摘要
针对采用综合平面图法设计的三维束状观测系统成果中满覆盖次数边界与绿山(MESA)软件设计结果存在差别的问题,从面元及覆盖次数的概念出发,将面元细分为纵向面元尺寸和横向面元尺寸,通过对纵向观测系统和横向观测系统具体分析,指出上述两种设计手段存在差别的原因,找出了对综合平面图法设计成果中满覆盖次数边界进行修正的方法。
In order to explain the disparity in the results of full coverage boundary between 3-D seismic fasciculate survey system designed by comprehensive plan act and professional design software of MESA Expert, the paper discusses the specific steps as follow: Firstly, the bin is carefully separated into longitudinal bin size and transverse bin size in accordance with the concepts of bin and coverage number; Secondly, the reasons of the disparity between two kinds of designing methods are worked out through the specific analysis of longitudinal survey system and transverse survey system; Finally, full coverage boundary results designed by comprehensive plan act are adopted. What's more, the paper revises and makes the results as exact full coverage boundary.
引文
[1]王菁,董君鹏.三维观测系统中纵横向覆盖次数的计算方法[J].西部探矿工程,2012(11):125–126.
[2]李庆珍,张兴民,王书军.三维观测系统中横向覆盖次数及CDP间隔的计算方法[J].物探与化探,2000,22(2):135–137.
[3]高银波,张研.关于面元计算和观测系统设计的思考[J].石油地球物理勘探,2008,43(4):383–386.
[4]CORDSEN A,PEIRCE J W.陆上三维地震勘探的设计与施工[M].俞寿朋,译.涿州:石油地球物理勘探局,1996:13–14.
[5]陆基孟.地震勘探原理[M].北京:石油大学出版社,1993.
[6]VERMEER G J O.三维地震勘探设计[M].李培明,何永清,译.北京:石油工业出版社,2008.
[7]王振国.规则线束状特殊三维观测系统设计[J].石油地球物理勘探,1998,33(增刊2):1–10.
[8]常锁亮,唐永洪,陈强,等.煤田三维地震勘探的观测系统设计现状与讨论[J].中国煤炭地质,2008,20(9):51–54.
[9]刘二鹏,李瑞强,李宇.基于面元属性分析的三维地震观测系统设计[J].山西煤炭,2011,31(5):54–57.