乡村旅游扶贫“打包开发”:利益诉求分化与利益失衡修正
|
摘要
乡村旅游开发作为实施乡村振兴战略和精准扶贫战略的重要抓手,基层政府往往会引进旅游公司并采取整体"打包开发"的策略。在此过程中,政府、企业、农民等不同利益主体的发展诉求不尽相同,各种资源、利益、机遇的配置经常出现精英俘获的现象。为了提升农民在乡村旅游扶贫开发中的获得感,降低或者消除他们的剥夺感,乡村旅游扶贫开发急需由"更快"发展向"更好"发展转变,这是农民的利益诉求所在,也是基层政府治理转变的现实要求。因此,政府向保障公平"归位",企业向长期共赢"移位",农民向发展主体"正位",成为修正产业扶贫与治理有效的关键举措。
Rural tourism development is taken as an important gripper to implement the strategies of rejuvenating the countryside and targeting poverty alleviation,and local government tends to introduce travel companies and take the strategy of"packaged development". In this process,the government,enterprises,farmers,and other stakeholders have different development demands. The allocation of various resources,interests,and opportunities often leads to the phenomenon of elite capture. In order to improve farmers' sense of gain in rural tourism poverty alleviation and development and reduce or eliminate their sense of deprivation,rural tourism poverty alleviation and development is in urgent need of transformation from"faster"development to"better"one,which is the interest appeal of farmers and the realistic requirement for the governance transformation of local governments. Therefore,the government ensures fairness,enterprises turn to long-term win-win,and farmers are in the development of"right position",which become the key measures to correct industrial poverty alleviation and effective governance.
Rural tourism development is taken as an important gripper to implement the strategies of rejuvenating the countryside and targeting poverty alleviation,and local government tends to introduce travel companies and take the strategy of"packaged development". In this process,the government,enterprises,farmers,and other stakeholders have different development demands. The allocation of various resources,interests,and opportunities often leads to the phenomenon of elite capture. In order to improve farmers' sense of gain in rural tourism poverty alleviation and development and reduce or eliminate their sense of deprivation,rural tourism poverty alleviation and development is in urgent need of transformation from"faster"development to"better"one,which is the interest appeal of farmers and the realistic requirement for the governance transformation of local governments. Therefore,the government ensures fairness,enterprises turn to long-term win-win,and farmers are in the development of"right position",which become the key measures to correct industrial poverty alleviation and effective governance.
引文
[1]杨冉冉.刍议国外乡村旅游的发展模式及对我国的启示[J].商业经济研究,2017(14):181.
[2]贺雪峰.关于实施乡村振兴战略的几个问题[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2018(3):25.
[3]温涛,朱炯,王小华.中国农贷的“精英俘获”机制:贫困县与非贫困县的分层比较[J].经济研究,2016(2):111.
[4]赵伦.相对贫困:从个体归因到社会剥夺[J].商业时代,2014(18):37.
[5]张书维,王二平,周洁.相对剥夺与相对满意:群体性事件的动因分析[J].公共管理学报,2010(3):100.
[6]叶敬忠.乡村振兴战略:历史沿循、总体布局与路径省思[J].华南师范大学学报(社会科学版),2018(2):64.
[7]杨伟荣.乡村振兴的伦理之维——“乡村振兴与乡村伦理”高层论坛综述[J].伦理学研究,2018(3):135.
(1)寨老是村里德高望重之人,通常是乡民中的意见领袖。
[2]贺雪峰.关于实施乡村振兴战略的几个问题[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2018(3):25.
[3]温涛,朱炯,王小华.中国农贷的“精英俘获”机制:贫困县与非贫困县的分层比较[J].经济研究,2016(2):111.
[4]赵伦.相对贫困:从个体归因到社会剥夺[J].商业时代,2014(18):37.
[5]张书维,王二平,周洁.相对剥夺与相对满意:群体性事件的动因分析[J].公共管理学报,2010(3):100.
[6]叶敬忠.乡村振兴战略:历史沿循、总体布局与路径省思[J].华南师范大学学报(社会科学版),2018(2):64.
[7]杨伟荣.乡村振兴的伦理之维——“乡村振兴与乡村伦理”高层论坛综述[J].伦理学研究,2018(3):135.
(1)寨老是村里德高望重之人,通常是乡民中的意见领袖。