医疗损害责任纠纷案件审理鉴定人出庭作证制度之构建——简论《关于审理医疗损害责任纠纷案件若干问题的司法解释》第十三条
|
摘要
鉴定人出庭作证是对鉴定意见进行有效质证的程序保障。通过对医疗损害责任纠纷案件159份判决书的分析,从鉴定意见本质属性、证据规则、鉴定人出庭作证的相关法律规定层面进行考察,最高人民法院《关于审理医疗损害责任纠纷案件适用法律若干问题的解释》第十三条第二款对鉴定人出庭意见质证的相关规定存有商榷之处。为此应当提出修改建议,将鉴定人出庭作证作为对鉴定意见质证的首选方式,完善鉴定人出庭作证制度的构建。
Forensic testimony is a procedural guarantee for effective cross-examination of expert opinions.Based on the analysis of 159 judgments of medical injury liability disputes,from the essential attributes of appraisal opinions,the rules of evidence,and the relevant legal provisions of experts appearing in court to testify,Article 13,paragraph 2,of the Supreme Court " on the Judicial Interpretation of Several Issues Concerning the Trial of Medical Damage Disputes" is open to question on the relevant provisions of the expertundefined opinion on cross-examination in court.This paper put forward some suggestions on how to make the expert appear in court as the first way to cross-examine the appraisal opinion,and improve the system of expert witness appearing in court.
Forensic testimony is a procedural guarantee for effective cross-examination of expert opinions.Based on the analysis of 159 judgments of medical injury liability disputes,from the essential attributes of appraisal opinions,the rules of evidence,and the relevant legal provisions of experts appearing in court to testify,Article 13,paragraph 2,of the Supreme Court " on the Judicial Interpretation of Several Issues Concerning the Trial of Medical Damage Disputes" is open to question on the relevant provisions of the expertundefined opinion on cross-examination in court.This paper put forward some suggestions on how to make the expert appear in court as the first way to cross-examine the appraisal opinion,and improve the system of expert witness appearing in court.
引文
[1]吴单,顾加栋.医疗损害鉴定制度优化的实证研究---以2016年N市及H市两级法院审判数据为基础[J].中国卫生事业管理,2018(2):120.
[2]郭锋,吴兆祥,陈龙业.最高人民法院关于医疗损害责任纠纷司法解释条文释义与实务指南[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2018(第1版):241.
[3]杨立新.最高人民法院关于审理医疗损害责任纠纷案件适用法律若干问题的解释条文释评[J].法律适用,2018(1):38.
[4]霍宪丹.坚持以审判为中心进一步健全鉴定人出庭作证制度的探索与思考[J].中国司法鉴定,2017(6):1.
[5]赵文洁.论我国“鉴定意见”之证据制度---以法院采信为例[J].知与行,2017(9):80.
[6]叶俊尧,王均平.鉴定意见质证实质化之建议[J].湖北警官学院学报,2018(4):58.
[7]张艳丽,于鹏,周建华.民事诉讼理论与制度[M].北京:法律出版社(第1版),2017:365.
[8]陈光中.证据法学[M].北京:法律出版社(第1版),2011:247.
[9]王浩云.鉴定人出庭作证制度的解构与完善-以《民事诉讼法》第78条为基点展开[J].法学杂志,2015(12):125.
[2]郭锋,吴兆祥,陈龙业.最高人民法院关于医疗损害责任纠纷司法解释条文释义与实务指南[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2018(第1版):241.
[3]杨立新.最高人民法院关于审理医疗损害责任纠纷案件适用法律若干问题的解释条文释评[J].法律适用,2018(1):38.
[4]霍宪丹.坚持以审判为中心进一步健全鉴定人出庭作证制度的探索与思考[J].中国司法鉴定,2017(6):1.
[5]赵文洁.论我国“鉴定意见”之证据制度---以法院采信为例[J].知与行,2017(9):80.
[6]叶俊尧,王均平.鉴定意见质证实质化之建议[J].湖北警官学院学报,2018(4):58.
[7]张艳丽,于鹏,周建华.民事诉讼理论与制度[M].北京:法律出版社(第1版),2017:365.
[8]陈光中.证据法学[M].北京:法律出版社(第1版),2011:247.
[9]王浩云.鉴定人出庭作证制度的解构与完善-以《民事诉讼法》第78条为基点展开[J].法学杂志,2015(12):125.