工作场所化学因素采样和检测的室间比对结果分析
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Analysis of results on the inter-laboratory comparison of sampling and testing of chemical factors in workplace
  • 作者:吴宪毅 ; 刘云富 ; 沈丽菲 ; 张琼 ; 林海捷 ; 杨峰
  • 英文作者:WU Xian-yi;LIU Yun-fu;SHEN Li-fei;ZHANG Qiong;LIN Hai-jie;YANG Feng;Huizhou Hospital for Prevention and Treatment of Occupation Health;
  • 关键词:工作场所 ; 化学因素 ; 室间比对 ; 职业卫生 ; 职业卫生评价
  • 英文关键词:Workplace;;Chemical factors;;Inter-laboratory comparison;;Occupational health evaluation health evaluation
  • 中文刊名:AHYF
  • 英文刊名:Anhui Journal of Preventive Medicine
  • 机构:惠州市职业病防治院;
  • 出版日期:2017-01-20
  • 出版单位:安徽预防医学杂志
  • 年:2017
  • 期:v.23
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:AHYF201701009
  • 页数:4
  • CN:01
  • ISSN:34-1154/R
  • 分类号:37-40
摘要
目的通过分析工作场所化学因素采样规范性和检测准确性,提高采样和检测能力。方法收集本院2013~2015年参加工作场所化学因素现场采样和实验室检测相结合的室间比对结果,对采样流量核查、实验室检测和采样的规范性结果的合格情况进行评价。结果参加工作场所化学因素现场采样和实验室检测相结合室间比对项目共13项,总体合格率(优秀率)为76.9%(30.8%),不同年份的室间比对项目合格率(优秀率)分别为25.0%(0.00%)、100%(20.0%)和100%(75.0%)。采样流量核查项目5项,总体合格率(优秀率)为80.0%(40.0%);采样后样品实验室检测项目6项,总体合格率(优秀率)为66.7%(33.3%);采样的规范性项目2项,均合格。结论采样阶段加强质量控制是检测结果准确性的重要基础;参加工作场所化学因素现场采样和实验室检测的室间比对有利于提升职业卫生技术服务能力。
        Objective To improve the capabilities of sampling and detection by analyzing the standardization of sampling and accuracy of detection of chemical factors in the workplace. Methods Collecting the data of the inter-laboratory comparison of sampling and testing of chemical factors in workplace in the past 3 years,analyzing the results of sampling flow verification,laboratory detection and sampling standard. Results A total of 13 items were conducted in the evaluation of the inter-laboratory comparison,and the general qualified rate( excellent rate) was 76. 9%( 30. 8%). The qualified rates( excellent rates) of inter-laboratory comparison items in different years were 25. 0%( 0. 0%),100%( 20. 0%)and 100%( 75. 0%). Totally 5 items of sampling flow verification were conducted,the general qualified rate( excellent rate) was 80. 0%( 40. 0%). Totally 6 items of laboratory detection were conducted,the general qualified rate( excellent rate) was 66. 7%( 33. 3%). Totally 2 items of sampling standard were conducted,the general qualified rate was 100%.Conclusion Strengthening the quality control from sampling phase is an important basis for the accuracy of the test results.Participating in the inter-laboratory comparison of sampling and testing of chemical factors in workplace could help to improve the occupational health technical service capabilities for the institution.
引文
[1]杜洪凤,谢碧俊,杨长晓.工作场所空气评价监测中化学毒物采集的质量控制[J].现代预防医学,2008,35(3):442-444.
    [2]陈莉,张一凡,李为,等.职业卫生现场采样中的质量控制[J].职业与健康,2005,21(11):1689-1690.
    [3]中国合格评定国家认可委员会.CNAS-GL03:2006能力验证样品均匀性和稳定性评价指南[S].北京:中国计量出版社,2006.
    [4]中华人民共和国卫生部.GBZ159-2004工作场所空气中有害物质监测的采样规范[S].北京:人民卫生出版社,2004.
    [5]中华人民共和国卫生部.GBZ/T160-2004(2007)工作场所空气有毒物质测定方法[S].北京:人民卫生出版社,2004(2007).
    [6]中国合格评定国家认可委员会.CNAS-GL02:2014能力验证结果的统计处理和能力评价指南[S].北京:中国计量出版社,2014.
    [7]皮向东.工作场所有害物质监测采样准确性分析及对策[J].广州化工,2014,42(18):146-148.
    [8]潘巧裕,戎伟丰,张子群,等.职业卫生技术服务机构工作场所空气采样和检测实验室间比对[J].中国职业医学,2015,42(2):167-171.
    [9]国家安全监管总局办公厅.职业卫生技术服务机构检测工作规范[Z].2016-2-6.
    [10]张海东,王晓云,易继湖,等.职业卫生检测现场工作存在的质控问题及对策[J].中国卫生工程学,2010,9(6):489,491.