基于Altmetrics的开放获取期刊论文影响力评价研究
|
摘要
[目的/意义]基于Altmetrics对开放获取期刊论文的影响力进行更全面准确的评价,丰富Altmetics的实证研究。[方法/过程]选取"PLoS One"期刊2013年全年发表的论文作为研究对象,利用ALMs平台获取Altmetrics数据,构建出学术论文的综合评价模型,并将该模型应用到国家学术论文影响力的比较。[结果/结论]相对于已有的小样本研究,本文具有指标类型丰富、数据量大的优势,结论更具有统计学意义。
[Purpose/significance]This paper aims to evaluate the impact of Open Access( OA) papers more comprehensively and accurately based on Altmetrics,and to enrich the empirical research of Altmetrics. [Method/process] It takes the academic papers published by"PLoS One"in 2013 as the research objects,and uses the ALMs platform to obtain Altmetrics data. A comprehensive evaluation model for academic papers is developed and applied to compare the impact of national academic papers. [Result/conclusion] Compared with the existing small sample studies,the paper has the advantages of rich indices types and large amount of data,so the conclusion is more statistically significant.
[Purpose/significance]This paper aims to evaluate the impact of Open Access( OA) papers more comprehensively and accurately based on Altmetrics,and to enrich the empirical research of Altmetrics. [Method/process] It takes the academic papers published by"PLoS One"in 2013 as the research objects,and uses the ALMs platform to obtain Altmetrics data. A comprehensive evaluation model for academic papers is developed and applied to compare the impact of national academic papers. [Result/conclusion] Compared with the existing small sample studies,the paper has the advantages of rich indices types and large amount of data,so the conclusion is more statistically significant.
引文
[1]刘丽敏,王晴.论文层面指标(ALMs)计量理论发展及实践探索[J].现代情报,2016(11):16-20.
[2]杨思洛,袁庆莉,韩雷.中美发表的国际开放获取期刊论文影响比较研究[J].中国图书馆学报,2017,43(1):67-88.
[3] MOUNCE R. Open access and altmetrics:distinct but complementary[J]. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science&Technology,2013,39(4):14-17.
[4] BINFIELD P. PLo S One:Background, future development,and article-level metrics[EB/OL]. https://elpub. architexturez. net/system/files/pdf/114_elpub2009. content. pdf.
[5] LIN J,FENNER M. Altmetrics in evolution:defining and redefining the ontology of article-level metrics[J]. Information Standards Quarterly,2013,25(2):20.
[6]宋玲玲.基于PLo S ALMs的论文影响力评价指标研究——以航空航天医学为例[J].情报理论与实践,2016,39(9):30-36.
[7]由庆斌,韦博,汤珊红.基于补充计量学的论文影响力评价模型构建[J].图书情报工作,2014,58(22):5-11.
[8]赵蓉英,郭凤娇,谭洁.基于Altmetrics的学术论文影响力评价研究——以汉语言文学学科为例[J].中国图书馆学报,2016,42(1):96-108.
[9]王贤文,刘趁,毛文莉.数字出版时代的科学论文综合评价研究[J].中国科技期刊研究,2014,25(11):1391-1396.
[10] WANG X,LIU C,FANG Z,et al. From attention to citation,what and how does Altmetrics work?[J]. Computer Science,2014.
[11] ZAHEDI Z,COSTAS R,WOUTERS P. Do Mendeley readership counts help to filter highly cited Wo S publications better than average citation impact of journals(JCS)?[J]. Computer Science,2015.
[12] CHANG S J L. Research on browsing behavior in the libraries:an empirical analysis of consequences,success and influences[J]. Journal of Library&Information Studies,2000(15):40-77.
[2]杨思洛,袁庆莉,韩雷.中美发表的国际开放获取期刊论文影响比较研究[J].中国图书馆学报,2017,43(1):67-88.
[3] MOUNCE R. Open access and altmetrics:distinct but complementary[J]. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science&Technology,2013,39(4):14-17.
[4] BINFIELD P. PLo S One:Background, future development,and article-level metrics[EB/OL]. https://elpub. architexturez. net/system/files/pdf/114_elpub2009. content. pdf.
[5] LIN J,FENNER M. Altmetrics in evolution:defining and redefining the ontology of article-level metrics[J]. Information Standards Quarterly,2013,25(2):20.
[6]宋玲玲.基于PLo S ALMs的论文影响力评价指标研究——以航空航天医学为例[J].情报理论与实践,2016,39(9):30-36.
[7]由庆斌,韦博,汤珊红.基于补充计量学的论文影响力评价模型构建[J].图书情报工作,2014,58(22):5-11.
[8]赵蓉英,郭凤娇,谭洁.基于Altmetrics的学术论文影响力评价研究——以汉语言文学学科为例[J].中国图书馆学报,2016,42(1):96-108.
[9]王贤文,刘趁,毛文莉.数字出版时代的科学论文综合评价研究[J].中国科技期刊研究,2014,25(11):1391-1396.
[10] WANG X,LIU C,FANG Z,et al. From attention to citation,what and how does Altmetrics work?[J]. Computer Science,2014.
[11] ZAHEDI Z,COSTAS R,WOUTERS P. Do Mendeley readership counts help to filter highly cited Wo S publications better than average citation impact of journals(JCS)?[J]. Computer Science,2015.
[12] CHANG S J L. Research on browsing behavior in the libraries:an empirical analysis of consequences,success and influences[J]. Journal of Library&Information Studies,2000(15):40-77.