运用拓扑学原理研究汶川与唐山地区公路网络的稳定性

英文篇名：Study on the Stability of Road Networks in Wenchuan and Tangshan Region Using Topology Theory
中文刊名：西北地震学报
英文刊名：Northwestern Seismological Journal
作者：张东辉 ; 何政伟 ; 赵银兵 ; 杨斌
英文作者：ZHANG Dong-hui1 ; HE Zheng-wei1 ; 2 ; ZHAO Yin-bing1 ; YANG Bin1 ; 3(1.National Laboratory of Geo-hazard Prevention and Geo-environment Protection ; Chengdu University of Technology ; Chengdu 610059 ; China ; 2.Institute of Mt.Hazards & Environment ; CAS.Chengdu 610041 ; China ; 3.Institute of Geology ; China Earthquake Administration ; Beijing 100029 ; China)
中文关键词：拓扑学 ; 生命线系统 ; 公路网络 ; 汶川地震 ; 唐山地震 ; 稳定性
英文关键词：Topology ; Lifeline systems ; Road net ; Wenchuan earthquake ; Tangshan earthquake ; Stability
出版日期：2009-09-30
机构：成都理工大学地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点实验室;中国科学院水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所;中国地震局地质研究所;
年：2009
期：03
出版单位：西北地震学报

摘要

汶川地震与唐山地震几乎将当地生命线系统完全损毁。以评价在近场地震作用下的城镇生命线系统的"稳健性"为研究目标,采用地震灾害比较学中拓扑学原理,计算两地公路网络相关评价参数并进行分析。参数包括拓扑指数(TI(G))、拓扑逆指数(TII(G))和节点孤立指数(NSI)等。研究得出公路网络"稳健性"唐山震后(2008年)最优,汶川(2007年)次之,唐山震前(1975年)最低的结论。从纯数学角度引入最优化理论,认为在复建原有公路前提下加修北川到安县等五条公路,区域分散性最高,且节点孤立指数最小,这时的公路网络易损性最低。
In Wenchuan earthquake and Tangshan earthquake the local lifeline systems were almost totally damaged.To evaluate the "stability" of the local lifeline systems under the condition of near field earthquake,the evaluation parameters of the two road nets are calculated and analyzed based on the theory of earthquake disaster comparatology.Those parameters are Topological Index(TI(G)),Topological Inverse Index(TII(G)) and Node Solitude Index(NSI) etc.The result shows that the "Stabilities" from low to high are Tangshan Before-earthquake(1975),Wenchuan Before-earthquake(2007),Tangshan After-earthquake(2008).It is concluded that five additional roads,Beichuan to Anxian and so on,should be built in case of rehabilitation the existing roads before Wenchuan earthquake with the optimization theory from a purely mathematical point of view,in which the local road nets would be the highest regional dispersion,the smallest node isolation index,and would be most stability.

引文

[1]叶耀先,冈田宪夫.地震灾害比较学[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2008.
    [2]叶耀先.地震灾害风险管理和实施技术[J].地震工程与工程振动,2006,26(3):11-17.
    [3]http://baike.baidu.com/view/384989.htm.
    [4]河北省地震局.唐山抗震救灾决策纪实[M].北京:地震出版社,2000.
    [5]Ye Yaoxian,Okada Norio.Improving management 0f urbanearthquake disaster risks[A]∥Proceedings of China-USMillennium Symposium on Earthquake Engineering[C].Chi-na,2000.
    [6]杨斌,何政伟.WebGIS技术在地震灾害防御中的设计探讨[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2007,18(4):70-73.
    [7]路鹏,刘瑞丰,李志雄,等.地震科学数据的分级分类探讨[J].西北地震学报,2007,29(3):248-255.
    [8]H M Deitel,P j Deitel.C#University Tutorial[M].Beijing:Tinghua University Publishing House,2003.
    [9]M Turker,B T San.Detection of collapsed buildings causedby the 1999 Izmit,Turkey earthquake through digital analysisof post-event aerial photographs[J].INT.J.Remote Sens-ing,2004,25(21):4701-4714.
    [10]冯建刚.利用双差地震定位法对民乐-山丹地震序列重新定位[J].西北地震学报,2008,30(1):62-65.
    [11]史培军,杜鹃,叶涛,等.加强综合灾害风险研究,提高迎对灾害风险能力———从第6届国际综合灾害风险管理论坛看我国的综合减灾[J].自然灾害学报,2006,15(5):1-6.
    [12]Donald Hearn.Digital Image Process[M].American:PrenticeHall,1998.
    [13]刘齐茂,燕柳斌.强震作用下框架结构的优化设计[J].西北地震学报,2008,30(2):107-112.