建构社会主义生态文明理论之多维思想资源比较分析
|
摘要
建构以历史唯物主义为基础的社会主义生态文明理论既是现代化建设的实践需要,也是完善社会主义理论体系的内在要求。中国传统文化生态智慧、西方生态中心主义及生态学马克思主义思潮虽是重要的理论资源,但通过"以古论今""以西论中"来建构社会主义生态文明理论,不仅在历时态上混淆了社会形态,在共时态上磨平了制度差别,因而偏离了历史唯物主义,而且否定了传统和西方各种思想资源与历史唯物主义的本质差别,实质是一种"复古主义""浪漫主义"的错误阐释。因此,建构社会主义生态文明理论必须始终立足于历史唯物主义基本立场、立足于中国特色社会主义现代化建设伟大实践,必须坚决抵制各种"非马克思主义"的思想言说。
The construction of socialist ecological theory based on historical materialism is not only the need of modernization practice, but also the inherent requirement of improving the socialist theory system. Chinese traditional ecological wisdom, the western eco-centrism and ecological Marxism are important theoretical resources. However, constructing socialist ecological theory through the ancient and the western theory not only confuses the social form, but also eliminates the system differences; does not only deviates from historical materialism, but also denies the essential difference between the traditional and Western thought and Marx's historical materialism. It is essentially a revivalist and romantic interpretation. Therefore, the construction of theory of socialist ecological civilization must always be based on historical materialism and the great practice of the construction of socialist modernization with Chinese features, and resolutely resist all kinds of non Marxist thought.
The construction of socialist ecological theory based on historical materialism is not only the need of modernization practice, but also the inherent requirement of improving the socialist theory system. Chinese traditional ecological wisdom, the western eco-centrism and ecological Marxism are important theoretical resources. However, constructing socialist ecological theory through the ancient and the western theory not only confuses the social form, but also eliminates the system differences; does not only deviates from historical materialism, but also denies the essential difference between the traditional and Western thought and Marx's historical materialism. It is essentially a revivalist and romantic interpretation. Therefore, the construction of theory of socialist ecological civilization must always be based on historical materialism and the great practice of the construction of socialist modernization with Chinese features, and resolutely resist all kinds of non Marxist thought.
引文
[1]中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局.马克思恩格斯文集:第一卷[M].北京:人民出版社,2009.
[2]奥尔多·利奥波德.沙乡年鉴[M].候文蕙,译.长春:吉林人民出版社,1997:194.
[3]霍尔姆斯·罗尔斯顿.环境伦理学[M].杨通进,译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,2000:294.
[4]何怀宏.生态伦理——精神资源与哲学基础[M].石家庄:河北大学出版社,2002:337.
[5]Andre Gorz. Ecology as Politics[M]. Boston:South End Press,1980:20.
[6]约翰·贝拉米·福斯特.生态危机与资本主义[M].耿建新,宋兴无,译.上海:上海译文出版社,2006:60.
[7]詹姆斯·奥康纳.自然的理由:生态学马克思主义研究[M].唐正东,臧佩洪,译.南京:南京大学出版社,2003:337.
[8]本·阿格尔.西方马克思主义概论[M].慎之,等译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,1991:494.
[9]戴维·佩珀.生态社会主义:从深生态学到社会主义[M].刘颖,译.济南:山东大学出版社,2005:356.
[10]中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局.马克思恩格斯文集:第七卷[M].北京:人民出版社,2009:928-929.
(1)出自《周易·文言传》。
(1)出自《周易·系辞上》。
[2]奥尔多·利奥波德.沙乡年鉴[M].候文蕙,译.长春:吉林人民出版社,1997:194.
[3]霍尔姆斯·罗尔斯顿.环境伦理学[M].杨通进,译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,2000:294.
[4]何怀宏.生态伦理——精神资源与哲学基础[M].石家庄:河北大学出版社,2002:337.
[5]Andre Gorz. Ecology as Politics[M]. Boston:South End Press,1980:20.
[6]约翰·贝拉米·福斯特.生态危机与资本主义[M].耿建新,宋兴无,译.上海:上海译文出版社,2006:60.
[7]詹姆斯·奥康纳.自然的理由:生态学马克思主义研究[M].唐正东,臧佩洪,译.南京:南京大学出版社,2003:337.
[8]本·阿格尔.西方马克思主义概论[M].慎之,等译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,1991:494.
[9]戴维·佩珀.生态社会主义:从深生态学到社会主义[M].刘颖,译.济南:山东大学出版社,2005:356.
[10]中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局.马克思恩格斯文集:第七卷[M].北京:人民出版社,2009:928-929.
(1)出自《周易·文言传》。
(1)出自《周易·系辞上》。