科学评价视角下文献使用比较研究——基于Usage Count的实证分析
|
摘要
[目的/意义]对比分析相同主题的不同类型科学文献的使用行为,利用用户学术行为数据全面测评学术论文影响力。[方法/过程]基于Web of Science数据库中学术论文使用次数,分析比较不同学科文献的使用差异。从文献使用入手,收集2013-2017年3D打印领域的论文数据,以化学、工程文献为对比分析对象,从论文的学科视角分析使用次数与被引频次之间的相关性,分析高使用与高引用(Top 10%)论文的重合文献,探测文献使用差异,并进行独立样本T检验。[结果/结论]U1与被引次数成微弱正相关,U2与被引次数显著性相关;两学科的科学论文在使用上存在统计学意义上的显著差异,可能原因是不同学科学者的文献使用行为不同。此外,文献类型对使用次数有影响,综述类文献信息量较为丰富,从而可以获得更多的使用、引用。
[Purpose/Significance]In order to evaluate the influence of academic papers comprehensively,the paper compared and analyzed the usage behavior of different types of scientific papers on the same topic with the user's academic behavior data.Based on usage count of scientific papers in the Web of Science,this paper analyzed the usage differences of different disciplinary literature.[Method/Process]We collected"3 D printing"paper data(2013-2017),with Chemistry,Engineering for comparative analysis,from the perspective of the discipline of the papers to analyze the correlation between the usage count and citation count,analysis the coincidence of literature of the top10% highly used and the top10% highly cited in this paper,to detect the differences of two types of literature,and with the independent sample T test.[Result/Conclusion]U1 was slightly correlated with citation counts;U2 was significantly correlated with citation counts;there were statistically significant differences in the usage of the two types of scientific papers,the possible reason was that different disciplinary scholars had different literature usage behavior.In addition,the literature type influences usage count,and information of review was abundant,thus review could get more usage and citation.
[Purpose/Significance]In order to evaluate the influence of academic papers comprehensively,the paper compared and analyzed the usage behavior of different types of scientific papers on the same topic with the user's academic behavior data.Based on usage count of scientific papers in the Web of Science,this paper analyzed the usage differences of different disciplinary literature.[Method/Process]We collected"3 D printing"paper data(2013-2017),with Chemistry,Engineering for comparative analysis,from the perspective of the discipline of the papers to analyze the correlation between the usage count and citation count,analysis the coincidence of literature of the top10% highly used and the top10% highly cited in this paper,to detect the differences of two types of literature,and with the independent sample T test.[Result/Conclusion]U1 was slightly correlated with citation counts;U2 was significantly correlated with citation counts;there were statistically significant differences in the usage of the two types of scientific papers,the possible reason was that different disciplinary scholars had different literature usage behavior.In addition,the literature type influences usage count,and information of review was abundant,thus review could get more usage and citation.
引文
[1]Garfield E.How Can Impact Factors Be Improved?[J].British Medical Journal,1996,313(7054):411.
[2]Moed H F.Statistical Relationships Between Downloads and Citations at the Level of Individual Documents Within a Single Journal[J].Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,2005,56(10):1088-1097.
[3]Bollen J,Van de Sompel H,Smith J A,et al.Toward Alternative Metrics of Journal Impact:A Comparison of Download and Citation Data[J].Information Processing & Management,2005,41(6):1419-1440.
[4]Guerrero-Bote V P,Moya-Anegón F.Relationship Between Downloads and Citations at Journal and Paper Levels,and the Influence of Language[J].Scientometrics,2014,101(2):1043-1065.
[5]Jahandideh S,Abdolmaleki P,Asadabadi E B.Prediction of Future Citations of a Research Paper from Number of Its Internet Downloads[J].Medical Hypotheses,2007,69(2):458-459.
[6]Subotic S,Mukherjee B.Short and Amusing:The Relationship Between Title Characteristics Downloads,and Citations in Psychology Articles[J].Journal of Information Science,2014,40(1):115-124.
[7]Davis P,Fromerth M.Does the arXiv Lead to Higher Citations and Reduced Publisher Downloads for Mathematics Articles?[J].Scientometrics,2007,71(2):203-215.
[8]陆伟,钱坤,唐祥彬.文献下载频次与被引频次的相关性研究——以图书情报领域为例[J].情报科学,2016,34(1):3-8.
[9]Markusova V,Bogorov V,Libkind A.Usage Metrics vs Classical Metrics:Analysis of Russia's Research Output[J].Scientometrics,2018,114(2):593-603.
[10]Wang X,Fang Z,Sun X.Usage Patterns of Scholarly Articles on Web of Science:A Study on Web of Science Usage Count[J].Scientometrics,2016,109(2):917-926.
[11]赵星.学术文献用量级数据Usage的测度特性研究[J].中国图书馆学报,2017,43(3):44-57.
[12]赵蓉英,魏绪秋.中美图书情报学领域国际学术论文影响力比较——基于被引频次和使用次数[J].情报理论与实践,2018,41(1):139-145.
[13]丁佐奇.基于Web of Science的论文使用次数和被引频次的相关性分析[J].中国科技期刊研究,2017,28(12):1166-1170.
[14]付中静.WoS数据库收录论文文献级别用量指标与被引频次的相关性[J].中国科技期刊研究,2017,28(1):68-73.
[15]Liang G Q,Hou H Y,Hu Z G,et al.Usage Count:A New Indicator to Detect Research Fronts[J].Journal of Data and Information Science,2017,2(1):89-104.
[16]Zhao S X,Lou W,Tan A M,et al.Do Funded Papers Attract More Usage?[J].Scientometrics,2018,115(1):153-168.
[17]Chi P S,Gl?nzel W.An Empirical Investigation of the Associations Among Usage,Scientific Collaboration and Citation Impact[J].Scientometrics,2017,112(1):403-412.
[18]梁国强,侯海燕,任佩丽,等.高质量论文使用次数与被引次数相关性的特征分析[J].情报杂志,2018,37(4):147-153.
[19]科睿唯安.使用次数[EB/OL].https://images.webofknowledge.com/WOK48B3/help/zh_CN/WOK/hp_usage_score.html,2018-04-09.
[20]迈克·塞沃尔.链接分析:信息科学的研究方法[M].孙建军,译.南京:东南大学出版社,2009:34.
[21]卢冶飞,孙忠宝.应用统计学(第2 版)[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2015:36-48.
[22]冯白云,林佳.化学及相关学科信息源:信息检索,分析与管理[M].北京:清华大学出版社有限公司,2003.
[23]Brody T,Harnad S,Carr L.Earlier Web Usage Statistics as Predictors of Later Citation Impact[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2006,57(8):1060-1072.
[24]祝娜,王芳.基于主题关联的知识演化路径识别研究—以3D打印领域为例[J].图书情报工作,2016,60(5):101-109.
[25]王灿友,苏秦.基于文献分析的3D打印技术的演化及发展前沿[J].情报杂志,2015,34(9):72-77,71.
[26]陈燕和.中国的3D打印研究(1993-2014)——基于文献计量学的分析[J].现代情报,2015,35(6):86-89.
[27]谢娟,龚凯乐,成颖,等.使用数据与引用数据间的补充或替代关系探讨[J].情报学报,2018,37(5):486-494.
[28]Leydesdorff L,Bornmann L,Comins J A,et al.Citations:Indicators of Quality?The Impact Fallacy[J].Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics,2016,1:Article 1.
[29]Gorraiz W G.Usage Metrics Versus Altmetrics:Confusing Terminology?[J].Scientometrics,2015(102):2161-2164.
[2]Moed H F.Statistical Relationships Between Downloads and Citations at the Level of Individual Documents Within a Single Journal[J].Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,2005,56(10):1088-1097.
[3]Bollen J,Van de Sompel H,Smith J A,et al.Toward Alternative Metrics of Journal Impact:A Comparison of Download and Citation Data[J].Information Processing & Management,2005,41(6):1419-1440.
[4]Guerrero-Bote V P,Moya-Anegón F.Relationship Between Downloads and Citations at Journal and Paper Levels,and the Influence of Language[J].Scientometrics,2014,101(2):1043-1065.
[5]Jahandideh S,Abdolmaleki P,Asadabadi E B.Prediction of Future Citations of a Research Paper from Number of Its Internet Downloads[J].Medical Hypotheses,2007,69(2):458-459.
[6]Subotic S,Mukherjee B.Short and Amusing:The Relationship Between Title Characteristics Downloads,and Citations in Psychology Articles[J].Journal of Information Science,2014,40(1):115-124.
[7]Davis P,Fromerth M.Does the arXiv Lead to Higher Citations and Reduced Publisher Downloads for Mathematics Articles?[J].Scientometrics,2007,71(2):203-215.
[8]陆伟,钱坤,唐祥彬.文献下载频次与被引频次的相关性研究——以图书情报领域为例[J].情报科学,2016,34(1):3-8.
[9]Markusova V,Bogorov V,Libkind A.Usage Metrics vs Classical Metrics:Analysis of Russia's Research Output[J].Scientometrics,2018,114(2):593-603.
[10]Wang X,Fang Z,Sun X.Usage Patterns of Scholarly Articles on Web of Science:A Study on Web of Science Usage Count[J].Scientometrics,2016,109(2):917-926.
[11]赵星.学术文献用量级数据Usage的测度特性研究[J].中国图书馆学报,2017,43(3):44-57.
[12]赵蓉英,魏绪秋.中美图书情报学领域国际学术论文影响力比较——基于被引频次和使用次数[J].情报理论与实践,2018,41(1):139-145.
[13]丁佐奇.基于Web of Science的论文使用次数和被引频次的相关性分析[J].中国科技期刊研究,2017,28(12):1166-1170.
[14]付中静.WoS数据库收录论文文献级别用量指标与被引频次的相关性[J].中国科技期刊研究,2017,28(1):68-73.
[15]Liang G Q,Hou H Y,Hu Z G,et al.Usage Count:A New Indicator to Detect Research Fronts[J].Journal of Data and Information Science,2017,2(1):89-104.
[16]Zhao S X,Lou W,Tan A M,et al.Do Funded Papers Attract More Usage?[J].Scientometrics,2018,115(1):153-168.
[17]Chi P S,Gl?nzel W.An Empirical Investigation of the Associations Among Usage,Scientific Collaboration and Citation Impact[J].Scientometrics,2017,112(1):403-412.
[18]梁国强,侯海燕,任佩丽,等.高质量论文使用次数与被引次数相关性的特征分析[J].情报杂志,2018,37(4):147-153.
[19]科睿唯安.使用次数[EB/OL].https://images.webofknowledge.com/WOK48B3/help/zh_CN/WOK/hp_usage_score.html,2018-04-09.
[20]迈克·塞沃尔.链接分析:信息科学的研究方法[M].孙建军,译.南京:东南大学出版社,2009:34.
[21]卢冶飞,孙忠宝.应用统计学(第2 版)[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2015:36-48.
[22]冯白云,林佳.化学及相关学科信息源:信息检索,分析与管理[M].北京:清华大学出版社有限公司,2003.
[23]Brody T,Harnad S,Carr L.Earlier Web Usage Statistics as Predictors of Later Citation Impact[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2006,57(8):1060-1072.
[24]祝娜,王芳.基于主题关联的知识演化路径识别研究—以3D打印领域为例[J].图书情报工作,2016,60(5):101-109.
[25]王灿友,苏秦.基于文献分析的3D打印技术的演化及发展前沿[J].情报杂志,2015,34(9):72-77,71.
[26]陈燕和.中国的3D打印研究(1993-2014)——基于文献计量学的分析[J].现代情报,2015,35(6):86-89.
[27]谢娟,龚凯乐,成颖,等.使用数据与引用数据间的补充或替代关系探讨[J].情报学报,2018,37(5):486-494.
[28]Leydesdorff L,Bornmann L,Comins J A,et al.Citations:Indicators of Quality?The Impact Fallacy[J].Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics,2016,1:Article 1.
[29]Gorraiz W G.Usage Metrics Versus Altmetrics:Confusing Terminology?[J].Scientometrics,2015(102):2161-2164.