基于ANP的我国软件和信息服务业发展绩效研究——以xx省(市)专项资金支出绩效评估为例
|
摘要
构建软件和信息服务业专项资金评估指标体系,基于xx省(市)的财政局、经济与信息化委员会、软件与信息企业136份调查表采集的4 466个数据,运用德尔非法和网络层次分析模型,评价软件与信息服务业发展专项资金支出绩效水平。结果表明,专项资金支出绩效水平总体较高,但管理部门和企业在项目过程管理、绩效评估方面需加强;项目制度、补助政策标准满意度、项目申报指导性以及专项资金对小微企业的扶持作用需加强。
Assessing the performance of software and information service industry can reduce the probability of asymmetric output and expenditure of software and information service industry and promote the social co-governance of software and information service industry. This paper constructs a software and information service evaluation index system of special funds based on xx Provincial(City) Finance Bureau, Economic and Information Technology Commission, and 4466 data collected from 136 questionnaires to software and information enterprises. Using Delphi illegal and network level Analysis model combined DN combination algorithm, the paper evaluates the performance of software and information service industry development of special funds expenditure performance. The results of empirical research show that:(1) The performance level of special funds expenditures is generally high, but the management departments need to be strengthened in project self-monitoring and evaluation and process supervision;(2) The project system leads the construction of enterprise system and the standards of project subsidy policy are satisfactory degree, project reporting guidelines and special funds for small and micro enterprises to support the role of low;(3) The project performance of enterprises is better, but the enterprises need to strengthen in the management mode, project performance credibility, financial concept and network platform construction.
Assessing the performance of software and information service industry can reduce the probability of asymmetric output and expenditure of software and information service industry and promote the social co-governance of software and information service industry. This paper constructs a software and information service evaluation index system of special funds based on xx Provincial(City) Finance Bureau, Economic and Information Technology Commission, and 4466 data collected from 136 questionnaires to software and information enterprises. Using Delphi illegal and network level Analysis model combined DN combination algorithm, the paper evaluates the performance of software and information service industry development of special funds expenditure performance. The results of empirical research show that:(1) The performance level of special funds expenditures is generally high, but the management departments need to be strengthened in project self-monitoring and evaluation and process supervision;(2) The project system leads the construction of enterprise system and the standards of project subsidy policy are satisfactory degree, project reporting guidelines and special funds for small and micro enterprises to support the role of low;(3) The project performance of enterprises is better, but the enterprises need to strengthen in the management mode, project performance credibility, financial concept and network platform construction.
引文
[1]苗圩.苗圩:软件是新一代信息技术产业的灵魂[J].河南科技,2016(11):4.
[2]吴传清,龚晨.国内服务业升级理论研究进展与展望[J].学习与实践,2016(2):34-45.
[3]湛军,王照杰.供给侧结构性改革背景下高端服务业创新能力与绩效:基于整合视角的实证研究 [J].经济管理,2017,39(6):53-68.
[4]肖挺.中国制造企业“绩效—服务化悖论”的再论证[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2015,36(10):123-134.
[5]冯梅,王成静.我国各地区软件与信息技术服务业绩效评价研究 [J].经济问题,2015(8):66-70.
[6]王猛,张鹏,郑建锋.服务业集聚区与企业绩效:来自微观层面的证据[J].现代经济探讨,2017(10):62-70.
[7]张化.基于DEA模型的软件与信息服务业上市公司绩效研究[J].商,2016(6):4.
[8]王恕立,汪思齐,滕泽伟.环境约束下的中国服务业全要素生产率增长[J].财经研究,2016,42(5):123-134.
[9]韩增林,李冰心.中国软件和信息技术服务业发展水平格局时空演变研究[J].经济经纬,2017(5):1-7.
[10]方齐.科技服务业服务创新过程与绩效关系实证研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2015(9):117-125.
[11]王智新,梁翠.科技服务业与战略性新兴产业融合发展对产业升级的影响研究[J].科学管理研究,2017(2):58-61.
[12]CHATTERJEE A.Chapter T–evaluation of information service[J].Elements of Information Organization & Dissemination,2017,卷(期):305-313.
[13]刘沛罡,蒋选.高技术产业结构与科技资源投入结构匹配关系测度[J].中国科技论坛,2017,5(6):69-74.
[14]田正.日本信息服务业的发展:产业组织特征与全要素生产率[J].现代日本经济,2016(6):41-53.
[15]刘岳平,文余源.京津冀生产性服务业转移与空间结构变迁[J].经济问题探索,2017(9):69-77.
[16]邓磊.我国软件和信息技术服务企业并购动因及绩效研究:以科大讯飞并购启明科技为例[D].成都:西南财经大学,2016.
[17]雷辉,龙泽.企业社会责任效率与生产前沿面研究[J].财经理论与实践,2016,37(6):107-113.
[18]LI M J,TAO W Q.Review of methodologies and polices for evaluation of energy efficiency in high energy-consuming industry[J].Applied Energy,2017,187:203-215.
[19]周霄雪.服务业外资自由化与中国制造业企业出口绩效:基于上下游投入产出关系的分析[J].产业经济研究,2017(6):23-26.
[20]顾伟男,申玉铭,施美辰.中国35个中心城市服务业发展特征及影响因素分析[J].城市发展研究,2017,24(9):33-41.
[21]FENG M,WANG C J.Evaluation research on performance of software and information technology service industry in different regions in China[J].On Economic Problems,2015(8):66-80.
[22]陈青姣,盖玉坤.商务服务业上市公司绩效及影响因素分析基于2009—2013年的面板数据[J].财经理论与实践,2015(3):78-83.
[23]边发吉.服务业供给侧改革始于服务结构创新[J].河北经贸大学学报,2016,37(4):51-51.
[24]钟顺昌,任媛.产业专业化、多样化与城市化发展:基于空间计量的实证研究[J].山西财经大学学报,2017,39(3):58-73.
[25]WEN-ZHEN L I.Study on the influencing factors and evaluation of the technological innovation capability of the industry information industry under the introduction of technology[J].Journal of Qingdao University,2017,30(1):135-138.
[26]朱有明,刘金程.知识密集型服务业创新绩效影响因素实证研究[J].财经问题研究,2016(5):42-47.
[27]陈国平,张鑫.服务创新能力对创新绩效的影响--组织创新氛围的调节作用[J].科技进步与对策,2016,33(6):26-32.
[28]JIA M,ZHANG Y,Management S O,et al.An empirical study on relationships among R&D investment,the preferential policy of R&D costs deduction and firm performance in software information industry [J].Science & Technology Progress & Policy,2017,187:203-215.
[29]SATTY T L.Decision making with dependence and feedback:the analytic network process [J].RWS Publications,1996,95(2):129-157.
[30]赵宁,邢天才.后危机时代跨国经营模式对信息技术绩效的影响:基于最优局部调整模型[J].宏观经济研究,2016(3):98-105.
[2]吴传清,龚晨.国内服务业升级理论研究进展与展望[J].学习与实践,2016(2):34-45.
[3]湛军,王照杰.供给侧结构性改革背景下高端服务业创新能力与绩效:基于整合视角的实证研究 [J].经济管理,2017,39(6):53-68.
[4]肖挺.中国制造企业“绩效—服务化悖论”的再论证[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2015,36(10):123-134.
[5]冯梅,王成静.我国各地区软件与信息技术服务业绩效评价研究 [J].经济问题,2015(8):66-70.
[6]王猛,张鹏,郑建锋.服务业集聚区与企业绩效:来自微观层面的证据[J].现代经济探讨,2017(10):62-70.
[7]张化.基于DEA模型的软件与信息服务业上市公司绩效研究[J].商,2016(6):4.
[8]王恕立,汪思齐,滕泽伟.环境约束下的中国服务业全要素生产率增长[J].财经研究,2016,42(5):123-134.
[9]韩增林,李冰心.中国软件和信息技术服务业发展水平格局时空演变研究[J].经济经纬,2017(5):1-7.
[10]方齐.科技服务业服务创新过程与绩效关系实证研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2015(9):117-125.
[11]王智新,梁翠.科技服务业与战略性新兴产业融合发展对产业升级的影响研究[J].科学管理研究,2017(2):58-61.
[12]CHATTERJEE A.Chapter T–evaluation of information service[J].Elements of Information Organization & Dissemination,2017,卷(期):305-313.
[13]刘沛罡,蒋选.高技术产业结构与科技资源投入结构匹配关系测度[J].中国科技论坛,2017,5(6):69-74.
[14]田正.日本信息服务业的发展:产业组织特征与全要素生产率[J].现代日本经济,2016(6):41-53.
[15]刘岳平,文余源.京津冀生产性服务业转移与空间结构变迁[J].经济问题探索,2017(9):69-77.
[16]邓磊.我国软件和信息技术服务企业并购动因及绩效研究:以科大讯飞并购启明科技为例[D].成都:西南财经大学,2016.
[17]雷辉,龙泽.企业社会责任效率与生产前沿面研究[J].财经理论与实践,2016,37(6):107-113.
[18]LI M J,TAO W Q.Review of methodologies and polices for evaluation of energy efficiency in high energy-consuming industry[J].Applied Energy,2017,187:203-215.
[19]周霄雪.服务业外资自由化与中国制造业企业出口绩效:基于上下游投入产出关系的分析[J].产业经济研究,2017(6):23-26.
[20]顾伟男,申玉铭,施美辰.中国35个中心城市服务业发展特征及影响因素分析[J].城市发展研究,2017,24(9):33-41.
[21]FENG M,WANG C J.Evaluation research on performance of software and information technology service industry in different regions in China[J].On Economic Problems,2015(8):66-80.
[22]陈青姣,盖玉坤.商务服务业上市公司绩效及影响因素分析基于2009—2013年的面板数据[J].财经理论与实践,2015(3):78-83.
[23]边发吉.服务业供给侧改革始于服务结构创新[J].河北经贸大学学报,2016,37(4):51-51.
[24]钟顺昌,任媛.产业专业化、多样化与城市化发展:基于空间计量的实证研究[J].山西财经大学学报,2017,39(3):58-73.
[25]WEN-ZHEN L I.Study on the influencing factors and evaluation of the technological innovation capability of the industry information industry under the introduction of technology[J].Journal of Qingdao University,2017,30(1):135-138.
[26]朱有明,刘金程.知识密集型服务业创新绩效影响因素实证研究[J].财经问题研究,2016(5):42-47.
[27]陈国平,张鑫.服务创新能力对创新绩效的影响--组织创新氛围的调节作用[J].科技进步与对策,2016,33(6):26-32.
[28]JIA M,ZHANG Y,Management S O,et al.An empirical study on relationships among R&D investment,the preferential policy of R&D costs deduction and firm performance in software information industry [J].Science & Technology Progress & Policy,2017,187:203-215.
[29]SATTY T L.Decision making with dependence and feedback:the analytic network process [J].RWS Publications,1996,95(2):129-157.
[30]赵宁,邢天才.后危机时代跨国经营模式对信息技术绩效的影响:基于最优局部调整模型[J].宏观经济研究,2016(3):98-105.