大跨度维修机库屋盖结构地震反应分析
|
摘要
采用反应谱法和时程分析法,对位于首都机场的四机位机库进行了竖向、水平及其组合地震反应分析,考察地震作用对大跨度维修机库屋盖结构的影响。分析结果表明:屋盖杆件在竖向地震作用下的内力分布与在水平地震作用下的有明显的不同,也不同于一般四边支承的大跨度屋盖结构;屋盖结构的水平地震作用大于竖向地震作用;在三向地震作用下屋盖杆件的地震内力分布不同于任何单向地震作用情况,也不是三向地震的简单组合;网架与大门架、中梁桁架连接的部位,大门架、中梁桁架及网架静内力较小的杆件,中弦杆件及网架周边杆件是屋盖结构在地震作用下的薄弱环节。分析结果可供大跨度维修机库结构抗震设计参考。
The vertical,horizontal and combined seismic response analyses on the long-span hangar at Capital International Airport are carried out using the response spectrum method and the time-history analysis method respectively to investigate the effect of the earthquake action on the roof structure.The analysis results show that the internal force distribution of roof members under the vertical earthquake action is obviously different from that under the horizontal earthquake action,and also different from that of other long-span roof structures with four sides supported;the horizontal seismic response is larger than the vertical seismic response of the hangar roof;the internal force distribution of roof members under the combined earthquake action is different from that under the vertical earthquake action or any unidirectional horizontal earthquake action,and is not the simple combination of the internal force of roof members under the vertical and horizontal earthquake action;the weak links of the hangar roof under the earthquake action are the connection parts of the space truss,the fringe truss beam and the middle truss beam,the members with smaller static internal force of the space truss,the fringe truss beam and the middle truss beam,the middle chord members and the members around the space truss.The analysis results can be for the seismic design reference of the long-span hangar.
The vertical,horizontal and combined seismic response analyses on the long-span hangar at Capital International Airport are carried out using the response spectrum method and the time-history analysis method respectively to investigate the effect of the earthquake action on the roof structure.The analysis results show that the internal force distribution of roof members under the vertical earthquake action is obviously different from that under the horizontal earthquake action,and also different from that of other long-span roof structures with four sides supported;the horizontal seismic response is larger than the vertical seismic response of the hangar roof;the internal force distribution of roof members under the combined earthquake action is different from that under the vertical earthquake action or any unidirectional horizontal earthquake action,and is not the simple combination of the internal force of roof members under the vertical and horizontal earthquake action;the weak links of the hangar roof under the earthquake action are the connection parts of the space truss,the fringe truss beam and the middle truss beam,the members with smaller static internal force of the space truss,the fringe truss beam and the middle truss beam,the middle chord members and the members around the space truss.The analysis results can be for the seismic design reference of the long-span hangar.
引文
[1]樊晓红,钱若军.网架结构在地震作用下抗震性能的研究[C]//第六届空间结构学术会议论文集,1992:247-256.
[2]VENTURA C E,FINN W D L,SCHUSTER N D.Seismic response ofinstrumented structures during the 1994 Northridge,Californiaearthquake[J].Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering,1995,22:316-337.
[3]蓝天,张毅刚.大跨度屋盖结构抗震设计[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2000.
[4]张毅刚,曹资.厦门太古飞机工程维修基地网架抗震分析[J].空间结构,1999,5(1):35-41.
[5]JOGLEKAR S G,KHANRA K K,NAVANI K P,et al.Long spanspace frame hangar roof with suspended docking system and cranes forheavy maintenance of 747-400 aircraft for air India at Mumbai,India[J].International Journal of Space Structures,1999,14(3):197-209.
[6]沈顺高,张微敬,朱丹,等.大跨度机库结构多点输入地震反应分析[J].土木工程学报,2008,41(2):17-21.
[7]GB50011—2001建筑抗震设计规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2005.
[8]冶金工业部建筑研究总院工程抗震研究室.九国抗震规范汇编[M].北京:地震出版社,1982.
[2]VENTURA C E,FINN W D L,SCHUSTER N D.Seismic response ofinstrumented structures during the 1994 Northridge,Californiaearthquake[J].Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering,1995,22:316-337.
[3]蓝天,张毅刚.大跨度屋盖结构抗震设计[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2000.
[4]张毅刚,曹资.厦门太古飞机工程维修基地网架抗震分析[J].空间结构,1999,5(1):35-41.
[5]JOGLEKAR S G,KHANRA K K,NAVANI K P,et al.Long spanspace frame hangar roof with suspended docking system and cranes forheavy maintenance of 747-400 aircraft for air India at Mumbai,India[J].International Journal of Space Structures,1999,14(3):197-209.
[6]沈顺高,张微敬,朱丹,等.大跨度机库结构多点输入地震反应分析[J].土木工程学报,2008,41(2):17-21.
[7]GB50011—2001建筑抗震设计规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2005.
[8]冶金工业部建筑研究总院工程抗震研究室.九国抗震规范汇编[M].北京:地震出版社,1982.
版权所有：© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心