公民水态度—行为差距及其影响因素——以中国省会城市为例
|
摘要
基于全国范围的抽样调查,发现31个省会城市公民存在不同程度的水态度与水行为不一致现象,即水态度—行为差距。立足城市视角,构建了经济因素、文明程度、政府公共服务水平对水态度—行为差距的影响模型,结果显示:各省会城市均存在不同程度的水态度—行为差距,人均收入、生活用水价格及政府公共服务水平对水态度—行为差距无显著影响;文明城市称号对水态度—行为差距有正向影响;公益组织建设情况对水态度—行为差距有负向影响。据此认为,通过行政、法律手段促进城市公益事业发展,有利于引导市民做到水态度—行为一致,进而降低水态度—行为差距。
Through a nationwide sample survey,it is found that there are an inconsistency between water attitude and water behavior,that is,water attitude-behavior gap. Based on existing research,the influence model of economic factors,civilization degree and government public service level on water attitude-behavior gap is constructed from the urban perspective from city perspective. The results show that there are different water attitudes-behavior gaps in provincial capital cities. And per capita income,domestic water price and level of government public service has no significant impacts on water attitude-behavior gap,while the title of"civilized city"has a positive effect on the gap,and the development of commonweal organizations has negative impact. According to this,it is believed that promoting the development of urban public welfare undertaking through administrative and legal means is beneficial to guide the citizens to " know one's deeds together" and reduce water attitude-behavior gap.
Through a nationwide sample survey,it is found that there are an inconsistency between water attitude and water behavior,that is,water attitude-behavior gap. Based on existing research,the influence model of economic factors,civilization degree and government public service level on water attitude-behavior gap is constructed from the urban perspective from city perspective. The results show that there are different water attitudes-behavior gaps in provincial capital cities. And per capita income,domestic water price and level of government public service has no significant impacts on water attitude-behavior gap,while the title of"civilized city"has a positive effect on the gap,and the development of commonweal organizations has negative impact. According to this,it is believed that promoting the development of urban public welfare undertaking through administrative and legal means is beneficial to guide the citizens to " know one's deeds together" and reduce water attitude-behavior gap.
引文
[1]王延荣,许冉,孙宇飞.中国公民水素养评价研究进展[J].水利发展研究,2017(11):52-56
[2]张红涛,王二平.态度与行为关系研究现状及发展趋势[J].心理科学进展,2007(1):163-168
[3]Baron R.A.,Byrnt D.,Suls J.Exploring Social Psychology[M].Allyn and Bacon,1988:79-82
[4]Upmeyer A.,Six B.Strategies for Exploring Attitudes and Behavior[A].In:Upmeyer A.ed.Attitudes and Behavioral Decisions.New york:Springer-Verlag New York Inc.1989:1-18
[5]Wicker A.W.Attitudes versus Actions:The Relationship of Verbal and Overt Behavior Response to Attitude Objects[J].Journal of Social Issues,1969(4):41-78
[6]Davies J.,Foxall G.R.,Pallister J.Beyond the Intention-Behaviour Mythology an Integrated Model of Recycling[J].Marketing Theory,2002(1):9-113
[7]Finisterra do Paco A.M.,Raposo M.L.B.Green Consumer Market Segmentation:Empirical Findings From Portugal:Green Consumer Market Segmentation[J].International Journal of Consumer Studies,2010(4):429-436
[8]彭远春.国外环境行为影响因素研究述评[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2013(8):140-145
[9]Brand K.W.Environmental Consciousness and Behaviour:the Greening of Lifestyles[A].In:Redclift M.R.,Woodgate G.eds.The International Handbook of Environmental Sociology.London:Edward Elgar,1997:204-215
[10]Maloney M.P.,Ward M.P.Ecology:Let’s Hear from the People:An Objective Scale for the Measurement of Ecological Attitudes and Knowledge[J].American Psychologist,1973(28):583-586
[11]孙剑,李锦锦,杨晓茹.消费者为何言行不一:绿色消费行为阻碍因素探究[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2015(5):72-81
[12]陈凯,彭茜.参照群体对绿色消费态度-行为差距的影响分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2014(S2):458-461
[13]Kollmuss A.,Agyeman J.Mind the Gap:Why Do People Act Environmentally and What Are the Barriers to Pro-environmental Behavior?[J].Environmental Education Research,2002(3):239-260
[14]Lane B,Potter S.The adoption of cleaner vehicles in the UK:exploring the consumer attitude-action gap[J].Journal of cleaner production,2007(11):1085-1092
[15]陆益龙.水环境问题、环保态度与居民的行动策略---2010CGSS数据的分析[J].山东社会科学,2015(1):70-76
[16]杜伟强,曹花蕊.基于自身短期与社会长远利益两难选择的绿色消费机制[J].心理科学进展,2013(5):775-784
[17]Spaargaren G.,Van Vliet B.Lifestyles,Consumption and the Environment:the Ecological Modernization of Domestic Consumption[J].Environmental Politics,2000(1):50-76
[18]杨虎涛.从众与服从的演化及其“齐美尔”意义[J].学术月刊,2017(3):112-120
[19]胡小武,陈友华.城市永续发展的战略与路径---张鸿雁教授“城市文化资本论”评述[J].南京社会科学,2010(12):81-87
[20]王薪喜,钟杨.中国城市居民环境行为影响因素研究---基于2013年全国民调数据的实证分析[J].上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2016(1):69-80
[21]王晓楠,刘琳.中国居民环境行为意愿的多层分析---基于2013年CSS数据的实证分析[J].吉首大学学报(社会科学版),2017(1):80-90
[22]袁亚运.我国居民环境行为及影响因素研究---基于CGSS2013数据[J].干旱区资源与环境,2016(4):40-45
[23]廖显春,夏恩龙,王自锋.阶梯水价对城市居民用水量及低收入家庭福利的影响[J].资源科学,2016(10):1935-1947
[24]王琰.我国居民绿色消费影响因素的多层次分析:基于CGSS2010的实证研究[J].南京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2015(2):79-89
[25]曹洪军,王小洁,刘鹏程.居民应对环保知行不一的认知策略及其原因---基于CGSS2010微观数据的分析[J].城市问题,2017(7):85-94
[26]欧阳斌,袁正,陈静思.我国城市居民环境意识、环保行为测量及影响因素分析[J].经济地理,2015(11):179-183
[27]刘凯,任建兰,王成新.中国绿色化的演变特征及其影响因素[J].城市问题,2016(4):11-17
[28]胡卫萍,李玉芬,史子浩.中国慈善活动实施现状调研的数据分析[J].华东交通大学学报,2012(2):116-120
[29]周望军.中国水资源及水价现状调研报告[J].中国物价,2010(3):19-23
[30]高兴佑.我国水价制度存在的问题及改革路径[J].人民长江,2016(4):103-107
(1)本文使用的主要数据来自水利部发展研究中心委托华北水利水电大学开展的2017年《中国省会城市公民水素养调查》课题的调查数据。
(2)水态度指数是依据水情感、水责任及水伦理三类7个问题的调查结果及问题权重综合计算得出。
(3)水行为指数是依据水生态和水环境管理行为、说服行为、消费行为及法律行为四类14个问题调查结果及问题权重综合计算得出。
[2]张红涛,王二平.态度与行为关系研究现状及发展趋势[J].心理科学进展,2007(1):163-168
[3]Baron R.A.,Byrnt D.,Suls J.Exploring Social Psychology[M].Allyn and Bacon,1988:79-82
[4]Upmeyer A.,Six B.Strategies for Exploring Attitudes and Behavior[A].In:Upmeyer A.ed.Attitudes and Behavioral Decisions.New york:Springer-Verlag New York Inc.1989:1-18
[5]Wicker A.W.Attitudes versus Actions:The Relationship of Verbal and Overt Behavior Response to Attitude Objects[J].Journal of Social Issues,1969(4):41-78
[6]Davies J.,Foxall G.R.,Pallister J.Beyond the Intention-Behaviour Mythology an Integrated Model of Recycling[J].Marketing Theory,2002(1):9-113
[7]Finisterra do Paco A.M.,Raposo M.L.B.Green Consumer Market Segmentation:Empirical Findings From Portugal:Green Consumer Market Segmentation[J].International Journal of Consumer Studies,2010(4):429-436
[8]彭远春.国外环境行为影响因素研究述评[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2013(8):140-145
[9]Brand K.W.Environmental Consciousness and Behaviour:the Greening of Lifestyles[A].In:Redclift M.R.,Woodgate G.eds.The International Handbook of Environmental Sociology.London:Edward Elgar,1997:204-215
[10]Maloney M.P.,Ward M.P.Ecology:Let’s Hear from the People:An Objective Scale for the Measurement of Ecological Attitudes and Knowledge[J].American Psychologist,1973(28):583-586
[11]孙剑,李锦锦,杨晓茹.消费者为何言行不一:绿色消费行为阻碍因素探究[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2015(5):72-81
[12]陈凯,彭茜.参照群体对绿色消费态度-行为差距的影响分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2014(S2):458-461
[13]Kollmuss A.,Agyeman J.Mind the Gap:Why Do People Act Environmentally and What Are the Barriers to Pro-environmental Behavior?[J].Environmental Education Research,2002(3):239-260
[14]Lane B,Potter S.The adoption of cleaner vehicles in the UK:exploring the consumer attitude-action gap[J].Journal of cleaner production,2007(11):1085-1092
[15]陆益龙.水环境问题、环保态度与居民的行动策略---2010CGSS数据的分析[J].山东社会科学,2015(1):70-76
[16]杜伟强,曹花蕊.基于自身短期与社会长远利益两难选择的绿色消费机制[J].心理科学进展,2013(5):775-784
[17]Spaargaren G.,Van Vliet B.Lifestyles,Consumption and the Environment:the Ecological Modernization of Domestic Consumption[J].Environmental Politics,2000(1):50-76
[18]杨虎涛.从众与服从的演化及其“齐美尔”意义[J].学术月刊,2017(3):112-120
[19]胡小武,陈友华.城市永续发展的战略与路径---张鸿雁教授“城市文化资本论”评述[J].南京社会科学,2010(12):81-87
[20]王薪喜,钟杨.中国城市居民环境行为影响因素研究---基于2013年全国民调数据的实证分析[J].上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2016(1):69-80
[21]王晓楠,刘琳.中国居民环境行为意愿的多层分析---基于2013年CSS数据的实证分析[J].吉首大学学报(社会科学版),2017(1):80-90
[22]袁亚运.我国居民环境行为及影响因素研究---基于CGSS2013数据[J].干旱区资源与环境,2016(4):40-45
[23]廖显春,夏恩龙,王自锋.阶梯水价对城市居民用水量及低收入家庭福利的影响[J].资源科学,2016(10):1935-1947
[24]王琰.我国居民绿色消费影响因素的多层次分析:基于CGSS2010的实证研究[J].南京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2015(2):79-89
[25]曹洪军,王小洁,刘鹏程.居民应对环保知行不一的认知策略及其原因---基于CGSS2010微观数据的分析[J].城市问题,2017(7):85-94
[26]欧阳斌,袁正,陈静思.我国城市居民环境意识、环保行为测量及影响因素分析[J].经济地理,2015(11):179-183
[27]刘凯,任建兰,王成新.中国绿色化的演变特征及其影响因素[J].城市问题,2016(4):11-17
[28]胡卫萍,李玉芬,史子浩.中国慈善活动实施现状调研的数据分析[J].华东交通大学学报,2012(2):116-120
[29]周望军.中国水资源及水价现状调研报告[J].中国物价,2010(3):19-23
[30]高兴佑.我国水价制度存在的问题及改革路径[J].人民长江,2016(4):103-107
(1)本文使用的主要数据来自水利部发展研究中心委托华北水利水电大学开展的2017年《中国省会城市公民水素养调查》课题的调查数据。
(2)水态度指数是依据水情感、水责任及水伦理三类7个问题的调查结果及问题权重综合计算得出。
(3)水行为指数是依据水生态和水环境管理行为、说服行为、消费行为及法律行为四类14个问题调查结果及问题权重综合计算得出。