对传统武术社会中信任机制的现代性反思
|
摘要
以现代性为视角,运用现代性理论反思、解读与重构传统武术的社会信任机制。认为:在因嵌入责任而具备"社会责任性"与嵌入道德而形成"武德紧密性"的传统武术从"熟人社会"迈入时空分离的"陌生人社会"的新系统下,其社会信任关系因信任双方于时间、空间中的非"共同在场"而在声誉、表现和外表3方面诱发了象征标志的虚拟化、文化再生产的异化和传统外衣的发明化等现代性信任危机,而通过"师生"式个体纯粹关系的建构、"沟通"式群体对话空间的营造及"契约"式社会维护机制的建立等再嵌入地方性场景,是重构传统武术社会积极信任机制的有效路径。
From the perspective of modernity,using the modern theory of reflection,this paper makes interpretation and reconstruction on social trust mechanism of traditional Wushu.The result shows that traditional Wushu,bearing the characteristics of "social-responsibility" embedded with responsibility and of "ethics-tightness" embedded with ethics,has transformed from "acquaintance society" to the new system of "stranger society",where the social trust mechanism exhibits modern trust crises such as the virtualization symbols,the alienation of cultural reproduction and the invention of traditional coat,on reputation,representation and appearance,due to temporal and spatial non-"co-presence".Thus,the re-embedding local scene approaches,such as the construction of "teacher-student" pure individual relationships,of "communication" dialogue space,and of "contract" social maintenance mechanism,are effective routes to reconstruct active trust mechanism in traditional Wushu society.
From the perspective of modernity,using the modern theory of reflection,this paper makes interpretation and reconstruction on social trust mechanism of traditional Wushu.The result shows that traditional Wushu,bearing the characteristics of "social-responsibility" embedded with responsibility and of "ethics-tightness" embedded with ethics,has transformed from "acquaintance society" to the new system of "stranger society",where the social trust mechanism exhibits modern trust crises such as the virtualization symbols,the alienation of cultural reproduction and the invention of traditional coat,on reputation,representation and appearance,due to temporal and spatial non-"co-presence".Thus,the re-embedding local scene approaches,such as the construction of "teacher-student" pure individual relationships,of "communication" dialogue space,and of "contract" social maintenance mechanism,are effective routes to reconstruct active trust mechanism in traditional Wushu society.
引文
[1]朱佩娴,叶帆.走出“熟人社会”,我们如何去信任:关于信任机制的研究综述[N].人民日报,2012-04-05(7).
[2]BUNKERS S S.Understanding the Stranger[J].Nursing Science Quarterly,2003,16(4):305.
[3]沈金浩.江湖与中国雅文化[J].中国社会科学,1996(3):160.
[4]戴国斌.门户对传统武术、流派的生产[J].上海体育学院学报,2013,37(4):77.
[5]格拉诺维特.镶嵌:社会网与经济行动[M].罗家德,译.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2007:11.
[6]布迪厄,华康德.实践与反思:反思社会学导引[M].李猛,李康,译.北京:中央编译出版社,1998:134.
[7]什托姆普卡.信任:一种社会学理论[M].程胜利,译.北京:中华书局,2005.
[8]柯进,高靓.重建信任,教育能做什么[N].中国教育报,2013-03-14(2).
[9]纽顿.信任、社会资本、公民社会与民主[J].于宝英,索娟娟,译.国外理论动态,2012(12):58.
[10]刘国芳,辛自强.间接互惠中的声誉机制:印象、名声、标签及其传递[J].心理科学进展,2011,19(2):233.
[11]JOSEPH MW.Effects of Positive Reputation Systems[J].Social Science Research,2000,29(2):188.
[12]布尔迪厄.文化资本与社会炼金术[M].包亚明,译.上海:上海人民出版社,1997:202.
[13]哈布瓦赫.论集体记忆[M].毕然,郭金华,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2002:92-94.
[14]吉登斯.现代性的后果[M].田禾,译.江苏:译林出版社,2011:24.
[15]吉登斯.现代性与自我认同:现代晚期的自我与社会[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1998:43.
[16]鲍曼.现代性与大屠杀[M].杨渝东,史建华,译.南京:译林出版社,2011:94.
[17]霍布斯鲍姆,兰格.传统的发明[M].顾杭,庞冠群,译.南京:译林出版社,2004:135.
[18]王虹.清代太极拳产生、发展、兴盛因素探析[J].武汉体育学院学报,2012,46(2):96.
[19]罗骧.信任危机与积极信任机制的重构[J].天府新论,2012(4):31.
[20]格尔兹.文化的解释[M].纳日碧力戈,等译.上海:上海人民出版社,1999:16.
[21]马廉祯.论中国武术的现代转型与竞技武术的得失[J].体育学刊,2012,19(3):114.
[22]郑中玉.现代性时空分离的辩证维度[J].甘肃理论学刊,2009(5):82.
[23]范碧鸿.从传统到现代:信任关系的现代性转换[J].广西师范学院学报,2010,31(2):141.
[24]周伟良.师徒论:传统武术的一个文化现象诠释[J].北京体育大学学报,2004,27(5):583.
[25]卢曼.信任:一个社会复杂性的简化机制[M].瞿铁鹏,李强,译.上海:上海世纪出版集团,2005:35.
[26]吉登斯.超越左与右:激进政治的未来[M].李慧斌,杨雪冬,译.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2000:131-132.
[2]BUNKERS S S.Understanding the Stranger[J].Nursing Science Quarterly,2003,16(4):305.
[3]沈金浩.江湖与中国雅文化[J].中国社会科学,1996(3):160.
[4]戴国斌.门户对传统武术、流派的生产[J].上海体育学院学报,2013,37(4):77.
[5]格拉诺维特.镶嵌:社会网与经济行动[M].罗家德,译.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2007:11.
[6]布迪厄,华康德.实践与反思:反思社会学导引[M].李猛,李康,译.北京:中央编译出版社,1998:134.
[7]什托姆普卡.信任:一种社会学理论[M].程胜利,译.北京:中华书局,2005.
[8]柯进,高靓.重建信任,教育能做什么[N].中国教育报,2013-03-14(2).
[9]纽顿.信任、社会资本、公民社会与民主[J].于宝英,索娟娟,译.国外理论动态,2012(12):58.
[10]刘国芳,辛自强.间接互惠中的声誉机制:印象、名声、标签及其传递[J].心理科学进展,2011,19(2):233.
[11]JOSEPH MW.Effects of Positive Reputation Systems[J].Social Science Research,2000,29(2):188.
[12]布尔迪厄.文化资本与社会炼金术[M].包亚明,译.上海:上海人民出版社,1997:202.
[13]哈布瓦赫.论集体记忆[M].毕然,郭金华,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2002:92-94.
[14]吉登斯.现代性的后果[M].田禾,译.江苏:译林出版社,2011:24.
[15]吉登斯.现代性与自我认同:现代晚期的自我与社会[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1998:43.
[16]鲍曼.现代性与大屠杀[M].杨渝东,史建华,译.南京:译林出版社,2011:94.
[17]霍布斯鲍姆,兰格.传统的发明[M].顾杭,庞冠群,译.南京:译林出版社,2004:135.
[18]王虹.清代太极拳产生、发展、兴盛因素探析[J].武汉体育学院学报,2012,46(2):96.
[19]罗骧.信任危机与积极信任机制的重构[J].天府新论,2012(4):31.
[20]格尔兹.文化的解释[M].纳日碧力戈,等译.上海:上海人民出版社,1999:16.
[21]马廉祯.论中国武术的现代转型与竞技武术的得失[J].体育学刊,2012,19(3):114.
[22]郑中玉.现代性时空分离的辩证维度[J].甘肃理论学刊,2009(5):82.
[23]范碧鸿.从传统到现代:信任关系的现代性转换[J].广西师范学院学报,2010,31(2):141.
[24]周伟良.师徒论:传统武术的一个文化现象诠释[J].北京体育大学学报,2004,27(5):583.
[25]卢曼.信任:一个社会复杂性的简化机制[M].瞿铁鹏,李强,译.上海:上海世纪出版集团,2005:35.
[26]吉登斯.超越左与右:激进政治的未来[M].李慧斌,杨雪冬,译.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2000:131-132.