艾滋病自愿咨询检测3470人次结果分析
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Analysis on results in 3 470 person-times of voluntary AIDS counseling and testing
  • 作者:钱应群 ; 周玲旭 ; 孟小容
  • 英文作者:QIAN Yingqun;ZHOU Lingxu;MENG Xiaorong;Yuzhong District Center for Disease Control and Prevention;
  • 关键词:获得性免疫缺陷综合征/预防和控制 ; 咨询 ; 危险行为 ; 流行病学 ; 重庆
  • 英文关键词:Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome/prevention & control;;Counseling;;Dangerous Behavior;;Epidemiology;;Chongqing
  • 中文刊名:XYWS
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Modern Medicine & Health
  • 机构:重庆市渝中区疾病预防控制中心;
  • 出版日期:2019-01-30
  • 出版单位:现代医药卫生
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.35
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:XYWS201902020
  • 页数:4
  • CN:02
  • ISSN:50-1129/R
  • 分类号:69-71+76
摘要
目的了解重庆市渝中区疾病预防控制中心2014-2016年3 470人次艾滋病自愿咨询检测(VCT)的求询者感染状况及分布特点,为更好地开展VCT工作、制定艾滋病防治对策提供科学依据。方法 2014-2016年采集VCT的求询者血液标本,按《全国艾滋病检测技术规范(2009年)》进行人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)抗体检测,收集就诊者基本信息,并进行数据的统计分析。结果 2014-2016年接受VCT的求询者3 470人次,HIV阳性850人,阳性率为24. 50%,3年阳性率比较,差异无统计学意义(P> 0. 05);求询者以男性为主[76. 92%(2 669/3 470)],HIV阳性率[26. 86%(717/2 669)]明显高于女性[16. 60%(133/801)],差异有统计学意义(P <0. 05); 20~50岁求询者(2 786人)明显多于小于20岁(195人)和大于50岁(489人)求询者,HIV阳性率以小于20岁[16. 41%(32/195)]、20~50岁[22. 76%(634/2 786)]、> 50岁[37. 63%(184/489)]的顺序依次升高,差异有统计学意义(P <0. 05);男性求询者中20~50岁者最多(2 231人),> 50岁求询者HIV阳性率[42. 72%(129/302)]明显高于小于20岁[18. 38%(25/136)]、20~50岁求询者[25. 24%(563/2 231)],差异有统计学意义(P <0. 05);人数最多的3种求询原因分别为男男性行为史(1 523人)、非商业非固定异性性行为史(670人)、商业异性性行为史(470人); HIV阳性率最高的3种求询原因分别为注射毒品史[45. 45%(50/110)]、男男性行为史[35. 46%(540/1 523)]、配偶/固定性伴阳性[25. 59%(76/297)]。结论重庆市渝中区VCT的求询人数较多、HIV阳性率较高,不同性别、年龄及不同原因求询者具有不同的流行形式,未来艾滋病防控面临巨大挑战。
        Objective To understand the infection status and distribution characteristics in 3 470 person-times of AIDS voluntary counseling and testing( VCT) in Yuzhong District Center for Disease Control and Prevention( CDC) during 2014-2016 to provide the scientific evidence for better carrying out VCT work and formulating the AIDS prevention and treatment strategy. Methods The blood samples of VCT were collected during 2014-2016,and conducted the HIV antibody test according to the National AIDS/HIV Test Technology Regulation( 2009). The basic information of the visitors were collected for conducting the data statistical analysis. Results A total of 3 470 person-times received VCT during 2014-2016,850 persons were HIV positive with a positive rate of 24. 50%,the annual positive rate had no statistical difference among 3 years( P > 0. 05); the consultants were mainly males [76. 92%( 2 669/3 470),the HIV positive rate was26. 86%( 717/2 699),which was significantly higher than that [16. 60%( 133/801) ]in the females,and the difference was statistically significant( P < 0. 05). The consultants aged 20-50 years old( 2 786 cases) were significantly more than those in aged < 20 years old( 195 cases) and > 50 years old( 489 cases); the HIV positive rate was in turn increased in the order of < 20 years old [16. 41%( 32/195) ],20-50 years old[22. 76%( 634/2 786) ] and > 50 years old[37. 63%( 184/489) ],the difference was statistically significant( P< 0. 05); among the male consultants,20-50 years old was the maximal( 2 231 cases),the HIV positive rate in the consultants aged > 50 years old was 42. 72%( 129/302) was significantly higher than 18. 38%( 25/136) in the consultants aged < 20 years old,the difference was statistically significant( P < 0. 05); the 3 kinds of counseling cause in maximal persons number were the MSM history( 1 523 cases),non-commercial and non-partner heterosexuality history( 670 cases) and commercial heterosexuality history( 407 cases); the 3 kinds of counseling cause in the highest HIV positive rate were the drug injection history [45. 45%( 50/110) ],MSM history [35. 46%( 540/1523) ] and spouse/steady partner positive [25. 59%( 76/297) ]. Conclusion There are more VCT consultants in Yuzhong Distric with higher HIV positive rate,the consultants with different sexes,difference ages and different causes have different prevalent modes. The prevention and control of AIDS in the future faces the enormous challenge.
引文
[1]冷雪冰,李洁芳,刘丽花,等.石家庄市艾滋病自愿咨询检测(VCT)结果分析[J].中华疾病控制杂志,2013,17(9):818-820.
    [2]《艾滋病综合防治手册》编写组:艾滋病综合防治工作手册[M].北京:北京大学医学出版社,2010:35.
    [3]王丽艳,秦倩倩,丁正伟,等.中国艾滋病全国疫情数据分析[J].中国艾滋病性病,2017,23(4):330-333.
    [4]李丽,王丽娟,刘洁,等. 974例自愿咨询门诊患者艾滋病、丙肝和梅毒感染情况分析[J].中国卫生检验杂志,2016,26(14):2094-2096.
    [5]宋琴,袁家麟.我国艾滋病流行现状、流行因素及其防治对策[J].职业与健康,2012,28(23):2974-2976.
    [6]潘彩珠,罗伟文,罗经伟,等. 2011-2013年深圳市龙华新区疾病预防中心艾滋病VCT点的资料分析[J].职业与健康,2014,30(24):3561-3564.
    [7]邱英鹏,刘爱忠,冯铁建.中国大陆MSM人群HIV/梅毒感染状况性行为特征和艾滋病知识知晓情况的Meta分析[J].中国艾滋病性病,2013,19(3):169-173.
    [8]蒋园园,唐昌新,李新建.全州县2011-2015年艾滋病检测结果分析[J].中国卫生检验杂志,2016,26(13):1937-1938.
    [9]何惊春,余小凤,李南,等. 2008-2012年重庆市九龙坡区艾滋病自愿咨询检测分析[J].预防医学情报杂志,2015,31(6):409-412.
    [10]唐金兰,董玉连,农桂德,等. 2008-2014年钟山县艾滋病自愿咨询检测结果分析[J].应用预防医学,2017,23(1):72-73.
    [11]黄丽花,陈晓明,陈志娟,等.大理州1989-2006年艾滋病流行分析[J].中国艾滋病性病,2008,14(3):290-291.
    [12]王丽艳,秦倩倩,葛琳,等.我国50岁及以上艾滋病病毒感染者/艾滋病患者特征分析[J].中华流行病学杂志,2016,37(2):222-226.
    [13]王丽艳,丁正伟,秦倩倩,等. 2008-2014年中国艾滋病经异性性途径传播的流行特征分析[J].中华流行病学杂志,2015,36(12):1332-1336.
    [14]陈方方,郭巍,王丽艳,等.我国部分地区艾滋病非婚异性性传播病例感染方式构成及特征分析[J].中国艾滋病性病,2015,21(7):550-553.
    [15]蔡于茂,宋亚娟,洪福昌,等.深圳市男男性行为人群异性性行为特征及影响因素[J].中华疾病控制杂志,2014,18(1):32-35.