阴阳离子添加剂对水牛繁殖性能的影响研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 作者:李孟伟 ; 罗华 ; 唐庆凤 ; 潘玉红 ; 韦升菊
  • 关键词:饲粮阴阳离子差 ; 水牛 ; 繁殖性能
  • 中文刊名:SLYJ
  • 英文刊名:Feed Research
  • 机构:中国农业科学院广西水牛研究所;
  • 出版日期:2019-02-15
  • 出版单位:饲料研究
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.42;No.489
  • 基金:广西水产畜牧科技推广应用项目(项目编号:桂渔牧科201528007)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:SLYJ201902004
  • 页数:3
  • CN:02
  • ISSN:11-2114/S
  • 分类号:18-20
摘要
试验研究了饲喂不同饲粮阴阳离子差(DCAD)对初情水牛繁殖性能的影响。试验选择40头2~3岁尼里拉菲水牛,随机分为A、B、C、D4组,其中分别饲喂+136.04、+35.49、-16.56和-55.86 4种DCAD水平日粮,试验周期3个月,预饲期1个月。结果表明:降低日粮DCAD水平,对水牛干物质日采食量没有影响(P>0.05),能够显著降低尿液pH值(P<0.05);能够显著影响水牛血液繁殖相关激素含量(P<0.05),显著提高水牛发情率(P<0.05)。由此可见,降低DCAD水平,对水牛繁殖性能具有一定的改善作用。
        
引文
[1]Hafez, Elsayed Saad Eldin, B. Hafez, eds. Reproduction in farm animals[M].South Carolina, USA:John Wiley&Sons, 2013:315-329.
    [2] Lean I J, DeGaris P J, McNeil D M, et al. Hypocalcemia in dairy cows:meta-analysis and dietary cation anion difference theory revisited[J].Journal of Dairy Science, 2006, 89(2):669-684.
    [3] De Rensis F, Lopez-Gatius F. Protocols for synchronizing estrus and ovulation in buffalo(Bubalus bubalis):A review[J]. Theriogenology, 2007,67(2):209-216.
    [4] Martinez N, Rodney R M, Block E, et al. Effects of prepartum dietary cation-anion difference and source of vitamin D in dairy cows:Health and reproductive responses[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2018, 101(3):2563-2578.
    [5]张丽英.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M].3版.北京:中国农业大学出版社,2007:48-150.
    [6]Stewart P A. Modern quantitative acid–base chemistry[J]. Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, 1983, 61(12):1444-1461.
    [7] Vagnoni D B, Oetzel G R. Effects of dietary cation-anion difference on the acid-base status of dry cows[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 1998, 81(6):1643-1652.
    [8]Barile V L. Improving reproductive efficiency in female buffaloes[J].Livestock Production Science, 2005, 92(3):183-194.
    [9] Perera B. Reproductive cycles of buffalo[J]. Animal Reproduction Science, 2011, 124(3/4):194-199.
    [10]Usmani R H, Dailey R A, Inskeep E K. Effects of limited suckling and varying prepartum nutrition on postpartum reproductive traits of milked buffaloes[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 1990, 73(6):1564-1570.
    [11]Singh B, Dixit V D, Singh P, et al. Plasma inhibin levels in relation to steroids and gonadotrophins during oestrous cycle in buffalo[J].Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 2001, 36(3/4):163-167.
    [12]Roy K S, Prakash B S. Plasma progesterone, oestradiol‐17βand total oestrogen profiles in relation to oestrous behaviour during induced ovulation in Murrah buffalo heifers[J]. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 2009, 93(4):486-495.
    [13]Hafez E S E. Semen evaluation[J]. Reproduction in Farm Animals, 1993,5:405-423.
    [14]Nanda A S, Brar P S, Prabhakar S. Enhancing reproductive performance in dairy buffalo:major constraints and achievements[J]. Reproduction Supplement, 2003, 61:27-36.
    [15]Oswin B M Perera. Reproduction in water buffalo:comparative aspects and implications for management[J]. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, 1999(54):157-168.
    [16]N. Martinez, R. M. Rodney, E. Block L L, et al. Effects of prepartum dietary cation-anion difference and source of vitamin D in dairy cows:Health and reproductive responses[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2018,101:1-16.