摘要
在涉案财物处理方面,《监察法》授予了监察机关两种处理权:程序性处理权与终结性处理权。在监察机关的涉案财物程序性处理权方面,应当增补采取财产保全措施的权力,并构建对涉案财物财产权限制程度不等的对物强制措施体系。在监察机关的涉案财物终结性处理权方面,应当根据涉案财物所有权的最终归属区分不同的涉案财物,采取不同的路径进行处理。另外,应当将部分案件的违法犯罪行为人的合法财产与违法行为工具纳入监察机关的处理权范围之内。
The Supervisory Law authorizes supervisory organs two types of power to dispose the case-involved property:procedural disposal power and conclusive disposal power. As for the procedural disposal power of case-involved property,it's imperative to supplement the power to take property preservation measures and work out a system of compulsory measures with different levels of restriction on rights of case-involved property. As for the conclusive disposal power of the case-involved property, it's imperative to classify the case-involved property according to its ultimate ownership and adopt different disposal measures. In addition, the legitimate property and the illegal instruments of the offenders in some cases should be included in the jurisdiction of the supervisory organ's disposal power.
引文
[1]吴光升.刑事诉讼财产保全制度论要[J].中国刑事法杂志,2016(4):85-86.
[2]何帆.刑事没收研究——国际法与比较法的视角[M].北京:法律出版社,2007:159-160.
[3]吴光升.刑事涉案财物处理程序研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2018:65.
[4]袁益波.刑法中的没收物之分类研究[J].华东政法学院学报,2004(1):55-56.
[5]陈兴良.刑法适用总论(上)[M].北京:法律出版社,1999:403.
[6]张明楷.论刑法中的没收[J].法学家,2012(3):63.