摘要
本文介绍了"金玫瑰"轮与"金盛"轮碰撞引发的船舶污染系列案件的详细审理情况。对该系列案件以及相关同类案件中出现的问题进行了总结梳理,并对案件审理中涉及《海商法》《海洋环境保护法》《海事诉讼特别程序法》以及最高人民法院司法解释、国务院部门行政法规相关具体条文进行对比分析,点出当中存在的矛盾与冲突,并希望通过这些探讨为相关的法律修订提供一些有益的思路。
This paper introduces the detailed hearings of serial cases of ship oil pollution caused by a vessel collision between "M/V Golden Rose" and "M/V Jin Sheng". By summarizing the issues identified in this series of cases and the issues found in cases with similar nature, this paper presents a comparative analysis of the related articles provided in The Maritime Law, The Marine Environment Protection Law, The Special Maritime Procedure Law and the judicial interpretations by the Supreme People’s Court as well as the related administrative regulations by the State Council, so as to identify the underlying contradictions and conflicts thereof.We conduct this research in hope of offering some useful ideas for the future relevant law revisions.
引文
[1]秦如雷,黄芳飞.“蓝鲸1号”:助力可燃冰试采的超深水钻井平台[EB/OL].(2017-07-13). http://www.cgs.gov.cn/ddztt/jqthd/trqshw/zxbdshw/201707/t20170713_435099.html.
[2]陈彦,张超,李瑾.“海洋石油982”入籍湛江[EB/OL].(2018-04-05).http://news.gdzjdaily.com.cn/zjxw/content/2018-04/05/content_2280902.shtml.
[3]沈李江,苏红锋,李润文.全国海洋生态环境公益诉讼第一案:非法捕捞者被索赔1.3亿元[EB/OL].(2018-03-27).http://mini.eastday.com/a/180327095647612.html.
[4]徐鹏《山东首例海洋环境行政公益案宣判》[EB/OL].(2018-10-10).http://epaper.legaldaily.com.cn/fzrb/content/20181010/Articel03004GN.htm.