创新系统视角下的科技成果产业化研究——以瑞典为案例
|
摘要
从创新系统的视角,对瑞典推动科技成果产业化采取的政策措施及成效进行分析,研究得出增强需求侧政策作用、跨部门联动制定系统性科技成果产业化政策、加强政策绩效评估以优化提升政策的实效性和影响面等措施建议,旨在对我国推进科技成果产业化工作提供借鉴。
From the perspective of innovation system,this paper analyzes the policy measures taken by Sweden to promote the industrialization of science and technology achievements,coming to the suggestions of increasing the policy effect on the demand side,coordinating the cross-ministries policy-making mechanism of systematical policies on the industrialization of scientific and technological achievements,strengthening the assessment of policy performance to optimize its effectiveness and influence surface,which provides some references for China's science and technology achievements industrialization.
From the perspective of innovation system,this paper analyzes the policy measures taken by Sweden to promote the industrialization of science and technology achievements,coming to the suggestions of increasing the policy effect on the demand side,coordinating the cross-ministries policy-making mechanism of systematical policies on the industrialization of scientific and technological achievements,strengthening the assessment of policy performance to optimize its effectiveness and influence surface,which provides some references for China's science and technology achievements industrialization.
引文
[1]汪芹,王长军.科技成果转化中三螺旋接口组织创新模式研究:以中科大先进技术研究院为例[J].科技进步与对策, 2015,32(8):7-11.
[2]杨浑,张艳秋.瑞典的科技创新模式:演变与挑战[J].全球科技经济瞭望,2017, 32(10):1-10.
[3]刘书庆.转制科研院所科技成果产业化模式研究[J].科技进步与对策,2011,28(12):20-25.
[4]MITCHELL W, SINGH K.Survival of businesses using collaborative relationships to commercialize complex goods[J].Strategic Management Journal,1996,17(3):169-195.
[5]BUSH V.Science:the endless frontier[J].Chemical&Engineering News, 1945,23(16):1420-1430.
[6]JOHANNESSENJA,DOLVAJO.Organizinginnovation:integratingknowledgesystems[J].EuropeanPlanning Studies,1997,5(3):331-349.
[7]HERMANS F, GEERLING E F, POTTERS J, et al. Public-private partnerships as systemic agricultural innovation policy instrumentsassessing their contribution to innovation system function dynamics[J].NJAS(Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences), 2018,88(4):76-95.
[8]CHAMINADE C, EDQUIST C.From theory to practice:the use of the systems of innovation approach in innovation policy[J].Papers in Innovation Studies, 2005,125(2):141-162.
[9]CORNELL UNIVERSITY, INSEAD, WIPO. The Global Innovation Index 2018:energizing the worldwith innovation[EB/OL].(2018-07-10)[2018-12-15].https://www.wipo.int/portal/en/index.html.
[10]JACOBSSON S.Is the commercialization of European academic R&D weak?:A critical assessment of a dominant belief and associated policy responses[J].Research Policy,2013,42(4):874-885.
[11]EJERMO O, KANDER A, HENNING M S. The R&D-growth paradox arises in fast-growing sectors[J].Research Policy,2011,40(5):664-672.
[12]DAVIS S J, HENREKSON M.Economic performance and work activity in Sweden after the crisis of the early 1990s[J].NBER Working Paper, 2006,195(12):225-252.
[13]HENREKSON M, ROSENBERG N. Designing efficient institutions for science-based entrepreneurship:lessons from the US and Sweden[J].Journal of Technology Transfer, 2001,26(3):207-231.
[14]CARLSSON B, JACOBSSON S. Technological systems and economic policy:the diffusion of factory automation in Sweden[J].Research Policy, 2004,23(3):235-248.
[15]MARKUS G, TEIS H, LARS C, et al. Innovation policy for systemwide transformation:the case of strategic innovation programmers(SIPs)in Sweden[J].Research Policy, 2019,48(4):1048-1061.
[16]蒋绚,张培培.制度、政策与运行机制:瑞典创新驱动发展研究与启示[J].武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017,70(5):131-142.
[17]CARLSSON B, JACOBSSON S.Technological systems and economic policy:the diffusion of factory automation in Sweden[J]. Research Policy, 2004,23(3):235-248.
[18]EDQUISTC,ZABALAITURRIAGAGOITIAJM.Public procurement for innovation as mission-oriented innovation policy[J].Research Policy, 2012,41(10):1757-1769.
[19]杨洋.瑞典的科技创新模式:演变与挑战[J].全球科技经济瞭望,2017,32(10):1-7.
[20]DZISAH J, ETZKOWITZ H. Triple helix circulation:the heart of innovation and development[J]. International Journal ofTechnologyManagement&SustainableDevelopment,2008,7(2):101-115.
[21]EDQUIST C. Towards a holistic innovation policy:can the Swedish National Innovation Council(NIC)be a role model?[J].Research Policy, 2019,48(4):869-879.
[22]EDQUIST C. Striving towards a holistic innovation policy in European countries:but linearity still prevails[J].STI Policy Review, 2014,5(2):1-19.
[23]郭雯,刘爱,王胜光.创新驱动的市场形成与需求侧政策[J].中国科学院院刊,2015(5):626-631.
[2]杨浑,张艳秋.瑞典的科技创新模式:演变与挑战[J].全球科技经济瞭望,2017, 32(10):1-10.
[3]刘书庆.转制科研院所科技成果产业化模式研究[J].科技进步与对策,2011,28(12):20-25.
[4]MITCHELL W, SINGH K.Survival of businesses using collaborative relationships to commercialize complex goods[J].Strategic Management Journal,1996,17(3):169-195.
[5]BUSH V.Science:the endless frontier[J].Chemical&Engineering News, 1945,23(16):1420-1430.
[6]JOHANNESSENJA,DOLVAJO.Organizinginnovation:integratingknowledgesystems[J].EuropeanPlanning Studies,1997,5(3):331-349.
[7]HERMANS F, GEERLING E F, POTTERS J, et al. Public-private partnerships as systemic agricultural innovation policy instrumentsassessing their contribution to innovation system function dynamics[J].NJAS(Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences), 2018,88(4):76-95.
[8]CHAMINADE C, EDQUIST C.From theory to practice:the use of the systems of innovation approach in innovation policy[J].Papers in Innovation Studies, 2005,125(2):141-162.
[9]CORNELL UNIVERSITY, INSEAD, WIPO. The Global Innovation Index 2018:energizing the worldwith innovation[EB/OL].(2018-07-10)[2018-12-15].https://www.wipo.int/portal/en/index.html.
[10]JACOBSSON S.Is the commercialization of European academic R&D weak?:A critical assessment of a dominant belief and associated policy responses[J].Research Policy,2013,42(4):874-885.
[11]EJERMO O, KANDER A, HENNING M S. The R&D-growth paradox arises in fast-growing sectors[J].Research Policy,2011,40(5):664-672.
[12]DAVIS S J, HENREKSON M.Economic performance and work activity in Sweden after the crisis of the early 1990s[J].NBER Working Paper, 2006,195(12):225-252.
[13]HENREKSON M, ROSENBERG N. Designing efficient institutions for science-based entrepreneurship:lessons from the US and Sweden[J].Journal of Technology Transfer, 2001,26(3):207-231.
[14]CARLSSON B, JACOBSSON S. Technological systems and economic policy:the diffusion of factory automation in Sweden[J].Research Policy, 2004,23(3):235-248.
[15]MARKUS G, TEIS H, LARS C, et al. Innovation policy for systemwide transformation:the case of strategic innovation programmers(SIPs)in Sweden[J].Research Policy, 2019,48(4):1048-1061.
[16]蒋绚,张培培.制度、政策与运行机制:瑞典创新驱动发展研究与启示[J].武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017,70(5):131-142.
[17]CARLSSON B, JACOBSSON S.Technological systems and economic policy:the diffusion of factory automation in Sweden[J]. Research Policy, 2004,23(3):235-248.
[18]EDQUISTC,ZABALAITURRIAGAGOITIAJM.Public procurement for innovation as mission-oriented innovation policy[J].Research Policy, 2012,41(10):1757-1769.
[19]杨洋.瑞典的科技创新模式:演变与挑战[J].全球科技经济瞭望,2017,32(10):1-7.
[20]DZISAH J, ETZKOWITZ H. Triple helix circulation:the heart of innovation and development[J]. International Journal ofTechnologyManagement&SustainableDevelopment,2008,7(2):101-115.
[21]EDQUIST C. Towards a holistic innovation policy:can the Swedish National Innovation Council(NIC)be a role model?[J].Research Policy, 2019,48(4):869-879.
[22]EDQUIST C. Striving towards a holistic innovation policy in European countries:but linearity still prevails[J].STI Policy Review, 2014,5(2):1-19.
[23]郭雯,刘爱,王胜光.创新驱动的市场形成与需求侧政策[J].中国科学院院刊,2015(5):626-631.