摘要
目的探讨小红细胞和RDW对Sysmex XE-5000血细胞分析仪血小板计数的影响。方法选取中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院2018年3月至12月期间,住院患者标本240例,测定红细胞平均体积(MCV)和红细胞分布宽度(RDW),根据两者不同范围进行分组,记录PLT-I、PLT-O、RDW-CV三项指标的结果,并对所测标本用显微镜手工法进行血小板计数,最后通过SPSS19.0统计软件行配对t检验统计分析。结果 (1)当MCV为70~80fL、RDW-CV<15%时电阻抗法(PLT-I)与手工法计数血小板结果比较差异无统计学意义;MCV<60fL、MCV为60~69fL时电阻抗法(PLT-I)检测结果均高于手工法血小板计数,差异有统计学意义;MCV为70~80fL且RDW-CV≥15%时,电阻抗法(PLT-I)与手工法计数血小板的差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。(2)当MCV<60fL、MCV为60fL~69fL、MCV为70fL~80fL时,血小板检测结果荧光法(PLT-O)均与手工法相近,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论小红细胞和RDW-CV大小对电阻抗法(PLT-I)影响较大,而荧光法(PLT-O)受二者影响较小,可以更准确反映血小板真实水平。
Objective To investigate the effect of small red blood cells and RDW on platelet count of Sysmex XE-5000 hematology analyzer. Methods A total of 240 inpatient specimens were selected from Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from March to December 2018. The mean red blood cell volume(MCV) and red blood cell distribution width(RDW) were determined and grouped according to the different ranges. PLT-I was recorded. The results of the three indicators, PLT-O, RDW-CV, and platelet counts were performed by microscope manual method. Finally, the paired t-test statistical analysis was performed by SPSS19.0 statistical software. Results(1) When the MCV was 70-80 fL and RDW-CV<15%, there was no significant difference between the electrical impedance method(PLT-I) and the manual counting platelet count. When MCV<60 fL and MCV were 60~69 fL The results of electrical impedance spectroscopy(PLT-I) were higher than those of manual platelet counts, and the difference was statistically significant. When MCV was 70-80 fL and RDW-CV ≥15%, electrical impedance method(PLT-I) and manual counting were used. Platelet differences were also statistically significant(P<0.01).(2) When MCV<60 fL, MCV was 60 fL~69 fL, MCV was 70 fL~80 fL, the platelet detection result fluorescence method(PLT-O) was similar to the manual method, and the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05).Conclusion The size of small red blood cells and RDW-CV has a great influence on the electrical impedance method(PLT-I), while the fluorescence method(PLT-O) is less affected by both, which can more accurately reflect the true level of platelets.
引文
[1]Kuwana M,Okazaki Y,Satoh T,et al.Initial laboratory findings useful for predicting the diagnosis of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura[J].Am JMed,2005,118(9):1026-1033.
[2]许文艳,涂云贵,杜巧丽.血小板假性减少的原因分析与对策[J].国际检验医学与临床杂志,2016,37(8):1157-1161.
[3]叶长钦,罗辉,彭兰芬,等.小红细胞对电阻抗法测定血小板计数影响的分析[J].检验医学与临床,2010,7(6):539-540.
[4]丛玉隆,乐家新,袁家颖.实用血细胞分析技术与临床[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2011:304-306,375.
[5]黄晓军,沈志祥,王爱霞,等.血液病/恶性肿瘤患者侵袭性真菌感染的诊断标准与治疗原则(草案)[J].中华内科杂志,2005,44(7):554-556.
[6]周艺,陈春兰,冯文安,等.血细胞分析仪中MCV,RDW对PLT计数的影响的调查研究[J].中国卫生检验杂志,2011,21(7):1735-1739.