一次性肛周脓肿根治术与传统分期治疗肛周脓肿效果对比
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Comparison of Effect of Disposable Perianal Abscess Radical Surgery and Conventional Staging for Perianal Abscess
  • 作者:余莉萍
  • 英文作者:YU Li-ping;Anorectal Department, Quanzhou First Hospital;
  • 关键词:肛周脓肿 ; 一次性根治术 ; 传统分期治疗 ; 肛门功能 ; 术后疼痛
  • 英文关键词:Perianal abscess;;Disposable radical mastectomy;;Conventional staging;;Anal function;;Postoperative pain
  • 中文刊名:HZZZ
  • 英文刊名:China & Foreign Medical Treatment
  • 机构:泉州市第一医院肛肠科;
  • 出版日期:2018-06-01
  • 出版单位:中外医疗
  • 年:2018
  • 期:v.37
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:HZZZ201816028
  • 页数:3
  • CN:16
  • ISSN:11-5625/R
  • 分类号:80-82
摘要
目的探讨一次性肛周脓肿根治术与传统分期治疗肛周脓肿的临床效果。方法回顾性分析2016年3月—2018年3月该院收治的67例肛周脓肿患者的临床资料,并随机分为观察组和对照组,观察组采取一次性肛周脓肿根治术治疗,对照组给予传统分期治疗。结果观察组肛周疼痛0级20例,Ⅰ级9例,Ⅱ级3例,Ⅲ级1例,对照组0级12例,Ⅰ级4例,Ⅱ级12例,Ⅲ级6例,组间差异有统计学意义(χ2=12.882 4,P<0.05);观察组术后肛门功能正常21例,部分功能失禁9例,严重功能失禁3例,对照组术后肛门功能正常11例,部分功能失禁16例,严重功能失禁7例,组间差异有统计学意义(χ2=6.671 6,P<0.05)。结论传统分期治疗相比较,一次性肛周脓肿根治术简单易行、手术时间短,并有助于提升患者的肛门功能,可显著减轻患者的痛苦,值得在临床上广泛应用和推广。
        Objective This paper tries to investigate the clinical effect of the treatment of perianal abscess radical surgery and conventional staging of perianal abscess. Methods The clinical data of 67 patients with perianal abscess admitted to this hospital from March 2016 to March 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were randomly divided into observation group and control group. The observation group was treated with a one-time treatment of perianal abscess. The control group was given traditional staging treatment. Results In the observation group, there were 20 cases of perianal pain in grade 0, grade I in 9 cases, grade II in 3 cases, grade III in 1 case, control group 0 in 12 cases, grade I in 4 cases, grade II in 12 cases, and grade III in 6 cases. Significant(χ2=12.882 4, P<0.05); In the observation group, there were 21 cases of normal postoperative anal function, 9 cases of partial function incontinence, and 3 cases of severe functional incontinence.In the control group, 11 cases had normal postoperative anal function, and some had incontinence in 16 cases. Incontinence was found in 7 patients, with significant differences between groups(χ2=6.671 6, P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with traditional staging treatment, the treatment of disposable perianal abscess is simple and easy, the operation time is short, and it helps to improve the anal function of patients. It can significantly reduce the patient's pain and is worthy of extensive application and promotion in clinical practice.
引文
[1]孟毓国.一次性肛周脓肿根治术与传统分期治疗肛周脓肿效果对比[J].大家健康旬刊,2015,9(10):115-116.
    [2]王建方,杨国山,牟东成,等.一次性肛周脓肿根治术与传统分期治疗106例肛周脓肿效果对比[J].中国医药导报,2013,10(27):51-53.
    [3]郑广延.探讨一次性肛周脓肿根治术与传统分期治疗肛周脓肿的疗效对比[J].中国卫生标准管理,2017,8(14):47-48.
    [4]王慧杰.一次性肛周脓肿根治术对比分期治疗肛周脓肿临床效果[J].临床医药文献电子杂志,2017,4(38):7384.
    [5]刘雪琴.一次性肛周脓肿根治术与传统分期手术治疗肛周脓肿的临床效果比较及其对患者术后肛门功能的影响[J].临床合理用药杂志,2017,10(24):156-157.
    [6]马洪生.一次性肛周脓肿根治术治疗肛周脓肿的效果分析[J].医学理论与实践,2016,29(12):1608-1609.
    [7]朱华峰,殷培东.一次性肛周脓肿根治术对比分期治疗肛周脓肿效果[J].中西医结合心血管病电子杂志,2017,5(21):189-190.
    [8]邵明,彭文,刘恒良.一次性根治术与传统分期治疗肛周脓肿的临床疗效对比[J].中国医学工程,2015,123(12):176.