论英国传播研究——一种马克思主义学术传统的考察
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本文尝试做出这样一种努力:一方面,从整体上把握英国学界关于媒体和传播的种种缤纷多元的研究,画出清晰的发展脉络和地形图,书写学术史;另一方面,努力以“马克思主义”为经络串起学术史上的史实,突出马克思主义对从事英国传播研究的学者与英国传播研究本身的双重影响。
     本文采用了文献阅读、访谈与讨论、实地观察三种方法来进行这次学术史的写作。首先,通过大量阅读英文文献尽可能全面地了解英国的传播研究领域,获得接近实际情况的理解。其次,借助在英国访问学习的机会,对本文所涉及到的一些重要学者进行访谈和讨论,消除误会、澄清态度和观点,弥补书面文献的不足之处。第三,参与威斯敏斯特学派这一媒体研究的代表学派的学术活动,通过实地观察法获得全面而深入的了解,并获得一手资料。
     要探究马克思主义与英国传播研究的关系,首先要了解马克思主义在英国的发展及其对知识界的影响,然后再在相关学术史中考察马克思主义如何被接受或被修正。因此本文在厘清基本概念之后,首先描述马克思主义对英国知识界的影响,突出了左派读书俱乐部与新左派运动的重要作用。然后对由左派知识分子所创立的英国文化研究领域进行详述,以伯明翰学派为分析的主要对象。写作中突出文化研究对媒体的关照,并理清其中“走近马克思”又“远离马克思”的线索。接着,讨论以威斯敏斯特学派为代表的英国媒体研究与马克思主义的关系。本文认为,在文化研究逐渐丧失对政治的关注后,媒体研究学者成为了英国的批判性研究的主体。最后,本文从马克思的阶级、劳动、权力的概念出发,对较多继承了马克思主义的传播政治经济领域进行了学说整理。
     就论文整体而言,对英国传播研究的整理以及对马克思主义在其中的影响力的阐释,对威斯敏斯特学派及其与马克思主义的关系的分析是本文的创新之处。将马克思主义、英国共产党、左派读书俱乐部、新左运动这四者勾连起来,以此阐述英国传播研究中马克思主义传统的大背景,也较有新意。
This thesis aims to on the one hand map out the academic field of media and communication studies in UK, which covers culture studies, media studies, political economy of media, policy research, media history, etc; and on the other hand outline the Marxism roots in the intellectual history of these fields. Not only the personal influences Marxism exerted to the scholars are examined, but also the dynamics between Marxism and the researches on media are evaluated.
     The methodologies of the thesis are as below: literature review, interview and informal talk, field observation. Abundant literature in English in its original form provide more accurate information than the translated versions; interviews and informal talks conducted by the author provide the chances to enhance the understanding of what the scholars thought of and wrote about; field observation collects first hand all-around information.
     The thesis first probes how Marxism was accepted by British intellectuals, especially the left wing. Left Book Club and New Left are discussed in this case. Then the thesis describes how the British culture studies and media studies inherit, modify, develop or abandon Marxism, in which way and causes what results. Birmingham School and Westminster School as the representing scholar communities of each approach are in the center of discussion. At last the thesis identifies three concepts of class, labor and power, which are key concepts of Marxism as well as playing a major role in the approach of political economy of media/communication.
     The main contribution of the thesis is to elaborate on Westminster School that was rarely mentioned before in China as well as map out the communication research field in UK in the Marxism perspective.
引文
①参见《马克思恩格斯全集》.1版.第35卷.第253页。
    ②参见《马克思恩格斯全集》.1版.第35卷.第422页。
    ①见‘Karl Marx: 100 not out’, Marxism Today, p.16.
    ①参见汪晖对佩里·安德森的访谈:《新左翼、自由主义与社会主义——P.安德森访谈》。
    ①参见汪晖对佩里·安德森的访谈:《新左翼、自由主义与社会主义——P.安德森访谈》。
    ①参见李兴耕译.“马克思至今仍然是具有重大现实意义的人物”——霍布斯鲍姆访谈录.当代世界社会主义问题. 2005年第1期. vol 83.
    ②参见:《文化研究四十年——理查·霍加特访谈录》,《现代传播:北京广播学院学报》,2002年5期。
    ②参看徐德林在《记忆与欲望的耦合》一书译后记里的脚注,第229页。
    ①Stuart Hall,‘Encoding/decoding’, in S Hall, D Hobson, A Lowe and P Willis, Culture, Media, Language. Unwin Hyman Ltd. 1980. pp128-138.
    ①David Morley, Television, Audiences and Cultural Studies, Routledge, 1997.p10-12.
    ②Ien Ang,‘On the Politics of Empirical Audience Research’, in M. G. Durham, D. Kellner eds. Media and Cultural Studies: Keyworks. Blackwell Publishing, 2001.
    
    ①参见http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Westminster
    ②参见http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polytechnic_(United_Kingdom)
    ②根据Andrew Goodwin于2008年5月对尼古拉斯·加汉姆的访谈,见https://usffiles.usfca.edu/FacStaff/goodwina/WWW/GarnhamInterview.pdf
    ①根据Andrew Goodwin于2008年5月对尼古拉斯·加汉姆的访谈,载https://usffiles.usfca.edu/FacStaff/goodwina/WWW/GarnhamInterview.pdf
    ①根据Andrew Goodwin于2008年5月对尼古拉斯·加汉姆的访谈,载https://usffiles.usfca.edu/FacStaff/goodwina/WWW/GarnhamInterview.pdf
    ①参见威斯敏斯特学术动态通讯“Findings: Centre for Communication and Information Studies, University of Westminster. Nov/Dec 2002”。
    ②参见柯林·斯帕克斯在自己主页上的介绍:http://www.wmin.ac.uk/mad/page-1613
    ①参见威斯敏斯特学术动态通讯“Findings: Centre for Communication and Information Studies, University of Westminster. Nov 2004”中对WPCC的介绍。
    ②参见威斯敏斯特学术动态通讯“Findings: Centre for Communication and Information Studies, University of Westminster. Spring 2009”中关于RAE评估结果的介绍。
    ③参见《泰晤士报》报道:Alexandra Frean,‘RAE: Former polytechnics give Oxbridge a run for its money in rankings’, Dec.18 2008, The Times.
    
    ①详情可见http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2003/ukpga_20030021_en_1
    ②全名为United Kingdom’s Office of Communications
    阿诺德. 2002.文化与无政府状态:政治与社会批评.韩敏中,译.北京:三联书店.
    安德森. 1981.西方马克思主义探讨.高铦,等译.北京:人民出版社.
    贝戈蒂克安. 2005.媒体垄断.石家庄:河北人民出版社.
    贝斯特,凯尔纳. 1999.后现代理论.北京:中央编译出版社.
    彼得. 1984. 1956年匈牙利事件的经过和历史教训.赵平生,译.北京:人民出版社.
    博伊德-巴雷特,等. 2004.媒介研究的进路:经典文献读本.汪凯,刘晓红,等译.北京:新华出版社.
    陈力丹. 1993.精神交往论:马克思恩格斯的传播观.北京:开明出版社. 1版.
    杜盖伊,等. 2003.做文化研究(索尼随身听的故事).霍炜,译.北京:商务印书馆.
    杜娜叶夫斯卡娅. 1998.马克思主义与自由.辽宁教育出版社.
    费斯克. 2002.理解通俗文化.北京:中央编译出版社.
    费斯克. 2004.关键概念:传播与文化研究辞典.北京:新华出版社.
    戈尔曼. 1990.“新马克思主义”传记辞典.赵培杰,等译.重庆:重庆出版社.
    郭镇之. 2001.传播政治经济学理论泰斗达拉斯·斯麦兹.国际新闻界, 3.
    郭镇之. 2002.席勒——传播政治经济学的批判领袖.国际新闻界, 1.
    胡翼青. 2006.试论社会学芝加哥学派与传播学技术主义范式的建构.国际新闻界, 8.
    胡翼青. 2007.再度发言:论社会学芝加哥学派传播思想.北京:中国大百科全书出版社.
    霍尔. 2003.表征——文化表象与意指实践.商务印书馆.
    霍尔. 2006.种族、文化和传播:文化研究的回顾和展望.文化研究精粹读本.北京:中国人民大学出版社.
    吉普森,等. 2002.文化研究四十年——理查·霍加特访谈录.现代传播, 5.
    加汉姆. 2005.解放·传媒·现代性:关于传媒和社会理论的讨论.李岚,译.北京:新华出版社.
    卡拉-穆尔扎. 2004.论意识操纵.北京:社会科学文献出版社.
    卡伦. 2006.媒体与权力.史安斌,董关鹏,译.北京:清华大学出版社.
    卡瑞,辛顿. 2005.英国新闻史.北京:清华大学出版社.
    卡斯特. 2001.网络社会的崛起.北京:社会科学文献出版社.
    凯尔纳. 2004.媒体文化——介于现代与后现代之间的文化研究、认同性与政治.北京:商务印书馆.
    李彬. 2001.批判学派纵横谈.国际新闻界, 2.
    李彬. 2003.传播学引论(增补版).新华出版社.
    李林洁. 2007.汤普森的文化研究. [硕士学位论文].北京:北京语言大学.
    李兴耕,译. 2005.“马克思至今仍然是具有重大现实意义的人物”——霍布斯鲍姆访谈录.当代世界社会主义问题, 1.
    利维斯. 2002.伟大的传统.袁伟,译.北京:三联书店.
    刘海龙. 2007.“传播学”引进中的“失踪者”:从1978年-1989年批判学派的引介看中国早期的传播学观念.新闻与传播研究, 4.
    刘建明. 2007.西方媒介批评史.厦门:福建人民出版社.
    卢岚兰. 2006.现代媒介文化——批判的基础.台湾:三民书局.
    路扬,王毅. 2000.大众文化与传媒.上海:上海三联书店.
    罗杰斯. 2002.传播学史.上海译文出版社.
    马克思恩格斯选集. 1995.北京:人民出版社. 2版.
    马特拉,等. 2008.传播学简史.孙五三,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社.
    马特拉. 2001.世界传播与文化霸权:思想与战略的历史.中央编译出版社.
    马特拉. 2005.世界传播与文化霸权.陈卫星,译.北京:中央编译出版社.
    麦克莱伦. 2005.卡尔·马克思传.王珍,译. 3版.北京:中国人民大学出版社.
    麦克莱伦. 2008.马克思以后的马克思主义.李智,译. 3版.北京:中国人民大学出版社.
    麦克罗比. 2001.后现代主义与大众文化.田晓菲,译,北京:中央编译出版社.
    莫利. 2005.电视受众与文化研究.史安斌,译.北京:新华出版社.
    莫斯可. 2000.传播政治经济学.胡正荣,等译.北京:华夏出版社.
    沈志华. 2007.中苏关系史纲(1917-1991).北京:新华出版社.
    石义彬. 2004.单向度、超真实、内爆——批判视野中的当代西方传播思想研究.武汉:武汉大学出版社.
    斯道雷. 2001.文化理论与通俗文化导论.南京:南京大学出版社.
    斯特龙伯格. 2005.西方现代思想史.刘北成,赵国新,译.北京:中央编译出版社.
    塔洛克. 2004.电视受众研究:文化理论与方法.严忠志,译.北京:商务印书馆.
    童兵. 2008.马克思主义新闻经典教程.上海:复旦大学出版社.
    王怡红. 2008.在历史的作用下认识传播研究的临界点——读《再度发言论社会学芝加哥学
    派传播思想》.国际新闻界, 1.
    威廉斯. 1991.文化与社会.吴松江,张文定,译.北京:北京大学出版社.
    威廉斯. 2005.关键词:文化与社会的词汇.刘建基,译.北京:三联书店.
    威廉斯. 2008.马克思主义与文学.王尔勃,周莉,译.郑州:河南大学出版社.
    维达利. 2006.“苏联共产党二十次代表大会”日记.王德树,译.北京:东方出版社.
    吴飞. 2008.传播学的反思要正视芝加哥学派的传统——兼评胡翼青的《再度发言:论社会学芝加哥学派传播思想》.当代传播, 5.
    许正林. 2005.欧洲传播思想史.北京:三联书店.
    杨击. 2006.传播?文化?社会——英国大众传播理论透视.上海:复旦大学出版社.
    伊格尔顿. 1999.希望之旅的资源:雷蒙德?威廉斯.历史中的政治、哲学、爱欲.马海良,译.北京:中国社会科学出版社.
    殷晓蓉. 2000.战后美国传播学的理论发展——经验主义和批判学派的视域及其比较.上海:复旦大学出版社.
    张锦华. 1994.传播批判理论.台湾:黎明文化事业公司.
    张亮. 2007.英国新左翼运动及对它的当代审理——迈克尔·肯尼教授访谈录.求是学刊, 5.
    赵国新. 2007.英国左派读书俱乐部的兴衰.读书, 10.
    赵月枝. 2007.国家、市场与社会:从全球视野和批判角度审视中国传播与权力的关系.传播与社会学刊, 2.
    Althusser,L. 1969. For Marx. London: Allen Lane.
    Anderson, Perry. 1968. Components of National Culture. New Left Review. June-July.
    Artz, Lee et. al. eds. 2006. Marxism and Communication Studies:The Point is to Change It. Peter Lang.
    Barker, C. & Willis, P. 2003. Cultural studies: theory and practice. London: Sage. ed.2.
    Bell, D. 1960. The end of Ideology. New York: Free Press.
    Blumler, J. G. 1980. Mass communication research in Europe: some origins and prospects. Media Culture Society, 2(4): 367-376.
    Bottomore & Rubel. eds. 1961. Karl Marx: Selected writings in sociology and social philosophy. Penguin.
    Brophy, E. 2006. System Error: Labour Precarity and Collective Organizing at Microsoft. Canadian Journal of Communication, 31(3): 619-638.
    Burns, E. 1983, Introduction to Marxism. London: Lawrence& Wishart Ltd.
    Calabrese, A. & Sparks, C. eds. 2004. Toward a Political Economy of Culture: Capitalism and Communication in the Twenty-first Century. Rowman & Littlefield.
    Chen, K.H. 1991. Postmarxism: between/beyond Critical Post-modernism and Cultural Studies. Media Culture Society, 13(1): 35-51.
    Collins, R et. al. 1986. Media Culture &Society: A critical reader. London: Sage.
    Collins, R. 1986. Broadband Black Death cuts queues. The Information Society and the UK. in Collins, R. et. al. Media Culture &Society: A critical reader. London: Sage.
    Cowling, M. & Wilde L. eds. 1989. Approaches to Marx. Open University Press.
    Cowling, M. & Wilde, L. eds. 1989. Approaches to Marx. Open University Press.
    Curran, J. & Seaton, J. 1980. Power Without Responsibility. London: Fontana.
    Curran, J. & Seaton, J. 2003. Power without responsibility: the press, broadcasting, and new media in Britain. edtion 6. London: Routledge.
    Curran, J. 1979. The media and politics (editorial). Media Culture Society, 1(1) :1-3.
    Curran, J. 1984. The Future of the Left. London: Polity Press.
    Curran, J. 1986. The impact of advertising on the British mass media. in Collins, R. et. al. Media Culture &Society: A critical reader. London: Sage.
    Curran, J. 2004. The rise of the Westminster school. In Calabrese & Sparks (eds). Toward a Political Economy of Culture: 13-40. Rowman & Littlefield.
    Davis, H. 2004. Understanding Stuart Hall: An Introduction. London: Sage.
    Dyer-Witheford, N. & de peuter, G. 2006.‘EA Spouse’and the Crisis of Video Game Labour: Enjoyment, Exclusion, Exploitation, Exodus. Canadian Journal of Communication, 31(3): 599-618.
    Elliott, P. et. al. 1986.‘Terrorism’and the state: a case study of the discourses of television. in Collins, R. et. al. Media Culture &Society: A critical reader. London: Sage.
    Feintuck, M. & Varney, M. 2006. Media Regulation, Public Interest and the Law. Edinburgh University Press.
    Garham, N. 1990. Capitalism and Communication: Global Culture and the Economics of Information. London: Sage.
    Garnham, N. 1986. Contribution to a political economy of mass-communication. In Collins, R. et. al. Media Culture &Society: A critical reader. London: Sage. 9-32.
    Garnham, N. 1990a. Media Theory and the Political Future of Mass communication. In Capitalism and Communication: Global Culture and the Economics of Information. London: Sage. Originally published in 1986.
    Garnham, N. 1995. Political Economy and Cultural Studies: Reconciliation or Divorce? Critical Studies in Mass communication, 3: 62-72.
    Gitlin, T. 1978. Media Sociology: The Dominant Paradigm. Theory and Society, 6(2): 205-253.
    Golding, P. & Murdock, G. 1978. Theories of communication and theories of society. Communication Research, 5(3): 339-356.
    Golding, P. & Murdock,G. eds. 1997. The Political Economy of the Media. Edward Elgar. Goodwin, A. 2000. Introduction to the Transaction Edition. in Hoggart, R. The Uses of Literacy. Transaction Publishers. xiii-xxxix.
    Goodwin, P. 1998. Television under the tories: broadcasting policy 1979-1997. British film Institute.
    Grossberg, L. 1983. Strategies of Marxist Cultural Interpretation. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 1(4):392-421.
    Hall, S. 1980. Cultural studies: two paradigms. Media Culture Society, 2:57-72.
    Hall, S. 1980. Cultural Studies: Two Paradigms. Media Culture Society, 2(1):57-72.
    Hall, S. 1989. The First New Left, in Archer, R. et al., eds., Out of Apathy. London:Verso.
    Hall, S. 1990. The Emergence of Cultural Studies and the Crisis of Humanities. October, 53, The Humanities as Social Technology (Summer), 11-23.
    Hall, S. 1992. Cultural Studies and its Theoretical Legacies. in Grossberg, L. et al. eds. Cultural Studies. London: Routledge, 277-294.
    Hall, S. 2008. Richard Hoggart, The Uses of Literacy and the Cultural Turn. in Owen, S. eds., Richard Hoggart and Cultural Studies. Palgrave Macmillan.
    Hall, S. Cultural studies and the centre: some problematics and problems. in Hall, S., Hobson, D., Lowe, A. and Willis, P. eds. Culture, Media, Language. London: Hutchinson, 15-47.
    Hendy, D. 2007. Life on Air: a History of Radio Four. Oxford University Press.
    Herman & Chomsky. 1994. Manufacturing consent: the political economy of the mass media. Vintage.
    Hoggart, R. 1957. The uses of literacy: changing patterns in English mass culture. Essential Books.
    Hoggart, R. 1978. An Idea and Its Servants: UNESCO from within. London: Chatto& Windus, Hoggart, R. 1990. A Sort of Clowning. London: Chatto and Windus.
    Lui Chang-de. 2006. De-skilling Effects on Journalists: ICTs and the Labour Process of Taiwanese Newspaper Reporters. Canadian Journal of Communication, 31(3): 695-714.
    Marcuse, H. 1968. One Dimensional Man. London: Sphere.
    Marx, K. & Engels, F. 1965. The German Ideology. London: Lawrence&Wishart.
    Marx, K. 1973. Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy. Harmondswarth: Penguin.
    Mattelart, A & Mattelart, M. 1998. Theories of Communication: A Short Introduction. translated by Taponier & Cohen. London: Sage.
    McLellan, D. 1980. Marx Before Marxism. Macmillan.
    McLellan, D. 2007. Marxism After Marx. Palgrave Macmillan.
    McLellan, D. eds. 1983.Marx: the first hundred years. Pontana paperbacks.
    McRobbie, A. 2007. The Uses of Cultural Studies. London: Sage Publications.
    Meehan, E. R. 1984, Ratings and Institutional Approach: A Third Answer to the Commodity Question. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 1(2): 216-225.
    Miege, B & Garnham, N. 1979. The Cultural Commodity. Media Culture Society, 1: 297-311.
    Mosco, V. 1996. The Political Economy of Communication: Rethinking and Renewal. London: Sage.
    Mosco, V. 2006. Revisiting the Political Economy of Communication. in Artz, Lee et. al. eds. Marxism and communication studies: The Point is to Change It. Peter Lang, 87-110.
    Nairn, T. 1964. The British Political Elite. New Left Review, 23: 22.
    Rush, F. eds. 2004. The Cambridge Companion to Critical Theory. Cambridge University Press.
    Sabry, T. 2006. An interview with professor Paddy scannell. Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture, 4(2):3-23.
    Saville, J.S. & Thompson, E.P. 1957. Editorial. New Reasoner, 1(1) (summer) : 2-3.
    Scannell, P et. al. 1992. Culture and Power: a Media Culture & Society reader. London: Sage.
    Scannell, P. & Cardiff, D. 1991. A Social History of British Broadcasting 1922-1939. Wiley-blackwell.
    Scannell, P. 1986. Broadcasting and the politics of unemployment 1930-1935. in Collins, R. et. al. Media Culture &Society: A critical reader. London: Sage.
    Scannell, P. 2007. Media and communication. London: Sage.
    Smythe, D. W. 2007. Communications: Blindspot of Western Marxism.曹晋,赵月枝,主编.传播政治经济学英文读本.上海:复旦大学出版社.
    Sparks, C & Reading, A. 1998. Communism, capitalism, and the mass media. London: Sage.
    Sparks, C & Tulloch, J. 2000. Tabloid tales: global debates over media standards. Rowman & Littlefield.
    Sparks, C. 1970. The Abuses of Literacy. Working Papers in Cultural Studies, Nov./Dec.
    Sparks, C. 1989. Experience, Ideology, and Articulation: Stuart Hall and the Development of culture. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 13(1):79-89.
    Sparks, C. 1991. New communication technologies: a challenge for press freedom. Published by Unesco.
    Sparks, C. 1992a, The Popular Press and Political Democracy. In Scannell, P. et. al. (eds.). Culture and Power. London: Sage, 278-292.
    Sparks, C. 1992b. Popular Journalism: Theories and Practice. In Sparks, C. et. al. (eds.) Journalism and Popular Culture. London: Sage, 24-44.
    Sparks, C. 1993. Goodbye, Hildy Johnson: the Vanishing 'Serious Press'. In Sparks, C. et al.(eds.) Communication and Citizenship. London: Routledge, pp.58-74.
    Sparks, C. 1994. Civil Society and Information Society as Guarantors of Progress. In Splichal, S. et al. eds. Information Society and Civil Society. West Lafayette, Indiana: Purdue University Press, 21-49.
    Sparks, C. 1996. Stuart Hall, cultural studies and Marxism. in Morley & Chen. Stuart Hall: Critical dialogues in cultural Studies.
    Sparks, C. 2000. Introduction: The Panic over Tabloid News. in Tabloid tales: global debates over media standards. Sparks, C. & Tulloch, J. Rowman & Littlefield.
    Sparks, C. 2005. Civil Society as a contested concept: Media and political transformation in Eastern and Central Europe. In Hackett & Zhao, Yuezhi. eds. Democratizing global media: One world, many struggles. Lanham, MD. : Rowman and Littlefield. 37-56.
    Sparks, C. 2007. Globalization, Development and the Mass Media. London: Sage.
    Sparks, C. 2008. After transition: A comparative study of Poland, Russia and China. Jakubowicz, K. & Sük?sd, M. eds. Finding the Right Place on the Map: Central and Eastern European Media Change in a Global Perspective. Budapest: CEU Press.
    Swingewood, A. 1979. Marx and Modern Social Theory. Macmillan Press.
    Thompson, E.P. 1959. A psessay in ephology. New Reasoner, (autumn): 1-8.
    Thompson, E.P. 1994. Making history: writings on history and culture. New York: New Press.
    Tremblay, D. et. al. 2006. Telework: A Way to Balance Work and Family or an Increase in Work-Family Conflict? Canadian Journal of Communication, 31(3): 715-732.
    Turner, G. 2003. British Cultural Studies: An Introduction. London: Routledge.
    Wayne, M. 2003. Marxism and Media Studies: key concepts and contemporary trends. Pluto Press.
    Williams, R. 1958. Culture is ordiary. in Williams, R. 1989. Resources of Hope. London: New Left Books, 3-18.
    Williams, R. 1962. Communications. Penguin books.
    Williams, R. 1974. Notes on Marxism in Britain since 1945. New Left Review, 100: 81-94.
    Williams, R. 1976-77. Notes on Marxism in Britain Since 1945. In 1980. Problems in Materialism and Culture. London: Verso.
    Williams, R. 1977a. Marxism and literature. Oxford University Press.
    Williams, R. 1977b. My Cambridge. In 1989. What I Came to Say. Hutchinson Radius.
    Williams, R. 1989. The Future of Cultural Studies. in The Politics of Modernism: Against the New Conformists. London: Verso.
    Wright, Erik Olin, 1979. Intellectuals and the class structure. in Between Labour and Capital, ed. Pat Walker, Harvester Press, Hassocks.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700