深圳市观澜断裂第四纪活动性研究
|
摘要
观澜断裂是深圳陆域地区规模最大的北北西向断裂。通过地质地貌调查、联合钻孔探测及地质年代测定等技术方法对观澜断裂的第四纪活动性进行了详细考察与综合研究。结果表明:穿越低丘陵台地地貌区的观澜断裂两侧未见地貌差异或现代构造形变现象;4个典型地质露头和2条钻孔联合剖面显示断裂没有扰动上覆第四系,观澜大布巷钻孔探测剖面还获得了断裂上覆冲洪积砂层底部12.6±2.4 Ka的光释光测年数据;断裂物质主要由碎裂岩、构造角砾岩、硅化岩等组成,可见硅质被膜及半固结岩屑或岩粉状物质;7个断层样品的电子自旋共振测试结果显示断裂的最新活动年龄为距今21.1±2.1万年。结合12条浅层地震测线探测未发现断裂错移第四纪覆盖层底界的事实,得出了观澜断裂最新一次活动发生在中更新世晚期,自晚更新世中期以后没有新的近地表活动的结论。
Guanlan fault is the largest NNW fault in Shenzhen city.Based on previous studies,the quaternary activity of Guanlan fault was investigated with the methods of geological and geomorphic survey,combined borehole detecting,OSL and ESR dating.The results indicate that neither the physiognomy divergence nor the deformation of recent tectonics can be found on both sides of Guanlan fault which cuts across the low hills and tableland region.The fault does not disturb the upper quaternary at four typical geologic observation spots and two boreholes composite profiles.The OSL data of 12.6±2.4Ka was obtained at the bottom of sand which covers the fault.The fracture substances are mainly composed of cataclastie,tectonic greccia and silicified rocks.Silicic integument and semi-conglutination detritus or meal can be found in the fracture substances.The ESR data of seven samples show that the latest movement of the fault took place at the time of 211±21Ka B.P.Considering the fact that the fault does not incise the quaternary at 12 shallow earthquake detection profiles,the conclusion can be drawn that the latest activity of the fault occurred at the late period of middle Pleistocene and since later Pleistocene,it was lacking in evidence of activity.
Guanlan fault is the largest NNW fault in Shenzhen city.Based on previous studies,the quaternary activity of Guanlan fault was investigated with the methods of geological and geomorphic survey,combined borehole detecting,OSL and ESR dating.The results indicate that neither the physiognomy divergence nor the deformation of recent tectonics can be found on both sides of Guanlan fault which cuts across the low hills and tableland region.The fault does not disturb the upper quaternary at four typical geologic observation spots and two boreholes composite profiles.The OSL data of 12.6±2.4Ka was obtained at the bottom of sand which covers the fault.The fracture substances are mainly composed of cataclastie,tectonic greccia and silicified rocks.Silicic integument and semi-conglutination detritus or meal can be found in the fracture substances.The ESR data of seven samples show that the latest movement of the fault took place at the time of 211±21Ka B.P.Considering the fact that the fault does not incise the quaternary at 12 shallow earthquake detection profiles,the conclusion can be drawn that the latest activity of the fault occurred at the late period of middle Pleistocene and since later Pleistocene,it was lacking in evidence of activity.
引文
[1]丁原章,郭钦华.广东省地震地质问题[J].广东地质,1989,4(1):63-73.
[2]张虎男,陈伟光,黄坤荣,等.华南沿海新构造运动与地质环境[M].北京:地震出版社,1990.
[3]汪一鹏,宋方敏,黄卿团,等.潮汕平原北西向断裂左旋走滑运动的地貌证据和速率[J].中国地震,2001,17(1):35-43.
[4]闵伟,朱金芳,冉永康,等.福州盆地活动断裂的探槽研究[J].地震地质,2002,24(4):514-523.
[5]章振铨,刘昌森,王锋.上海地区断裂活动性与地震关系初析[J].中国地震,2004,20(2):143-151.
[6]黄镇国,李平日,张仲英,等.深圳地貌[M].广东:广东科技出版社,1983.
[7]宋方敏,范福田,汪一鹏等.深圳断裂带第四纪活动性研究[A].中国地震学会地震地质专业委员会.中国活动断层研究[C].北京:地震出版社,1994:186-195.
[8]陈伟光,赵红梅,李富光,等.深圳市断裂构造的活动性及其对地质环境的影响[J].热带地理,2001,21(1):45-50.
[2]张虎男,陈伟光,黄坤荣,等.华南沿海新构造运动与地质环境[M].北京:地震出版社,1990.
[3]汪一鹏,宋方敏,黄卿团,等.潮汕平原北西向断裂左旋走滑运动的地貌证据和速率[J].中国地震,2001,17(1):35-43.
[4]闵伟,朱金芳,冉永康,等.福州盆地活动断裂的探槽研究[J].地震地质,2002,24(4):514-523.
[5]章振铨,刘昌森,王锋.上海地区断裂活动性与地震关系初析[J].中国地震,2004,20(2):143-151.
[6]黄镇国,李平日,张仲英,等.深圳地貌[M].广东:广东科技出版社,1983.
[7]宋方敏,范福田,汪一鹏等.深圳断裂带第四纪活动性研究[A].中国地震学会地震地质专业委员会.中国活动断层研究[C].北京:地震出版社,1994:186-195.
[8]陈伟光,赵红梅,李富光,等.深圳市断裂构造的活动性及其对地质环境的影响[J].热带地理,2001,21(1):45-50.
版权所有：© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心