变迁作为遗产?城市传统作为“自相矛盾”的范畴
|
摘要
城市与文化遗产这两个概念虽然是现代化的两个"孩子",是市民阶级世界观的两个"投影区",但是从历史语义学的视角来看,它们彼此之间是明显对立的。文化遗产主要彰显的是知识形式的连续性与封闭性,而城市的知识文化所关涉的则是区别与变迁:在乡村,外来事物被摒弃在外,而在城市,却必须要积极地将其纳入在内。所以,在城市的空间,对于像传统、世代、共同体等一些老的观念,必须以新的方式加以修正、时代化、情境化。这是必要的,特别是当我们也想在城市的环境内利用这些观念的"象征性资本"、并自其中制定核心的(文化)政策纲领的时候。
The two concepts—city and cultural heritage—are the two"children"of modernization.And they are the two"projection area"of the civil world view.But from the perspective of historical semantics they are clearly opposed to each other.The cultural heritage mainly embodies the continuity and the closeness of the knowledge forms,while the knowledge culture of the city represents the difference and the change:in the countryside foreign things are abandoned,but in the city,they must be actively included.Therefore,in the urban space old concepts such as tradition,generation and community must be modified,updated and contextualized in a new way.This is necessary,especially when we want to make use of the"symbolic capital"of these concepts in the urban environment and develop central(culture)policy projects out of it.
The two concepts—city and cultural heritage—are the two"children"of modernization.And they are the two"projection area"of the civil world view.But from the perspective of historical semantics they are clearly opposed to each other.The cultural heritage mainly embodies the continuity and the closeness of the knowledge forms,while the knowledge culture of the city represents the difference and the change:in the countryside foreign things are abandoned,but in the city,they must be actively included.Therefore,in the urban space old concepts such as tradition,generation and community must be modified,updated and contextualized in a new way.This is necessary,especially when we want to make use of the"symbolic capital"of these concepts in the urban environment and develop central(culture)policy projects out of it.
引文