体裁互文性的话语分析——以南中国海仲裁案为例
|
摘要
Bhatia(2008b,2012)注意到专业体裁越来越倾向于挪用不同的体裁资源,导致专业体裁的混合、内嵌和扭曲。专家作者写作时经常在体裁边界的内外创造新的但却是相关的混合形式在社交实践和体裁规范可接受的范围内来表达其个人的意图。本文从话语实践的层面分析了南中国海仲裁案的体裁互文性,表明该仲裁案从一开始就突破了"仲裁"体裁的界限,大规模地"挪用"了"诉讼"的体裁资源,以达到妖魔化中国和损害其在南中国海主权的企图。
Bhatia(2008 b,2012) noticed that professional discourse increasingly appropriate or exploit generic resources associated with other genres and practices,giving rise to 'mixing','embedding',and 'bending' of generic norms in professional contexts so as to give expression to their own private intentions. This paper probes into the South China Sea Arbitration,revealing the ways in which it appropriated the generic resources of litigation with the possible intention of demonizing the People's Republic of China and impairing its sovereign rights in the South China Sea.
Bhatia(2008 b,2012) noticed that professional discourse increasingly appropriate or exploit generic resources associated with other genres and practices,giving rise to 'mixing','embedding',and 'bending' of generic norms in professional contexts so as to give expression to their own private intentions. This paper probes into the South China Sea Arbitration,revealing the ways in which it appropriated the generic resources of litigation with the possible intention of demonizing the People's Republic of China and impairing its sovereign rights in the South China Sea.
引文
[1]Bhatia,V.K.Discursive practices in disciplinary and professional contexts[J].Linguistic and Human Sciences,2006,2(1):5-28.
[2]Bhatia,V.K.Genre Analysis,ESP and Professional Practice[J].English for Specic Purposes,2008a,27:161-174.
[3]Bhatia,V.K.Towards critical genre analysis[C]//Bhatia,V.K.,Flowerdew,J.&R.Jones.Advances in Discourse Studies.London:Routledge,2008b.166-177.
[4]Bhatia,V.K.Interdiscursivity in professional communication[J].Discourse and Communciation,2010,21:32-50.
[5]Bhatia,V.K.Witness examination as interdiscursive practice[J].World Englishes,2011,30(1):106-116.
[6]Bhatia,V.K.Critical Reflections on Genre Analysis[J].Iberica,2012,24:17-28.
[7]Bhatia,V.K.Critical Genre Analysis:Theoretical Preliminaries[J].Journal of Language and Communication in Business,2015,54:9-20.
[8]Bhatia,V.K.Critical Genre Analysis:Investigating Interdiscursive Performance in Professional Practice[M].London:Routledge,2017.
[9]Fairclough,N.Language and Power[M].London/New York:Longman,1989.
[10]Fairclough,N.Discourse and Social Change[M].Cambridge:Polity Press,1992.
[11]Fairclough,N.Critical Discourse Analysis:The critical study of language[M].London:Longman,1995.
[12]Fowler,A.Kinds of Literature:An Introduction to the Theory of Genres and Modes[M].Oxford:Clarendon Press,1982.
[13]Halliday,M.A.K.&R.Hasan.Language,Context and Text:Aspects of language in a socio-semiotic perspective[M].Victoria:Deakin University Press,1985.
[14]Marriott,A.Less is more:directing arbitration procedures[J].Arbitration International,2004,16:353-6.
[15]O’Beebee,T.The Ideology of Genre:A Comprehensive Study of Generic Instability[M].Pennsylvania:The Pennsylvania State University Press,1994.
[16]Pêcheux,M.Language,Semantics and Ideology[M].trans.H.Nagpal.London:Macmillan,1982.
[17]van Leeuwen,T.Genre and Field in Critical Discourse Analysis:A Synopsis[J].Discourse&Society,1993,4(2):193-223.
[18]Solin,A.Intertextuality as mediation:On the analysis of intertextual relations in public discourse[J].Text,2004,24(2):267-296.
[19]Swales,J.M.Genre Analysis:English in Academic and Research Settings[M].Cambridge:CUP,1990.
[20]傅莹.中国为什么对南海仲裁案说不?[N].环球时报,2016.7.12.
[21]辛斌.语篇互文性的批评性分析[M].苏州:苏州大学出版社,2000.
(1)他称之为“话语形态”(discursive formation)。
[2]Bhatia,V.K.Genre Analysis,ESP and Professional Practice[J].English for Specic Purposes,2008a,27:161-174.
[3]Bhatia,V.K.Towards critical genre analysis[C]//Bhatia,V.K.,Flowerdew,J.&R.Jones.Advances in Discourse Studies.London:Routledge,2008b.166-177.
[4]Bhatia,V.K.Interdiscursivity in professional communication[J].Discourse and Communciation,2010,21:32-50.
[5]Bhatia,V.K.Witness examination as interdiscursive practice[J].World Englishes,2011,30(1):106-116.
[6]Bhatia,V.K.Critical Reflections on Genre Analysis[J].Iberica,2012,24:17-28.
[7]Bhatia,V.K.Critical Genre Analysis:Theoretical Preliminaries[J].Journal of Language and Communication in Business,2015,54:9-20.
[8]Bhatia,V.K.Critical Genre Analysis:Investigating Interdiscursive Performance in Professional Practice[M].London:Routledge,2017.
[9]Fairclough,N.Language and Power[M].London/New York:Longman,1989.
[10]Fairclough,N.Discourse and Social Change[M].Cambridge:Polity Press,1992.
[11]Fairclough,N.Critical Discourse Analysis:The critical study of language[M].London:Longman,1995.
[12]Fowler,A.Kinds of Literature:An Introduction to the Theory of Genres and Modes[M].Oxford:Clarendon Press,1982.
[13]Halliday,M.A.K.&R.Hasan.Language,Context and Text:Aspects of language in a socio-semiotic perspective[M].Victoria:Deakin University Press,1985.
[14]Marriott,A.Less is more:directing arbitration procedures[J].Arbitration International,2004,16:353-6.
[15]O’Beebee,T.The Ideology of Genre:A Comprehensive Study of Generic Instability[M].Pennsylvania:The Pennsylvania State University Press,1994.
[16]Pêcheux,M.Language,Semantics and Ideology[M].trans.H.Nagpal.London:Macmillan,1982.
[17]van Leeuwen,T.Genre and Field in Critical Discourse Analysis:A Synopsis[J].Discourse&Society,1993,4(2):193-223.
[18]Solin,A.Intertextuality as mediation:On the analysis of intertextual relations in public discourse[J].Text,2004,24(2):267-296.
[19]Swales,J.M.Genre Analysis:English in Academic and Research Settings[M].Cambridge:CUP,1990.
[20]傅莹.中国为什么对南海仲裁案说不?[N].环球时报,2016.7.12.
[21]辛斌.语篇互文性的批评性分析[M].苏州:苏州大学出版社,2000.
(1)他称之为“话语形态”(discursive formation)。