不同方法对某桥梁抗震分析的影响比较
|
摘要
反应谱法和时程分析法是桥梁结构抗震计算中的两种基本方法。为了比较这两种方法对计算结果的差异,对某主桥结构进行了动力特性分析,应用反应谱法和时程法分别对主桥结构进行了P1和P2两阶段的地震响应分析和相应的强度验算,两种方法得出了不同的结论。由于反应谱法分析是基于线性系统的,而时程法作为精细的分析方法,适用于任何非线性系统,因此在两种方法结论有较大差异时,应以时程法结果作为最终的设计依据。
Response spectrum and time history analysis method are two basic ways in the bridge structure calculation.In order to compare the difference between the results of the two calculating methods,the dynamic properties of a main bridge structure are analyzed in this paper.The analysis of the response to the earthquake and corresponding intensity checking by the method of response spectrum and time history analysis on the main bridge structure in the P1 and P2 stage are carried out.Different conclusions are made by the two ways.As the response spectrum analysis is based on the linear system,and the time history method of analysis as a fine analysis can be applied to any non-linear system,so when a large difference by the two ways occurs the results of time-seismic should be taken for the ultimate design basis.
Response spectrum and time history analysis method are two basic ways in the bridge structure calculation.In order to compare the difference between the results of the two calculating methods,the dynamic properties of a main bridge structure are analyzed in this paper.The analysis of the response to the earthquake and corresponding intensity checking by the method of response spectrum and time history analysis on the main bridge structure in the P1 and P2 stage are carried out.Different conclusions are made by the two ways.As the response spectrum analysis is based on the linear system,and the time history method of analysis as a fine analysis can be applied to any non-linear system,so when a large difference by the two ways occurs the results of time-seismic should be taken for the ultimate design basis.
引文
[1]Scanlan R H,Sachs K.Earthquake Time Historiesand Response Spectra[J].Journal of Engineering Me-chanics Division.1974,(4):636-655.
[2]魏欢庆.基于性能的桥梁抗震设计及分析方法的研究[D].武汉:华中科技大学,2007.
[3]张方胜.桥梁结构地震反应时程分析[D].合肥:合肥工业大学,2007.
[4]颜晓芸.高墩大跨桥梁地震响应分析研究[D].武汉:武汉理工大学,2007.
[5]王昌杰,樊建平,宁小玲.施州大桥地震反应分析[J].华中科技大学学报:城市科学版,2006,23(12):3-4.
[6]李贞新,李俊,李小珍,郭丰哲,程海根,庄卫林.宜宾长江公路大桥主桥地震反应分析[J].公路交通科技.2006,23(7):64-67.
[7]刘红绪,张吉刚.汉江特大桥地震反应分析[J].工程抗震与加固改造,2007,29(4):80-83.
[8]俞琦,陈语,王家林.桥梁抗震分析方法[J].重庆交通学院学报,2005,6(25):32-34.
[9]李凡,刘世忠,赵河清.湟水河大桥动力反应分析[J].兰州交通大学学报:自然科学版,2006,6(25):87-88.
[2]魏欢庆.基于性能的桥梁抗震设计及分析方法的研究[D].武汉:华中科技大学,2007.
[3]张方胜.桥梁结构地震反应时程分析[D].合肥:合肥工业大学,2007.
[4]颜晓芸.高墩大跨桥梁地震响应分析研究[D].武汉:武汉理工大学,2007.
[5]王昌杰,樊建平,宁小玲.施州大桥地震反应分析[J].华中科技大学学报:城市科学版,2006,23(12):3-4.
[6]李贞新,李俊,李小珍,郭丰哲,程海根,庄卫林.宜宾长江公路大桥主桥地震反应分析[J].公路交通科技.2006,23(7):64-67.
[7]刘红绪,张吉刚.汉江特大桥地震反应分析[J].工程抗震与加固改造,2007,29(4):80-83.
[8]俞琦,陈语,王家林.桥梁抗震分析方法[J].重庆交通学院学报,2005,6(25):32-34.
[9]李凡,刘世忠,赵河清.湟水河大桥动力反应分析[J].兰州交通大学学报:自然科学版,2006,6(25):87-88.
版权所有：© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心