摘要
本文考察了若干国际著名科学期刊应对开放存取运动的策略。指出国际科学出版巨头对开放存取运动态度的快速转变,一些著名科学期刊采取创办开放存取子刊的方式,既保持了原有品牌,也不错过商业利润;另一些科学期刊自身向开放存取转型;而某些新创办的开放存取期刊则采取极度商业化的手法和富有欺骗性的策略。这些考察有助于我们加深对开放存取期刊商业性质的认识,从而进一步理解开放存取运动的本质。
引文
[1]“Budapest Open Access Initiative”[EB/OL].(2002-02-14).http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read.“Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing”[EB/OL].(2003-06-20).http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/bethesda.htm.“Berlin Declaration”[EB/OL].(2003-10-22).https://openaccess.mpg.de/Berlin-Declaration.
[2]Jim Giles.“PR’s‘pit bull’takes on open access”[J].Nature,2007(1).
[3]Beata Socha.“How Much Do Top Publishers Charge for Open Access?”[EB/OL].(2017-04-26).http://openscience.com/how-much-do-top-publishers-chargefor-open-access/.
[4]江晓原,穆蕴秋.“开放存取运动”:科学出版乌托邦的背后---Nature实证研究之六[J].上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018,26(3).
[5]穆蕴秋,江晓原:不公平游戏:“两栖”SCI刊物如何操弄影响因子---Nature实证研究之四[J].上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2016,24(2).
[6]http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2014/02/aaas-launches-open-access-journal.
[7]http://www.sciencemag.org/about/aaas-and-gatesfoundation-partnership-announcement.
[8]Richard Van Noorden.Science journals end open-access trial with Gates Foundation[J].Nature,2018(7).
[9]http://www.nature.com/openresearch/publishing-withnpg/nature-journals/.
[10]Bo-Christer Bj觟rk.The Hybrid Model for Open Access Publication of Scholarly Articles-a Failed Experiment?[J].Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,2012.63(8).
[11]DC Prosser.From here to there:a proposed mechanism for transforming journals from closed to open access[J].Learned Publishing,2003,16(3).
[12]http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2012/06/newopen-access-journal-lets-scientists-publish-til-they-perish.
[13]Ewen Callaway.Open-access journal eLife gets?25-million boost[N].Nature News,2016-06-01.
[14]https://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/dec/09/nobel-winner-boycott-science-journals.
[15]Declan Butler.Open-access journal eLife to start charging fees[J].Nature,2016(9).