斜拉索截面信息未知时的刚度识别及索力计算
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
用拉索振动实测数据计算斜拉桥拉索的索力时,不考虑斜拉索刚度影响的计算方法可演化为许多种.计算表明由不同计算方法造成的误差已不能忽视.斜拉桥索力检测的实例分析表明斜拉桥拉索的抗弯刚度影响是不能忽略的.在斜拉索截面信息未知的情况下,利用一种实用的拟合方法得到了拉索的刚度.在考虑刚度的影响后,计算结果表明基频法能反应中长索索力的真实值,对于短索的索力应根据基频法进行折减.用数值拟合方法对拉索截面未知情况下的拉索刚度进行了识别,改进了固支情况下索力的计算结果.
Quite a number of methods have been deduced for calculating cable forces by vibration determination without considering the effect of stiffness.The errors caused by these methods couldn’t be ignored.The measuring results of cable force of one cable-stayed bridge indicated that the effect of stiffness on cable-stayed bridge couldn’t be neglected.Without the cable’s section information available,a practical curve fitting method was used to identify the stiffness of cables.Taking the stiffness effect into account,the basic-frequency method could reflect the real forces of the medium and long cables,but the force of the short cables should be deducted according to the basic-frequency method.
引文
[1]刘效尧,蔡键,刘晖.桥梁损伤诊断[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2002:107-119.
    [2]陈刚,任伟新.基于环境振动的斜拉桥拉索基频识别[J].地震工程与工程振动,2003,23(3):100-106.
    [3]Roman Geier,Guido De Roeck,Johannes Petz.Cable force determination for the Danube channel bridge in Vienna[J].Structural Engineering International,2005,15(3):181-185.
    [4]宋一凡,贺拴海.斜拉索动力计算长度研究[J].中国公路学报,2001,14(3):70-72.
    [5]张宏跃,田石柱.提高斜拉索索力估算精度的方法[J].地震工程与工程振动,2004,24(4):148-151.
    [6]Xu Y L,Zhan S,Ko J M,et al.Experimental study of vibration mitigation of bridge stay cables[J].Journal of Structural Engineering,1999,125(9):977-986.
    [7]任伟新,胡卫华,林友勤.斜拉索模态试验参数研究[J].实验力学,2005,20(1):102-108.
    [8]吴海军,辰思甜,龚尚龙,等.斜拉桥索力测试方法研究[J].重庆交通学院学报,2001,20(4):24-37.
    [9]方志,张智勇.斜拉桥的索力测试[J].中国公路学报,1997,10(1):51-58.
    [10]Hiroshi Zui,Tohru Shinke,Yoshio Namita.Practical formulas for estimation of cable tension by vibration method[J].Journal of Structural Engineering,1996,122(6):651-656.
    [11]殷学纲,陈淮,骞开林.结构振动分析的子结构方法[M].北京:中国铁道出版社,1991:25.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心