基于概率估计方法的立式储罐地震易损性研究

英文篇名：Investigation on seismic vulnerability of vertical storage tanks based on probability estimate method
中文刊名：世界地震工程
英文刊名：World Earthquake Engineering
作者：孙建刚 ; 张荣花 ; 张亮
英文作者：SUN Jiangang1 ; ZHANG Ronghua2 ; ZHANG Liang2(1.College of Civil and Architecture Engineering ; Dalian Nationalities University ; Dalian 116600 China ; 2.College of Civil and Architecture Engineering ; Daqing Petroleum College ; Daqing 163318 ; China)
中文关键词：立式储罐 ; 概率估计方法 ; 地震易损性 ; 可靠性指标 ; 失效模式
英文关键词：vertical storage tank ; probability estimate method ; seismic vulnerability ; reliability index ; faiure modes
出版日期：2009-03-15
机构：大连民族学院土木建筑工程学院;大庆石油学院土木建筑工程学院;
年：2009
期：01
出版单位：世界地震工程

摘要

结合储罐的震害资料和震害特点,提出了基于概率估计方法的立式储罐地震易损性研究。考虑了结构的随机性及荷载作用的随机性,给出了各随机变量的概率分布模型及给定烈度下地震发生的概率。从可靠度指标的几何意义入手,提出了储罐的地震易损性计算方法。通过2×103m3和5×104m32种高矮罐的地震易损性研究,结果表明:通过概率方法和绘制地震易损性曲线的方式,更能直观的给出储罐各失效模式的地震易损性。储罐的地震易损性与地震烈度、高径比的关系很大,地震易损性随着地震烈度的增大逐渐增大;与2×103m3储罐相比,5×104m3储罐各失效模式地震易损性明显较小;从多种失效模式进行储罐地震易损性研究更具有科学性。
Combined past earthquake disaster data with earthquake disaster characters of storage tanks,seismic vulnerability of vertical tanks based on probability estimate method is discussed.Considering the randomness of structures and loads,probability models of random variables and exceeding probability under a given seismic intensity are represented.The calculation method of seismic vulnerability of vertical tanks based on the reliability index's geometry significance is given out.The seismic vulnerability of two 2 ×103m3 tall tanks and a 5 ×104m3 low tank is analyzed.The numerical result shows that: the seismic vulnerability of all failure modes of storage tanks is more visual by using probability method and drawing vulnerability curves.The seismic vulnerability of tanks is closely related to the seismic intensity and the ratio of height to radius,which gradually increases with the increase of seismic intensity.The seismic vulnerability of all failure modes of 5×104m3 tanks is smaller than that of 2×103m3 tanks.Evaluating seismic performance of tanks from various failure modes is more scientific.

引文

[1]赵桂峰,马玉宏.建筑结构震害预测研究进展[J].广州大学学报:自然科学版,2005,4(10):442-446.
    [2]Salzano E,Iervolinl I,Fabbrocino G.Seismic risk of atmospheric storage tanks in the framework of quantitative risk analysis[J].Journal of LossPrevention in the process industries,2003,16:403-409.
    [3]Berahman F,Behnamfar F.Seismic fragility curves for un-anchored on-grade steel storage tanks:Bayesian approach[J].Journal of EarthquakeEngineering,2007,11(2):166-192.
    [4]项忠权,孙家礼.石油化工设备抗震[M].北京:地震出版社,1995.
    [5]沙丽新,石雪飞.斜拉桥主梁静力可靠性反问题分析[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2004,36(2):258-260.
    [6]赵国藩,金伟良,贡金鑫.结构可靠度理论[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2002.
    [7]杜永锋,李惠,金德保,等.大震下被动与智能隔振结构动力可靠度的对比[J].地震工程与工程振动,2006,6,4(26):212-219.
    [8]刘树林,李凤明,黄文虎.钢筋混凝土结构的非线性地震可靠性分析[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2004,36(2):248-249.
    [9]戴树和,王明娥.可靠性工程及其在化工设备中的应用[M].北京:化学工业出版社,1987:30-31.
    [10]高小旺,鲍霭斌.地震作用的概率模型及其统计参数[J].地震工程与工程振动,1985,5(1):13-21.
    [11]吕大刚,李晓鹏,王光远.基于可靠度和性能的结构整体地震易损性分析[J].自然灾害学报,2006,15(2):107-114.
    [12]王光远,朱靖华.地震作用下串、并联工程系统中结构失效相关性的近似处理[J].地震工程与工程振动,1998,18(4):1-7.