11份毛蔓豆属种质营养价值评价
|
摘要
本研究对11份毛蔓豆属种质的常规营养成分进行测定分析,并采用主成分、隶属函数值法和聚类分析对其营养价值进行综合评价。结果表明:11份毛蔓豆种质的粗蛋白、粗灰分、中性洗涤纤维、酸性洗涤纤维、钙、磷含量间差异极显著,将其隶属函数值进行聚类,分为2类,其中,041130150毛蔓豆、051210057毛蔓豆、050320021毛蔓豆、050106023毛蔓豆、050319007毛蔓豆为高营养价值种质,其他种质综合营养价值较低;通过主成分分析发现,磷、中性洗涤纤维和粗蛋白的含量可作为其营养价值评价的重要指标。
The nutritive components of Calopogonium were determined by chemical analysis, and the comprehensive evaluation was carried out by membership function method and cluster analysis. The results showed that the crude protein, crude ash, neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber, calcium and phosphorus of 11 strains were significantly different. Through the comprehensive evaluation of membership function, the clustering was divided into two categories. Among them, 041130150, 051210057, 050320021, 050106023, 050319007 had higher nutritive value. The total phosphorus, neutral detergent fiber and crude protein can be used as an important index to evaluate the nutritional value of woolen bean.
The nutritive components of Calopogonium were determined by chemical analysis, and the comprehensive evaluation was carried out by membership function method and cluster analysis. The results showed that the crude protein, crude ash, neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber, calcium and phosphorus of 11 strains were significantly different. Through the comprehensive evaluation of membership function, the clustering was divided into two categories. Among them, 041130150, 051210057, 050320021, 050106023, 050319007 had higher nutritive value. The total phosphorus, neutral detergent fiber and crude protein can be used as an important index to evaluate the nutritional value of woolen bean.
引文
[1]高兴业.适合饲喂肉牛的几种豆科牧草[J].养殖技术顾问,2011(1):74.
[2]杨春霞.胶园覆盖绿肥[J].热带农业科技,2008(1):55.
[3]蒋侯明.狗爪豆--一种有希望的短期豆科复盖作物[J].热带作物译丛,1978(3):39.
[4]陈(Tan K H),梁品珍.胶园的一种耐荫豆科覆盖-兰花毛蔓豆[J].热带作物译丛,1978(4):10-15.
[5]羿静,乌日嘎,陈锡梅,等.几种草地营养评价方法及研究进展[J].内蒙古草业,2010,22(2):45-47.
[6]郑凯,顾洪如,沈益新,等.牧草品质评价体系及品质育种的研究进展[J].草业科学,2006,23(5):57-61.
[7]李艳琴,徐敏云,王振海,等.牧草品质评价研究进展[J].安徽农业科学,2008,36(11):4485-4486,4546.
[8]袁福锦,奎嘉祥,谢有标.南亚热带湿热地区引进豆科牧草的适应性及评价[J].四川草原,2005(10):9-12.
[9]周经第,陈香远.蓝花毛蔓豆生殖期间的农业气候条件[J].热带作物研究,1989(3):20-23,12.
[10]韦瑶.几种坡地绿肥的调查[J].广西农业科学,1965(3):21-23.
[11]杨春霞.不同绿肥作物覆盖对橡胶园土壤理化性质的影响[C]//中国农业生态环境保护协会.十一五农业环境研究回顾与展望-第四届全国农业环境科学学术研讨会论文集.2011:9.
[12]Sousa A C B,Carvalho M A,Campos T,et al.Molecular diversity,genetic structure and mating system of Calopogonium mucunoides Desv.[J].Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution,2012,59(7):1449-1464.
[13]Okonwu K,Mensah S I,Sam S M.Growth of Calopogonium mucunoides Desv.in crude oil contaminated soil:a possible phytoremediating agent[J].Asian Journal of Agricultural Research,2014,8(1):66-69.
[14]Obua B E,Okoye C O.Performance,carcass and economic characteristics of broiler finisher birds fed diets containing graded levels of Calopogonium mucunoides Desv(calopo)leaf meal[J].Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and the Environment,2014,15(2):247-257.
[15]张丽英.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M].第二版.北京:中国农业大学出版社,2003.
[16]全国饲料工业标准化技术委员会.饲料中粗灰分的测定:GB/T 6438-2007[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2007.
[17]全国饲料工业标准化技术委员会.饲料中钙的测定:GB/T6436-2002[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2002.
[18]全国饲料工业标准化技术委员会.饲料中总磷的测定分光光度法:GB/T 6437-2002[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2002.
[19]王春萍,张世才,雷开荣,等.辣椒苗期耐低氮指标与评价方法研究[J].园艺学报,2017,44(12):2318-2326.
[20]袁扬,王胤晨,曾兵.运用数学模型构建紫花苜蓿干草粉品质评价体系初探[J].草业与畜牧,2016,255(2):28-32,55.
[21]孙红,于应文,马向丽,等.黔西北岩溶区九种灌木综合营养价值评价[J].草业学报,2014,23(5):99-106.
[22]高杨,张新全,谢文刚.鸭茅的营养价值评定[J].草地学报,2009,17(2):222-226.
[23]韩清芳.不同苜蓿(Medicago Sativa)品种抗逆性、生产性能及品质特性研究[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2003.
[24]李艳琴,徐敏云,王振海,等.牧草品质评价研究进展[J].安徽农业科学,2008,36(11):4485-4486,4546.
[25]易显风,赖志强,蔡小燕.四种藤蔓豆科牧草生产性能的比较[J].上海畜牧兽医通讯,2012(2):28-29.
[2]杨春霞.胶园覆盖绿肥[J].热带农业科技,2008(1):55.
[3]蒋侯明.狗爪豆--一种有希望的短期豆科复盖作物[J].热带作物译丛,1978(3):39.
[4]陈(Tan K H),梁品珍.胶园的一种耐荫豆科覆盖-兰花毛蔓豆[J].热带作物译丛,1978(4):10-15.
[5]羿静,乌日嘎,陈锡梅,等.几种草地营养评价方法及研究进展[J].内蒙古草业,2010,22(2):45-47.
[6]郑凯,顾洪如,沈益新,等.牧草品质评价体系及品质育种的研究进展[J].草业科学,2006,23(5):57-61.
[7]李艳琴,徐敏云,王振海,等.牧草品质评价研究进展[J].安徽农业科学,2008,36(11):4485-4486,4546.
[8]袁福锦,奎嘉祥,谢有标.南亚热带湿热地区引进豆科牧草的适应性及评价[J].四川草原,2005(10):9-12.
[9]周经第,陈香远.蓝花毛蔓豆生殖期间的农业气候条件[J].热带作物研究,1989(3):20-23,12.
[10]韦瑶.几种坡地绿肥的调查[J].广西农业科学,1965(3):21-23.
[11]杨春霞.不同绿肥作物覆盖对橡胶园土壤理化性质的影响[C]//中国农业生态环境保护协会.十一五农业环境研究回顾与展望-第四届全国农业环境科学学术研讨会论文集.2011:9.
[12]Sousa A C B,Carvalho M A,Campos T,et al.Molecular diversity,genetic structure and mating system of Calopogonium mucunoides Desv.[J].Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution,2012,59(7):1449-1464.
[13]Okonwu K,Mensah S I,Sam S M.Growth of Calopogonium mucunoides Desv.in crude oil contaminated soil:a possible phytoremediating agent[J].Asian Journal of Agricultural Research,2014,8(1):66-69.
[14]Obua B E,Okoye C O.Performance,carcass and economic characteristics of broiler finisher birds fed diets containing graded levels of Calopogonium mucunoides Desv(calopo)leaf meal[J].Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and the Environment,2014,15(2):247-257.
[15]张丽英.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M].第二版.北京:中国农业大学出版社,2003.
[16]全国饲料工业标准化技术委员会.饲料中粗灰分的测定:GB/T 6438-2007[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2007.
[17]全国饲料工业标准化技术委员会.饲料中钙的测定:GB/T6436-2002[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2002.
[18]全国饲料工业标准化技术委员会.饲料中总磷的测定分光光度法:GB/T 6437-2002[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2002.
[19]王春萍,张世才,雷开荣,等.辣椒苗期耐低氮指标与评价方法研究[J].园艺学报,2017,44(12):2318-2326.
[20]袁扬,王胤晨,曾兵.运用数学模型构建紫花苜蓿干草粉品质评价体系初探[J].草业与畜牧,2016,255(2):28-32,55.
[21]孙红,于应文,马向丽,等.黔西北岩溶区九种灌木综合营养价值评价[J].草业学报,2014,23(5):99-106.
[22]高杨,张新全,谢文刚.鸭茅的营养价值评定[J].草地学报,2009,17(2):222-226.
[23]韩清芳.不同苜蓿(Medicago Sativa)品种抗逆性、生产性能及品质特性研究[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2003.
[24]李艳琴,徐敏云,王振海,等.牧草品质评价研究进展[J].安徽农业科学,2008,36(11):4485-4486,4546.
[25]易显风,赖志强,蔡小燕.四种藤蔓豆科牧草生产性能的比较[J].上海畜牧兽医通讯,2012(2):28-29.