监察委与司法机关衔接机制研究——以监察机关在调查阶段的法律援助制度为视角
|
摘要
法律援助制度是刑事诉讼制度的重要内容。以法律援助制度的历史沿革中呈现出来的全覆盖趋势结合当前监察委与司法机关的衔接问题分析,因为监察机关不适用刑诉法,所以其适用的监察法中未确立法律援助制度,对法律援助制度全覆盖发展起着阻碍作用,这也是监察委与司法机关在法律上的衔接问题。通过修订监察法,先确立律师介入权进而确立法律援助制度。逐步实现在监察体制改革下监察委与司法机关在法律上的衔接以及推动法律援助制度全覆盖的发展,以达到保障人权、促进刑事司法公正之目的。
The legal aid system is an important part of the criminal procedure system. Based on the historical development of the legal aid system and the connection between the supervisory committee and the judicial authority,this paper analyzes the problem where,because the supervisory organ does not apply the criminal procedure law,the undefined legal aid system in the applicable supervisory law hinders the full coverage of the legal aid system. This is also the problem of the linking between the supervisory committee and the judicial authority. By amending the supervision law,the lawyer's right to intervene is to be established first and the legal aid system is to be established next. Under the reform of the supervisory system,the legal connection between the supervisory committee and the judicial organs could be gradually realized and the full coverage of the legal aid system could be promoted so thatthe human rights can be protected and criminal judicial fairness can be promoted.
The legal aid system is an important part of the criminal procedure system. Based on the historical development of the legal aid system and the connection between the supervisory committee and the judicial authority,this paper analyzes the problem where,because the supervisory organ does not apply the criminal procedure law,the undefined legal aid system in the applicable supervisory law hinders the full coverage of the legal aid system. This is also the problem of the linking between the supervisory committee and the judicial authority. By amending the supervision law,the lawyer's right to intervene is to be established first and the legal aid system is to be established next. Under the reform of the supervisory system,the legal connection between the supervisory committee and the judicial organs could be gradually realized and the full coverage of the legal aid system could be promoted so thatthe human rights can be protected and criminal judicial fairness can be promoted.
引文
[1]韩大元.论国家监察体制改革中的宪法问题[J].法学评论,2017(3):11-22.
[2]熊秋红.监察体制改革中职务犯罪侦查权比较研究[J].环球法律评论,2017(2):40-60.
[3]龙宗智.监察与司法协调衔接的法律规范分析[J].法律与政治,2018(1):2-18.
[4]韩世贵.监察体制改革中的留置措施:由来、性质及完善[J].甘肃社会科学,2018(2):168-175.
[5]陈光中.制定《国家监察法》保障被调查人权利[EB/OL].[2017-03-29][2017-11-02].http://app.myzaker.com/news/article.php pk=58dc4fad1bc8e05f39000011.
[6]秦前红,石泽华.监察委员会留置措施研究[J].苏州大学学报(法学版),2017(4):9-19.
[7]陈光中,张益南.推进刑事辩护法律援助全覆盖问题之探讨[J].法学杂志,2018(3):1-16.
[8]赵秉志.刑法原理与实务[M].北京:中囯政法大学出版社,2010.
[2]熊秋红.监察体制改革中职务犯罪侦查权比较研究[J].环球法律评论,2017(2):40-60.
[3]龙宗智.监察与司法协调衔接的法律规范分析[J].法律与政治,2018(1):2-18.
[4]韩世贵.监察体制改革中的留置措施:由来、性质及完善[J].甘肃社会科学,2018(2):168-175.
[5]陈光中.制定《国家监察法》保障被调查人权利[EB/OL].[2017-03-29][2017-11-02].http://app.myzaker.com/news/article.php pk=58dc4fad1bc8e05f39000011.
[6]秦前红,石泽华.监察委员会留置措施研究[J].苏州大学学报(法学版),2017(4):9-19.
[7]陈光中,张益南.推进刑事辩护法律援助全覆盖问题之探讨[J].法学杂志,2018(3):1-16.
[8]赵秉志.刑法原理与实务[M].北京:中囯政法大学出版社,2010.