基于云物元模型的装配式建筑绿色性评价
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Green Assessment of Fabricated Building Based on Cloud Matter Element Model
  • 作者:龙姗 ; 张云宁 ; 欧阳红祥
  • 英文作者:LONG Shan;ZHANG Yun-ning;OUYANG Hong-xiang;School of Business,Hohai University;
  • 关键词:装配式建筑 ; 绿色性评价 ; 云物元模型 ; 全寿命周期
  • 英文关键词:fabricated building;;green assessment;;cloud matter element model;;the whole life cycle theory
  • 中文刊名:JCGL
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Engineering Management
  • 机构:河海大学商学院;
  • 出版日期:2018-10-29 10:09
  • 出版单位:工程管理学报
  • 年:2018
  • 期:v.32;No.162
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金面上项目(71572126)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:JCGL201805005
  • 页数:6
  • CN:05
  • ISSN:23-1561/TU
  • 分类号:28-33
摘要
结合《中国绿色建筑评价标准》与装配式建筑特点,基于全寿命周期理论,从设计、生产运输、施工、运营管理、报废与回收5个阶段建立装配式建筑绿色性评价指标体系。在此基础上,提出云物元评价模型,并运用主观赋权法—AHP和客观赋权法—熵权法确定指标的综合权重。通过指标与绿色性等级之间的关联度计算,根据隶属度最大原则,由此得出装配式建筑绿色性等级。并通过案例验证了云物元模型能够克服了绿色性评价的随机性、离散性和不确定性,为装配式建筑绿色性评价提供了新的思路。
        Combining the China "Green building evaluation criteria" with characteristics of fabricated building,an evaluation index system for fabricated building was established based on the whole life cycle theory from the following 5 dimensions : design,production transportation,construction,operation management,and recycling. On the basis of this system,the paper puts forward a cloud matter element model. In addition,the method of objective weighting entropy and subjective weighting included AHP are used to determine the overall index weight. Then the cloud correlation degree between each index and the green score is calculated.According to the maximum principle of membership,the green grade is calculated. Finally,the case study shows that cloud matter element model can overcome randomness, discreteness and uncertainty, which provides a new idea and method for the green evaluation of the fabricated building.
引文
[1]高源,刘丛红.我国传统建筑业低碳转型升级的创新研究[J].科学管理研究,2014,32(4):72-75.
    [2] Schweber L, Haroglu H. Comparing the fit between BREEAM assessment and design processes[J]. Building Research&Information,2014,42(3):300-317.
    [3] Michael M, Zhang L, Xia X. An optimal model for a building retrofit with LEED standard as reference protocol[J].Energy&Buildings,2016,139:22-30.
    [4] Wong S C,Abe N.Stakeholders'perspectives of a building environmental assessment method:The case of CASBEE[J].Building&Environment,2014,82:502-516.
    [5]熊向阳,马晓国,欧阳强.绿色智能建筑综合评价体系的构建与应用[J].科技管理研究,2017,37(3):95-99.
    [6]董群,刘春利,王陶冶.城市公园建设的绿色评价研究[J].工程管理学报,2014,28(4):72-76.
    [7]钱琴珍,王永祥.多级可拓综合评价法在绿色建筑评价中的应用[J].工程管理学报,2014(2):11-16.
    [8]魏太兵,陈坚.建筑绿色性评价层次模型构建及matlab仿真[J].煤炭技术,2013,32(1):137-139.
    [9]杨海红,刘梦颖,李金瑾.基于灰色系统理论的低碳建筑评价[J].武汉理工大学学报(信息与管理工程版),2016,38(2):210-213.
    [10]蔡文.物元模型及其应用[M].科学技术文献出版社,1994.
    [11]李德毅,孟海军.隶属云和隶属云发生器[J].计算机研究与发展,1995(6):15-20.
    [12]孙秋霞,孙一心,孙璐.基于云物元模型的汽车客运站绿色等级评价[J].干旱区资源与环境,2018(2).
    [13]胡涛,王树宗,杨建军.基于云模型的物元综合评估方法[J].海军工程大学学报,2006,18(1):85-88.
    [14]梁唐杰,谢庆,柳春芳,等.基于全寿命周期理论和云物元理论的配电网规划综合效益的评估[J].电力系统保护与控制,2017,45(19):12-17.
    [15]刘大海,宫伟,邢文秀,等.基于AHP-熵权法的海岛海岸带脆弱性评价指标权重综合确定方法[J].海洋环境科学,2015,34(3):462-467.