比其它月份更容易发生骨折。采用
    对数线性模型对骨折病人的年龄、性别和骨折发生原因进行综合分析的结果显
    示:女性更容易因为跌倒造成骨折,40岁年龄组人群多因交通事故造成骨折,
    而60岁以上年龄组多因跌倒造成骨折。
     采用对应分析方法,对年龄与医疗付费方式之间的关系进行分析,显示:
    10M0岁年龄组主要通过商业保险,而30而9岁年龄组则主要通过社会医疗保
    险,70岁年龄组主要通过公费医疗,10岁以下年龄组主要通过自费来支付费
    用。
     应用lOgistiC回归模型进行单因素及多因素分析,单因素分析结果表明:
    随着年龄的增加,发生骨折的风险也相应地增加;随着文化程度的增加,骨折
    的危险性减少;体力劳动者发生骨折的危险性大于脑力劳动者;骨骼系统疾病。
    经常饮酒、孕次、使用镇静药、服用减少骨量的药物均是骨折发生的危险因素。
    而多喝奶、18岁以前增加体育活动、充足的睡眠及使用增加骨量的药物可以减
    少骨折的发生。多因素分析结果表明:体力劳动者发生骨折的危险性高于脑力
    劳动者;有骨骼系统疾病者是危险因素;服用雌激素是保护性因素。
     结论 综上所述,骨折的发生可能与年龄、文化程度、体育锻炼、行为习
    惯、健康状况及药物史等因素有关。为降低骨折在人群中的发生,要大力开展
    社区卫生服务,开展健康教育与健康促进,使人们自觉地采纳有益于健康的行
    为和生活方式,不断提高社区人群的保健意识和创伤 范意识,消除和减轻影
    响健康的危险因素,预 骨折的发生,以提高患者乃至整个人群的生存质量。
Objective Fracture is a common and unexpectable hurt, which cause deep pain and large burden to patients, their family and society. Fracture not only affect patient's quality of life, potentially loss in lives, but also damnify social labour in certain degree and cause social and individual resource waste. This report is intended to test epidemiological character of fracture and relative risk factors, confirming high risk group and establishing prevention measures can decrease incidence of fracture and deformity rate, decrease pain and economical burden brought by fracture, which can improve fracture patients and all people's quality of life. It has practical meaning .
    Methods Using retrospective study and cross-sectional investigation, we treated a epidemiological investigation of 2730 patients in hospital with fracture in Tianjin hospital and Hexi orthopaedics hospital, in order to find out epidemiological character hi Tianjin. On the base of descriptive analyze, we apply log-linear model and correspondence analysis to in-depth analyze data. Random select 140 the fractures as case group and 148 the non-fractures as control group to have case control study. Data was analyzed with logistic regression. To comprehensively determine the risk factors of fracture , confirming high risk group, and establishing detailed prevention measures. It can provide foundations of community health service and health education, then guide community medical and health work.
    Results This study is based on describes analysis. The finding shows the average age was 41.70yr, and the proportion of 15~59yr was the topmost (76.5%) , while the proportion of up to 60yr and aged 0 to 14 were the least. The occupational proportion was the worker was more than the cadre and student. The circular distribution showed there were central tendency from May to November. There was half more of the whole (54.0%) that happened on the road, some others happened in the office and home. The majority of the fracture was single fracture
    
    
    
    (74.1%). Tibia and fibula fracture were the most (16.0%), and the others were thighbone neck, kneecap and anklebone. The reasons of the fracture were traffic accident (30.5%), tumble (26.8%),falling from high(26.0%).Most of the patients were emergency treatment(88.0%)and leave hospital, most of them were on the mend(57.5%). The average hospital day (AHD) of the single facture was lower than the compound fractures, and vertebra, thighbone trunk, tibia and fibula, thighbone tubercle, thighbone neck facture's AHD are the first to the fifth. The hospitalization expenses of compound fracture was more the single facture's and the vertebra fracture is the most of each position fracture.
    Base on the describing analysis of the data, the log liner model was applied to analyze the age, sex, happen time of fracture. The results shows there were interaction among the age, sex, happen time of fracture. The fracture was befell on Male more than female aged 10 to 49. The 50~59yr was lower than others in October. The fracture was befell on Male in Mar, April, August and September more than other months.
    The log liner model was applied to analyze the age, sex, happen reason of fracture too. The results show the tumble was the main reason in female; the traffic accident was main reason of 40yr group while the tumble was the main reason in up to 60yr group.
    The fashion of spending was studied by the method of corresponding analysis was applied to analyze. The result shows most of the 10~20yr group spent by commercial insurance, the 30~69yr group spent mainly by social hospitalization insurance, up to 70yr spent at public health service, while the group under lOyr spent at their own expenses.
    The simple factor analysis showed that the risk factors for fracture patients were age, physical work, disease of bone, drink liquer, pregnancy number of times, take tranquilizer. The protective factors were milk-drinking, physical training, enough sleep.
    Logistic regression analysis confirmed that occurrence of fracture was mainly related
引文
1 铁军.生存质量与疾病预后的研究进展.国外医学社会医学分册,2001,18(2):67—70
    2 耿贯一主编.流行病学.第四版.北京:人民卫生出版社,1996:1
    3 徐苓.骨质疏松症的流行病学调查.中国骨质疏松杂志,2000,6(2):44-47
    4 陈文昌,吴淑贝,张旭鸣.3688例骨与关节损伤病人的流行病学调查.海峡预防医学杂志,2001,7(1):15—17
    5 杜玉开,刘筱娴.826例女性骨折的特点及分布研究.疾病控制杂志,2001,3(1):80-81
    6 黄遂柱.老年人髋部骨折的预防.国外医学老年医学分册,1998,19(2):74-78
    7 周兰姝,李树珍,姜安丽.住院骨折患者流行病学研究对健康教育的启示.中华护理杂志.2001,36(1):13—15
    8 张岩波,何大卫。列联表资料的对数线性模型与logistic会规模性分析对比.现代预防医学,1999,26(4)519
    9 梁荣辉,张科,刘若群.对应分析方法在学生体质调研样本分类中的应用.中国卫生统计,1999,16(2):18
    10 袁元杏,徐卓明,黄彦清,等.1288例外伤骨折住院病人流行病学特征.中华创伤杂志,2001,16(11):688
    11 许安平,高晓强.1656例骨折流行病学分析.疾病控制杂志,2000,12:375
    12 梁超轲,马凤,吴云鹏.中国农村人群骨折基本情况分析.医学研究通讯,2002,31(5):10-13
    13 刘克力,袁萍,安珍.成都市人群中骨折的流行病学调查及相关因素分析.现代预防医学,2000,4:459—462
    14 马敬东,刘筱娴.老年人骨折发生危险因素.国外医学.社会医学分册,2002,6:70—72
    
    
    15 张元民,王志彬.高能骨折.中国骨伤,2001,14(11):679
    16 涂平生,曾颖,黄自为.骨折与原发性骨质疏松症临床流行病学分析.广州医药,2001,32(3):10—11
    17 敖新华.2110例老年入骨折流行病学分析.骨与关节损伤杂志,2000,3:143—144
    18 李晨.髋部骨折426例分布调查.骨与关节损伤杂志,1998,13(3):140—141.
    19 朱国雄,顾晓明,雷德林,等.交通事故中颌面损伤住院患者的流行病学,第四军医大学学报,2000,21(10):1277—1279
    20 王玉珍.578例骨折住院患者的流行病学分析.中国公共卫生,1998,14(8):507
    21 樊薇,贝珍珠,邓力军,等.1984—1993年住院病人髋骨骨折发病及相关因素分析.中国骨质疏松杂志,1997,3:31-33
    22 王正国.全国道路交通事故流行病学——1996年回顾.中华创伤杂志,1998,14:242—246
    23 邓运明.老年人髋部骨折的预防与治疗.江西中医学院学报,2001,13(1):6
    24 Li Y. Bone and Minimal Research. 2001, 16(5): 15-17
    25 唐海,罗先正.1043例髋部骨折的病因分析.中华骨科杂志,1996,12:764
    26 林艳,刘筱娴.儿童自行车事故伤的影响因素.国外医学社会医学分册,2001,18(1):9一12
    27 Oji C. Maxillofacial in juries. Plast Surg Reconste. 1996, (4): 868—886
    28 Civil ID, Ch B, Schwab CW. AS 1985 revision: A conden chart for Clinical use. J Trauma, 1998, 28(1): 87—90
    29 王声涌.伤害:威胁年轻一代健康的严重问题.中华预防医学杂志,2000,34(4):197
    30 徐伟.老年骨折危险因素的主成分分析.实用老年医学,1999,13(5):266
    31 Zhang L, et, al. J Bone Miner Metab, 2000, 18(2): 84—88
    
    
    32 谢可永,凌庆成,赵光复.上海市区老年人骨质疏松症的发病率.老年学杂志,1988,6(3):28
    33 霍德政,李立明.北京市城区中老年人髋部骨折的病例对照研究.中华流行病学研究,2000,1:37—40
    34 李君,韩向平,张抚顺,等.对数线性模型分析在煤工尘肺生命质量评价中应用.中国公共卫生,1994,10(7):315—316
    35 薛廷主编.骨质疏松症诊断与治疗指南.北京:科学技术出版社,1999,21-27
    36 杨定焯.骨质疏松与骨折.实用妇产科杂志,1995,5:232-234
    37 世界卫生组织.骨折危险性评估及其在绝经后骨质疏松症筛查中的应用.林仲秋等译.北京:人民卫生出版社,1998:20
    38 段明英,王鹏云,王秀问.女性绝经与男性更年期.中国老年学杂志,1997,17(5):379-380
    39 徐才慧.绝经后骨质疏松症的控制与社区防护.国外医学社会医学分册,2001,18(3)125—128
    40 Garton M, Rei d D, Rennie E. The climacteric, ostioporsis and hormone replacement: views of aged 45-49. Maturitas. 1995, 21(1): 7-15
    41 王铄,王士爱.股骨骨折317例致伤因素分析.中国医院统计,1999,3:51-52
    42 Alho A. Concurrent ipsilateral fracture of the hip and femoral shaft:A meta-analysis of 659cases. Acta Orthop Scand. 1996,67(1):19-28
    43 Sommer C, Leutenegger A, Ruedi T. The floating joint injury of the lower and upper extriemity-epidemiology therapy and result in 40 extremities. Swiss Surg. 1998, (4): 163-169
    44 Lustenberger A, Ganz R. Epidemiology of teochanteric femoral fractures over 2 decades(1972-1988).Unfallchirurg, 1995,98(5):278-282
    45 赵慧.老年人髋部骨折的外伤因素分析.护理研究,2002,16(6):348—349
    46 Ferrari SL. Arthritis Rheum, 2001, 44(1): 196-201
    
    
    47 胡逢祥编译.因跌倒所致骨折的危险因素.国外医学物理医学与康复学分册,2001,15(1):18
    48 王雪飞,于振山,雍宜民.体重指数和骨折危险性预测.中国骨质疏松杂志,
    49 Laurutzen JB, et al. Changing incidddence and residual lifetime risk of common osteoporosis-related fractures. Hvidovre Osteoporosis Study. Osteoporosis international, 1993, 3:127-132
    50 Qunnes M. The relationship between anthropo measurements and fractures in women. Bone, 1996,19:407-413
    51 周乃珍,陈治卿,余玲玲,等.老年男性骨密度值与体重、体重指数关系探讨.浙江医学,2001,23(3):143-144
    52 曹颖,宋红,高艳,等.老年髋骨骨折危险因素的评估与预防.职业与健康,2000,16(9):97-98
    53 刘铭.老年骨质疏松症的发病机理及治疗.国外医学骨科学分组,2001,22(4):205-209
    54 金鸿宾.骨质量对骨折及其治疗的影响.中国骨伤,2001,14(2):67—68
    55 唐三元,徐永年,郑玉明.肢体损伤与骨质疏松.中国中医骨伤科杂志,1998,6(1):44—47
    56 Jarvinen M, Kannus P, Finland T. Injury of an extremity as a risk factor for the developmentof osteoporosis. J Bone Joint Surg, 1997,79A:263
    57 Nordin BE, Need AG, Steurer T, et al. Ann NY Acad Sci, 1998,854:336-351
    58 石雁川,屠青,徐恪晟,等.绝经后妇女股骨颈骨折与膳食蛋白质摄入量关系的研究.预防医学文献信息,2001,7(4):357-358
    59 石雁川,孙忠,屠青,等.膳食营养在绝经后妇女髋骨骨折的作用.中华预防医学杂志,2001,35(3):209
    
    
    60 凌万军,葛春芳.烟酒对骨密度的影响.中华预防医学杂志,1999,33(1):
    61 Jee W. Osteoporosis Update 1999 Proccedings Third Inter_ national Congress On Osteoporosis, Beijing, 1999:78-83
    62 朱继珩,杨蕊敏.老年人骨折危险因素分析.中国临床医学杂志,1998,5(3):158-159
    63 Nguyen ND, Oesterring BR. McLaughlin RE, et al. Femoral neck fracture in the elderly patient:a preventable injure. Am J Emerg Med, 1996,14(3):288-290
    64 吴景明,卢伟杰,黎文.高龄患者髋部骨折的治疗.中国老年学杂志,2001,21(3):228—234
    65 李佛保.股骨颈骨折治疗的困难与对策.中华创伤杂志,2000,16(3):136—137
    66 符气祯,李佛保,黄纲,等.广州市1996年摩托车中1346例分析.中华创伤杂志,1998,14:102—104
    67 杨建,石应康,杨宁,等.中国人重伤住院调查.中华创伤杂志,1997,13(4):329
    68 李玉坤.老年骨质疏松遗传学,分子生物学和骨计量学研究进展.国外医学 老年医学分册,1994,14(3):288—290
    69 伊藤博三.骨质疏松症的运动疗法.日本医学介绍,1996,17(2):71—73
    70 安鹏,白海,马晓宏,等.84例老年妇女骨质疏松与骨折分析.大同医学专科学校学报,2000,4:15-17
    71 祝坤,刘忠厚.骨质疏松危险因素与骨折预防.中国骨质疏松杂志,2000,6(4):81—82
    72 Nguyen ND, Oesterring BR, McLaughlin RE, et al. Femoral neck fracture in the elderly patient:a preventable injure. Am J Emerg Med, 1996,14(3):288-290
    73 Chung KC, et al. Jhand Surg, 2001,26(5): 908-915
    74 Baddoura R, et al. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique, 2001, 49(1): 27-32

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700