不同连梁形式联肢剪力墙的静力弹塑性分析

详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文

英文篇名：Pushover analysis on coupled shear wall with different patterns of coupling beam 中文刊名：深圳大学学报(理工版) 英文刊名：Journal of Shenzhen University Science and Engineering 作者：管民生 ; 杜宏彪 ; 姜晶 ; 韩大建 英文作者：GUAN Min-sheng1 ; 2 ; DU Hong-biao3 ; JIANG Jing1 ; and HAN Da-jian21)Faculty of Civil and Transportation Engineering ; Guangdong University of Technology ; Guangzhou 510006 P.R.China2)School of Civil Engineering and Transportation ; South China University of Technology ; Guangzhou 510640 P.R.China3)College of Civil Engineering ; Shenzhen University Shenzhen 518060 P.R.China 中文关键词：高层建筑混凝土结构 ; 联肢剪力墙 ; 钢筋混凝土连梁 ; 型钢混凝土连梁 ; 静力弹塑性分析 ; 抗震性能 英文关键词：concrete structures in high-rise buildings ; coupled shear wall ; reinforced concrete coupling beam ; steel reinforced concrete coupling beam ; pushover analysis ; seismic performance 出版日期：2009-10-31 机构：广东工业大学土木与交通工程学院;华南理工大学土木与交通学院;深圳大学土木工程学院; 年：2009 期：04 出版单位：深圳大学学报(理工版)

摘要

建立12层钢筋混凝土联肢剪力墙结构分析模型,用两种不同的侧向载荷分布模式,分别对采用钢筋混凝土连梁和型钢混凝土连梁的联肢剪力墙结构进行静力弹塑性(Pushover)分析.在此基础上,以变形和延性(包括顶点位移、层间位移和结构塑性铰分布)为参数评估其抗震性能.研究发现,在承载力相同时,型钢混凝土连梁比钢筋混凝土连梁的截面尺寸小很多,型钢混凝土连梁的联肢剪力墙抗震性能较好.
The coupled shear wall structures with reinforced concrete coupling beams and steel reinforced concrete coupling beams were analyzed by pushover analysis with two common load patterns.The seismic performances were studied by means of the deformation and ductility such as the top drift,inter-story drifts and plastic joints distribution.The results show that the cross section size of steel reinforced concrete coupling beam is smaller than the one of reinforced concrete coupling beam under the same loads,and the seismic performance of coupled shear wall with steel reinforced concrete coupling beam is better than that of coupled shear wall with reinforced concrete coupling beam.

引文

[1]Gong B G,Shahrooz B M.钢-混凝土组合连梁—行为和设计[J].工程结构,2001,23(11):1480-1490(英文版).
    [2]北京金土木软件技术有限公司,中国建筑标准设计研究院.SAP2000中文版使用指南[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2006:460-475.
    [3]汪大绥,贺军利,张凤新.静力弹塑性分析(Pushover Analysis)的基本原理和计算实例[J].世界地震工程,2004,20(1):45-53.
    [4]Smith B S,Coull A.高层建筑结构分析与设计[M].北京:地震出版社,1993:241-247.
    [5]管民生.钢筋混凝土框架结构柱-梁强度比的抗震研究[D].广州:广东工业大学,2005.
    [6]管民生,杜宏彪.现浇板参与工作后框架结构的push-over分析研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,2005,25(5):117-123.
    [1]Gong B G,Shahrooz B M.Steel-concrete composite cou-pling beams-behavior and design[J].Engineering Struc-tures,2001,23(11):1480-1490.
    [2]Civil King Software Technology Co Ltd,China Institute of Building Standard Design&Research.SAP2000Analysis Reference Manual for Chinese Version[M].Beijing:China Communications Press,2006:460-475(in Chinese).
    [3]WANG Da-sui,HE Jun-li,ZHANG Feng-xin.The basic principle and a case study of the static elastoplastic analysis(pushover analysis)[J].World Earthquake Engineering,2004,20(1):45-53(in Chinese).
    [4]Smith B S,Coull A.Structure Analysis and Design of TallBuilding Structures[M].Beijing:Earthquake Press,1993:241-247(in Chinese).
    [5]GUAN Min-sheng.Seismic Research on Reinforced Con-crete Structures with Different Column-to-Beam Strength Ra-tios[D].Guangzhou:Guangdong University of Technolo-gy,2005(in Chinese).
    [6]GUAN Min-sheng,DU Hong-biao.Pushover analysis of effect of casting slab on RC frame structure[J].Earth-quake Engineering and Engineering Vibration,2005,25(5):117-123(in Chinese).