磁流变阻尼建筑结构多态控制策略研究
|
摘要
针对双态控制易引起结构加速度局部放大和三态控制中刚度不易确定的问题,提出以速度响应作为状态切换参数的多态控制策略。以磁流变阻尼结构为例对采用不同的速度切换参数大小、输入地震动强度、场地类别和结构周期等相关因素对结构地震反应控制效果进行对比分析,发现存在一个对加速度响应的最优速度控制参数。并利用遗传算法对状态切换参数的取值进行优化计算,得到其简化计算公式。通过对一装有磁流变阻尼器的三层钢筋混凝土框架-剪力墙结构的振动台试验,对比分析多态控制策略与passive-off、passive-on和双态控制的控制效果。研究结果表明,多态控制策略比其它控制策略能更有效地控制结构反应,实用性较强;提出的速度切换参数估算公式是合理的。
The multi-state control strategy is developed, where the velocity response is regarde as state-switch parameter, of and the amplified local acceleration response in bi-state control and the difficultly determied stiffness in tri-state control, are paid attention. Different control parameter, different peak value of input earthquake excitation, and different type of site and different period of structures are comparatively investigated in the numerical examples of magnetorheological structure. It is found that an optimal velocity response exists as the state-switch parameter for reducing the absolute acceleration. Selecting multi-state strategy, passive-off, passive-on and the double-state method, the shaking table experiments of a three-flour reinforced structure with a magnetorheological damper are conducted respectively. The results show that the multi-state control strategy is more effective with higher practicability.
The multi-state control strategy is developed, where the velocity response is regarde as state-switch parameter, of and the amplified local acceleration response in bi-state control and the difficultly determied stiffness in tri-state control, are paid attention. Different control parameter, different peak value of input earthquake excitation, and different type of site and different period of structures are comparatively investigated in the numerical examples of magnetorheological structure. It is found that an optimal velocity response exists as the state-switch parameter for reducing the absolute acceleration. Selecting multi-state strategy, passive-off, passive-on and the double-state method, the shaking table experiments of a three-flour reinforced structure with a magnetorheological damper are conducted respectively. The results show that the multi-state control strategy is more effective with higher practicability.
引文
[1]李宏男,杨浩·多维地震作用下偏心结构的磁流变阻尼器半主动控制[J].地震工程与工程振动,2004,24(3):167-174.
[2]欧进萍.结构振动控制-主动、半主动和智能控制[M].北京:科学出版社,2003.
[3]李秀领,李宏男.框架-剪力墙偏心结构的MRD减振试验研究[J].东南大学学报,2005,32(Ⅰ):27-31.
[4]李秀领,李宏男.磁流变阻尼器结构控制策略研究进展[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2004,24(3):335-342.
[5]Jansen L M,Dyke S J.Semi-active control strategies for MR dampers:a comparative study[J].Journal of Engineering Me-chanics ASCE,2000,126(8):795-803.
[6]Kamagata S,Kobori T.Autonomous adaptive control of active variable stiffness systemfor seismic ground motion[C]//Proc1st World Conf on Struct Control Vol2.USC Publications Los Angeles,TA,1994:4-33.
[7]Jann N Y,Ki mJ H,Anil K A.Resetting semi-active stiffness damper for seismic response control[J].Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE,2000,126(12):1427-1433.
[8]徐赵东,沈亚鹏.磁流变阻尼结构的双态控制和三态控制弹塑性分析[J].西安交通大学学报,2003,37(7):754-758.
[9]任晓崧,许奇.MR阻尼器的状态跳跃控制参数[J].力学季刊,2004,25(1):145-151.
[10]宁欣.磁流变减振控制技术的研究[D].沈阳:沈阳建筑工程学院,2004.
[11]谢礼立,翟长海.最不利设计地震动研究[J].地震学报,2003,25(3):250-261.
[2]欧进萍.结构振动控制-主动、半主动和智能控制[M].北京:科学出版社,2003.
[3]李秀领,李宏男.框架-剪力墙偏心结构的MRD减振试验研究[J].东南大学学报,2005,32(Ⅰ):27-31.
[4]李秀领,李宏男.磁流变阻尼器结构控制策略研究进展[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2004,24(3):335-342.
[5]Jansen L M,Dyke S J.Semi-active control strategies for MR dampers:a comparative study[J].Journal of Engineering Me-chanics ASCE,2000,126(8):795-803.
[6]Kamagata S,Kobori T.Autonomous adaptive control of active variable stiffness systemfor seismic ground motion[C]//Proc1st World Conf on Struct Control Vol2.USC Publications Los Angeles,TA,1994:4-33.
[7]Jann N Y,Ki mJ H,Anil K A.Resetting semi-active stiffness damper for seismic response control[J].Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE,2000,126(12):1427-1433.
[8]徐赵东,沈亚鹏.磁流变阻尼结构的双态控制和三态控制弹塑性分析[J].西安交通大学学报,2003,37(7):754-758.
[9]任晓崧,许奇.MR阻尼器的状态跳跃控制参数[J].力学季刊,2004,25(1):145-151.
[10]宁欣.磁流变减振控制技术的研究[D].沈阳:沈阳建筑工程学院,2004.
[11]谢礼立,翟长海.最不利设计地震动研究[J].地震学报,2003,25(3):250-261.
版权所有：© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心