摘要
我国装备制造业企业普遍存在技术创新能力缺乏和产品技术含量不高的问题,这些问题制约了装备制造业企业的进一步发展。越来越多的装备制造业企业为了摆脱自身资源和能力的限制,认识到同企业进行合作创新是分担风险、共享资源的有效途径,将合作创新视为明智的选择。但是,随着新技术复杂性的提高和不同学科、技术领域之间的交叉融合,加上新产品生命周期的缩短和竞争的加剧,致使企业合作创新的风险加大了。目前企业进行合作创新面临着较高的失败率,其中经过研究分析,失败的合作创新伙伴选择是致使企业合作创新失败的重要原因之一。因此,通过研究影响装备制造业企业合作创新失败的要素,来建立装备制造业企业合作创新伙伴选择的指标体系并运用模型进行分析,对于提高合作创新的成功率、提高合作创新的绩效具有相当重要的理论价值与实践意义。
本文以装备制造业企业为研究对象,在阅读了大量国内外的研究文献的基础上,从装备制造业企业合作创新失败的角度,对装备制造业企业合作创新伙伴选择的影响要素进行了总结,并根据装备制造业企业自身的特点,挑选出了影响装备制造业企业合作创新失败的关键要素,构建了装备制造业企业合作创新伙伴选择的指标体系和模型,最终进行了实证分析,为装备制造业企业挑选合作创新伙伴提供借鉴。全文共分为三个部分进行研究。
第一部分是本文的前两章,为论文研究的基础部分。首先介绍了本文的研究背景、思路、内容以及研究方法,概括和归纳了国内外现有关于对企业合作创新,伙伴选择方面研究的内容,阐述了本文研究的合作创新的理论基础和装备制造业的相关内容。
第二部分是本文的第三章到第五章,为本论文的核心部分。首先,介绍了企业合作创新伙伴选择基本概念、原则和程序,阐述了装备制造业企业合作创新伙伴选择的重要性及存在的问题。其次,对装备制造业企业合作创新失败的问题进行了相关研究,通过大量阅读国内外相关文献,对影响装备制造业合作创新失败的伙伴选择要素进行了筛选,结合装备制造业的特点,选择出高频关键因素。然后建立了装备制造业企业合作创新伙伴选择的指标体系,阐明本文主要是研究伙伴选择的初步筛选阶段。最终,运用熵权法和Ward聚类法建立了装备制造业伙伴选择的模型。
第三部分是本文的第六章。主要是对某装备制造业企业的合作创新伙伴选择进行了实证分析,得出该企业进行合作创新伙伴选择的实证结果。
The enterprises of equipment manufacturing industry in China have widespread problems such as the lack of technological innovation and low-Technological content of products,which restricted the further development of equipment manufacturing industry. In order to get rid of their own resources and capacity constraints,More and more equipment manufacturing enterprises regard The cooperative innovation as a wise choice.because that's an effective way of shareing the risk and the resources. However,the enhancement of new technical complex and the intersection of different disciplines and different fields of technology, in addition to the reduction of the new product life cycle and the aggravation of competition have enlarged the enterprise risk of in the cooperative innovation. It is already an accepted fact at present that cooperative innovation is facing very high failure rate and the unsuccessful partner selection is one of the substantial causes.Therefore, by studying the impact of failed equipment manufacturing enterprises elements of cooperative innovation, to build the equipment manufacturing industry cooperative innovation partner selection index system and analyzed using the model for improving the success rate of cooperative innovation and the performance of cooperative, have a very important theoretical value and practical significance.
This article takes the enterprises of equipment manufacturing industry as the object of study and carries on the theoretical and empirical study on the view of failure of cooperative innovation, makes conclusions on the impact factors of partner selection of cooperative innovation for the enterprises of equipment manufacturing industry. And According to the characteristics of its own equipment manufacturing industry, selected the key elements which affect the failure of equipment manufacturing industry's cooperative innovation, build the equipment manufacturing industry cooperative innovation partner selection index system and model for Analysis,make a reference for the partner selection of equipment manufacturing industry's cooperative innovation. Text is divided into three parts to study.
The first part is the former two chapters. It is the elements of this paper. It present the background, method firstly, and recapitulate the inland and overseas' actuality of the collaboration innovation and partner selection of enterprises, then, explain the academic elements for cooperative innovation and equipment manufacturing industry.
The second part includes three chapters, the third, fourth and fifth. This part is the core of the paper. First of all, it introduces the cooperative innovation partner selection of basic concepts, principles and procedures, describes the importance of the partner selection of equipment manufacturing industry's cooperative innovation and it's problems. Secondly, by reading a lot of issues and reaserches,makes a study on the failure of cooperative innovation, electes the high frequency elements which affect the failure of equipment manufacturing industry's cooperative innovation. And builds the equipment manufacturing industry cooperative innovation partner selection index system, clarifies that is only study on the first stage of partner selection for equipment manufacturing industry's cooperative innovation in this. text. Finally, it uses the Entropy Weight Method and Ward clustering Method to build the model of partner selection for equipment manufacturing industry's cooperative innovation.
The third part is the sixth chapter. It is makes a empirical analysis for the partner selectionof equipment manufacturing industry's cooperative innovation and it's result.
引文
[1]孙陈.我国装备制造业行业技术创新能力与技术创新效率评价研究[D].合肥工业大学.2007:1
[2]王章豹,吴庆庆.我国装备制造业自主创新之问题透视与路径选择[J].合肥工业大学学报,2006(5):1-8页
[3]Morasch,Karl.Moral hazard and optimal contract form for R&D cooperation [J]. Journal of Economic Behavior&Organization,Elsevier,1995,28(1):63-78P
[4]Morton I.Kamien,Israel Zang. Meet me halfway:research joint ventures and absorptive capacity[J].International Journal of Industrial Organization 2000, (18):995-1012P
[5]D'Aspremont C,Jacquemin A,Cooperative and noncooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers [J], American EconomicReview,1988,78(5):1133-1137P.
[6]D'Aspremont C,Jacquemin A.Cooperative and noncooperative R&D in duopoly with spillover:erratum[J].American Economic Review, 1990,80(3):641-642P
[7]孙利辉,高山行,徐寅峰.研究合作组织(RJVs)的影响因素及激励模式研究[J].研究与发展管理,2002,14(3):26-31页
[8]苏敬勤,王延章.合作技术创新理论及机制研究[M].大连:大连理工大学出版社,2002.
[9]Cyert, Richard and Goodman,Paul. Creating effective university-industry alliances:an organizational learning perspective[J].Organizational Dynamics,1997,25(4):45-47P
[10]Sakakibara,Mariko.Evaluating government-sponsored R&D consortia in Japan:who benefits and how?[J].Research Policy,1997,26(4-5):447-473P
[1]] Branstetter,Lee and Sakakibara,Mariko.Japanese Research Consortia:A Microeconometric Analysis of Industrial Policy[J].The Journal of Industrial Economics,1998,Vol.ⅩLⅥ ,No.2
[12]Das,T.,Teng,Bing-Sheng. Aresource-based theory of strategic alliances[J].Journal of Management,2000, (26):31-61P
[13]Hagedoorn, John, Link, Albert N., Vonortas, Nicholas S. Research partnerships [J]. Research Policy,2000,29(5):567-586 P
[14]Wolfgang Becker, Jurgen Dietzl.R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms-evidence for the German manufacturing industry[J].research policy.2004:209-223P
[15]Roller, L.-H., Tombak, M.M., Siebert, R. The incentives to form research joint ventures:theory and evidence [J]. Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin discussion paper,1998. FSIV:98-115 P
[16]Fritsch, Michael, Lukas, Rolf. Who cooperates on R&D [J]. Research Policy, 2001, (30):297-312 P
[17]Fontana,Roberto,Aldo Geuna,Mireille Matt.Firm size andopenness:the driving forces of university-industry collaboration.Berlin:Paper presented at the EARIE 2004 conference,2004.2-5P
[18]Christoph Bronder, Rudolf Pritzl.Developing strategic alliances:A conceptual framework for successful co-operation [J]. European Management Journal,1992,10 (4):412-421P
[19]Michael G. Harvey, Robert F. Lusch. A systematic assessment of potential international strategic alliance partners [J]. International Business Review, 1995,4 (2):195-212P
[20]Geringer JM. Selection of partners for international joint venture [J]. Business Quarterly,1988,53(2):31-36 P
[21]Brouthers, K. D., Brouthers, L.E., Wilkinson, T. J. Strategic Alliances: Choose your partners [J]. Long Range Planning,1995,28(3):18-25 P
[22]David Faulkner,Cliff Bowman.Measuring product advantage using competitive benchmarking and customer perceptions[J]Long Range Planning, Volume 27, Issue 1, February 1994, Pages 119-132P
[23]Jakki Mohr, Robert Spekman. Characteristics of partnership success: Partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques [J]. Strategic Management Journal,2006,15(2):135-152 P
[24]Paul E. Bierly Ⅲ, Scott Gallagher. Explaining Alliance Partner Selection: Fit, Trust and Strategic Expediency [J].Long Range Planning,2007,40 (2): 134-153P
[25]Stevan R. Holmberg, Jeffrey L. Cummings. Building Successful Strategic Alliances:Strategic Process and Analytical Tool for Selecting Partner Industries and Firms [J].Long Range Planning, In Press, Corrected Proof, Available online 28 February 2009
[26]罗炜,唐元虎.企业合作创新的原因与动机[J].科学学研究.2001,19(3):91-95页
[27]罗炜,唐元虎.企业合作创新的组织模式及其选择[J].科学学研究.2001,19(4):103-108页
[28]罗炜,唐元虎.合作创新与企业能力发展[J].科学学与科学技术管理.2001,22(9):31-32页
[29]刘新同.R&D联盟:提升企业竞争力的重要途径[J].北方经济,2003,(5):34-35页
[30]徐鹏,张洪.合作创新模式与中小企业发展[J].西南民族学院学报,2001,(12):188-190页
[31]王京文.中外企业合作创新的模式研究[J].兰州学刊,2006,(10):132-135
[32]幸理.企业合作创新模式的经济学分析[J].武汉工业学院学报,2007,(10):126-129页
[33]马海刚.民营企业合作创新模式选择及影响因素[J].商场现代化,2008,8(2):95页
[34]雷静,潘杰义.企业合作创新战略模式选择的博弈分析[J].情报杂志,2009,28(5):189-194页
[35]刘楠.基于合作创新的道德风险及对策研究[D].陕西:西安电子科技大学,2006.
[36]贾晓霞,周溪召.合作创新企业间知识转移障碍因素识别与对策研究[J].科学管理研究,2007,(1):61-64页
[37]杨玉秀,杨安宁.合作创新中知识的溢出与保护[J].消费导刊,2008,(12):106页
[38]李潭,胡珑瑛.基于灰色关联度的技术创新合作伙伴选择方法[J].技术经济与管理研究,2005,(4):36-37页
[39]桂黄宝,赵付民.基于模糊层次分析法(FAHP)的合作技术创新伙伴选择研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007,28(9):50-54页
[40]阮国祥,毛荐其.合作创新伙伴选择的ANP方法研究[J].科技进步与对策,2007,24(11):31-33页
[41]彭展声.合作伙伴选择的模糊多属性决策[J].科技管理研究,2007,27(2)149-151页
[42]田波、李春好、孙永河.网络分析法在选择企业创新合作成员中的应用[J].情报科学,,2008,,26(8):1257-1260页
[43]王晓新、邹艳、叶金福.企业合作创新伙伴选择的多层次优属度评价[J].科技进步与对策,,2008,,25(7):65-67页
[44]杨建君,梅晓芳,陈曼.合作创新的伙伴选择:一个综合评价体系[J].科技管理研究,2009,(1):6-9页
[45]严继东、宋德朝、沈斌.工程机械网络联盟制造中最佳合作伙伴选择[J].建筑机械化,2002,(6):32-33页
[46]余雅风,郑晓齐.基于资源观的大学-企业合作创新研究[J].北京航空航天 大学学报(社会科学版),2002,25(2):55-58页
[47]崔永刚.基于AHP的企业战略联盟合作伙伴优化选择[J].天津商学院学报,2004.24(1):17-20页
[48]卢燕,汤建影、黄瑞华.合作研发伙伴选择影响因素的实证研究[J].研究与发展管理,,2006,18(1):52-57页
[49]吉峰,周敏.基于联盟的企业技术创新策略关键成功因素研究[J].科技导报,2007,25(1):65-68页
[50]王晓辉、余佳群.企业战略联盟伙伴选择的原则标准及方法[J].上海管理科学,2008,(2):91-93页
[51]Fritsch, Michael, Lukas, Rolf.Who cooperates on R&D.Research Policy, 200 (130):297-312页
[52]高材林.共生经济决定合作创新行为[J].科学技术.1995,(7):54-55页
[53]傅家骥.技术创新论[M].清华大学出版社,1998
[54]苏敬勤,王延章.合作技术创新理论及机制研究[M].大连理工大学出版社,2002.
[55]刘新同.合作创新:企业自主创新的有效形式[J].科技管理研究,2007,(1)
[56]李潭.信息不完全情况下技术创新合作伙伴选择研究[J].科技和产业,2008,(7)
[57]王京文,单婧.中外企业合作创新的模式研究[J].经济学研究,2006,(10):133页
[58]Bernard L. Simonin. The importance of collaborative know-how:an empirical test of the learning organization [J]. Academy of Management Journal,1997,40(5) 1150-1174 P
[59]周赵丹,刘景江,许庆瑞.合作创新形式的研究[J].自然辩证法通讯,2003,25(5):61-64页
[60]中国设备工程.什么是装备制造业?.2006http://finance.sina.com.cn, http://www.eei.net.cn/show.asp
[61]李潭,胡珑瑛.基于灰色关联度的技术创新合作伙伴选择方法[J].技术经济与管理研究,2005,(4):36-37页
[62]尼尔·瑞克曼.合作竞争大未来[M].北京:经济管理出版社,1998
[63]Brouthers K D,Brouthers L F,Wilkinson T J.Strategic Alliances:Choose your Partners[J].Long Range Planning,1995,28(3):18~25.
[64]Tyler B B,Steensma H K.Evaluating Technological Collaborative Opportunities:Cognitive Modeling Perspective[J].Strategic Management Journal, 1995,16:43~70.
[65]李健,金占明.战略联盟伙伴选择、竞合关系与联盟绩效研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007,(11):161-165页
[66]吉峰,周敏.基于联盟的企业技术创新策略关键成功因素研究[J].科技导报,2007,25(1):65-68页
[67]郭军灵.技术联盟中合作伙伴的选择研究[J].科研管理,2003,24(6):109-113页
[68]Dacin, M. T., M. A. Hitt and E. Levitas,Selecting partners for successful international alliances[J]. Journal of World Business,1997,32 (1):321-345
[69]Spekmen, R. E, A.I. Lynn, T.C. MacAvoy and I. Forbes,Creating strategic alliances which endure[J]. Long Range Planning,1996,29 (3):122-147
[70]D.littler, F.Leverick,M.Bruce.Factors affecting the process of collaborative product development[J].Journal of product Innovation Management 1995, 12(1):16-31P
[71]K.R.Harrigan.Strategic alliances and partner asymmetries[J]. Management International Review 28(special issue),1988
[72]尹技虎.企业战略联盟失败原因分析[J].理论观察.2006,41(5):83-84贝
[73]刘本伟.企业战略联盟失败原因及对策分析[J].湖北教育学报.2006,23(2):123-125页
[74]Geringer JM. Selection of partners for international joint venture [J]. Business Quarterly,1988,53(2):31-36 P
[75]孙东波.战略联盟伙伴选择问题研究[D].南京师范大学.2007:35
[76]徐森泉.基于熵权的施工导流标准多目标风险决策研究[D].武汉大学.2004:36
[77]易晓文.上市公司财务评价指标体系研究.温州大学学报[J].1999.(3):8-12页
[78]李元年.基于熵理论的指标体系区分度测算与权重设计[D].南京航空航天大学.2008:57
[79]王彦慧.基于群决策方法的第三方物流服务商评价[D].西安电子科技大学.2007:63
[80]王华丽.基于熵聚类的RBF神经网络训练算法研究[D].重庆大学.2008:67
[81]熊伟.ERP、SCM与熵理论研究和应用[D].四川大学.2005:27
[82]侯新.基于熵原理的柳州市鱼峰区产业结构优化研究[D].天津大学.2004:25
[83]李春茹.供应链管理下的分销商选择问题研究[D].西南交通大学.2005:39
[84]陈榕,游海.物元分析法在大气环境监测优化布点中的研究[J].2004:181-183页
[85]孟庆生.信息、论[M].西安:西安交通大学出版社,1989:19-36页
[86]汪营洛.系统工程[M].北京:机械工业出版社,1999.27-29页
[87]杨晓帆.熵权系数优化模型在综合型房地产投资决策中的应用[D].武汉大学.2004:76
[88]李强.熵理论在区间数多属性决策中的应用研究[D].首都经济贸易大学.2009:65
[89]徐森泉.基于熵权的施工导流标准多目标风险决策研究[D.]武汉大 学.2004:47
[90]冯梅.基于模糊聚类分析的教师课堂教学质量评价[J].数学的实践与认识,,2008,38(2):26-30页.
[91]邱宛华.管理决策与应用熵学[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2002:193-196页