中美铁路桥梁抗震设计对比研究
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
分别从抗震设计的基本思想、设计地震动参数、地震动反应分析方法、构造细节等方面对我国《铁路工程抗震设计规范》(GB50011—2006)与美国《AREMA》抗震篇进行较为详细的对比,并选取最具代表性的简支梁桥,分别按中美两国铁路抗震规范进行设计研究,得出两国规范的差别主要体现在地震力组合、抗震构造细节及桥梁基础的抗震设计上。
The author makes a comparison between Chinese Code for Seismic Design of Railway Engineering(GB50011—2006) and American AREMA,respectively in view of some issues,such as the seismic design basic idea,design parameters of ground motion,seismic response analysis method,structural details and so on.Furthermore,taking the most representative simply-supported girder bridges as the examples,the author carries out the design research on these examples respectively according to Chinese and American railway seismic standards.The conclusion drawn from this comparative study is: seismic force combination and structural seismic details and bridge foundation seismic design method are the main differences between the seismic standards of the two countries.
引文
[1]AREMA VolumeⅡ(Bridges)[S].U.S.A:2009.
    [2]American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials,AASHTO—GUID SPECIFICATION FOR LRFD SEISMIC DESIGN[S].USA:2010.
    [3]GB50111—2006,铁路工程抗震设计规范(2009年版)[S].
    [4]GB50011—2010,建筑抗震设计规范[S].
    [5]冯国军.中菲桥梁抗震设计规范比较[J].铁道标准设计,2010(11):65-67.
    [6]张立江.中国、欧盟和美国铁路桥梁抗震规范简要对比[J].铁道标准设计,2010(11):51-53.
    [7]Dynamics of Structures(Theory and applications to Earthquake Engi-neering)[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2005.
    [8]GB18306—2001,中国地震动参数区划图[S].
    [9]M.J.N.普瑞斯特雷,F.塞勃勒,G.M.卡尔维.桥梁抗震设计与加固[M].袁万城,等译.北京:人民交通出版社,1997.
    [10]American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials,HB-17,Standard Specifications for Highway bridges.17th Edition2002[S].USA:2002.
    [11]范立础,等.桥梁延性抗震设计[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2001.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心