安徽省2015—2017年传染病防治卫生监督行政处罚情况分析
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Analysis on administrative punishment for health supervision on prevention and treatment of infectious diseases in Anhui,2015-2017
  • 作者:季亮 ; 樊春
  • 英文作者:JI Liang;FAN Chun;Anhui Health Inspection and Supervision;
  • 关键词:传染病防治 ; 卫生监督 ; 行政处罚
  • 英文关键词:prevention and treatment of infectious diseases;;health supervision;;administrative punishment
  • 中文刊名:GGWS
  • 英文刊名:Chinese Journal of Public Health Management
  • 机构:安徽省卫生厅卫生监督所;
  • 出版日期:2019-06-20
  • 出版单位:中国公共卫生管理
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.35;No.195
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:GGWS201903041
  • 页数:4
  • CN:03
  • ISSN:23-1318/R
  • 分类号:140-143
摘要
目的通过分析安徽省2015—2017年传染病防治监督行政处罚案件,了解和掌握目前安徽省在传染病防治卫生监督工作中存在的问题,为下一步做好传染病防治监督工作提供决策依据。方法对2015—2017年安徽省传染病防治行政处罚案件的地区分布、处罚对象、案件来源、行政处罚依据、行政处罚类型等方面进行统计分析。结果 2015—2017年安徽省行政处罚案件共1 146起。案件来源主要为监督检查发现;行政处罚法律依据主要为《医疗废物管理条例》和《消毒管理办法》,二者案件占96.12%;行政处罚对象主要为未定级医疗机构,占82.32%。行政处罚类型主要为警告和罚款。结论在加强传染病防治监督执法的同时,应注重均衡发展,着力解决传染病处罚形式单一、处罚力度小等问题。
        Objective To analyze the administrative punishment cases of infectious disease prevention and control in Anhui from 2015 to 2017,understand and master the existing problems in the supervision of infectious diseases prevention and control in Anhui,provide decision-making basis for the next step in the prevention and control of infectious diseases.Methods Statistical analysis was carried out to analyze the regional distribution,punishment targets,source of cases,administrative punishment basis and administrative punishment types of administrative punishment cases for infectious diseases prevention and control in Anhui from 2015 to 2017.Results A total of 1 146 administrative punishment cases were filed in Anhui from 2015 to 2017.The source of the cases was mainly for supervision and inspection.The legal basis for administrative punishment was mainly the Regulations on Medical Waste Management and the Measures for Disinfection Management,accounting for 96.12% of the cases.The administrative punishment targets were mainly ungraded medical institutions,accounting for 82.32%.The types of administrative penalties were mainly warnings and fines.Conclusion While strengthening the supervision and enforcement of infectious diseases,we should pay attention to balanced development,focus on solving the problems of single forms of punishment for infectious diseases and small penalties.
引文
[1] 孙梅娜,张玉慧,袁青春,等.2014-2017年山东省传染病防治监督卫生行政处罚分析[J].预防医学论坛,2018,24(5):362-364.
    [2] 刘红莹,田泽玲,王英浩.北京市昌平区2013—2015年传染病防治卫生监督行政处罚情况分析[J].中国卫生监督杂志,2016,23(6):541-546.
    [3] 陈靖,柳州市2003—2013年传染病卫生行政处罚情况分析[J].中国初级卫生保健,2015,29(7):84-85.
    [4] 张雪峰,葛连君.民营医疗机构传染病防治卫生监督管理模式分析[J].大家保健,2017,11(11):288.
    [5] 刘根方.卫生计生综合执法机构在传染病防治中的职责及问题探究[J].心理医生,2017,23(30):309-310.
    [6] 宋召海,李丽.基层传染病防治监督执法存在的问题[J].医学信息,2015,28(50):13.
    [7] 严霞.传染病防治卫生监督的思考[J].中国卫生监督杂志,2015,22(4):389-391.
    [8] 张振京.卫生计生综合执法机构在传染病防治中的职责及存在问题分析[J].中国营养保健,2016,26(11):253-254.
    [9] 崔艳红,韩云霄.银川市2014—2017年医疗机构卫生行政处罚情况分析[J].健康大视野,2018,14:277-278.
    [10] 王鹏,贺鹭.某市143家医院传染病防治监督现状及对策研究[J].中国卫生监督杂志,2017,24(2):158-163.