文化资本对农民工职业选择及接受培训问题的影响研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本文利用东北师范大学农村教育研究所对北京、上海、山东、贵州等全国十个省市各个行业近万名农民工的调查数据,描述了现阶段我国城市农民工所具有文化资本的基本状况及存在的问题,并运用SPSS软件等相关统计方法分析了文化资本和农民工打工动机、就业、培训以及收入情况的相关性。并在深入分析影响农民工文化资本存量的深层原因的基础上从教育视角提出了提升农民工文化资本积累的对策建议。
     调查发现,农民工的文化资本现状不容乐观。首先表现为文化资本现状整体偏低,学力水平更低,具体之,农民工群体的学历只在初二水平,而学力尚未达到小学水平,在语文、科学与数学知识方面缺乏必要的知识应用与迁移能力,整体缺乏法律意识,不能通过法律手段较好的保护自身权益;其次,经济资本匮乏无法构成文化资本提升的有力支撑;再次,文化资本无法与其经济资本和社会资本形成良性互动。
     通过运用统计学的相关方法对调研数据的分析表明,农民工的文化资本严重影响着其就业机会、就业能力以及城市生活的各个方面。第一,农民工的文化资本与其打工动机的相关性十分显著,农民工的教育程度越高,打工动机中积极因素的比例越大,相反,农民工所受教育的程度越低,越倾向于为生计所迫而消极外出打工;第二,农民工的文化资本与其从事的职业具有很大的相关性。具体之,较高的文化资本存量对其就业机会、职业选择和职业期待都有很大的正面影响;第三,农民工的收入与其文化资本呈明显正相关,而且相关非常显著。第四,农民工文化资本与其打工生活感受具有非常显著的相关性。对打工生活感到满意和感觉还可以的农民工,随文化程度的增高而逐渐减少,而对打工生活感到不太满意、不满意和很不满意的农民工,随文化程度的增高而逐渐增多;第五,是否参加过培训对其职业和收入的相关不显著。
     通过上述分析和讨论,笔者从城乡二元户籍结构方面的制度因素、农民工培训有效供给不足方面的社会因素以及农村整体教育质量不高方面的教育因素三个角度对农民工文化资本存在问题进行了深层次的原因分析,并提出如下四点对策建议:提高农村基础教育质量,夯实农民工的文化基础;大力发展农村职业教育,着重农民工职业技能的培养;大力建设农民工培训工程,提升农民工的就业竞争力;扩大补偿教育内涵,践行终身教育思想。
Through the survey data of rural Education Institute in Northeast Normal University to nearly 10,000 migrant workers of every occupation in the ten different provinces municipalities across the nation including Beijing、Shanghai、Shandong、Guizhou etc., this study describes the basic situation and the existing problems of migrant workers processing culture capital in the present stage of China, and analyzes the relations between culture capital of migrant workers and work motivation、employment、training and income by the use of SPSS software and other related statistical approaches. This study also presents some suggestions to improve migrant workers’cultural capital accumulation in the aspect of education on basis of the in-depth analysis of the impact on farmers’cultural capital accumulation.
     We find that migrant workers of the cultural capital status is not optimistic from the survey, whose performance is, First of all, the low educational level, a lower level of learning abilities, and specifically, groups of migrant workers only in the first two grades of academic level, and learning abilities having not yet reached the level of primary school ; the lack of necessary knowledge and application migration capacity in language, science and math; the overall lack of legal awareness and protection of their rights and interests through legal means. Second, a lack of economic capital can not enhance the strong support of cultural capital. Third, the cultural capital can not form benign interaction with its economic and social capitals.
     The analysis of the survey data by using related statistical methods shows that the cultural capital of migrant workers has a serious impact on their employment opportunities, employment ability, as well as all aspects of city life. First, the relevance between cultural capital of migrant workers and their work motivation is significant. Migrant workers suffered higher level of education, the greater proportion of positive factors will be in the work motivation. On the contrary, migrant workers suffered the lower level of education, likely the more negative work driven for a living. Second, the cultural capital of migrant workers and their career is very relevant. Specifically, the relatively high cultural capital stock has a great positive impact on their employment chances, career choices and career expectations. Third, the income of migrant workers and their culture capital was correlated, and the relation is very significant. Fourth, the relation between the culture capital of migrant workers and their feeling of live is much related. The migrant workers who feel satisfied to life, with the higher education level, gradually decline, and who are not quite satisfied with life, with the higher education level and gradually increase. Fifth, the relation of whether to participate in the training of their job and income is not significantly correlated.
     Through the analysis and discussion above, the study analyzes the deep-rooted reasons of the low culture capital of migrant work, from three different angles of registration system which is the urban and rural structure of the household, social factors which are the effective training of migrant workers shortage, as well as education factors which the overall quality of education in rural areas of education is not high. And the study puts forward the following four-point Suggestions: to improve the quality of primary education in rural areas, strengthen the cultural foundation of migrant workers; to develop vocational education in rural areas vigorously, with emphasis on vocational skills training of migrant workers; to build the training engineering of migrant workers, to enhance the employment competitiveness of migrant workers; to expand the connotation of compensatory education, and to practice lifelong education idea.
引文
[1]马用浩.《弱势群体与改革—关于社会转型期弱势群体问题的深层次思考》,《理论与改革》,2002(6).
    [2]国务院研究室课题组. 中国农民工调研报告[M]. 北京:中国言实出版社,2006:16.
    [3][14]高存艳.农村劳动力转移培训研究[D]:[硕士学位论文].上海:华东师范大学,2005.9、13.
    [4]罗强.农民工工资水平影响因素及拖欠问题研究[D]:[硕士学位论文].北京:中国农业大学,2005.
    [5]胡建,董娅. 对农民工问题的调查与思考[J] . 中国青年研究,2006(1):28.
    [6]钱雪飞. 进城农民工收入的实证分析——基于南京市 578 名农民工的调查[J] .南通师院学报(社科版),2004(3):49.
    [7]蔡文.农民工教育培训[D]:[硕士学位论文].武汉:华中师范大学,2006.16.
    [8]刘维佳.中国农民工问题调查[J]. DATA MAGAZINE. 13.
    [9] Cohen and Prusak. In Good Company. How social capital makes organizations work. Harvard Business School Press. 2001.
    [10][12]嵇高诺.进城农民工社会资本运作策略研究[D]:[硕士学位论文].上海:华东师范大学,2004.15、16.
    [11]胡建,董娅. 农民工流动社会资本与人力资本[J] . 江汉论坛,2006(4):65.
    [13]陈曙红. 中国中间阶层——教育与成就动机[M]. 北京:中国大百科全书出版社,2007.7.
    [15]CLASS D. V. Social Mobility in Britain [M] .London: Routledge, Kenan Paul, 1954. 转引自:郭丛斌,闵维方.家庭经济和文化资本对子女教育机会获得的影响[J],高等教育研究,2006(11).
    [16]刘玉来. 国外农村劳动力培训的启示[J]. 中国人力资源开发,2003(12).
    [17] Johnson.D.Gale.2003,“Provincial Migration in China in the 1990s,”China Economic Review,2003,14(1):22 一 31.
    [18]刘国瑜.中国农村劳动力转移与农村教育研究[D]:[硕士学位论文].南京:南京农业大学,2004.P34
    [19]张泓骏,施晓霞. 教育、经验和农民工的收入[J]. 世界经济文汇. 2006(1).
    [20][35]张利萍.教育与劳动力流动研究[D]:[博士学位论文].武汉:华中师范大学,2006.129-130、182.
    [21]农业部,劳动保障部,教育部,科技部,建设部,财政部.2003-2010 年全国农民工年培训规划(国办发[2003] 79 号).
    [22] [23]王少男.农民工培训:一个全局性的紧迫课题[N].中国劳动保障报,2005-10-29. 王少男.
    [24]李岚.论农民工培训一西部农民增收新思路[D]:[硕士学位论文].北京:中央民族大学,2005.46.
    [25]李湘萍.《关于农民工培训提供机制的案例研究》.北大教育经济研究(电子季刊),2004(2).
    [26]袁桂林. 农村教育的三个误区与三个重点[J].中国教师,2004.
    [27]袁桂林.在农村实施多教结合与两教优先发展的战略思考[J]. 现代教育科学. 2002(2):2.
    [28]张利萍.教育与劳动力流动研究[D]:[博士学位论文].武汉:华中师范大学,2006.175.
    [29]国家教育发展研究中心:2005 年中国教育绿皮书[M].教育科学出版社 2005 年版.111.
    [30]袁桂林.农村基础教育学校培养应用型人才问题初探[J]. 东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版).2005(1):123.
    [31] Dr. Ding XueDong. The Development of Compulsory Education Finance in Rural China . http://ciefr.pku.edu.cn/n23c47.aspx
    [32]袁桂林. 新机制 新希望 新问题——农村义务教育财政政策回顾与展望[J].人民教育.2006(10):2.
    [33]袁桂林. 农村基础教育发展的战略重点[J]. 国家教育行政学院学报.2004(3):38.
    [34]刘国瑜.中国农村劳动力转移与农村教育研究[D]:[硕士学位论文].南京:南京农业大学,2004.46.
    [36] A.H.Halsey, Hugh Laudcr, Phillip Brown and Amy Stuart Wells,(eds.).Education: Culture, Economy, and Society[M].New York: Oxford University Press,1997.p254.
    [37]程方平、李挥.社会需求,职教发展的有力支撑[N],中国教育报,2005 年 12 月 21 日第 3版。
    [38]于伟、张立阅、李柏玲. 我国农村职业教育发展的困境与对策[J].东北师大学报,2006(4).
    [39]国务院. 国务院关于解决农民工问题的若干意见. http://news.xinhuanet.com/mrdx/2006-03/28/content_4354255.htm. 2006-03-28.
    [40]农业部,劳动保障部,教育部,科技部,建设部,财政部. 2003-2010 年全国农民工培训规划. http://www.douban.com/group/topic/1053513/.2006-03-25.
    [41]郑新蓉. 把农民工教育纳入国民教育体系[N].人民政协报,2004-4-14.
    [42]郑新蓉. 呼唤为农民工提供补偿教育[N].光明日报,2004-4-8.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700